Waack Girls: Indian show renews interest in 1970s dance style from America’s gay clubs

A woman dances in front of the camera while the glittering tassel on her gown shiver and sway in response to her movements.

But it’s her wings that get the light, they storm, roll and punch through the atmosphere at breath-taking speed, almost like the blade of a lover.

Waack Ladies, a crisis centered around six women who learn a new party technique to get their state’s primary all-female waacking crew, is currently available on Amazon Prime Video.

Not many people are aware of the party, so the ladies must struggle ferociously to be taken seriously by culture and their families. Waacking, however, ultimately becomes the product that endures.

The line, which was produced by Sooni Taraporevala, came out at a time when some American cities, both large and small, are showing renewed interest in waacking.

About why she created the line, Taraporevala says,” I was fascinated by the importance of self-expression.”

In a number of cities, global waacking traditions are visiting the country to tell the party, and underground waacking jam, where performers battle it out with their techniques, are mushrooming.

Recently, Archie Burnett, who was a league dance in New York in the 1970s and 80s and is a recognized number in the waacking area, visited India for a jelly.

Dancers hope the website series will increase awareness of waacking in the nation and demonstrate that there is more to dancing than just traditional dance, hip-hop, and Bollywood.

Waacking has a history that is rooted in the liberation championed by dance music and the LGBTQ emancipation motion.

In the 1970s, when there was a lot of shame associated with homosexuality, the dancing type started to appear in Los Angeles queer venues. Gay people reacted to the love and bias they experienced by waacking to show themselves on the dance floor.

Thus, the dancing style developed swift, strong and aggressive movements- much like how action heroes in humorous books hit up their villains, accompanied by sound-effects like “ka-pow” and “bam”.

” Waacking comes from the phonetic word’ slap’ and is suggestive of]the results ] found in humorous publications”, says Tejasvi Patil, a Mumbai-based performer who has been waacking for more than a decade.

The Hollywood drama and its glamorous leading ladies served as inspiration for the dance style. Waacking is characterized by dramatic poses, quick footwork, and striking arm movements, but dancers have continued to add new steps to the list because celebrating individuality and self-expression are at the heart of the movement.

And because of its core ethos, waacking continues to be a tool of empowerment and self-expression for India’s LGBTQ community.

Ayushi Amrute, who has been hosting Red Bull’s Your House Is Waack, a waacking jam for dancers across the nation, says that “many people explore their sexual identity through the dance style because it allows for introspection and expression.

Another crucial factor is that the waacking community makes an effort to be a safe haven for people to express themselves, she continues.

When her dance instructor introduced her to waacking, the art was largely unknown in India. She was advised by her teacher to research the style and research dancers from abroad.

” We ] the few Indian dancers who began waacking over a decade ago ] learned waacking the hard way by conducting our own research, studying the art form’s history, and connecting with dancers in nations where waacking was well-liked,” says Amrute.

Patil recalls having the same experience with waacking. However, today’s circumstances are remarkably different. The dance style has grown in popularity over the past five or so years, with more children taking classes to learn it.

Patil, who teaches dance, says that she encourages her students to stay true to the ethos of the style- unabashed self-expression.

When it comes to music, India is still finding its soundscape for the style, she adds. Popular today are songs by American popstar Diana Ross and disco king Donna Summer, as are Staying Alive songs from the year 1983.

Bollywood also had its own disco era, with songs like Koi Yahan Nache Nache and Aap Jaisa Koi dominating the 1980s chart-topping charts, but they don’t frequently find their way in today’s waacking jams.

In order to produce an album of original soundtracks for Waackers in India, Taraporevala partnered with independent artists to produce an album for the Waacker Girls. Patil claims this has resulted in a brand-new and promising soundscape for waackers in India.

” I believe the moment is right for people to fully embrace who they are,” Patil says,” and waacking is the ideal platform to showcase what you find.”

Continue Reading

Bangladesh-Pakistan thaw to redraw South Asia’s power map – Asia Times

Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif saw an opportunity to revive generally strained relationships just days after Sheikh Hasina’s withdrawal and Muhammad Yunus ‘ appointment as Bangladesh’s time chief executive.

Both officials have met half in the last few weeks, opening the way for a political reset with significant implications for South Asia’s politics, following a rare hot conversation between Islamabad and Dhaka.

Bangladesh has acted to end a specific security area at Dhaka Airport for Pakistani people, waived the need for physical inspection of packages, and welcomed the first strong cargo ship to dock at Chittagong Port from Pakistan.

These actions suggest a major heat trend. Pakistan and Bangladesh were after a single country before they split up following a terrible conflict in 1971. Since therefore, Bangladesh has developed stronger relations with neighboring India, Pakistan’s historic enemy.

Even though Pakistan officially recognized Bangladesh in 1974, the historical repercussions of the separation of East Pakistan in 1971 have long persisted in diplomatic relations, with persistently conflicted political and historical narratives also periodically stoking conflicts.

Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Hasina’s parents, played a vital role in the isolation of Bangladesh, a tradition that added challenges to diplomatic relations. Sheikh Hasina’s relationship to India may have been influenced by that past.

However, Hasina’s ties with Islamabad were somewhat strained. Pakistan, which saw the tests when politically motivated, drew the ire of its own leaders from the Jamaat-e-Islami Party’s murder on conflict murder charges for events relating to 1971. In 2016, both countries expelled officials, more souring relationships.

On December 19, Sharif and Yunus met on the outside of the D-8 event in Cairo, Egypt, for their next meeting, taking place in New York City since September.

In Cairo, the two leaders expressed” satisfaction]with ] the increasing frequency of high-level contacts”, Sharif’s office said in a statement.

He expressed Pakistan’s “keen wish to increase bilateral cooperation, particularly in the areas of industry, people-to-people connections and social exchanges”.

In particular, Sharif mentioned the option for “new avenues of monetary cooperation” and industry in chemicals, concrete clinkers, medical goods, leather goods and the IT sector.

But, reflecting past scars, Yunus urged Sharif to” live the problems of 1971 to support Dhaka proceed forward with its relationship”, the Bangladesh official news agency reported.

” The issues have kept coming up,” he continued. Let’s settle those issues for us to move forward”, he told Sharif. It would be nice to resolve things “once and for all for the future generations”, Yunus said. &nbsp,

Before Hasina came to power in 1996, Dhaka had never previously requested an apology from Islamabad for the “genocide” committed during its war of independence.

In response, Pakistan only described the events as “regrettable” during former military dictator General Pervez Musharraf’s visit to Dhaka in July 2002.

Sharif informed his federal cabinet that his nation was beginning a new chapter of its relationship with Bangladesh upon returning from Egypt after a “positive engagement” in Cairo.

Additionally, he made the announcement that a high-level delegation would travel to Dhaka in February of next year, a ephemeral visit that might alter the dynamics of South Asian alliances.

Regional reset

India appears to be the biggest geopolitical loser as Islamabad and Dhaka get closer as a result of Hasina’s fall, with once-friendly relations experiencing significant decline in recent months.

Hasina maintained a complex relationship with India throughout her tenure. That included a rail connectivity agreement, which would enable India to transport goods to its far-off-the-beaten-path states using Bangladesh’s rail network.

Additionally, Bangladesh approved India’s request to send experts to assess the Teesta River Project, a key bilateral water-sharing initiative.

However, following her ouster amid violent protests, Hasina fled to New Delhi to seek refuge. Since then, Bangladesh has formally requested India’s assistance in extraditing Hasina from court proceedings.

India has acknowledged the request, but it has not provided any additional information, highlighting that Hasina is staying in India for safety reasons.

When protests began against Hasina, she was in China, which has deep and wide ties to Dhaka’s defense establishment, having supplied 72 % of Bangladesh’s military equipment.

The modernization of Bangladesh’s military under the” Forces Goal 2030” has the potential to boost Chinese arms imports further.

As she aimed to strengthen ties with China, Hasina made sure to avoid alienating India while attempting to maintain a strategic balance between the two geopolitical rivals.

However, unlike its relations with India, Bangladesh’s ties with China appear unchanged in the transition from Hasina to Yunus. Yunus was quickly welcomed as the interim leader in Beijing.

On the UNGA in New York in September, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi made a call to Yunus. That same month, Beijing’s ambassador to Bangladesh Yao Wen also called on Yunus.

” No matter what changes have taken place in the domestic situation of Bangladesh, China’s commitment to develop China-Bangladesh relations remains unchanged”, Yao said.

In addition to their conversation, Yunus and Sharif discussed reviving the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation ( SAARC ), a multilateral body that hasn’t held a summit since 2014.

The last summit took place in Nepal, while the planned 2016 summit in Pakistan was canceled after India, Bangladesh, Bhutan and Afghanistan chose not to participate under Delhi’s influence.

” I am a big fan of the idea of SAARC. I keep harping on the issue. Even if the summit is just for a photo session, Yunus said,” I want a summit of SAARC leaders because it will convey a powerful message.”

Continue Reading

Sweeping Vietnam internet law comes into force

BANGKOK: In what critics claim is the most recent attack on freedom of expression, new Vietnamese internet rules that require Facebook and TikTok to verify user identities and hand over data to authorities came into effect on Wednesday ( Dec 25 ). All tech companies operating in Vietnam are requiredContinue Reading

YouTube populists driving South Korea’s political instability – Asia Times

In the past three weeks, South Korea has experienced a brief period of military rules, its abrupt reform, and Yoon Suk Yeol’s senate.

One underrated driver of the current crisis is the increase of YouTube-based agitators, activists and influencers, who both profit from and power a new brand of populism. South Korea has a severe impact, but the pattern is widespread.

An exceedingly online electorate

In South Korea’s 2022 poll, Yoon trailed his opposition for much of the plan. His intense populist policies attracted some help, but he appeared to be going to fail.

Then he discovered a novel district: a group of passionate young people who are passionate about abolition of the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family. These protestors used platforms like YouTube and others to transmit their ideas.

This demographic, in addition to traditional liberal voters, allowed Yoon to get a close election and retain control of South Korea’s most potent social position. The female department was then formally overthrown, and he claimed architectural discrimination was” a thing of the past.”

Yoon issued arrest warrants for a number of his alleged political competitors after gaining strength. Among these was Kim Eo-Jun, a vital and aggressive YouTube blogger, and a controversial populist find tied to progressive politics. Kim’s regular videos send millions of active followers reports, guest appearances, and sleazy commentary.

We’ve come to terms with the notion that social media platforms influencing political processes by promoting specific content and spreading reports and analysis. However, the rising social acclaim of platform actors like Kim suggests that the impact is becoming more clear.

Populist systems

Social media platforms give access to a wide range of news and media producers, from established newspapers to separate commentators at the most extremes of the social spectrum. However, not all of the information gets similar interest.

Research indicates that fake news receives more loves and interactions than factual information, at least in South Korea. ” Real information” tends to collect dislikes and scorn.

More recent research from South Korea indicates that people may contempt political decisions or groups on platforms to find out conspiracy theories. Customers are also infamously primary against issues like women’s rights.

South Korea is just one of these issues. International trends exist in populist and controversial news and analysis.

Traditional news media’s reputation is declining, in part because of concerns that it is associated with prominent and elite figures. These concerns are frequently confirmed by social media influencers who are attempting to get the new view leaders.

Online celebrities are fantastic tools for populist politicians. They have personal contacts with their viewers, tend to suggest straightforward solutions, and often resist responsibilities and fact-checking.

Platforms are frequently more likely to persuade viewers to watch controversial and perhaps radical content, eroding otherwise more balanced content.

Nevertheless, these polarising numbers are not alone in these areas. Native editors and outsiders are adapting to systems while maintaining accuracy of information.

On YouTube, past major journalists, such as Australia’s Michael West and the British Phil Edwards, have amassed followings while blending private and informal articles with more standard journalism.

Non-journalists, such as Money &amp, Macro and the English Tom Nicholas, have expanded their control through adopting some main editorial techniques. With the help of their numerous viewers, they create articles that investigates, explores, and explains current affairs reports and evaluation.

These YouTube news influencers demonstrate how literary content can help the new news media ecosystem and draw huge audiences without relying on nationalist and polarizing content.

Newsfluencers” producing news on systems, such as YouTube, tailor their information to the norms of the websites.

Newsfluencers and the upcoming

Newsmakers frequently shoot in casual settings rather than conventional models, and they establish a friendly rapport with their viewers. They utilize “authenticity”, going out of their approach to “avoid looking like smooth business media”.

Their many revenue channels include ads, sponsors, product and, most importantly, primary audience contributions. These efforts may be made through members or through third-party programs like Patreon and Substack.

Even major media outlets have begun to follow YouTuber guidelines, including ABC from Australia. The current matters radio If You’re Listening, for instance, significantly outperforms traditional written material because of its everyday style and focus on giving the visitors what it wants while being produced under the canopy of the national presenter.

YouTube channels in South Korea like VoiceOfSeoul use avenue reporting, casual talk-show panels, and investigative reporting to combine road coverage. Video and breaking news styles are combined on OhMyTV, which includes links for individual donations and sponsorships.

Legacy advertising like KBS maintains a strong following through TV and site websites like Naver at the same time. KBS’s traditional format, but, struggles to maintain viewership on these extremely popular platforms, where these innovative journalists have succeeded.

On YouTube and other related websites, there is a distinct place for news. But, it will need to adjust. The moment may be nearing when program journalism is essential for democracy, as the North Korean experience demonstrates.

Timothy Koskie is doctoral researcher, School of Media and Communications, University of Sydney and Christopher James Hall is PhD Researcher, Centre for Media Transition, University of Technology Sydney

The Conversation has republished this essay under a Creative Commons license. Read the original post.

Continue Reading

Trump tariffs as confrontation, deterrence and art of the deal – Asia Times

The next day Donald Trump was US senator, he entered trade war with China and Europe. But despite his bombast and taxes, the US trade deficit did not improve.

In fact, it deteriorated from US$ 195 billion in the first quarter of 2017 to$ 260 billion in the same period of 2021.

A number of selected items were subject to the Trump tariffs, which were set at a maximum of 25 %. However, his current strategy seems to be that the US will impose tariffs of 10 % or 20 % on the majority of imported goods. Taxes in Canada and Mexico could be 25 %, and tariffs on Chinese goods could be 60 %.

This revision appears to be drastically different from the previous one. What are the potential cases for the US, the UK, and the world economy then?

Situation 1: Fight

Taking the president-elect’s expression to the email, if Trump stands his ground on across-the-board taxes one effect may be that the US market faces higher costs because of more expensive goods. The desire for US-produced goods may rise, which will probably result in higher domestic wages and a spiraling inflationary trend.

It is not difficult to imagine the US market accelerating. But, there are also opposing causes. Higher taxes and significant US investment are likely to cause the money to rise, resulting in imports becoming less expensive at the frontier before tariffs are imposed. This may eat away at prices.

The common sector’s claim of massive layoffs may also lessen the strain on the job market. Technology advancement, such as the press for autonomous vehicles, might also have an impact.

Lastly, easing environmental laws in the energy industry and potential serenity with Russia and perhaps even the Middle East could increase energy prices.

Scenario 2: The art of the bargain

Donald Trump’s interpersonal elections are well-known. This translates to being unburdened by the foreign regulations that have guided global industry since the Second World War.

This trend is further heightened by the election of Scott Bessent as treasury secretary. In his thoughts, taxes are a” sanctions resource” in wider political and economic game.

In trade for a wide range of possible concessions, the US good dangles somewhat attractive terms to get its business in a good scenario for potential trade relations with the rest of the world. These might include more options for US investment or exports, as well as a stronger political position and significant US investment.

Nevertheless, supply chains could undergo significant restructuring, with imports from the most effective nations being replaced by less efficient ones. This may lower the US’s trade deficit with China while reducing its trade imbalance with the EU, UK, Mexico, and Canada.

May these agreements been extended to China, and likely China accept them? is a looming question. If not, it is possible to see two economical alliances, one centered on China and the other centered on the US.

Scenario 3: Punishment

In a second – undoubtedly doubtful situation, the Chinese government may recognize US demands to adjust their bilateral deal imbalance in the belief that the moment is not yet right to challenge US supremacy.

Maintaining an export-led development design, building power, breaking into international markets and only sitting out the Trump administration may be China’s best plan. The Chinese authorities would have to consent to larger and more quickly purchased American-made goods and services than the previous arrangement between the Trump and Xi governments.

chess pieces and us and chinese currency
China will have to carefully consider its second step. Pla2na/Shutterstock

But what about the UK and Europe? UK export to the US may face a 20 % tariff, reducing profits and impacting on those British suppliers exporting goods the US buys, like medicine or equipment, for example. The UK will have to decide whether to fight and impose levies on US products. And if so, at what levels?

The UK’s objectives are not in conflict with the US, but what will happen then will depend on the demands the Trump administration makes. In the event that regional trade blocs emerge as a result of various nations ‘ hostile actions, there is already talk about whether the UK should choose the US or the EU.

Although there will be a significant difference, the consequences may be comparable for the EU. The EU as a whole has a similar-sized business to the US and its own business plan. The EU and US are thus strongly motivated to launch retribution and a business battle.

The UK may find it more difficult if the EU decides to proceed in that direction. In this situation, the English may later need to choose a part. It would have to decide between its unique partnership with the US and a more decline in trade with the EU, which is its closest marketplace. Or it would have to choose to become more politically and economically connected to the EU.

Unfortunately, when countries close their borders to business, they are also – apparently mistakenly – readying themselves for fight.

Agelos Delis is senior teacher in finance, Aston University and Sami Bensassi is audience in trade and development finance, University of Birmingham

This content was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original content.

Continue Reading

All the power in God-Emperor Elon Musk’s hands – Asia Times

The US social structure was &nbsp, designed by its founders&nbsp, to have a system of checks and balances, so that no individual or organization would have total energy.

But that system was designed with only&nbsp, government&nbsp, leaders and&nbsp, government&nbsp, institutions in brain — although the founders did care about private individuals controlling the authorities, this wasn’t their primary focus, and they eventually ended up declining to throw institutions in place precisely to guard against financial power. &nbsp,

James Madison believed, for instance, that the governmental system of the US state was protection much against little cabals of rich oligarchs. In recent years, especially in the wake of the Supreme Court ‘s&nbsp, Citizens United&nbsp, choice, some have voiced concerns that the US has become an elite, where wealthy people are capable of buying power and influence — either by plan efforts, lobbying, or other means.

These issues came mostly from the liberal left, who&nbsp, generally claimed&nbsp, that the US has become an aristocracy. However, many on the right were also concerned about George Soros and other democratic entrepreneurs ‘ effect.

But the studies backing up the “oligarchy” state was &nbsp, very uneven and weak&nbsp, — in reality, most political researchers found that coverage in the US tends to connect strongly with the objectives of the center class. And common problem was vague and scattered — Americans will tell you that their financial program “unfairly favors the strong interests”, but this could mean something, and most Americans&nbsp, are no concerned&nbsp, about the prosperity of billionaires.

Yet in the past week, we have witnessed a single wealthy man making important decisions in real time regarding US national government policy. In order for the US federal government to spend money, it has to pass “appropriations” bills. There are always big fights over those bills, so sometimes they just pass a” continuing resolution” to keep spending going.

If the CR doesn’t pass, the government shuts down, and its employees— including the people in the US Military — stop getting paychecks. In a number of instances over the past three decades, the party in charge has threatened to refuse to pass a bill and impose austerity on the government, or worse, to exceed the “debt ceiling,” which prevents the government from borrowing money.

Elon Musk, president Trump’s most significant donor and political ally, and the owner of one of the largest social media networks, had a different take on the most recent CR. Musk&nbsp, launched an all-out attack&nbsp, on the resolution:

Musk, who&nbsp, spent more than US$ 250 million &nbsp, getting Trump elected, posted about his opposition to the original spending deal well over 100 times over the past two days, with threats to fund primary challenges to anyone who voted for the plan, which was six weeks in the making.

Any member of the House or Senate who supports this outrageous spending bill should be re-elected in two years! Musk was posted on X on Wednesday afternoon.

Later in the day, Trump himself&nbsp, came out against it, making it clear the bill was done.

What’s interesting about this is that&nbsp, everyone&nbsp, seems to&nbsp, agree&nbsp, that it was Musk, not Trump, who torpedoed the CR. &nbsp, Fox News reports:

After Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy allegedly engaged in congressional discussions regarding government funding, some House Republicans are privately expressing their anger.

If Elon and Vivek are freelancing and shooting off the hip without working with [President-elect Trump], according to a second GOP lawmaker, they are getting dangerously close to undermining the actual 47th President of the United States.

Overheated rhetoric is common, so we shouldn’t take this as gospel. And it’s also worth noting that Musk&nbsp, approved&nbsp, of a modified CR, but that one was torpedoed by conservatives in Congress. Also, &nbsp, Musk’s threat&nbsp, to primary anyone in Congress who voted against the approval of Matt Gaetz wasn’t enough to keep Gaetz from withdrawing. So Musk actually isn’t the all-powerful emperor he’s depicted as in the header image of this post — at least, not yet.

But it’s undeniable that Musk has influence that goes far beyond that of any typical super-rich political influencer. He’s not just the owner of X but its poster-in-chief, who manipulates the platform’s algorithm to&nbsp, show everyone his own tweets&nbsp, first and foremost.

Additionally, he is the owner of SpaceX, which the US government largely depends on for its entire space program. And he’s more or less the leader of&nbsp, a right-wing faction in the tech industry &nbsp, that has become a key Republican constituency over the last election cycle.

Therefore, Musk has a lot of extremely powerful tools for directly influencing American policies. He has the authority to threaten to primary any Republican who deviates from his personal goals ( and frequently does ). He has the power to launch right-wing instant mobs on X to attack any Republican who floutes his rules.

He can ( and does ) dump hundreds of millions into elections. He could probably use SpaceX’s government contracts as leverage as well, if he chose. And with Donald Trump, the oldest President ever elected, clearly in his final years, Elon’s energy and activity level frequently make him the ideal stand-in.

It’s clear to both foreign and domestic leaders where the power is in the incoming U.S. regime, but this isn’t just supposition on my part. House Speaker Mike Johnson&nbsp, called up both Trump and Musk&nbsp, to try to get a CR passed. And Musk now&nbsp, regularly accompanies Trump&nbsp, to his meetings with foreign heads of state. The American public as a whole is now accepting this reality after watching Musk kill the continuing resolution.

What does it mean for the nation to have so much of the government’s power firmly rooted in the hands of a single, unelected private individual? It’s hard to say.

There may be some historical precedents here, as Mark Hanna had a significant influence in the McKinley administration and William Randolph Hearst’s control of the print media terrified politicians over a century ago. Various industrial-age tycoons wielded a lot of influence in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Fox News was created by Rupert Murdoch. But Musk’s clout may eclipse them all — X is a new kind of media, Trump is a different kind of President, and so on.

Many in the tech sector I know are enthralled by Elon’s authority. But I believe that this is scary for many regular Americans because they won’t be able to trust Elon to do the right thing, as many other tech professionals do. To see this, let’s do a thought exercise: What if Elon were evil?

Imagining” Evil Elon”

In a post back in October, I wrote that America’s future could hinge on whether Elon Musk decides to play the superhero or the supervillain.

Musk’s friends and confidantes expect the former. They probably know him as a reasonable guy — a&nbsp, Reaganite&nbsp, conservative who was &nbsp, driven to the center-right&nbsp, by the excesses of wokeness, who loves&nbsp, free speech&nbsp, and free enterprise and small government and responsible fiscal and monetary policy and&nbsp, peace between nations, who wants to bring human civilization to Mars and accelerate tech progress and so on.

Let’s refer to this variation of Elon as” Real Elon.”

However, one might also think of Elon, who lives in the fervent imaginations of his foes. Let us call this” Evil Elon”. Regular people, observing Elon’s actions in the public sphere, can’t always tell the difference between Real Elon and this fantasy supervillain.

Whereas Real Elon opposed the CR because of concerns over government spending and legislative complexity, Evil Elon opposed it because it contained national security provisions that&nbsp, would have nixed&nbsp, some of Tesla ‘s&nbsp, planned investments in China:

Cynics note&nbsp that Elon supported’s shorter replacement CR would have actually spent more money than the one Elon killed, with the main difference being that the replacement CR didn’t have restrictions on US investment in China:

Real Elon is a consistent and dedicated ally of the Chinese Communist Party, despite his admiration for individual freedoms and capitalism. When Real Elon calls for Taiwan to become a” special administrative zone” of China, he does it because he likes authoritarian rule and because the Chinese Communist Party has paid him off. Evil Elon does it because he wants to avoid World War 3.

On Ukraine, similar, Real Elon&nbsp, just wants to end the conflict&nbsp, and stop more Ukrainians from dying. After all, Russia is strong and determined enough to almost certainly hold onto a piece of Ukraine at the end of the conflict. So why not just trade land for peace and be done with it?

However, Evil Elon, who shares his sympathies with authoritarian rulers in general, wants Putin to succeed. No one is aware of what Elon and Putin discussed in their frequent conversations since 2022. However, Evil Elon’s supporters believe they conspired to smuggle the Russians into the conflict.

Real Elon and Real Elon both accused Vindman of treason and threatened him with” the appropriate penalty” because we all get upset on social media and like to rippling people who criticize us. However, Vindman was right when Evil Elon did it.

When Real Elon&nbsp, declared his support&nbsp, for the German far-right party AfD, it was because he saw Germany spinning into&nbsp, industrial decline&nbsp, and suffering from an immigration policy that failed to exclude&nbsp, violent criminals. But Evil Elon did it because he likes that AfD is&nbsp, vocally pro-Putin&nbsp, and&nbsp, pro-CCP.

In fact, believers in Evil Elon suspect that his support for AfD might also be due to the whiff of&nbsp, Nazi apologia&nbsp, and&nbsp, antisemitism&nbsp, that hang around some of the party’s candidates. Real Elon is a stand-up guy — when he agreed with a tweet about Jewish communities pushing anti-White hatred, he&nbsp, publicly apologized, declaring it the worst tweet he’s ever done, and declaring himself a “philosemite”. And when Real Elon accidentally endorsed a Tucker Carlson interview with a Hitler apologist, he&nbsp, quickly deleted the endorsement&nbsp, once he realized what it actually contained.

However, those who believe in Evil Elon believe that these are just the kind of public relations stunts a supervillain would employ to cover his tracks. They worry that the massive wave of antisemitism that has swept X&nbsp since Elon took control is the result of deliberate boosting rather than just the unavoidable result of more indulgent moderation policies combined with the response to the Gaza war. 1&nbsp, They do not buy&nbsp, Real Elon’s protests&nbsp, that other platforms have even more antisemitism.

And so on. Essentially, Evil Elon is a somewhat cartoonish supervillain, who wants to set himself up as the ruler of one of three great dictatorships, ruling the world with an iron fist alongside his allies Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin — a new&nbsp, Metternich System&nbsp, to enshrine right-wing values and crack down on wokeness and progressivism and obstreperous minorities all over the world.

I had Grok draw this new Metternich System for fun, and the end result was pretty good. I feel like I have to share it:

Art by Grok

But anyway, the point here is that when normal Americans look at Elon and his words and deeds, they can’t be 100 % certain that he ‘s&nbsp, not&nbsp, Evil Elon. A few progressives will be very convinced that he&nbsp, is&nbsp, actually evil, but I think most people will simply wonder and be uneasy. Evil Elon will continue to exist in a sort of quantum superposition with Real Elon in their minds — a Schrödinger’s oligarch who will&nbsp, probably&nbsp, turn out to have been a good guy all along, but&nbsp, might&nbsp, ultimately turn out to have been very bad from day 1.

And that will scare them. In fact, all powerful people have this same property— even some of the people who voted for them didn’t entirely trust Bill Clinton, George Bush, Barack Obama, and so on. &nbsp, Powerful people are simply inherently untrustworthy, because the consequences of misplacing your trust in them are so grave.

There have been checks and balances on these leaders for the majority of modern American history, which means that if they did prove to be bad, there would be plenty of institutions and opponents in place to limit the damage.

So who or what can check Elon’s power?

One flaw of the US political system, as I mentioned at the beginning of this post, is that there are few mechanisms in place to restrict the political influence of private actors. This is why some people worry about the U. S. becoming an oligarchy, especially in the years after&nbsp, Citizens United.

Up until now, I believe those worries have been unfounded because powerful figures like the Kochs, Soros, and Murdoch have, of course, had a hand in politics and some sort of canceled out each other. But in the age of X, SpaceX, and Trump, we may be looking at a very different situation.

Musk is a singular figure because he has already demonstrated himself to be the one who can create large, successful new high-tech manufacturing companies in the United States. He might also prove himself to be the one who can successfully convert a vast fortune and a corporate empire into effective dominance of US politics.

So who or what could balance out Elon’s power? Prior to his primary threats and online assaults, Congress appears prostrate. Trump may have fired and denounced him in 2017 as he did Steve Bannon, but that Trump has long since passed away. This Trump is aging, bedeviled, and abandoned by many of his former allies. Democrats are still dealing with the collapse of 2010s-era progressivism, and in a few days they will control zero branches of the federal government.

It’s possible that a bunch of&nbsp, other super-rich people&nbsp, will unite to balance out Musk. Although the idea of needing oligarchs to stop other oligarchs is not particularly appealing, it might be preferable. So far, though, even super-rich people who have had rivalries with Musk in the past&nbsp, seem inclined to bend the knee&nbsp, and live as best they can under the new regime.

What about the press? Traditional media — newspapers, TV, and radio — has declined steeply, &nbsp, replaced by social media. Musk&nbsp, owns one of America’s main news platforms&nbsp, ( and a second one, TikTok, is&nbsp, effectively controlled by the CCP). Meanwhile, more progressive media outlets still seem to be in a state of paralysis over conflicts with their activist staffers and their subscribers over Gaza, trans issues, and general election-related recriminations.

Ultimately, of course, power resides with the American people. Musk’s power comes from his ownership of capital, but the way he exercises it is fundamentally a&nbsp, democratic&nbsp, one — if he’s able to primary Congressional Republicans, it’s because his primary challengers are able to win votes, and if he’s able to start a rage-mob on X, it’s because people like what he says.

This means that if enough people get tired of Musk’s attempts to influence American politics, he’ll lose his influence. X is somewhat influential, but even with Musk’s algorithmic changes, it’s not a mind-control device, and it’s also&nbsp, <a href="https://mashable.com/article/elon-musk-x-declining-user-base-2025″>not actually that widely used. Musk is America’s most successful and successful entrepreneur, but even the most successful of men is powerless if he is turned down by the populace. 2&nbsp,

The fracas over the CR this week have a chance of alienating Musk because the American public has never liked shutdown brinksmanship. If Elon pulls a few more stunts, Trump’s second term could be defined by a protracted backlash against his overreach.

Vox populi, vox dei, as they say.

Notes

1. In reality, I have a third theory that claims that Russian and Chinese bots are the primary culprits of antisemitism in order to wedge American society. Right after the election, I’ve noticed that antisemitism largely vanished. This could have been attributable to an Elon crackdown.

2. I wouldn’t bet on it, though, but a few techlords might one day be able to use AI to rule the world in defiance of the vast majority of humanity.

This&nbsp, article&nbsp, was first published on Noah Smith’s Noahpinion&nbsp, Substack and is republished with kind permission. Become a Noahopinion&nbsp, subscriber&nbsp, here.

Continue Reading

Biden’s arms dump won’t ease Taiwan’s Trump trepidation – Asia Times

China has firmly objected to US President Joe Biden’s approval of Taiwan’s$ 571.3 million in security funding and service, accusing the country of “playing with fire” with its most recent donation of military equipment and services. &nbsp, &nbsp,

Individually, the US Defense Department announced that it approved$ 295 million fair of military equipment for Taipei in response to rising regional conflicts, which many people believe could become the center of global political conflicts with the anticipated ending of the Ukraine war under the approaching Donald Trump administration.

The$ 571 million in military assistance tops up Biden’s authorization of$ 567 million for the same purposes in late September. In October, He approved$ 2 billion in arms sales to Taiwan, including the first-time distribution of an advanced surface-to-air missile defense system.

A statement from the Chinese Foreign Ministry, which was released on Sunday ( December 22 ), urged the US to stop arming Taiwan and stop making what it called “dangerous moves that undermine peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.”

China’s largest maritime drills around Taiwan since 1996 have resulted in the most recent US military package, with the People’s Liberation Army ( PLA ) stationing more than 90 warships in nearby waters stretching from the East China Sea to the Taiwan Straits and South China Sea.

The Taiwanese foreign ministry stated in a statement that “taiwan and the United States will continue to work closely together on safety issues to preserve stability, peace, and the status quo across the Taiwan Strait.”

Due to the sensitivity of the situation, Taipei declined to provide information on the” content” of the assistance “based on the tacit agreement between Taiwan and the United States.”

The stakes don’t get higher. A lately released report by the US Pentagon has warned that China has “amplified” its full-spectrum force on Taiwan over the past month, underscoring Beijing’s danger to “reunify” the area with the island.

War drum

Xi Jinping, the country’s most powerful chief, apparently instructed the Army to be prepared to launch a successful conquest of Taiwan by 2027, if needed.

If Trump follows through on his pledge to impose 60 % tariffs on all Chinese products, a move that would put pressure on China’s now troubled economy and potential ruling Communist Party, as well. &nbsp,

If something, China is determined to create a “world-class” defense that can rival America’s by 2049. With a defence resources of$ 450 billion, China is well positioned to focus its extremely powerful army features on its own garden, such as the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait.

Now in possession of the world’s largest military, with as many as 395 battleforce ships to travel on vapor next year, China is also deploying&nbsp, DF-27 anti-ship nuclear missiles that could drastically harm America’s military presence in the Western Pacific, including the proper outpost of Guam. &nbsp,

Washington has the obligation to help prevent any forcible takeover of the self-ruling island nation in accordance with the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, despite adhering to a “one China” policy that calls for Beijing to be the diplomatic representative of the so-called” Greater China.”

Even if the two parties no longer have a mutual defense pact, Biden has repeatedly pledged to come to Taiwan’s defense in the event of a conflict with China.

However, there are some concerns about the incoming Trump administration’s desire to support Taiwan’s defense and even consider entering a potential grand bargain with China at the expense of Taiwan’s self-proclaimed sovereignty and regional partners ‘ security.

By signing a Reciprocal Access Agreement (RAA ), which would increase military interoperability and strengthen a joint response to any significant emergency in the area, including over Taiwan, US allies Japan and the Philippines have accordingly doubled down on their own defense cooperation.

Key regional players are hedging their bets ahead of a potentially disruptive second Trump presidency, while hoping for continuity in America’s China policy.

Far from a passive actor, Taiwan is preparing for all eventualities. The self-governing island nation is increasing its imports of cutting-edge American weapons systems after ratifying a record$ 20 billion defense budget in August.

This month, Taiwan received the first batch of 38 M1A2T Abrams tanks, underscoring its preparation for a possible all-out of war, including attrition warfare, in the near future.

Midway through December, the new American-made tanks were delivered to the Armor Training Command in Hsinchu County, southwest of Taipei. For next year, Taiwan is planning to allocate NTD70.6 billion ($ 2.2 billion ) for the acquisition of new US-made platforms.

Atop Taiwan’s shopping list, according to a proposal submitted by Taiwan’s legislature, are 100 Harpoon land-based missile systems, 66 F-16V fighter jets, 29 HIMARS rocket systems and a total of 108 M1A2T Abrams tanks.

” Taipei has signed contracts with the US for 21 procurement projects, totaling NT$ 716.6 billion, with final payments scheduled to be made in 2031″, Taiwan’s defense ministry said last month.

” Of this total, approximately NT$ 373.1 billion has already been paid, while NT$ 343.5 billion remains unpaid and will be disbursed according to the payment schedule”, the ministry added. Next year, Taiwan is allocating up to NT$ 70.6 billion on portable short-range air defense missiles and radar system upgrades.

Taiwan has historically adopted a “porcupine strategy,” which would significantly increase the cost of any full-scale invasion by the Asian superpower given its power asymmetry with China. &nbsp,

Thanks to Taiwan’s sophisticated industries, robust defense budget and acquisition of modern weapons systems from the West, some military experts have proposed a “honey badger” strategy, which relies on a more proactive and” smart” deployment of state-of-the-art platforms to foil any Chinese invasion.

A second Trump presidency, however, introduces new uncertainties to US support for that strategy. Trump has stated abundantly that he favors allies shouldering more of their own defense expenses and paying more for US “protection.”

In fairness, Trump’s first term is fondly remembered in Taipei, a period that saw a historic phone call between then-Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen and Trump, a rapid expansion in high-level contacts and joint visits, and Taipei’s purchase of$ 18 billion worth of US weapons,$ 4 billion more than the combined two terms of the Obama administration.

Trump is expected to take a more “isolationist” stance in light of rising public outcry in the United States over the massive funding of the Ukraine war, especially since he won’t be restrained by veteran and more multilateralist generals.

Trump has gone so far as to criticize Taiwan’s alleged underspending for its own defense throughout the year and has adopted more blatantly transactional language on foreign policy. ( Taiwan spends around 2.5 % of annual GDP on defense. ) Trump has referred to as” stupid” any military action that might lead to a war with China.

Trump stated in an interview earlier this year that he would “never say” whether America would stand by Taiwan and that he would maintain a” good relationship” with Chinese President Xi. ” I never say because I have to negotiate things ]with China ], right”? Trump stated this in an interview with Kristen Welker, a Meet the Press host on NBC.

Taiwan is reportedly cautious of the influence of influential figures in Trump’s plans, including billionaire Elon Musk, who has significant business interests in China. He has parodied Beijing’s position by calling Taiwan an “integral part of China.” &nbsp,

” I think most people are anxious…Because of Trump’s unpredictability, we don’t know if Taiwan will be safer or more dangerous under his second term”, Chen Ming-chi, a former senior advisor to Taiwan’s National Security Council, told the media.

Dealing with Trump

Likely to Trump’s liking, Taiwan is reportedly mulling a$ 15 billion weapons package in the coming years. But, according to a report by the Cato Institute, a Washington-based think tank, Taiwan has yet to receive$ 20.53 billion worth of military equipment from the US due to production and delivery delays. In the past year, the Pentagon has already been stretched by significant arms transfers to Israel and Ukraine.

According to prominent Taiwanese defense expert Shu Hsiao-Huang, an associate research fellow at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research,” some new equipment encountered integration issues, which required system adjustments to meet customer demands.” This was in response to competing demands from conflicts elsewhere, making it difficult to obtain key US-made weapons like Stinger missiles.

At the same time, US regional allies are also preparing for potential contingencies. Japan has consented to reorganize US forces in Japan into a larger joint force headquarters under the US Indo-Pacific Command ( INDOPACOM) in Hawaii.

A Joint Operations Command is also being established by the Japanese Self-Defense Forces ( JSDF) to better coordinate with the consolidated INDOPACOM.

In response to growing concerns among US allies about a potential Taiwan war, Japan is expanding its cooperation with the Philippines. The Philippine Senate finally approved a visiting forces agreement-style pact after years of negotiations, which highlights growing strategic convergence between the two key US allies.

The Philippine Senate said in a statement that “ratifying the agreement further affirms the strategic partnership between the two countries and their shared goal of enhancing contributions to regional and international peace, security, and stability.

For his part, Japan’s ambassador to Manila, Kazuya Endo, emphasized how the new pact will “facilitate the implementation of cooperative activities between the forces of the two countries, further promote security and defense cooperation, and firmly support peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region”.

Trump and Taiwan were not directly mentioned by either side, but both are actively preparing for a new era of strategic uncertainty and hot great power rivalry closer to home than under Biden, as with other important US allies in the region.

Follow Richard Javad Heydarian on X at @Rich Heydarian

Continue Reading

Tibet: How China cracked down on rare protests over Kamtok dam

Getty Images Treated image: An aerial photo of the Wudongde Hydropower Station, in red, superimposed on a treated image of winding Jinsha river.Getty Images

The BBC has learned from sources and verified images that hundreds of Tibetans were arrested earlier this year for their protests against a Chinese bridge. Some of the victims were beaten and seriously injured.

In Tibet, which China has strongly controlled since it annexed the area in the 1950s, demonstrations of this nature are unique. The fact that they continue to occur shows China’s contentious effort to build dams in a region that has long been sympathetic.

Soon after the activities in February, accusations of the arrests and stabbings started to surface. Authorities tightened restrictions even more in the coming weeks, making it difficult for anyone to check the report, especially for journalists who are unable to travel freely to Tibet.

However, the BBC has spent decades looking for Tibetan solutions whose friends and family members were beaten and detained. Additionally, BBC Verify has checked leaked videos and satellite pictures that show large-scale demonstrations and clergy pleading with the authorities for mercy.

The options are no associated with activist organizations and reside outside of China. However, for health reasons, they did not want to be named.

The Chinese ambassador in the UK did not confirm or refute the demonstrations or the ensuing assault in response to our inquiries.

However, it stated that” China is a nation governed by the rule of law, and completely protects people ‘ right to legitimately express their concerns and ideas or ideas.”

BBC graphic showing location of Gangtuo dam project and affected villages and monasteries

The demonstrations, followed by the assault, took position in a country house to Tibetans in Sichuan territory. For years, Chinese authorities have been planning to build the massive Gangtuo dam and hydropower plant, also known as Kamtok in Tibetan, in the valley straddling the Dege ( Derge ) and Jiangda ( Jomda ) counties.

The dam’s reservoir, which is constructed, do bury a Tibetan region rich in both cultural and religious significance and a location rich in ancient monasteries and villages.

One of them, the 700-year-old Wangdui ( Wontoe ) Monastery, has particular historical value as its walls feature rare Buddhist murals.

Taus of Tibetans would also be displaced by the Gangtuo bridge. The transfer of 4, 287 people to make way for the dam has been seen by what appears to be a common sweet document.

The BBC spoke with a government official listed on the sweet record as well as Huadian, the state-owned company rumored to be building the dam. Neither have responded.

Plans to build the dam were first approved in 2012, according to a United Nations special rapporteurs letter to the Chinese government. The letter, which is from July 2024, raised concerns about the dam’s “irreversible impact” on thousands of people and the environment.

From the start, citizens were no” consulted in a significant way” about the bridge, according to the email. For example, they were given data that was limited and not in the Tibetan vocabulary.

The government also promised to the people that the project would only proceed if 80 % of them gave their consent, the letter continues, adding that people tried to raise issues about the dam several times.

Therefore, in February, officials told them they had been evicted immediately, while giving them much information about relocation options and payment, the BBC understands from two Tibetan sources.

Despite knowing the dangers of a assault, people and Buddhist priests decided to step protests because of this.

They “didn’t know what was going to occur to them,” they said.

In Dege, the largest one saw hundreds of people gathering outside a state tower. Activists can be heard calling on the government to prevent the foreclosures and letting them sit in a video tape that was obtained and verified by the BBC.

A group of inhabitants reportedly pleaded with visiting officials to halt construction of the bridge in a separate incident. The BBC has verified that this tragedy occurred in the town of Xiba and obtained footage that appears to show it.

Red-robed priests and people are seen knelt down on a sandy road and giving a thumbs up, a customary Tibetan pleading for mercy.

In the past, the Taiwanese government has been swift to oust any resistance to authority, particularly in Tibetan country, where it is sensitive to anything that might lead to separatist attitude.

This day, it was no different. According to one of our resources, authorities quickly launched their assault, raiding homes across the river, and arresting hundreds of people at demonstrations.

In what is thought to be an arrest function, one unidentified but widely shared picture appears to show Chinese police shoving a group of priests on a street.

Our Tibetan options, whose families and friends were the targets of the onslaught, claim that many were detained for weeks and some were severely beaten.

One resource shared new details of the investigations. He claimed to the BBC that a close friend from childhood was detained and subjected to numerous interrogations over the course of several weeks.

He was questioned and treated politely at earliest. They asked him’ who asked you to attend, who is behind this’.

” Then, when he couldn’t provide them]the ] comments they wanted, he was beaten by six or seven unique surveillance officers over several times.”

His companion sustained only small wounds, and was freed within a few days. But others were not so fortunate.

A different cause informed the BBC that more than 20 of his relatives and friends were detained for participating in the demonstrations, including an old man who was older than 70.

” Some of them sustained accidents all over their system, including in their bones and liver, from being kicked and beaten… some of them were ill because of their wounds, “he said.

Similar allegations of physical abuse and whippings during the detention have come up in Tibetan media reports from abroad.

The UN notice also notes accounts of suspensions and use of pressure on hundreds of demonstrators, stating they were” seriously beaten by the Chinese authorities, resulting in injury that required hospitalisation”.

Tsering Woeser A photo showing seated red-robed monks praying inside the Wontoe Monastery in Dege county. Tsering Woeser
Tsering Woeser An ancient, fading mural inside the Wontoe Monastery shows Buddha seated, with other images surrounding him - the mural is painted in red, blue, green, yellow and white. Tsering Woeser

After the assault, Tibetans in the area encountered yet tighter restrictions, the BBC understands. There was increased security, and communication with the outside world was more hampered. According to sources, those who are still in contact have been reluctant to talk because they fear a new onslaught.

According to the first source, some released protesters were finally permitted to travel abroad in Tibetan place, but others have received orders restricting their motion.

Nomadic nomads who need to travel across pastures with their herds and those who need to go to a hospital for health care have issues as a result, he said.

When I got through, they told me not to visit any more because they would be arrested, according to the next cause, who claimed he last heard from his friends and relatives at the end of February. They were quite scared, they would stand up on me.

” We used to talk over Twitter, but now that is certainly achievable. I’m absolutely blocked from contacting all of them”, he said.

” A younger girl cousin was the last people I spoke to,” I said. She said,’ It’s very unsafe, a lot of us have been arrested, there’s a lot of problem, they have hit a lot of us’… They didn’t know what was going to happen to them next”.

The Chinese state media has been unable to provide any information about the protests and assault. But soon after the protests, a Chinese Communist Party national visited the area to “explain the need” of building the bridge and called for” security repair methods”, according to one report.

According to documents posted online, a few months later, a tender was awarded for the construction of a Dege “public security post.”

The BBC has been using satellite imagery to monitor the valley for months. For now, there is no sign of the dam’s construction nor demolition of the villages and monasteries.

The Chinese Embassy informed us that the government was still conducting geological surveys and special studies to build the dam. They added the local government is “actively and thoroughly understanding the demands and aspirations” of residents.

Development or exploitation?

China is no stranger to controversy over dams.

The Three Gorges on the Yangtze River, the government’s largest dam, was the subject of protests and criticism when it built the world’s largest dam in the 1990s.

As China has accelerated its transition from coal to clean energy sources in recent years, these moves have become particularly sensitive in Tibetan territories.

Beijing has been eyeing the steep valleys and mighty rivers here, in the rural west, to build mega-dams and hydropower stations that can sustain China’s electricity-hungry eastern metropolises. President Xi Jinping has personally pushed for this, a policy called” xidiandongsong”, or” sending western electricity eastwards”.

Getty Images An aerial photo shows Wudongde Hydropower Station on the Jinsha river, the world's seventh largest hydropower station, on the channel of the Jinsha river in Liangshan prefecture, Sichuan Province, China, December 31, 2022. Getty Images

Like Gangtuo, many of these dams are on the Jinsha ( Dri Chu ) river, which runs through Tibetan territories. It is located in the Yangtze River’s upper reaches, making it China’s largest clean energy corridor.

Gangtuo is in fact the most recent of a string of dams planned for this valley, five of which are either being built or are already operational.

These dams have been described by the Chinese government and state media as a win-win solution that reduces pollution, generates clean energy, and improves rural Tibetans.

Clean energy projects are focused on “promoting high-quality economic development” and “enhancing the sense of gain and happiness among people of all ethnic groups,” according to the Chinese embassy’s statement to the BBC.

However, Tibetans have long been accused of violating their rights by the Chinese government. The dams, according to activists, are the most recent instance of Beijing squattering Tibetans and their land.

” What we are seeing is the accelerated destruction of Tibetan religious, cultural and linguistic heritage”, said Tenzin Choekyi, a researcher with rights group Tibet Watch. The Chinese government is implementing “high-quality development” and “ecological civilisation” in Tibet.

The Tibetans are expelled from their homes in China, which creates a favorable environment for development. The same fate awaits the villagers and monks who live close to the Gangtuo dam. According to Human Rights Watch ( HRW), more than 930, 000 rural Tibetans have been relocated since 2000.

Beijing has always maintained that these relocations happen only with the consent of Tibetans, and that they are given housing, compensation and new job opportunities. State media often portrays it as an improvement in their living conditions.

Getty Images A spectacular bend in the Jinsha river as it winds all the way around mountain, is seen in an aerial photo of Garze city, Sichuan Province.Getty Images

But rights groups paint a different picture, with reports detailing evidence of coercion, complaints of inadequate compensation, cramped living conditions, and lack of jobs. They also point out that relocation severs the deep, centuries-old connection that rural Tibetans share with their land.

According to Maya Wang, interim China director at HRW,” These people will essentially lose everything they own, their livelihoods, and community heritage.”

There are also environmental concerns related to the possible dangers of building dams in a region rife with earthquake fault lines, as well as the flooding of Tibetan valleys renowned for their biodiversity.

Some Chinese academics have found the pressure from accumulated water in dam reservoirs could potentially increase the risk of quakes, including in the Jinsha river. This could cause catastrophic flooding and destruction, as seen in 2018, when rain-induced landslides occurred at a village situated between two dam construction sites on Jinsha.

The Chinese embassy informed us that any clean energy project’s implementation” will go through scientific planning and rigorous demonstration, and will be subject to relevant supervision.”

China has recently passed laws protecting the environment around the Yangtze River and the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. The Yangtze’s upper reaches must be protected, according to President Xi.

About 424 million yuan ( £45.5m,$ 60m ) has been spent on environmental conservation along Jinsha, according to state media. Reports have also highlighted efforts to quake-proof dam projects.

Multiple Tibetan rights groups, however, argue that any large-scale development in Tibetan territory, including dams such as Gangtuo, should be halted.

They have organized demonstrations abroad and called for an international moratorium, arguing that businesses involved in these projects would “allow the Chinese government to profit from the occupation and oppression of Tibetans.”

” I really hope that this]dam-building ] stops”, one of our sources said. ” Our ancestors were here, our temples are here. We have been here for generations. It causes a lot of pain to move. What kind of existence would we have if we left?”

Additional reporting by Richard Irvine-Brown of BBC Verify

Continue Reading