The thick school plays never to lose, while the wealthy play to win.  ,
charles kiyosaki
Middle-class people prefer to defend their wealth over offence. Instead of generating money, presence, or opportunity, they prioritize their survival and security. It boils down to this: If your goal is to be secure, chances are you’ll never get wealthy. But if your goal is to get rich, chances are you’ll end up nervous.
For the middle class, satisfaction is the ultimate objective. It is good, also. At least you can alter for a while at a respectable cafe. However, you essentially place an order based on the menu’s charges rather than the products. The affluent and middle school have a fundamentally different perspective.
Middle-class people pay attention to the charges, while the wealthy pay attention to the list items. Therefore, if you want to be prosperous, your priorities may be, second, not belittle your desire, next, believe in yourself as the master of your life, and, next, be responsible for your decisions.
Instead of playing the victim cards and blaming outside factors for one’s loss, the belief that one has control over their life is at the heart of constructing one’s future or wealth. Of course,” Poor me” is the dominant thought approach of any “victim”. Witness ethos not only prevents personal development. It also affect social choices.  ,
Members of the middle school around the world want someone else to shoulder the burdens of their political and constitutional devotion to the nation rather than accepting complete accountability for actively participating in a functioning democracy and occasionally questioning the intentions of authority.
The leaders have a great opportunity to present themselves as the prophets who will assist them in fulfilling their obligations and problems. India is no exception, and it is currently demonstrating this.
 , Modi has turned end class against its own politics
The American economy’s reform in the 1990s contributed greatly to the development of a 300-million-strong middle class. Contrary to Western counterparts, who previously played a key role in bringing about cultural, social, and economic change, the Indian middle class inherited politics without actively participating in revolution movements.
The European middle course led the French Revolution, which brought a new world in which the rights of man, the rights of citizens, were declared. The American thick group’s struggle paveed the method for parliamentary democracy.
For the American middle course, that new program was handed over through the law, which contains suggestions borrowed from the West’s upheavals. The beneficiaries are careless about the political legacy and values they were given because of this absence of conflict.  ,
The lord complex, which is believed to be the solution to all of society’s problems, has emerged in India recently. This conviction has been a key factor in Narendra Modi’s rise to power.  ,
Modi has exploited the shortcomings of Indian political systems, including red tape, government, corruption, and the defenseless mindset of the middle class.
Nevertheless, it’s crucial to recognize that American democracy, despite its flaws, functions fairly well. Modi, to, is the solution of that democracy. It is evident in Modi’s transition from a drink trader to the head of the largest democracy in the world. No other country’s politics can match this kind of case.
However, Modi wants to end the very foundation that led to his increase today.
A parallel structure that would erode the constitutional guarantee
The history of rebellion has been used romanticized as a forerunner of evolution and development. However, a darker truth lurks behind the fervor and idealism: Once revolutions are successful, the people who take office are first to remove the forces that caused change so that their status quo ca n’t be challenged.
Modi is no exception. In the last ten centuries, Modi has built a character worship. The campaign” Modi Ki Guarantee” ( Modi’s Guarantee ) that’s being propagated by the , BJP and Modi in the general elections of 2024 is a reflection of it.  ,
Modi now wants to replace the rights provided by the law through administrative democracy through savvy marketing strategies and strategic messaging. There is only one promise in the country: Modi’s Assurance.
This dangerous idea undermines the principles of democracy, transparency and social obligation. Democracy does not involve holding a chosen leader guilty, but rather encouraging citizens to take control of government and determine the direction of their country.
” Modi Ki Ensure” symbolizes the growing intensity of power in the hands of a second person, eclipsing the function of institutional checks and balances. No leader you replace a powerful political system, despite the fact that leaders may change over time. This underscores the unavoidable fact that no leader can replace its effectiveness.  ,
For the past century, Indian media controlled by entrenched interests have perpetuated the problem,” If never Modi, then who”? – gently reinforcing the tale of indispensability.
History has shown us that politics does n’t need protectors. Julius Caesar was the last Roman to appoint a single person to defend their democracy, and he never relinquished his position of authority. More significantly, if this political system can make Modi it also has the potential to produce society’s option.
India’s middle class actually needs a radiant, inclusive democracy that gives them the power to determine their own destiny rather than a savior.