KWAP makes USmil maiden investments under its Dana Perintis Strategy

Startups Bateriku, Lapasar, VCs Vynn Capital and Antler the recipients
Targeted total deployment of US$104.6mil, aims to strengthen startup ecosystem

Kumpulan Wang Persaraan (Diperbadankan) (KWAP) has announced the first batch of investments made under its Dana Perintis strategy. The investments, which amount to US$21 million (RM100 million), comprise of two direct investments in…Continue Reading

‘Cheap Japan’ falling fast on global economy tables – Asia Times

TOKYO – No Japanese leader wants to preside over a bad milestone — like your economy dropping from No 3 to No 4 globally.

Welcome to Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s hellish 2024. Barely six weeks in, Kishida’s Liberal Democratic Party is struggling to spin Japan’s falling behind Germany’s gross domestic product (GDP) in US dollar terms and the LDP’s culpability for this symbolic changing of the guard.

Kishida’s party is also giving Chinese leader Xi Jinping something of a much-needed soft power win. At a moment when Beijing is struggling to tame a property crisis, head off deflationary forces, restore confidence in the stock market and address record youth unemployment, news that it is pulling further ahead of arch-rival Tokyo sure is making for a welcome positive news cycle.

Japan, meanwhile, entered 2024 in recession. GDP contracted an annualized 0.4% in the October-December period after a 3.3% retreat in the previous quarter. “Japan’s economy is in poor shape,” says Stefan Angrick, senior economist at Moody’s Analytics.

Yet that’s true, too, of the longer-term trajectory as Germany surpassing Japan indicates.

Granted, this change in the league tables might rock Tokyo a bit less than China blowing past Japan’s annual output. Depending on which data set you use, that happened in 2010 or 2011, somewhere between the premierships of Naoto Kan and Yoshihiko Noda, and set the stage for the LDP’s return to power in 2012.

At the time, premier Shinzo Abe didn’t exactly sell his return to power as a beat-China mission. But so-called “Abenomics” was indeed a reformist retort to China becoming the world’s No 2 and Japan relegated to third place.

Sadly, the Abe era prioritized weakening the yen over reviving Japan’s once-vaunted innovative spirits. That failure, 11 years on, did more than anything to enable Germany to put Japan in the rearview mirror.

Adding insult to injury is the “sick man of Europe” narrative now plaguing Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s economy.

Germany’s once-fabled growth model has lost its groove. China’s slowdown and Russia’s war on Ukraine have become headwinds for Germany. So is softening global demand for autos, machinery, chemicals and other vital German industrial products.

At a moment when Europe is desperate for growth engines, Germany is looking at its second year of post-pandemic economic disappointment.

“At this point, economic underperformance of the German economy and the whole Eurozone is the key risk to the downside to our forecasts,” says Juraj Kotian, an economist at Erste Group Bank AG.

Economist Daniel Kral at Oxford Economics says “it’s clear that Germany was the worst performer among the major eurozone economies last year.”

In other words, it’s debatable whether Germany overtook Japan or Tokyo ceded the road to its fellow Group of Seven member. And this gets us back to Kishida, who’s now fighting for his political life.

Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida looks wobbly. Image: Twitter Screengrab

Kishida ended 2023 with a 17% approval rating largely because inflation has been outpacing top-line growth and wage gains. On top of a host of political finance scandals afflicting his party, Kishida is now struggling to finesse the second bad milestone of recent months.

The other: China overtaking Japan to become the globe’s largest exporter of automobiles. Those headlines brought back that 2010-2011 feeling that Japan has little choice but to accept China’s rising dominance in Asia.

But might this latest wake-up call be the one that jolts the LDP from its legislative slumber?

Since October 2021, Kishida telegraphed a series of promising ideas to take control of the economic narrative. One was a “new capitalism” that redistributes wealth to middle-class families to boost consumption. Another was catalyzing a startup boom to disrupt Japan’s top-down and rigid economic system.

This latter scheme seemed particularly promising. It entails opening a path for the $1.5 trillion Government Pension Investment Fund, the world’s largest such entity, to help finance entrepreneurs and provide incentives to pull more overseas innovators Japan’s way.

But just as during the 2012-2020 tenure of mentor Abe, Kishida’s 28-plus months in office have been maddeningly unproductive from a structural reform perspective. In fact, Kishida has put virtually no upgrades on the scoreboard.

Falling to No 4 globally seems as good a reason as any to get busy. What better way to get Kishida’s approval ratings back toward 30% than clawing back Japan’s global economic status?

Were economic time travel possible, imagine where Japan might be if Kishida’s party had acted boldly since 2012. If only it had moved more assertively then to reduce bureaucracy, increase innovation and productivity, alter the tax code in favor of startups, empower women, lure foreign talent and remind global CEOs and investors that Tokyo is as good a place to be as any.

Yet the second-best moment to launch a financial “big bang” is the present. First, though, Kishida and his party have to move beyond the weak yen crutch on which they have been leaning.

An undervalued exchange rate and hyper-aggressive Bank of Japan policies took pressure off government officials and corporate chieftains to do the hard work of recalibrating growth engines or taking risks.

Now, Tokyo’s weak yen-centric strategy is backfiring. The reason? The “cheap Japan” strategy of recent years is increasingly diminishing Japan’s global relevance in GDP terms.

This characterization has been popularized in recent years by economist Hideo Kumano at Dai-Ichi Life Research Institute. Since at least 2019, he’s been warning that reducing Japanese purchasing power in the long run is a risky way to boost GDP in the short run.

The costs of this complacency can be seen in Kishida’s abysmal approval ratings but also in how Japan is essentially walking in place as even troubled Germany steps forward.

Meanwhile, India is setting the stage for the next round of surpassing-Japan headlines that Tokyo must explain to the next generation of voters. Being surpassed by South Asia’s biggest economy would be another big blow to the collective Japanese psyche.

Of course, the magnitude of headwinds facing Germany is a source of keen debate. At Davos in January, German Finance Minister Christian Lindner dismissed the “sick man” label.

“I know what some of you are thinking: Germany probably is a sick man. Germany is not a sick man — Germany is a tired man after a short night,” Lindner said, arguing that the economy just needs a “cup of coffee” to regain momentum.

Japan bulls make a similar point as Tokyo stocks rally to the highest levels in 30-plus years. “We remain bullish on Japan equities which are our largest overweight recommendation in our coverage universe,” says strategist Jonathan Garner at Morgan Stanley MUFG.

The Nikkei 225 Stock Average is currently over 38,000 and “now seems likely to break near term the all-time high of 38,916 which was set as long ago as December 1989,” Garner says.

“In our view, the major turning point for the Japanese equity market came in late 2012 – when the Nikkei was below 9,000 – with the launch of the three arrows of Abenomics and [the BOJ’s] initiation of an innovative policy approach to combat deflation,” he says.

Amundi Asset Management strategist Eric Mijot argues that Japan’s stock market “remains attractive.” As economic headwinds intensify, he says, “this robust performance is unlikely to be replicated with the same strength in 2024, but the outlook for the market remains favorable.”

Sadly, though, all Japan is proving in 2024 is that 1980s-style “trickle-down economics” works no better today.

A woman looks at shoes on sale at an outlet store in Tokyo’s shopping district, Japan. Photo: Asia Times Files / Twitter Screengrab

Abe did indeed take steps to strengthen corporate governance, setting the stage for record profits and share buybacks. But none of these tweaks translated into significant wage increases or broad-based efforts to increase productivity and innovation.

At the same time, everything BOJ officials thought they knew about 2024 is going awry. “The Bank of Japan will likely now become even more cautious about any policy change,” says economist Min Joo Kang at ING Bank.

Just six weeks ago, it seemed a foregone conclusion that BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda would end quantitative easing (QE) and raise rates as soon as next month. Now, economists are scrambling to walk back those expectations.

A similar whiplash is confronting Fed watchers in the US as the economy confounds the skeptics.

“While pricing for the March [Fed meeting] has been trimmed to negligible levels, there’s still latent upside fuel for the US dollar in pricing for FOMC meetings beyond that,” says strategist Richard Franulovich at Westpac. “We assume US resilience can extend well into 2024 … and will make for a bumpy disinflation last mile.”

In the meantime, as the “cheap Japan” problem ruins Tokyo’s year, the race is on to see what drops faster: Kishida’s approval numbers, Japan’s GDP – or any remaining hope that Japan will ever regain its position as a top-three global economy.

Follow William Pesek on X, formerly Twitter, at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading

Participate in the EGH x AWSome Friday networking event  

Aims to cultivate an ecosystem that accelerates startup success.
Event convenes 30+ investment firms and government agencies nationwide

The Entrepreneur Growth Hub (EGH), in partnership with Amazon Web Services (AWS), announced the inaugural EGH x AWSome Friday Networking event for startups and investors at the Ship Campus in Batu Kawan on Friday, 23…Continue Reading

Quantum Sovereignty: Is Malaysia Prepared?

National Quantum Strategy with support beyond regular science funding
Urgent to revive efforts towards development of robust quantum ecosystem

Leveraging quantum technology (QT) is crucial for national security, the digital economy, and sovereignty in the immediate future. Quantum physics laws suggest not only a significant leap in communication efficiency and computational power but…Continue Reading

Japan’s Leave a Nest Group launches Center of Garage Malaysia to spur deep tech ecosystem

Ambitious target to generate US$20.97mil in economic impact
Support from global leaders such as Mitsubishi Electric, Kobashi Industries

Japan based Leave a Nest Group (LVNS) has introduced the Center of Garage Malaysia (CoGMY), a pioneering initiative set to revolutionise the Deep Tech Ecosystem in Malaysia. CoGMY is poised to position Malaysia as a…Continue Reading

China needs bold, open-door policies for economic resurgence – Asia Times

The recent decision to strengthen dealing restrictions indicates a concerted effort by authorities to maintain markets as China struggles with an economic downturn and stock rout.

The erratic trading that caused stock to fall to a five-year poor has forced policymakers to reconsider their approaches. &nbsp,

A departure from the smaller steps is required due to the cumulative impact of three years of economic decline, which erased a remarkable US$ 7 trillion in value. &nbsp,

It’s time for Beijing to take more audacious, “open- door,” globally conscious, and clear actions to rekindle growth and boost confidence in the second-largest economy.

A dedication to flexibility and global cooperation must be at the heart of Beijing’s restoration method. &nbsp,

Through international cooperation, China’s financial would has increased, and a renewed focus on an open-door policy will not only draw foreign investment but also make it easier for ideas and technologies to be exchanged. &nbsp,

This strategy is consistent with the interconnectedness of the contemporary international business, where cooperation frequently results in mutually advantageous results.

Transparency, which is frequently regarded as the cornerstone of investment trust, must also be given top priority.

Both domestic and foreign investors are concerned about the new opaque financial sector crackdown. Beijing needs to promote a more open regulatory setting and offer precise policy and reform direction. &nbsp,

Trust will be increased and risks reduced through an open discussion with partners, including the financial sector and global partners.

A comprehensive strategy that focuses on promoting private consumption and innovation is needed to address poor financial information. &nbsp,

Beyond foreign relations, an open-door policy embraces a business environment that supports entrepreneurship and creativity. China is diversify its economic landscape and produce sustained growth by developing a friendly ecosystem for startups and small companies.

Need for discourse

Financial security is severely hampered by escalating geopolitical tensions, particularly with the US. Beijing needs to approach politics pragmatically and with an international perspective, preferring speech to clash.

Prioritizing assistance on issues like climate change and public health is foster goodwill and foster an environment that promotes economic recovery.

Another important aspect of China’s financial problems, the worsening property crisis, necessitates audacious and open intervention. In this situation, taking a proactive approach entails working with the real estate sector to put intended stimulus measures into place. &nbsp,

Restricting consumers, promoting sustainable development methods, and ensuring accountability in property transactions can all help to stabilize the industry and stop a wider economic downturn.

Beijing’s dedication to an inclusive strategy focuses on both luring foreign investment and fostering a different and encouraging environment for its local businesses.

Reforms that simplify administrative procedures, cut down on red tape, and improve business efficiency should be taken into consideration by the government. To create a more effective and competitive financial habitat, adopting an international perspective entails learning from international best practices.

Using more audacious fiscal and monetary policies may offer vital support for the recuperation in addition to these geopolitical measures. Targeted governmental stimulus and open disclosure of the government’s intentions had increase investor confidence. &nbsp,

It is wise to adjust interest rates and liquidity measures to strike a balance between immediate financial needs and long-term economic stability.

Beijing must then take the helm with quality, flexibility, and a dedication to fostering global cooperation.

The founder and CEO of deVere&nbsp, Group is Nigel Green. @nigeljgreen on Twitter, follow him.

Continue Reading

DisruptInvest to gather 1000+ entrepreneurs, investors & corporates to drive startup investments & acquisitions

Summit set to attract over 1,000 attendees
Aims to unite startup investors, corporate innovation communities for long-term collaboration

NEXEA has announced the annual DisruptInvest Summit on the 23rd of May 2024. This gathering is touted as Malaysia’s largest startup and corporate innovation event, aiming to invigorate the startup ecosystem, fostering connections and collaborations…Continue Reading

Mavcap invests in Vynn Capital’s SEA focused mobility and supply chain fund

Reflects continuous commitment to back local funds,  nurture pioneering startups
Sime Darby, AEI Capital earlier investors, enabling industry to invest into tech companies

Malaysia Venture Capital Management Bhd (MAVCAP), Malaysia’s largest venture capital firm, announced that it is investing as a limited partner (LP) in Vynn Capital’s latest Mobility and Supply Chain Fund….Continue Reading

US political paralysis thwarting CHIPS Act promise – Asia Times

The battle to keep the government open may feel just like the crisis of the day. But these fights pose immediate and long-term risks for the US.

The federal government spends tens of billions of dollars every year to support fundamental scientific research that is mostly conducted at universities. For instance, the basic discoveries that made the Covid-19 vaccine possible stretch back to the early 1960s.

Such research investments contribute to the health, wealth and well-being of society, support jobs and regional economies, and are vital to the US economy and national security.

If Congress can’t reach an agreement, then a temporary government shutdown could happen on January 19, 2024. If lawmakers miss a second February 2 deadline, then automatic budget cuts will hit future research hard.

Even if lawmakers avoid a shutdown and pass a budget, America’s future competitiveness could suffer because federal research investments are on track to be billions of dollars below targets Congress set for themselves less than two years ago.

I am a sociologist who studies how research universities contribute to the public good. I’m also the executive director of the Institute for Research on Innovation and Science, a national university consortium whose members share data that help us understand, explain and work to amplify those benefits.

Our data shows how endangering basic research harms communities across the US and can limit innovative companies’ access to the skilled employees they need to succeed.

A promised investment

Less than two years ago, in August 2022, university researchers like me had reason to celebrate.

Congress had just passed the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act. The “science” part of the law promised one of the biggest federal investments in the National Science Foundation – America’s premier basic science research agency – in its 74-year history.

The CHIPS Act authorized US$81 billion for the agency, promised to double its budget by 2027 and directed it to “address societal, national, and geostrategic challenges for the benefit of all Americans” by investing in research.

But there was one very big snag. The money still has to be appropriated by Congress every year. Lawmakers haven’t been good at doing that recently. The government is again poised to shut down.

As lawmakers struggle to keep the lights on, fundamental research is likely to be a casualty of political dysfunction. The budget proposals released so far fall $5 billion to $7.5 billion short of what the CHIPS Act called for in fiscal year 2024. Deal or no deal, science is on the chopping block in Washington.

A lag or cut in federal research funding would harm US competitiveness in critical advanced technologies like artificial intelligence and robotics. Photo: Hispanolistic / E+ via Getty Images

Research’s critical impact

That’s bad because fundamental research matters in more ways than you might expect.

Lagging research investment will hurt US leadership in critical technologies like artificial intelligence, advanced communications, clean energy and biotechnology. Less support means less new research work gets done, fewer new researchers are trained and important new discoveries are made elsewhere.

But disrupting federal research funding also directly affects people’s jobs, lives and the economy.

Businesses nationwide thrive by selling the goods and services – everything from pipettes and biological specimens to notebooks and plane tickets – that are necessary for research.

Those vendors include high-tech startups, manufacturers, contractors and even Main Street businesses like your local hardware store. They employ your neighbors and friends and contribute to the economic health of your hometown and the nation.

Nearly a third of the $10 billion in federal research funds that 26 of the universities in our consortium used in 2022 directly supported US employers, including:

  • A Detroit welding shop that sells gasses many labs use in experiments funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, Department of Defense and Department of Energy.
  • A Dallas-based construction company that is building an advanced vaccine and drug development facility paid for by the Department of Health and Human Services.
  • More than a dozen Utah businesses, including surveyors, engineers and construction and trucking companies, working on a Department of Energy project to develop breakthroughs in geothermal energy.

When Congress’ problems endanger basic research, they also damage businesses like these and people you might not usually associate with academic science and engineering. Construction and manufacturing companies earn more than $2 billion each year from federally funded research done by our consortium’s members.

Jobs and innovation

Disrupting or decreasing research funding also slows the flow of STEM – science, technology, engineering and math – talent from universities to American businesses. Highly trained people are essential to corporate innovation and to US leadership in key fields, like AI, where companies depend on hiring to secure research expertise.

In 2022, federal research grants paid wages for about 122,500 people at universities that shared data with my institute. More than half of them were students or trainees. Our data shows that they go on to many types of jobs, but are particularly important for leading tech companies like Google, Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Intel.

Intel is in line to benefit from the CHIPS and Science Act. Credit: Intel

More comprehensive numbers don’t exist, but that same data lets me estimate that over 300,000 people who worked at US universities in 2022 were paid by federal research funds. Threats to federal research investments put academic jobs at risk.

They also hurt private sector innovation because even the most successful companies need to hire people with expert research skills. Most people learn those skills by working on university research projects, and most of those projects are federally funded.

High stakes

The last shutdown was the longest in 40 years, but even short delays in research funding have big negative effects on the scientific workforce and lead expert researchers to look outside the US for jobs. Temporary cuts to research funding hurt too because they reduce high-tech entrepreneurship and decrease the publication of new findings.

Lasting stagnation or shrinking investments would have even more pronounced effects. Over time, companies would see fewer skilled job candidates, academic and corporate researchers would produce fewer discoveries, and fewer high-tech startups would mean slower economic growth.

America would become less competitive in the age of AI. This would make one of the fears that led lawmakers to pass the CHIPS and Science Act into a reality.

Ultimately, it’s up to lawmakers to decide whether to fulfill their promise to invest more in the research that supports jobs across the economy and American innovation, competitiveness and economic growth.

Whether the current budget deal succeeds or fails, basic research is on the table and the stakes are high.

Jason Owen-Smith is Professor of Sociology, University of Michigan

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading