Trump 2.0: How to lose a trade war in just 18 days – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Japan – So far, China has had a little better-than-feared encounter with the Donald Trump 2.0 president.

In reality, Xi Jinping’s Communist Party is probably relieved to discover Trump stifling world markets, torn political relationships, and destroying the soft power that America has come to rely on so much for decades to accumulate in just 18 days.

Elon Musk, a Trump benefactor, is filmed slinging dust into US institutions and using it to espionage sensitive data, affecting trust both domestically and abroad.

Increase in Trump’s concern over his disastrous trade war. Though Trump went away with 10 % levies on Xi’s business, that was just one-sixth of the 60 % he had threatened. At the same time, the Price Man-in-chief backed away from 25 % levies on Canada and Mexico. For today, at least.

But Wall Street now senses Trump’s retreat. The biggest player in the cutting of US companies a few days ago. Today, many investors are concluding Trump’s taxes leg competition is far more wood than bit.

The principles that surround Trump 2.0 and the fear of a stock market collapse and the backlash from the oligarchs who are trying to control the country are varied. Trump’s businessman entourage is evidently worried about their earnings.

It’s possible, too, that Trump’s advisers are warning him that threatening a massive trade war are one point, devastating the world market, and Wall Street with it, is quite another.

Since Trump’s surprise victory in November, Xi has been promoting China as a more robust power than the US as the protector of free business and international economic institutions. Beijing says it stands ready to protect modernization from” serious problems” amid a “new period of volatility and shift” and disruption.

CEOs gathered in Peru for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation ( APEC ) summit in November told Xi,” Dividing an interdependent world is going back in history.”

Xi was harkening again to 2017, when a turbulent Trump 1.0 White House was likewise spooking global markets. Xi in Davos stated to CEOs that trade wars and protectionism may result in “injury and damage to both sides” at the time.

However, according to Stewart Patrick, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,” there is now Washington is located in the scheme equivalent of Tornado Alley, battered by a storm of confusing and norm-shattering professional commands that promise to upend eight years of US internationalism.”

Plan experts, Patrick says, “have become storm-chasers, tracking down the latest offense in the hopes of answering a simple question: Just what is the White House hoping to accomplish with all this conflict”?

No recent step tells us more about Trump’s “disdain for America’s global reputation” than the “reckless and arguably illegal and unconstitutional effort to dismantle” the US Agency for International Development ( USAID ) without legislative approval,” Patrick says.

The episode exposes Trump’s contextual relativism, which recognizes that the US has no purpose in world affairs. These misplaced choices may harm Americans themselves.

Yet as Trump complains about China’s supremacy, he’s paving the way for Asia’s biggest economy to grow its effect at America’s price. Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative ( BRI ) expands its colossal infrastructure investment strategy around the world, especially in the Global South, by ending US development aid.

” None of these individuals has any thought of how the universe works,” says Stuart Stevens, a lifelong Republican strategist whose latest book is titled” The Conspiracy to Stop America.”” The country’s greatest authority wants to have as little impact as Liechtenstein. ” Either by design or unwittingly, Stevens says, the Trump-Musk label group is” going to give away National energy” to China and Russia.

Yun Sun, director of China programs at the Stimson Center, a Washington-based consider container, adds that any” decay of US management and credibility does gain China.”

That goes, also, for Chinese goods. There is confusion over why Trump’s Treasury Department gave Musk exposure to the US national payments system amid the legislation conflict in Washington.

Owners and Eastern central banks sat on hills of US Treasury securities are already sufficiently concerned about Washington’s persistently high inflation and US$ 36 trillion debt load. Then they may be concerned about a number of tech bros scurrying around Washington’s financial system for enigmatic reasons.

If Tokyo, which holds more than$ 1.1 trillion of US Treasuries, or Beijing, with$ 770 billion, doubt the sanctity of the reserve currency, it might result in titanically large debt sales and surging yields.

Though the economic fallout would rattle China’s 2025, the longer-term gains may be worth the short-term problems. It may, at a minimum, perform into Xi’s fingers as he works to export the yuan. The dollar’s influence on global commerce and finance increased over the past ten years ‘ Xi’s party.

On top of Trump’s extreme strength grabs, he’s pushing to implement another multi-trillion-dollar duty cut, wrestle decision-making power away from the Federal Reserve and apparently degrade the dollar. The odds of credit rating organizations allowing US debt to remain unchanged are decreasing.

Trump’s MAGA plan to end America’s low-cost, high-impact foreign aid programs to help fund tax cuts for the ultrawealthy is a blow to US influence abroad, according to Alan Yu, senior vice president at the Center for American Progress think tank.

Trump, Musk, and their allies are satisfied, but the aid attacks have also stifled trust and uncertainty among American allies and partners, which the United States relies on to maintain world security, Yusays.

The programs Trump is pausing, Yu explains”, strengthen the capabilities of partner nations, deter adversaries, and reduce the need for direct military intervention.”

In particular, he adds, the status of assistance to Ukraine, critical to sustaining Kyiv’s war effort against Russia, remains ambiguous. Military assistance to Taiwan, which relies on US training and equipment to deter Chinese aggression, has also been thrown into uncertainty.

To be sure, many observers think the tariffs will eventually be imposed. The justification is that you don’t talk about the power of trade restrictions and how crucial they are to rebuilding America. Also, the ways in which Xi is pushing back may have Trump’s gang of anti-China advisors, including Peter Navarro, apoplectic.

As such, says Dominique Dwor-Frecaut, chief US economist at advisory Macro Hive”, tariff increases are likely to proceed on two tracks. The long-term track is broad-based, gradual and meant to generate revenues and support reshoring. Meanwhile, the’ opportunistic’ track is country-specific, aggressive and meant to exert leverage on trade partners.”

Dwor-Frecaut notes that during his confirmation hearing, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent explained that tariff policy had three objectives: revenue generation, reshoring and leverage in trade negotiations”. Because the goals for generating revenue and reshoring are long-term, permanent tariff increases are required. Also, this is likely to lift prices, possibly inflation, and lower growth.”

Thickening the plot, Xi’s party struck back with tit-for-tat tariffs on US energy, manufacturing and minerals while hitting Google with an antitrust investigation. Overall, economists and analysts say, it’s a reasonable and proportional response that leaves the door open to future negotiations.

According to Julian Evans-Pritchard, an analyst for Capital Economics China, “fairly modest” is how it sounds.

However, Ian Bremmer, CEO of Eurasia Group, believes that the prospect of a market-wrecking conflict between Washington and Beijing fundamentally misunderstands both the scope of Trump’s strategy and the nature of US-China relations during the Xi era.

According to Bremmer,” the most geopolitically significant relationship in the world is fundamentally adversarial and devoid of trust.” The Biden administration made a significant effort to create and maintain 25 high-level bilateral channels across the cabinet as the only reason it remained comparatively stable in 2024.

Team Trump, by contrast”, has no interest in putting in that kind of painstaking diplomatic work for a relationship they view as fundamentally adversarial,” Bremmer says”. Without those safeguards, there will be few management and communication strategies to stop even minor incidents from developing into major crises.

Can Trump get past this reality and coerce Beijing into signing a deal? Bremmer thinks not.

” The problem, “he says”, is that his strongman tactics only work against much weaker countries. When he threatens Colombia and Panama with tariffs, they have no choice but to capitulate because, in the event that their economies would collapse, they would have to. However, hitting down is simple. China is a completely different game. It has the power and leverage to retaliate against the US in ways that other nations cannot. And punch back it will.”

According to economist Alicia Garcia Herrero at Natixis, the question that no one can answer is whether Trump might respond to Beijing’s initial retaliation in broader ways. If]Trump ] doubles down, China will have a problem,” she notes.

Agatha Kratz, economist at the Rhodium Group, tells AFP that” given the current economic downturn, China cannot afford – and does not want – to impose excessive trade barriers. China’s economy is in a fragile state, and this limits its ability to act freely. Beijing cannot afford to take reckless actions, and I don’t think it wants to.”

The bottom line is that no one really knows, so perhaps it’s best to remain agile, says Yung-Yu Ma, chief investment officer at BMO Wealth Management”. Be patient and opportunistic – there may be a time to be aggressive, but it isn’t upon us yet,” Ma notes.

According to Ma,” President Donald Trump may be willing to let the US suffer a lot of economic pain in an effort to realize his stated goals of reducing trade deficits, bringing jobs to the US, and improving border security.”

We still anticipate that the US will impose more tariffs on China later this year as part of its larger trade goals, according to Morgan Stanley’s economists, which will only lead to further retaliatory actions from China.

Part of the issue is Trump’s frustration that efforts to date haven’t slowed China’s trajectory. That goes both for Trump 1.0 policies and those of Joe Biden’s White House”. From DeepSeek to Huawei, US tech restrictions on China are backfiring,” says Diana Choyleva at Enodo Economics.

In fact, Choyleva argues, US efforts to curb China’s technological advancements may be having the opposite effect: accelerating China’s move upmarket toward self-reliance and innovation.

Huawei, Huawei, and others are providing case studies on how China Inc. is developing workarounds for US chip and other tech export controls. Along with creating genuine obstacles, decoupling efforts are incentivizing domestic innovation.

China has other opportunities ripened by Trump’s tariffs. For one thing, they’ll cost America’s friends, particularly staunch US allies Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and certain governments in Southeast Asia.

Hard feelings between Washington and top Asian democracies could generate greater distrust, increasing China’s appeal as an alternative. It has given Xi the moral support she needs, and it has made her appear more committed to capitalist principles than tycoon Trump.

Xi’s party is still benefiting from Trump’s unilateral withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement, which later became the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership ( CPTPP ) without the US.

Trump 2.0, in contrast, is clinging to misguided interests in bilateral trade agreements over wider efforts to establish a Chinese military fortress.

In particular, Carnegie’s Patrick notes, the demise of USAID is an early win for Beijing. Many innocent people around the world will pass away if the agency does. As for the United States ‘ continued reputation as a nation that values its own self-interest and values itself in international affairs, Patrick concludes,” so will it do so.”

Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading

When tariffs make good common sense – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

The&nbsp, hazard of US tariffs&nbsp, on Canada and Mexico seems to have abated for today. Both nations made mainly symbolic commitments to border security, which led to Trump’s decision to postpone the tariffs by one month. This suggests that the taxes may be delayed or completely canceled.

This is the least negative results. Although the majority of the world is euphoric, the simple knowledge that Trump may change his mind and impose tariffs on America’s important allies and trading partners at any time will chill business investment. &nbsp, Bloomberg information:

Over a furious 72 hours, President Donald Trump’s danger of punishing fresh tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China …sent manufacturing organizations scrambling for cover…Even after the senator put a&nbsp, one-month hold&nbsp, on the Mexico and Canada tasks on Monday, professionals are still very much on watch for extra taxes …

It was …frantic for Randy Carr, who runs&nbsp, World Emblem, the biggest global manufacturer of emblems and patches …” We have had to suspend every capex project we have for the next 24 months until we better understand the trade situation”, Carr said… World Emblem also paused hiring plans, said the executive, whose company has 1, 300 employees between production bases in the US and Mexico. ” It’s suggestive of the changes we had to make during Covid-19″.

Tariffs benefit private manufacturers by shielding them from foreign competitors, but they also hurt them by raising the price of imported components. One of the two main issues with taxes is that they raise customer costs, which is the other.

Does this imply that tariffs are usually unfair? Some people praised the benefits of free trade in response to Trump’s turbulent tariff announcement, even some Democrats who are typically wary of liberal arguments.

But after years of underdevelopment, for fanatic explanations are improbable to carry much weight. Any ideological blanket denunciation of tariffs will likely face that deep reservoir of ( somewhat justified ) anger. It seems like free trade was America’s sucker’s bet.

In reality, there&nbsp, are &nbsp, some reasonable explanations for when taxes may be useful. These concepts have been the subject of numerous documents written about them that economists have known for centuries. The reasons for tariffs are often discussed in public conversations because economists frequently have an overt attachment to the concept of free trade.

I therefore decided to go over some of these. But notice that all of them are claims for&nbsp, targeted&nbsp, taxes, instead of the large, across-the-board tariffs that Trump threatened against Canada and Mexico.

Federal safety concerns

The most important rationale for taxes, as I see it, is national security. If a war breaks out between the US and China, the US will own to create a whole lot of munitions and weapons quite fast— especially drones, ships, missiles, and so on. It’s crucial to have existing human industries that can be immediately repurposed for defense functions in order to accomplish that, just like automakers built planes and vehicles in World War 2.

A nation’s manufacturing base will collapse and die in a lengthy standard modern war against a rival nation. For instance, if the US finds itself without battery factories — both on its own soil or in a secure area of the country — it won’t be able to produce the FPV drones that have come to be the standard tool on Ukraine’s battlefields. That could be devastating. Therefore, it is important to keep some power production power in the US, Canada, and/or Mexico.

Today, Xi Jinping knows this. One thing he can do is try to crush the US producing industries by outpacing them with targeted surges of cheap exports, as he almost certainly does if he wants to undermine the US. It’s quite possible that this is one motivation behind China ‘s&nbsp, sudden wave of manufactured exports, which is being promoted with below-market bank loans, government grants, and a host of other laws.

Taxes are a means of preventing this forced underdevelopment method. If Xi unexpectedly decides to flood America with affordable Chinese batteries, the US may respond very quickly by raising taxes on Chinese chargers, canceling out the impact of China’s incentives. In reality, this is what Biden did last year, when&nbsp, he levied extremely large tariffs&nbsp, on a variety of China’s proper business.

However, take note that Trump’s tariff proposals for Mexico and Canada don’t exactly suit this technique. Most important, putting taxes on US allies doesn’t protect against forced underdevelopment by China, in truth, it makes the problem&nbsp, worse, by disrupting North American supply stores and raising prices for US manufacturers.

It also makes the US dollar value, making American imports less aggressive. This is a common reason why intended tariffs like Biden’s are more powerful than large, across-the-board tariffs like the ones Trump is threatening.

In fact, dollar appreciation is exactly what happened in 2018-19 after Trump’s initial tariffs, and it’s exactly what’s happening now:

So if you want tariffs for national security reasons, Trump’s proposed tariffs on US allies are &nbsp, exactly the wrong kind.

Our companies vs their companies

Economists don’t typically think about national security, instead, they tend to think good policies are those that produce more growth, more employment, and so on. And if those are your objectives, there are definitely still some reasons why tariffs might be a good thing— at least, from a single nation’s perspective.

The most common reason is all about&nbsp, national champions. Real-world markets aren’t perfectly competitive — some big companies make a ton of profit, by leveraging what economists call&nbsp, increasing returns to scale.

Increasing returns to scale are just anything that gives big companies a cost advantage over smaller ones — maybe network effects, or big fixed costs, or a” superstar” effect that draws in top talent, etc. In a world of increasing returns, the winning companies make a lot of profit, and smaller companies don’t.

A country might, therefore, be able to increase its wealth by using tariffs to guard its own “national champion” companies. The idea is basically to block foreign companies ‘ domestic markets by using tariffs to lower their scale.

This will make it easier for your own nation’s national champions to outshine their international rivals, resulting in greater profit for them on the market. This is called” strategic trade” policy.

James Brander and Barbara Spencer&nbsp, pointed out&nbsp, this argument for tariffs back in the 1980s. Paul Krugman, who helped develop the leading theory of increasing returns and trade, &nbsp, summarized&nbsp, their work on this topic in 1987:

If a nation can somehow make sure that the lucky firm that receives the most money is domestic rather than foreign, it can raise its national income at the expense of other nations. James Brander and Barbara Spencer uncovered in two well-known papers that, when appropriate, government policies like export subsidies and import restrictions can deter foreign companies from entering lucrative markets.

Government policy here serves much the same role that” strategic” moves such as investment in excess capacity or research and development ( R &amp, D) serve in many models of oligopolistic competition —hence the term” strategic trade policy” .…]A ] t least under some circumstances a government, by supporting its firms in international competition, can raise national welfare at another country’s expense.

In fact, there’s some evidence that free trade can make a country poorer by destroying its national champions. This is from&nbsp, Sampson et al. ( 2022 ):

Import liberalization lowers import costs and boosts competition. However, with scale economies, import liberalization can also reduce domestic industry’s productivity by reducing its scale, leading to lower exports.

Evidence from the permanent normalization of US trade relations with China in the early 2000s, as this column demonstrates, demonstrates that increased Chinese import competition did indeed reduce US exports through this channel, implying the existence of industry-level economies in the US.

The point is that America would have been a little wealthier if the US had started importing tariffs to protect some very oligopolistic industries from Chinese competition in the early 2000s.

But again, this argument for tariffs doesn’t apply to Trump’s recent efforts. First of all, it only applies to those sectors where there are few winners and a lot of profits to be made. That implies, again, that&nbsp, targeted&nbsp, tariffs are the way to go.

Broad, across-the-board tariffs will dilute the effect, through exchange rate appreciation. Trump would have imposed tariffs on agriculture, which is a highly competitive sector with few profits to compete for. Simply put, this strategy does not align with the theory of strategic trade.

Second, you probably don’t want to start a trade war with your most significant allies and trading partners if you want your national champions to be able to scale up. They will almost certainly retaliate, denying market access to your own top companies.

If their attempts to buy off Trump with symbolic concessions failed, Canada and Mexico would likely resort to retaliation measures. The top companies in America would lose market share and suffer in their fierce competition with Chinese rivals as a result.

And finally, if you want to increase your national champions ‘ scale, you can probably get a lot more mileage out of&nbsp, export subsidies&nbsp, than tariffs. Tariffs can hurt national champions by denying them access to cheap production inputs, export subsidies, although they cost more in fiscal terms, don’t have this problem.

The American way of protecting the infant industry

In this recent blog post by Anthony Pompliano, many people have questioned my response to the pro-tariff arguments. Please click on the link.

Some of Pompliano’s arguments in this piece are simply bad. For example, he cites the factory construction boom and&nbsp, the reshoring of the solar industry &nbsp, as examples of American industrial successes driven by tariffs.

However, in both of those cases, while tariffs might have been a significant factor, we didn’t really see much progress until Biden introduced industrial policy through the CHIPS Act and the Inflation Reduction Act.

Pompliano also contends that tariffs are less deflationary than income taxes, which is generally true if the subject is the same tax rate. But if you’re talking about raising a set amount of&nbsp, revenue&nbsp, from either income tax or tariffs, then the tariffs are almost certainly much worse.

This is because tariffs are a lot easier to&nbsp, avoid&nbsp, than income taxes, you just buy similar products made elsewhere. Because tariffs are relatively easy to avoid, they don’t raise a lot of revenue. And so if you want to use tariffs to raise, say,$ 1 trillion a year for the US government, you’re going to need to set the tariff rates&nbsp, very&nbsp, high. And that will be very distortionary.

But anyway, Pompliano’s strongest argument is that tariffs for infant industries were useful for America’s economic development back in the 19th century:

Tariffs are widely credited as&nbsp, an essential tool&nbsp, for the success of the Industrial Revolution, which created the American economy we know today…Historical figures like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Henry Clay, James Monroe, Abraham Lincoln, William McKinley, and Theodore Roosevelt were all outspoken supporters of tariffs as a necessary tool for America to thrive. Give us a protective tariff, and we shall have the greatest nation on earth, according to the well-known Lincoln quote on tariffs.

This is what economists refer to as an “infant industry argument.” Basically, American leaders in the early days of the republic wanted to promote the creation of new industries in the US Alexander Hamilton wrote his famous&nbsp,” Report on Manufactures” &nbsp, in 1791.

He claimed that tariffs would enable domestic champions to have the same level of scale as foreigners, which was in line with the strategic trade theory developed a century later. Hamilton added that shielding brand-new American industries from competition would give them more time to “learn” about how to compete with established foreign rivals.

In some cases, infant industry arguments are plausible; Pompliano certainly exaggerates when he claims that tariffs built America, but they were likely a result of helping some important American industries start their own businesses rather than being replaced by floods of British imports.

But here too, the specifics of Trump’s plans are at odds with the economics. Once again, the economic argument is for&nbsp, targeted tariffs&nbsp, in very specific cases— in this case, new industries facing competition from big foreign incumbents. Trump’s across-the-board tariffs are almost entirely targeting&nbsp, non-infant&nbsp, industries. ( Also, in general, &nbsp, import quotas are more helpful&nbsp, for infant industries than tariffs. )

Two more speculative arguments

So those are the three basic arguments in favor of tariffs — national security, national champions, and infant industries. All of them are pretty solid arguments, though they all imply that Trump’s preferred approach to tariffs is highly suboptimal. However, there are still some intriguing tariff debates that merit discussion.

One of these is&nbsp, Michael Pettis ‘ theory&nbsp, that tariffs on China will help to correct global trade imbalances, and could force China to change its economic model to a more consumption-focused one. I discussed this concept here.

Basically, I think this makes sense as a&nbsp, China-specific political-economic&nbsp, argument. The idea is that Chinese companies will quickly become unprofitable ( due to overproduction and over competition ) if tariffs force them to concentrate more on their domestic market.

This unprofitability could prompt China’s government to reduce its subsidies for industrial overproduction. That’s my personal interpretation of Pettis ‘ ideas, and I’m not sure how plausible it is, but it’s certainly an interesting thought. I would note, however, that this is a purely&nbsp, China-specific&nbsp, idea, rather than a justification for tariffs on Mexico and Canada.

Another theory, &nbsp, courtesy of Sam Hammond, is that tariffs are the first step in a forced de-dollarization of the global economy:

The US intentionally undermines the stability of the dollar as a trade currency by imposing universal tariffs, which I believe is the case because disruption forces other nations to consider reducing dollar holdings or considering alternative reserve arrangements, thereby enabling a monetary reset.

I don’t put much credence in this theory. The reason, as I’ve explained a number of times, is that tariffs make the US dollar more expensive, not less.

Anyway, I believe that national security, as well as the traditional economics justification for tariffs, such as strategic trade and infant industry protection, are still the strongest arguments in favor of tariffs. And every single one of them raises doubts about the tariffs Trump is proposing. Trump’s threatened tariffs on Canada and Mexico are incredibly unlikely to be those that are, even if some tariffs are acceptable in some circumstances.

This&nbsp, article&nbsp, was first published on Noah Smith’s Noahpinion&nbsp, Substack and is republished with kind permission. Become a Noahopinion&nbsp, subscriber&nbsp, here.

Continue Reading

Myanmar’s Shwe Kokko: Inside a city ‘built on scams’

By:
On:
In: Asia
47 seconds ago
Jonathan Mind

South East Asia journalist

Jonathan Mind/ BBC Workers in blue shirts sit amid construction rubble in front of tall buildings near a crane.Jonathan Mind/ BBC

The large, beautiful structures that emerge from the meadows on the Myanmar part of the Moei creek are so jarring that you find yourself squirming to make sure you haven’t imagined them.

Eight years ago there was nothing over there in Karen State. A long-running legal war and a few roughly-built concrete structures have made this region of Myanmar one of the poorest places on earth, all combined with trees. But now, on this area along the border with Thailand, a little town has emerged like a dream. It is known as the Golden Raintree or Shwe Kokko.

It is accused of being a city built on schemes, home to a profitable yet lethal connection of scams, money-laundering and human trafficking. She Zhijiang, the person responsible for it, is awaiting extradition to China while he is imprisoned in Bangkok.

But Yatai, She Zhijiang’s firm which built the city, paints a very unique perspective of Shwe Kokko in its promotional videos – as a resort town, a healthy holiday destination for Taiwanese tourists and shelter for the super-rich.

Shwe Kokko’s story is also one of the unbridled ambition that has swept away from China in recent years.

She Zhijiang dreamed of building this glittering city as his ticket out of the shadowy world of scams and gambling which he inhabited.

But by aiming so high, he has attracted Beijing’s attention, which is now eager to stop the fraudulent activities along the Thai-Myanmar border, which are increasingly targeting Chinese citizens.

Publicity about the scams is also hurting Thai tourism – Thailand is shutting down power to compounds over the border, toughening its banking rules and promising to block visas for those suspected of using Thailand as a transit route.

Shwe Kokko has been stranded in Myanmar’s post-coup, war-ravaged country, unable to attract the investment and visitors it needs to continue.

Yatai is trying to fix the city’s sinister image by allowing journalists to see it, holding out hope that more favourable reporting might even get She Zhijiang out of jail.

So they sent the BBC to Shwe Kokko.

Inside Shwe Kokko

Finding the location is challenging.

Ever since construction began in 2017, Shwe Kokko has been a forbidden place, off-limits to casual visitors.

Access became even more difficult as the civil war in Myanmar grew even more after the military coup in 2021. It takes three days from the country’s commercial hub Yangon – through multiple checkpoints, blocked roads and a real risk of getting caught in armed skirmishes. Crossing Thailand takes only a few minutes, but careful planning is required to avoid Thai police and army patrols.

She Zhijiang’s colleagues took us on a tour, highlighting the newly-paved streets, the luxury villas, the trees–” Mr She believes in making a green city”, they told us. Wang Fugui, who claimed to be a former police officer from Guangxi in southern China, was our guide. He ended up in prison in Thailand, on what he insists were trumped-up fraud charges. He became one of his most dependable lieutenants there after getting to know She Zhijiang.

Getty Images Thai military personnel keep watch atop armoured vehicles along the Moei river on the Thai side, next to the 2nd Thai-Myanmar Friendship Bridge, in Thailand's Mae Sot district on April 12, 2024. Getty Images
Jonathan Mind/BBC A market in Shwe Kokko. Two women walk along a wet brown road, one pushing a wooden cart with white flowers in it. Their outfits are shades of pink. Shops selling baskets and dresses line the street on one sideJonathan Mind/BBC

At first glance, Shwe Kokko has the appearance of a provincial Chinese city. There is a constant procession of Chinese-made construction vehicles going to and from building sites, and the signs on the buildings are written in Chinese characters.

Yatai is vague about the tenants of all its buildings, as it is about many things. They told us that “rich people from many nations rent the villas.” And what about the businesses? ” Many businesses. Hotels, casinos”.

However, the majority of the people we saw were local Karen, who are one of the ethnic minorities in Myanmar, who visit Shwe Kokko daily for work. We saw very few of the overseas visitors who are supposed to be the customers of the hotels and casinos.

Yatai claims Shwe Kokko has stopped a number of scams. It has put up huge billboards all over town proclaiming, in Chinese, Burmese and English, that forced labour was not allowed, and that “online businesses” should leave. However, local people quietly informed us that the scam business was still operating.

Starting a decade ago in the unchecked frenzy of Chinese investment on the Cambodian coast, then moving to the lawless badlands of Myanmar’s border with China, the scam operators have now settled along the Thai-Myanmar border. The Myanmar military and a roiling gang of rebel armies and warlords are battling it out for control of Karen State around them.

The scams have grown into a multi-billion dollar business. They involve tens of thousands of workers who are kept in locked-down buildings where they defraud people all over the world of their savings.

Some work there willingly, but others are abducted and forced to work. Those who have fled have enslaved and suffered horrifying experiences. Some have come from Shwe Kokko.

We had the opportunity to speak with a young woman who had recently worked in one of the scam centers. She had not enjoyed it and been allowed to leave.

She claimed that her role in the modeling team, which consisted primarily of attractive young women, was to attempt to establish an intimate online relationship with potential victims.

” The target is the elderly”, she said. You begin a conversation by saying,” Oh, you look just like one of my friends.” Once you make friends you encourage them by sending pictures of yourself, sometimes wearing your night clothes”.

Then, she explains, the conversation shifts to get-rich-quick schemes, such as crypto investments, where the women claim that’s how they made a lot of money.

” When they feel close to you, you pass them on to the chatting section”, she says. The chatting partners will continue to communicate with the client to convince them to purchase shares of the crypto company.

During our brief time in Shwe Kokko we were only allowed to see what Yatai wanted us to see. Even so, it was obvious that the scams continue to exist and are likely still the city’s main industry.

Our request to see inside any of the newly-built office buildings were turned down. They kept telling us that those were private. We were escorted at all times by security guards seconded from the militia group which controls this part of the border. We were not permitted to enter the buildings ‘ construction sites or the exteriors. Many of the windows had bars on the insides.

Jonathan Mind/ BBC A military vehicle inside the city. Armed men in fatigues stand on the back of a black pickup truck driving down a road with shops on it, one called Family Fashion ShopJonathan Mind/ BBC

The young woman who used to work in a scam center said,” Everyone in Shwe Kokko knows what goes on there.”

She dismissed Yatai’s claim that it no longer permitted scam centres in Shwe Kokko.

That is a lie, I tell you. There is no way they don’t know about this. In those high-rise buildings, the entire city is doing it. No-one goes there for fun. Yatai has no way of knowing.

Who is She Zhijiang?

She Zhijiang reportedly received a call from Bangkok’s Klong Prem Prison, where he is currently imprisoned, saying,” I can promise that Yatai would never accept telecom fraud and scams.”

Yatai wanted us to hear from the man himself, and hooked up a ropey video link. We had to rely on Mr. Wang to answer our questions and keep our eyes off the prison guards because only Mr. Wang could be seen conversing with him.

Not much is known about She Zhijiang, a small-town Chinese entrepreneur who Beijing alleges is a criminal mastermind.

He left school when he was 14 and started learning computer coding in Hunan province, China, a poor village. He appears to have moved to the Philippines in his early 20s and into online gambling, which is illegal in China. He began to make his money at this point. In 2014 he was convicted by a Chinese court of running an illegal lottery, but he stayed overseas.

He managed to obtain Cambodian citizenship by investing in gambling companies there. He has used at least four different names.

He and a Karen warlord Saw Chit Thu, who controls the Moei River in Myanmar, made a deal in 2016 to create a new city together. She Zhijiang would provide the funds, the Chinese construction machinery and materials, while Saw Chit Thu and his 8, 000 armed fighters would keep it safe.

Yatai’s glitzy videos depicted a high-rise wonderland of hotels, casinos, and cyberparks, promising a$ 15 billion ( £12 billion ) investment. Shwe Kokko was described as part of Xi Jinping’s Belt-and-Road Initiative or BRI, bringing Chinese funds and infrastructure to the world.

In 2020, China publicly split its support for She Zhijiang, and the Myanmar government opened an investigation into Yatai, which was operating casinos before they were made legal in Myanmar.

Courtesy Yatai She Zhijiang wearing a black leather jacket and black trousers at Tiananmen Square, in front of yellow barricades Courtesy Yatai

She Zhijiang was detained and imprisoned in Bangkok in August 2022 following a Chinese request to Interpol. He and his business partner Saw Chit Thu have also been sanctioned by the British government for their links to human trafficking.

She Zhijiang claims to have been a victim of double deception by the Chinese government. He says he founded his company Yatai on the instruction of the Chinese Ministry of State Security, and insists that Shwe Kokko was then a part of the BRI.

He claims that because he refused to give them control of his project, China’s communist leadership is turning against him. They wanted a colony on the Thai-Myanmar border, he says. She Zhijiang’s business relationship has been denied by China.

While he denied any wrongdoing on Yatai’s part, She Zhijiang, however, admitted to” a high probability” that scammers were coming to Shwe Kokko to spend their money.

” Because our Yatai City is completely accessible to anyone who wants to enter and leave freely. Refusing customers, for a businessman like me, is really difficult. This is my area of weakness.

It is, however, stretching credulity to believe that Yatai, which runs everything in Shwe Kokko, was unable to stop scammers coming in and out of the city.

Other than scams, it’s also difficult to imagine any other business choosing to operate here. With Thailand cutting off power and telecommunications, electricity comes from diesel generators, which are expensive to run. Additionally, Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite system, which is also very expensive, is used for communication.

Yatai’s strategy is” to whitewash the project to create a narrative that Shwe Kokko is a safe city”, says Jason Tower, from the United States Institute for Peace, which has spent years researching the scam operation in Shwe Kokko.

He claims that they may even be “begin moving some of the more notorious components of the scam industry, like torture, into other areas.”

But he doesn’t think the plan will work:” What kinds of legitimate businesses will go into Shwe Kokko? It’s simply not appealing. The economy will continue to be a scam economy”.

A company operating in a conflict zone

When we were eventually allowed to see inside one casino in Shwe Kokko, run by a genial Australian, he told us they were going to close it down.

Local Karen were the only customers inside, playing a well-known arcade game where they had to shoot digital fish. We were forbidden from doing any interviews. The roulette and card tables were not present in the back rooms. The Australian manager said the casino- built six years ago- had been popular and profitable when there were just one or two of them, before the civil war. However, these days, with at least nine customers in place, there were not enough customers to turn around.

The real money was in online gambling, which he said was the main business in Shwe Kokko.

Jonathan Mind/BBC A woman walks past a sign saying trafficking is prohibited. The sign is largely blue, with drawings of people with tools apparently smashing rocks on one side, and skyscrapers on the otherJonathan Mind/BBC

It is impossible to determine how much money is made through online gambling and how much is made through blatant criminal activity, such as money laundering and fraud. They are usually run from the same compounds and by the same teams. When we inquired about the amount of money they made, Yatai refused to answer with even a ballpark figure. That is private, they said. Although the business has registered in Hong Kong, Myanmar, and Thailand, these are essentially shell companies with very little revenue or income passing through them.

We turned down Yatai’s offer to see the go-kart track, water park and model farm that they have built. Although we were unable to enter Yatai’s own luxurious hotel, we did see one more casino while being served breakfast there. It seemed empty.

The only other place we were permitted to visit was a karaoke club, which had incredible private rooms and gigantic domes that were completely obscured by digital screens and where large tropical fish and sharks swam. They also ran video loops extolling the vision and virtues of She Zhijiang. Except for a few young Chinese women who worked there, this club also appeared deserted.

They wore opera masks to avoid being identified, and danced unenthusiastically to music for a few minutes before giving up and sitting down. Interviews were not permitted. We were allowed to talk to a local Karen member of staff, but she was so intimidated by this we got little more than her name.

Jonathan Mind/BBC Seven women in a karaoke bar, wearing white, black and gold clothing, holding hands and dancing in neon lightsJonathan Mind/BBC

She Zhijiang has left Shwe Kokko’s running to a young protégé, 31-year-old He Yingxiong, in his absence. He lives with Wang Fugui in a sprawling villa they have built on the banks of the Moei River, overlooking Thailand, and guarded by massive Chinese bodyguards. They play mahjong there, eat the best food and beverages, and watch business closely.

Mr He has a slightly different explanation from his boss for the scams still operating under their noses. We are just developers of properties, he said. ” I can guarantee that this kind of thing does not happen here. However, even if it does, the locals have their own legal system, so it is their responsibility to handle it. Our job is just to provide good infrastructure, good buildings and supporting industries”.

However, this region of Myanmar has neither a legal system nor a functioning government. It is ruled by the various armed groups which control different bits of territory along the Thai border. Their leaders decide who can start or run a business, using their profits to help pay their battles with the Myanmar military or against one another. Many of them are known to be hosting scam compounds.

Jonathan Mind/BBC He Yingxiong who is running Shwe Kokko stands in front of a wooden fence with a field and city in the backgroundJonathan Mind/BBC
Jonathan Mind/BBC A view of the villa that is being used by He Yingxiong who is currently running Shwe Kokko. A decking area with woven chairs overlooks a river and green trees on the other sideJonathan Mind/BBC

Mr. He acknowledged that the war had allowed Yatai to purchase the land for such a low price. Karen human rights groups have accused Saw Chit Thu of driving the original inhabitants off their land, with minimal compensation, though it is clear Yatai is also providing badly needed jobs for the locals.

The lawlessness of Karen State appeals to illegal businesses, but that doesn’t help Shwe Kokko’s reputation.

Neither do recent headlines.

A 22-year-old Chinese actor, Wang Xing, was duped into Thailand with an offer to work on a movie shoot, and last month he was freed from a scam center on the border. His disappearance spurred a barrage of questions on Chinese social media, forcing the Thai and Chinese authorities to mount a joint operation to free him.

Chinese tourists have been putting off travel to Thailand because they worry for their safety. Other rescues have followed. Some scam victims have emailed the BBC asking for assistance, and rescue organizations claim there are still thousands of people trapped. Nearly all are in smaller compounds along the border south of Shwe Kokko.

Yatai emphasized to us that they are not the same as these heinous operations, which are essentially a collection of sheds constructed in forest clearings. That is where all the bad things happen now, they said. They discussed Dongmei, a cluster of low-rise buildings run by a well-known Chinese crime lord known as Wan Kuok Koi, also known as Broken Tooth, and KK Park, a notorious compound south of the border town of Myawaddy.

That distinction hasn’t helped She Zhijiang, who once had the ear of politicians, police bosses and even minor royalty in Thailand. He appears to have lost even the influence he once had in prison today to obtain special privileges. He has complained of being roughed up by the guards.

His attorneys are contesting the Interpol red notice used to justify his arrest, but China’s voice will likely be the one that will determine his fate.

From our interview with him, Shi Zhijiang seemed genuinely outraged over his sudden reversal of fortune.

” Before, I had no understanding of human rights, but now I really understand how horrible it is to have human rights violated,” he said. ” It is hard to imagine how the human rights of ordinary people in China are trampled upon when a respected businessman like me, who used to be able to go to the same state banquets as Xi Jinping, does not have his human rights and dignity protected in any way”.

It appears he actually believed he could create something that would, one day, transcend Shwe Kokko’s vile beginnings as a scam city.

What happens to it now is hard to guess, but if the Thai and Chinese governments keep acting to shut down the scams, the money will start to dry up.

Continue Reading

GE Newbie Watch: PAP makes moves in opposition wards, PSP and WP fresh faces hit the ground

By:
On:
In: South-East Asia

In December, Ms. Phneah was spotted in one of WP’s social media posts talking about walkabouts and referral initiatives in both the East Coast and Jalan Besar GRCs.

Her involvement with the WP dates back to the 2015 General Election, when she began volunteering with the Jalan Besar staff. &nbsp,

After that vote, she joined the group’s East Coast-Fengshan staff and helped out with local activities. &nbsp,

Since then, the WP part has been outspoken about socio-economic problems on various social media platforms, including her blogging, where she frequently details her opinions and experiences. &nbsp,

In a website blog earlier this month reflecting on Singapore’s 60th anniversary, she said she joined WP as she believed political competition may boost leadership in Singapore. She wrote,” It was a good platform for me to contribute to creating a credible and rational opposition and promotes Singapore’s improvement.”

Ms. Phneah is already an account chairman at business intelligence company AlphaSense, where she has been employed since 2023, according to her LinkedIn profile.

Continue Reading

Trump’s Gaza takeover all about natural gas – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

US President Donald Trump has said America&nbsp,” does get over” &nbsp, the Gaza Strip, while the Palestinians who live there should be relocated to Jordan or Egypt.

Energy is one of the most important but neglected factors in making this choice. Israel and Gaza both have substantial onshore natural gas reserves. Developing these sources could help asset Gaza’s restoration.

But Trump needs to move quickly to capitalise on this once-in-a-lifetime option. Soviet natural gas is being pushed out of Europe in a desperate attempt. New vendors are being sought out. &nbsp, This is going time.

This break it down. Israel’s big offshore fuel fields—Leviathan, Tamar, and Dalit—are now in operation and/or being explored by Chevron &amp, some other midsized Jewish oil firms.

On February 4, Azerbaijan’s state power company SOCAR&nbsp, acquired a 10 % stake&nbsp, in the Tamar oil field. &nbsp, Did they know tomorrow’s Gaza news was coming?

Three months Before the October 7, 2023 attacks, &nbsp, Hamas made a US-brokered deal&nbsp, to enable growth of a possible major oil field off the coastline of Gaza.

Then three months after October 7, Israel&nbsp, controversially granted exploration rights&nbsp, to Eni ( Italy ), Dana Energy ( UK) &amp, Ratio Petroleum ( Israel ) to explore within Palestine’s maritime boundaries.

Key power developments in the area have been making significant progress while the conflict in Gaza has been raging.

Qatar-Turkey pipelines

The Qatar-Turkey pipelines was planned to transport gas from Qatar through Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria to Turkey and Europe. In 2009, Syria’s then-leader Bashar al-Assad rejected the project.

Then that Assad is gone?

Turkey’s energy minister has &nbsp, publicly stated&nbsp, the plan could be revived if” Syria achieves its territorial integrity and stability”. Qatar wants to expand its trade options beyond Crude supplies to pipelines.

And now these fast-moving innovations:

&gt, Five days ago, &nbsp, Qatar’s Emir was the first head of state to attend Syria since Assad’s drop.

&gt, Monday Syria’s president, Ahmad al-Sharaa&nbsp, was in Saudi Arabia&nbsp, for his first established overseas trip.

&gt, Now al-Sharaa&nbsp, was in Turkey&nbsp, meeting with President Erdogan.

Hmmm…

Iranian pipeline

Iran even has a program to&nbsp, create a gas pipeline to Europe&nbsp, via Iraq and Syria. Since 2016, there haven’t been any growth changes for the Persian Pipeline job. Given Syria’s fresh command and Iran’s fast-growing social isolation, that offer didn’t occur any time soon.

Since Muammar Gaddafi’s assassination in 2011 there has been a civil war or political crises in Libya.

However, things are improving. Two weeks ago a&nbsp, big oil conference&nbsp, was held in Tripoli with some Americans and Europeans in attendance. Now Libya’s Minister of Economy &amp, Trade&nbsp, went people with plans&nbsp, to maintain a restoration meeting ace.

With some of the nation’s largest reserves of oils, Libya is hoping to climb back into the game in a major way.

Why are all of these countries—Israel, Qatar, Libya, Syria and Turkey—moving swiftly to potentially grow their fuel supplies and/or network abilities?

Because Europe needs to replace Russian energy, and anyone who supplies that oil does have a significant amount of economic and political influence.

All of these people are aware of the urgency of a quick response before Russia steps in and the conflict in Ukraine is forgotten.

The US and EU want Russia out of Europe’s power supply network. The option? Many gas providers like as Israel, Qatar &amp, Libya. Now is the ideal time for all oil producers in the area to relocate.

Trump’s Gaza choice

How does moving Palestinians from Gaza to Egypt and/or Jordan aid in the fuel supply to Europe?

1 ) It removes a vital social problem. The Israeli-Palestinian issue has long been a hindrance to local economic growth.

2 ) Personally, many Arab states told the US they were in favor of hammering Hamas. This issue is resolved by totally removing the Palestinians from Gaza. Plus: no terror attacks on reconstruction crews, no acts of terrorism in Israel ( inviting yet another Israeli response ), and no chance onshore gas facilities are sabotaged.

3 ) This did fast-track oil development. With US support, Gaza’s gas fields may be immediately developed without outdoor intervention. Without constantly being threatened by violence and/or civil warfare, pipes can be constructed.

4 ) Divide and conquer. Make no mistake: if the majority of the people of Gaza stays it, anything will be almost impossible to accomplish. Any remaining kinetic energy may be sucked up as they are divided up, some going to Egypt, and the others going to Jordan, especially as the fresh Gaza is rebuilt and promises of economic development are made clear.

5 ) According to Bloomberg, rebuilding Gaza may charge more than US$ 80 billion. Someone has to give for it and it won’t be American citizens. The obvious answer is revenue from normal oil.

The death of Gaza. Image: Resource Wars

None of this will be simple. There are still huge challenges. But they are addressable:

&gt, Dangle network transit fees and/or offtake partnerships with Jordan and Egypt to help negotiate Gaza’s people …

In order to aid in the country’s rapid reconstruction, Trump leans on Qatar to give additional transport costs for Syria.

&gt, Massive infrastructure projects may offer jobs for young males in the region, reducing turmoil. Untold riches will be brought to places where there hasn’t been genuine economic growth in years thanks to gas flowing continuous to Europe.

The advantages

If this technique works, the benefits for Trump—and US international policy—could be great:

Would it be a stretch to see a Trump-brokered Saudi-Israel standardization? What about a broader Middle East authority that integrates Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, Saudi, the UAE and Qatar into a local financial alliance?

Plus, this would switch Russia out of Europe’s energy structure for a generation – an huge earn for America. Selling gas to Europe&nbsp, could&nbsp, facilitate all of this.

Trump’s decision to remove Palestinians from Gaza may seem extreme. But when viewed through the lens of energy strategy, it makes more sense.

We’ll see if his administration can pull off one of the most nuanced foreign policy decisions in US history.

This article originally appeared on Resource Wars, and it has since been republished with permission. Read the original here.

Continue Reading

Petronas-Sarawak gas dispute: LNG excluded in terms agreed by PM Anwar and state premier, says law minister

By:
On:
In: Asia

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia’s national oil company Petronas ‘ recognition of Sarawak government-owned Petros as the state’s gas aggregator excludes liquified natural gas ( LNG ), the government disclosed on Tuesday ( Feb 4).

In a parliamentary response, Azalina Othman Said, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department ( Law and Institutional Reform ), said that this is one of the terms of the agreement between Petronas and Sarawak regarding the east Malaysia state’s efforts to have more control over its oil and gas resources.

She added that the deal was reached at a Jan. 7 conference between Sarawak top Abang Johari Openg and excellent secretary Anwar Ibrahim.

Since July of last year, Petronas and Petros have been in discussions to overcome state disputes involving gas distribution rights.

Under Malaysia’s Petroleum Development Act ( PDA ) 1974, Petronas has exclusive control over exploration and distribution of the country’s oil and gas resources.

But in February 2024, Sarawak appointed Petros, or Petroleum Sarawak Berhad, as the state’s only oil aggregate under its Supply of Gas Ordinance 2016. Under Sarawak’s state laws, a oil aggregate procures natural oil for distribution or offer, and develops and maintains the country’s oil distribution system.

The northeast state accounts for about 90 % of Malaysia’s LNG imports, which has made a number of techniques to position itself as an economic superpower in Malaysia.

Malaysia was the nation’s fifth-largest supplier of LNG in 2023, according to the International Gas Union’s World LNG Report 2024.

Chong Chieng Jen, a member of Parliament who represents the Stampin district in Sarawak, posed a problem to Azalina.

He had inquired about the specifics of the terms of the agreement between Petronas and Sarawak regarding Sarawak’s right to the oil and gas that the condition extracts.

PETRONAS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO Obtain A LICENCE IN SARAWAK

Anwar Ibrahim, the prime minister of Malaysia, last month expressed confidence that the Petronas and Petros troubles had been resolved.

Continue Reading

Five ways China is hitting back against US tariffs

By:
On:
In: Asia
21 days ago
Michael Race

Business columnist, BBC News

Getty Images A gantry crane lifts containers at the Nanchang International Dry Port in Nanchang, Jiangxi province, ChinaGetty Images

After China responded to the US’s individual implementation of tariffs with steps of its own, the trade war between the world’s two largest economies has gotten worse.

Following President Donald Trump’s blanket 10 % tax on all Chinese goods into the US, Beijing has set out to target particular American items with retaliatory income, among other steps.

This most recent tit-for-tat builds on the ongoing trade dispute between the countries, with tariffs having previously been imposed and threatened on a number of products since 2018.

A package may still be struck because Trump has stated he intends to speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping. What might the impact remain if China launches its response as planned on February 10th?

Fuel, oil and gas

Getty Images Vehicles transfer coal at the coal terminal of Lianyungang Port in Lianyungang, in eastern China's Jiangsu provinceGetty Images

Trump’s tariffs have caused China to impose import taxes of its own on US coal and liquefied natural gas ( LNG ) of 10 %, as well as a 15 % sur crude oil.

Businesses wanting to buy fossil fuels from the US would have to pay the tax as a result of Beijing’s answer.

China is the world’s largest supplier of fuel, but it gets most of it from Indonesia, although Russia, Australia and Mongolia are also among its suppliers.

When it comes to the US, China has been increasing exports of LNG from the state, with levels almost double 2018 rates, according to Chinese customs information.

However, its overall trade in fossil fuels is reasonable, with US imports accounting for only 1.7 % of China’s full crude oil purchased from abroad in 2023. This suggests that China’s dependence on the US may be low, and the effects of the taxes might be low.

As the Kremlin tries to finance its war work, China may easily obtain more products from Russia, according to Rebecca Harding, a business analyst and chief executive of the Centre for Economic Security think container.

On the flipside, the US is the nation’s largest LNG supplier, and so has lots of other customers, especially the UK and the European Union.

Agricultural technology, pick-up cars and big cars

As well as fuel, China has slapped a 10 % tariff on agricultural machinery, pick-up trucks, and some large cars.

However, China does not import a lot of US pick-ups and goods, therefore a 10 % tax on an already sizable number of exports would not be too harsh on consumers. It imports the majority of its cars from Europe and Japan.

China has increased opportunities in farm equipment in recent years to boost production, lower import dependence, and increase its food safety.

Therefore, it might be a new strategy to try to boost domestic market by imposing tariffs on agricultural technology.

Julian Evans-Pritchard, brain of China finance at firm Capital Economics, said all the price measures were “fairly reasonable, at least equivalent to US moves”.

He suggests that China’s targeted goods represent about$ 20bn ( £16bn ) worth of annual imports- around 12 % of China’s total imports from the US.

This is a significant improvement over the US’s US-targeted$ 450 billion in Chinese products.

However, he claimed that China had” clearly been calibrated to try to send a message to the US]and domestic audiences ] without causing too much damage.”

Google spacecraft

Additionally, the Chinese government has made some non-tariff announcements, one of which is an anti-monopoly research into US software giant Google.

It is questionable what the inspection will require, but for environment, Google’s search providers have been blocked in China since 2010.

The company continues to operate in the country by offering apps and games to Chinese markets through collaboration with local developers.

But China simply generates about 1 % of Google’s world income, which suggests if it cut ties fully with the land, it wouldn’t be much worse off.

Calvin Klein added to the list of “unreliable institutions.”

Getty Images Calvin Klein jeans of different styles hung up in a row on pegsGetty Images

China has listed PVH, the British business that operates Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, as its so-called “unreliable object” record and accused them of “discriminatory actions against Chinese companies.”

The record, which has different US companies on it, was created in 2020 by Beijing amid the heating up of business conflicts.

For Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, being on China’s record may make it harder to accomplish business in the country. They may experience restrictions, including charges, and having the work visa of their international staff revoked.

Officials will also go to companies of the companies to evaluate procedures, according to Andreas Schotter, teacher of global business at Western University in Ontario, Canada.

The US has its own “entity list,” which forbids a number of organizations from purchasing goods from US businesses without Washington’s approval.

” China is retaliating in the same way that President Trump accuses Chinese businesses.” This is all a result of US-China’s de-coupling, Prof. Schotter continued.

Export controls on rare metals

While tariffs have been imposed on businesses that import products from abroad, China has also imposed export controls on 25 rare metals.

For a lot of electrical products and military equipment, some metals are essential components.

China has mastered the art of producing almost 90 % of the world’s refined metals.

Wormwood, a scarce resource for the aerospace sector, is included in the restricted list.

While there are restrictions on exports, Mr Evans-Pritchard of Capital Economics, said it was notable that the critical metals China imports from the US, which are used to make high-end chips, semiconductor machinery, pharmaceuticals and aerospace equipment were not targeted in any measures.

Exports will decline sharply as a result of previous rounds of restrictions, which have been proven to be costly. Companies must now scramble to obtain licenses, a procedure that takes several weeks.

When it comes to the impact of the restrictions, it appears the US has a plan. Trump stated on Monday that he wanted Ukraine to provide more rare earth metals in exchange for$ 300 billion in support of Russia’s campaign.

Continue Reading

‘Tactical move’: China’s WTO gambit over US tariffs more about optics than outcomes

By:
On:
In: Asia

SHIFTING Techniques

Experts claim that China’s most recent reply to Trump’s taxes is a calculated change from its strategy in 2018, when Beijing imposed punitive tariffs after Washington fired the first shot.

A full-blown business battle ensued, hurting consumers and businesses in and beyond the country’s leading two economy, with its influence still lingering now.

This day, China has held off, although officials have warned that” related measures” will be taken to protect the country’s rights and interests.

Roberts from the Atlantic Council stated that Beijing is attempting to avoid a clear intensification with the US, especially given that it struggles with local monetary issues like poor consumer spending and concerns about local debt.

Imports and investment is only spur economic growth, according to Roberts, and I believe that this is a sign that China does not want this to increase further. They aren’t ready to engage in a cool conflict with the US at this time.

According to Olson of the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, going down the WTO path and halting retribution is a “tactical shift” that allows China to determine how Trump’s tariffs affect Canada and Mexico.

According to researchers, it also leaves Beijing with some room to negotiate a deal with Trump while also preventing the worst US taxes.

Weeks before Trump took office, he had what he described as a “good, friendly” telephone contact with Xi, who the businessman-turned-president invited to his opening.

When asked if he could reach a deal with China over fair business practices, Trump said in an interview with Fox News on January 23 that he could do so. The US leader then followed up by saying he would “rather not” use tariffs against China, but called it ( tariffs ) a” tremendous power”.

Trump said in a statement to reporters at the Oval Office on February 3 that the proposed 10 % blanket tariffs on Chinese goods would only be” an opening salvo.”

” If we can’t create a bargain with China, then the taxes would be very, very substantial”, he said.

In light of this, watch carefully what Trump and Xi will be having in store for the upcoming meeting.

Continue Reading