Jonathan Tennenbaum, director of the Asia Times Science, provides the advantages.
Eric Lerner made headlines in September with his Asia Times content,” Saying goodbye to the Big Bang,” in which he argued that the principle is incompatible with a vast body of celestial data gathered over many years, including most recent statistics from NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope.
Yet two well-known astrophysicists Adam Frank and Marcelo Gleiser, who had previously been ardent Big Bang proponents, were persuaded by the data to acknowledge that the conventional cosmic theory must be inherently flawed. They said,” It’s starting to appear as though we might need to reevaluate important aspects of the creation and course of our world.”
Eric Lerner outlines the fundamental concepts of an alternative theory of the development of our world in this and the two articles that follow. This theory is based on the work of physicist Hannes Alfvén, who won the Nobel Prize.
The exact theories that explain the origin and evolution of stars, galaxies, and larger-scale structures in the Universe, according to Lerner, hold the key to understanding practical fusion power on Earth. He wants to demonstrate this using the work of his own business, LPPFusion, on the fusion method known as deep blood concentrate. This is Part 1 of him:
How did things get to where they do? People have relied on faith and folklore for centuries, and some still do. But today, the majority of people look to science to explain the history of how our nation, species, world, and the whole cosmos have evolved.
A deluge of fresh information from the James Webb Space Telescope ( JWST )  , among other instruments, has caused the history of the cosmos that most cosmologists have been telling to fall apart over the past year.  , The theory that the universe is expanding from a massive blast 14 billion years ago is currently refuted by dozens of different sets of data and has been disproven by any medical exam.
What would have happened, though, if the Big Bang had n’t occurred? Exists a different theory of cosmic creation that has really been supported by data? And what difference does what occurred in far-off stars billions or billions of years back make to the present?
In fact, a different, medically supported record of cosmic evolution has emerged over the past 50 years, with science Nobel laureate Hannes Alfvén and his associates at the forefront.
Using the natural methods that we observe and study these on Earth and in our solar system, this method statistically describes and predicted the major events we see in the Universe before studies.
It’s a tale that does n’t require enigmatic forces like inflation, dark matter, or dark energy. Since plasmas, electric conducting gases, are essential to understanding cosmic evolution, I’ve dubbed this alternative “plasma cosmology.”
The production of fusion strength, a form of cheap, clean, secure, and limitless power to replace fossil fuels, is one of the most important processes that explain the cosmos ‘ advancement that can be used right here on Earth. The study of the sky can result in very real and significant scientific advancements here on Earth, as has been the case numerous times in the past.
The Evolutionary Technology
A proper scientific method is necessary to study and comprehend the creation of the Universe or anything else in a scientifically sound manner. To attempt to write a grand cosmical drama always leads to myth, as Alfvén put it 40 years before. Research is the attempt to replace misunderstanding with expertise in extremely vast areas of space and time.
In other words, we ca n’t sit at our computers and create the most exquisite equations that depict how the Universe must have been in the beginning if we want to learn about the real Universe. That results in story that is expressed in mathematical terms. The same way that Sumerian, Hebrew, or English can simply define myths, so you calculus.
Instead, we had use observations to follow the exact universe evolution step-by-step backward in time and forward in area. Next, as far back as we can tell with our current technology, we are constantly describing an evolutionary history that does not begin at some fictitious “beginning.”
Next, a description of truth that acknowledges that the Universe is made up of both the processes that create and maintain such structures—things like protons, molecules, cells, and people—is necessary for an accurate understanding of the evolution process.
When applied to complex methods, including the Universe as a whole, the bottom-up intellectual method known as “reductionism,” which asserts that the universe is composed of elementary particles that form nuclear, atoms, molecules, and so on, results in contradictions and “mysteries.”
Rather, it is necessary to consider the processes that create these structures to be equally important to the structures themselves, such as the thermonuclear fusion that results in chemical elements in stars.
Consider what happens when you take a breath as an easy illustration of the change in strategy. Your breathing receive hydrogen atoms from the atmosphere, which then enter your bloodstream, enter cells, and eventually become a part of your body.
It is obvious that the air particles in the surroundings are dead. But when they enter your tissues and become a part of you, do they miraculously become “alive”? When they are eventually exhaled as a component of carbon dioxide molecules in your mouth, do they “die” at that point?
These issues become enigmatic and contradictory from a materialist perspective that claims you are” only” made up of molecules, forming molecules, creating cells, and so forth.
However, when reality is viewed as a series of processes, we can see that when we breath in, the air molecules that enter our cells join the process that we refer to as “life,” which is the distinct process of each unique human being.
The buildings in your body are constantly evolving and renewing, from atoms to tissue to tissues to your entire body, but this process of life creates and maintains them. With each breathing, the specific hydrogen, carbon, and nitrogen molecules you are made of change, but the process that creates each of those molecules into you continues from birth until death.
You, as a unique individual being, are connected to the larger method of biologic and social development that gave rise to and sustains your life process.
These processes may be studied with the same scientific accuracy that is used to identify structures like atoms and molecules, and they are crucial to comprehending evolution, the most comprehensive process of all.
The earliest techniques that we can currently observe
What period of history do we currently have evidence for being the furthest again? The observations of the largest-scale buildings in the Universe provide us with the broadest perspective again.
As surface- and space-based cameras have peered deeper and deeper into space, they have found larger and larger clusters of galaxies. Galaxie clusters that are almost spherical are strung together like pearls on filaments with a diameter of tens of millions of light years, and the superclusters are twisted into an ever-larger hierarchy that spans more than four billionlight years. They are also longer.
We can determine the speed at which galaxies are moving inside of such enormous structures, so we can estimate how long it took to type them. These velocities typically do n’t go faster than 1, 000 km/sec, or roughly 1/3 of the speed of light.
Simple mathematics reveals that these objects must be about 7 or 8 trillion years old, or about 500 times older than the fictional time of the Big Bang, because the formation of any thing takes at least as long as it takes the subject to turn around its axis.
One of the main inconsistencies in the Big Bang hypothesis ‘ predictions is the existence of these enormous things.
Through techniques that we have observed in the lab, it is possible to determine the development of the observed order of buildings in, up to and including these largest buildings, without the time constraint imposed by the Big Bang strategy.
Alfvén and his colleagues first demonstrated in 1978 that, given enough time, such institutions were the unavoidable outcome of the contacts of a small number of techniques, all of which were well-observed in laboratory tests and explained by widely accepted theory.
The squeeze effect, which is the interest of electric currents moving in the same direction as a result of their contact with the magnetic fields created by their own motion, is this primary for operation. Ampere made the initial observation of this effect in 1820 using voltages in cables.
Any little currents of electrons moving in one way in a blood in space will attract other current that just so happens to be traveling in the same way. They thwart opposing currents that flow through them.
Electrical tides accumulate over time in ever-greater amounts. Alfvén emphasized that because astronomical plasmas outside of celebrities have such low densities, they are often magnetized, which means that the electrical fields that currents produce control their motions.
Particle incidents that would alter tides and nbsp are uncommon.
With currents flowing in the direction of the magnetic field, yet incredibly small amounts of current self-organize into filaments. The magnetic field forces electrons to maneuver in small lines around the area way as they move across it, so they are compelled to do so very closely, much like gymnasts holding onto a shaft.
The filaments take on a distinctive form as currents flow along the filament’s plane in the middle and are wrapped in helixes around the outside.
These filaments ‘ axes are concentrated with plasma by electrical forces, which act as a vortex that draws fluids to the middle. The swirling forces of these forces also propel these celestial whirlwinds at speeds of 1,000 km/s.
For strands are still visible today at all weights throughout the Universe. They are exquisitely depicted in pictures of the Veil cloud. Tiny tides of a few amps gradually merged together over incredibly long periods of time to form enormous strands with radii of many billion light years and carrying close to one billion trillion amp.
The largest buildings that we can currently see emerged from those fibers.
How can we be sure?
How can we be certain that these enormous structures were created by this method and that the Big Bang, black power, and dark matter are real events from a fairy tale?
Second, the theories of the formation of these filaments and their merging to enormous size are based on a theory called electromagnetism, which has been proven through millions of experiments and serves as the foundation for much of modern technology that supports human community.
Every time you turn on the latest, Maxwell’s electricity theory is verified. This is very dissimilar from theories like dark strength, for which there is no proof through laboratory tests. Dark power is not a comprehensive theory with accurate predictions.
Next, in laboratory experiments, we can watch and control the fibers themselves.
In all high-energy plasmas that are used to generate fusion energy on Earth, filaments naturally appear, as we’ll go into more detail in the following sections of this series. The filaments are the first step in a method of concentrating blood and heating it in our own deep plasma concentrate machine.
Third, and perhaps most importantly, we see that these fibers have electromagnetic fields that are present at all scales of the world. The effects of magnetic domains on the polarization of light and radio waves can be used to electronically detect them.
The numerical hypotheses that these fibers are guided by electric and magnetic forces have been verified by in-depth comparisons of the electromagnetic fields ‘ structure and size.
When we describe the next stage of celestial development, which involves the relations of these magnetic strands with gravity, we’ll talk about more evidence for this method in the next part of the series. That, we’ll demonstrate how the enormous ancient electrical filaments actually gave rise to the hierarchy of stars, galaxies, groups, and superclusters.
This first ask: Is this the earliest operation to have ever happened in the Universe before moving on to that next topic.
No always. We return to Alfvén’s idea of going back in day step by step. The earliest method for which we currently have reliable information is this filamentation approach. However, researchers have considered the possibility of earlier stages, including Alfvén and his associates.
For instance, we are aware that just simply equal amounts of energy can create matter and antimatter in a laboratory. Contaminants that are equivalent to matter particles but have the opposite charge make up ether.
However, problem is 50, 000 occasions more prevalent than antimatter in the universe, such as in celestial rays.
Alfvén and colleagues discovered that matter and antimatter would normally separate at incredibly large scales as a result of interactions between an “ambiplasma” and gravitation, electrical currents, and electromagnetic fields. Large-scale filamentation may have formed at the same time as or even before this parting process took place.
However, because there is no concrete observational evidence for such an earlier stage, we must state that it is currently” speculative” —something that may be true, theoretically possible, but is not in any way supported by science.
We would need more and various studies than we currently have to confirm it. For those looking for nice stories, this may not be a satisfactory response, but it is the scientific response.
However, in the following section of this series, we will move forward rather than backward in time to the gravitational-magnetic recession phase of cosmic evolution that ultimately gave rise to galaxies, stars, and stars.
LPPFusion, Inc.’s chief professor is Eric J. Lerner.