Cargo cult: Why America cannot have nice things – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Also, I’ve been scared of changing

‘ Reason I’ve built my existence around you

But day makes you braver

Yet children get older

And I’m getting older to

&nbsp, &nbsp, – Fleetwood Mac

The Biden administration plans to impose 100 % tariffs on Chinese electric vehicle imports, according to media reports. Before November, the President needs to rig the coalition ballot and shield his right from “weak on China” charges.

Both issues can be resolved cheaply using Electric tariffs. Americans wo n’t feel a thing. Trucks are exported to the US by China infrequently. Large, stupid and happy – American life may bring on as if nothing happened.

In the US, novel vehicles typically cost$ 48, 000. In the Ford F- 150 collection- up, that’s a late- range XLT version. A Toyota Crown in Nightshade cut at the middle of the range.

And it’s a Tesla Model 3 with the longer- collection, two motors, all- vehicle generate package. Americans may be envious of the world because of these high-quality motor choices because they are all highly regarded vehicles.

No… no they may never. Americans are paying ridiculous prices for utter dog piles in comparison to what is currently on the market in China. For$ 40, 000, Foreign buyers may get a best- of- the- line Tesla Model S similar dual- motor 4WD BYD Han.

Hyundai cut costs on its Sonata sedan from$ 42, 000 to$ 17, 000. And Chinese buyers can purchase a BYD Qin plug-in combination for less than half the price of Toyota’s Corolla hybrid for$ 11,000. &nbsp,

Most Americans are unaware that they do n’t have nice things, which is Biden’s saving grace. Some Americans complain about the lack of high-speed road. How can you lose what you never possessed?

If you’ve never experienced 300 Mbps download speeds, you wo n’t question AT&amp, T marketing 100 Mbps as 5G. If every pupil goes$ 40, 000 into debt to pay for school, it’s not considered a stress on America’s fresh.

New York City’s train has always been like that. People will continue to purchase$ 48, 000 dog mounds and other similar vehicles if Foreign EVs are prohibited in the US.

Of course, the pretense ca n’t go on forever. There are well-traveled, smart Americans who are aware of what is happening elsewhere. Unfortunately, they have n’t had much success bringing those nice things home.

For centuries, China has consistently on- shored the best the world has to offer. The systematic process has been a remarkable success, despite still missing a few crucial pieces ( cutting-edge chip factories and commercial airplanes ).

In the Pacific Melanesia, members of the” cargo cult” aped the behavior of powerful societies in an effort to bring in more valuable” cargo” to their islands.

Maybe this required the creation of intricate but comical imitations of modern technology and infrastructure, such as wooden planes and impromptu landing strips, but they never succeeded in producing the desired result.

1,600 feet of recently completed high-speed rail track, which the California High-Speed Rail Authority proudly dubbed the” Fres no River Viaduct,” are located in the San Joaquin Valley of California. It took nine years to build and apparently cost$ 11 billion.

Two decades after Congress allocated$ 7.5 billion to build 500, 000 EV charging stations, seven have been completed. TSMC’s Arizona device fantastic has been called a “debacle” by media store Rest of the World, replete with employee dissension, produce- work and higher turnover.

The Pentagon sent hundreds of military-grade robots to Ukraine, but they were turned down in favor of less expensive and more reliable off-the-shelf models from China’s DJI, according to the WSJ.

Every naval strategist is advocating for a Whole of Government Effort ( WOGE ) to revitalize American shipbuilding, whose capacity has fallen to 0.4 % of China’s. There are a lot of eggheads currently running around Washington supporting all-type WOGEs.

This extends from the political variety of fresh energy WOGEs to military WOGEs, science and technology WOGEs, and reform WOGEs. WOGES are all over the news and had their supporters attributed mysterious powers.

Anthropologists then dismiss the cartoonish” cargo religion” conceptualization as basic. Traditional island cultures were shattered by contemporary technology, leading to a painful upheaval and societal upheaval that just occasionally expressed in funny ways.

Island cultures were longer led by “big guys” who set objectives, doled out sources and settled disputes. Gentlemen were referred to as “rubbish men” if they were unable to appreciate in these interpersonal interactions. When the” cargo” of the modern world sank in, island large men and all the favors they had previously offered lost value, causing “rubbish people” to rule entire civilizations.

Social entrepreneurs rose up with the promise to reclaim the islands ‘ former golden age, restore traditional morality, and/or summon valuable cargo. The foolish airplanes, landing strips and manage towers were a small part of the movement, derisively hyped by European snickering.

In the end,” cargo cults” were attempting to create new social structures and structures in societies that had been destroyed by sudden external contact with the modern world.

On a social levels, Han Feizi sympathizes with the Washington WOGE activists and the California High-Speed Rail Authority. After all, how do cargo cults from Qing Dynasty boxers who led a brave but fruitless rebellion against foreigners differ?

But, love cannot override the fact that the Melanesians were blinded by goods sects as they groped their way into the modern world, just as the Boxer Rebellion made things worse for Qing Dynasty China.

If the payment concerned refuses to provide assistance from experts in the field, a budget and a mission are just as useless for building high-speed road as a wood and wood airplane are for delivering cargo. Similar to how blocking the most affordable and technologically advanced products from British businesses makes the transition to clean electricity easier.

To be sure, Han Feizi understands why huge taxes are being implemented. American automakers wo n’t be able to survive the present era without them. Inexplicable are the consequences of losing such a crucial sector on both the economic and societal fronts.

Of course, this serves as justification for numerous” just this once” bailouts of the industry, including the” chicken tax” on imported pickup trucks, guaranteed loans to export quotas for Japanese cars, more guaranteed loans to EV subsidies, and now 100 % tariffs on Chinese EVs.

It begs the question of why General Motors, Ford, Jeep/Dodge and Tesla are reporting substantial profits while Americans suffer a cost of living crisis, no helped by$ 50, 000 get- up vehicles with$ 12, 000 profits?

Why, in addition to receiving sizable income over the past ten years, were Ford and GM permitted to return$ 12 billion and$ 18 billion to shareholders, both, through enormous share buybacks?

General Motors, Ford, and Jeep/Dodge have never been held accountable for wasting years of government support and have shown no capacity to rise to the occasion.

As consumers in the Global South start driving more advanced vehicles than Americans, goods worship habits will become more and more apparent as the Big Three attempt to compete with China’s EVs under state shelter.

The US properly twisted Japan’s finger in the 1990s, forcing them to build local businesses. China required domestic production from all multinational corporations through regional joint ventures. The US, but, may not be able to pull off something similar this time around.

The US has not been the world’s largest vehicle business for 15 years, selling simply fifth as many products as China. The International South currently purchases three times as many trucks as the US, which is not just China. America, as they say, will not be negotiating from a position of strength.

Officials are unsure whether to believe Chinese cars, even those produced in the US, because they fear there will be millions of spy cars scurrying through British streets.

Bytedance’s encounter with TikTok may give Chinese automakers delay, after achieving large implementation and dazzling success, officials moved in for the steal. For 13 % of global markets ( 6 % excluding pickup trucks ), is it worth the aggravation?

Governments are unable to withstand plans where the advantages are concentrated but the costs are spread, according to social scientist Mancur Olson.

China’s EVs will likely be subject to a further sediment level of inefficiency that has grown in the late-stage democracy that interest groups have socially captured.

Let’s face it, Detroit’s chances of rising to the occasion are comparable to those of California’s high-speed bridge project, which was completed on time and on budget.

Cargo religions no more exist in Melanesia. It was a society that had been devastated by modernity’s actions, which was unfortunate but apparently unavoidable. Through spiritual rituals that made them immune to shots, China’s Boxer fortified themselves for their revolution. It did n’t work.

Every nation may travel to the shores of civilization to escape the sand of denial and suffering. America is no exception.

Continue Reading

Biden, Trump China tariffs draw on old, losing playbook – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

The US senator runs the risk of repeating one of his counterpart’s biggest mistakes as Joe Biden attempts to beat Donald Trump.

This week, Biden will unveil plans to quadruple taxes on Chinese electric vehicle ( EV ) imports and slap&nbsp, huge tariffs&nbsp, on other key industries. Apparently, the new taxes on coast electric vehicles will go up to 102.5 %. Tariffs may double or triple in some of the highest-priority business.

It’s Biden’s latest campaign to out- Trump Trump, and finally a losing solution in terms of raising British living standards. Additionally, it runs the risk of provoking China into reacting negatively on US consumers and investors.

Biden’s need to revisit 1985 possibly makes feeling from a political point ahead of the November 5 vote. Taxes like those that Biden is considering and Trump used from 2017 to 2021 may have worked.

In 2024, while, Team Biden is endeavoring to defend an economic method that no longer exists. Similar to how Trump did while he was in office, when he imposed duties of at least 10 % on steel and aluminum and at least 10 % on all other domestic goods.

In a minute word, Trump has predicted that there will be 60 % tariffs on Chinese goods, so Biden’s administration is evidently trying to avoid coming across as friendly with Asia’s largest economy. Yet trying to kill China’s EV market is n’t the way to do it.

For beginners, it’s vague that Biden’s EV price plan may actually make much of a thorn. One concern, as Asia Times company editor&nbsp, David Goldman argues, is that now no Chinese cars are also on present in the US right then.

Some economists are calling it “economic metaphor” that will do more to pacify Elon Musk than delayed China’s increase. The Tesla leader has warned that without major tariffs, Chinese automakers did “demolish” the international competitors.

Because of the “extremely small penetration of Taiwanese Vehicles in the US market today,” according to Evercore ISI researcher Sarah Bianchi, higher tax rates will have “minimal near-term financial impact.”

Biden’s earlier attempts to reignite US technology and boost production would be a wiser choice. With his&nbsp, CHIPS and Science Act&nbsp, and inflation- decrease legislation, Team Biden moved to create financial muscle at home and put the US back in the tech race for 2025 and above.

Silicon Valley has long lost its problematic zeal. The lion’s share of the “innovation” emanating from California and another US technology centers is on ways to sell more online and smartphone marketing.

The Trump administration seemed to have lost sight of the importance of improving America’s competitive spirit. Trump spent more money to revive coal and browbeat Detroit to produce less fuel-efficient vehicles than to restart growth engines. His massive tax cuts did little to encourage investments in productivity-boosting reforms and innovation.

Biden made the wrong mistakes in his attempts to criticize China more harshly than his rival. Tariffs will only increase US consumer prices, which are already very high.

Adam Tooze, an economist at Columbia University, calls Trump’s plans a “recipe” for an inflationary surge, which appeals to many. Goldman Sachs economist Ronnie Walker thinks Trump’s new&nbsp, China taxes&nbsp, will dent US gross domestic product ( GDP ).

According to Walker,” the direct impact of higher tariffs on GDP is likely to be moderately negative, with the decline in the trade deficit outweigh the impact on real income and consumer spending.” There are also unanticipated indirect effects, such as a downturn in business sentiment and supply-chain upheaval, that could worsen the negative impact.

According to James Singer, a spokesperson for the Biden campaign, “what Trump and his allies are proposing will cause chaos in markets, raise costs for working families, and cause inflation to rocket.” It goes beyond tariffs, too.

” Most of the major policy initiatives being suggested by Donald Trump’s campaign would be inflationary”, says economist Paul Ashworth at Capital Economics. ” Whether it’s narrowing the trade deficit via tariffs or a dollar devaluation, curbing immigration or, now we learn, compromising the&nbsp, Fed’s independence”.

Enter the Biden campaign to make a November arms trade war more intense. Economist Intelligence Unit warns that whether Democrats or Republicans win, Sino-US relations will” a sustained worsening” in economic and diplomatic ties for the remainder of the decade.

” Either president will pursue policies aimed at exerting further pressure on China’s technology sector, while also justifying future trade and investment restrictions based on national security&nbsp, concerns”, EIU analysts write.

Yet neither trade war policy mix, be it from Biden or Trump, is likely to halt China‘s increasing dominance – not even in EVs, says Michael&nbsp, Dunne, CEO of auto industry advisory ZoZoGo. ” Imagine a world in which&nbsp, China&nbsp, builds every single car”, Dunne says. ” Unthinkable, right? Think again”.

China today, Dunne points out, has enough capacity to manufacture half of the world’s 80 million vehicles. By 2030, China’s capacity could climb to 75 % of the world’s volume, according to Global Data. &nbsp, This year China will export 6 million vehicles to more than 140 countries worldwide, blowing past Japan for global leadership.

Dunne notes that Chinese brands like SAIC’s MG, Chery, Geely’s Volvo and BYD are leading the way, winning in every time zone from Brazil to Thailand, from the UK to Australia. &nbsp,” Call it the coming China car colossus”, he says.

EVs are merely a small sample of a larger dynamic. While Trump was tossing grenades at the global trade system during his first term, Beijing was investing aggressively in making China the dominant power in 5G, EVs, semiconductors, artificial intelligence, renewable energy and other dominant “future” industries.

Trump’s four more years of dragging America back to 1985 would be ideal for Xi Jinping, a Chinese leader. Trump’s domestic policies would push Xi’s” Made in China 2025” gambit even further ahead, despite the fact that they would temporarily stifle Chinese growth.

If Biden uses the economic model from 40 years ago, he faces a similar own goal.

Rewind to the mid- 1980s, Japan was cast in the villain’s role now occupied by China. The notion that Japan Inc. would rule the world economy captivated the American media. At the time, Japanese buyers were scooping up New York’s Rockefeller Center, golf courses like California’s Pebble Beach and Hollywood studios. They hoovered up any Rembrandts, Monets, Picassos and other masterworks on auction to hang in Tokyo.

Lawmakers and pundits warned of an&nbsp, economic Pearl Harbor and of America becoming a commercial” colony” of Japan. In an interview at the time, Trump the businessman claimed that Japan had” systematically sucked the blood out of America — sucked the blood out!” They have gotten away with murder. They ultimately prevailed in the war.

Ronald Reagan, the then-US president, used a mercantilist strategy that still inspires Trump when he began his second term. In 1985, Reagan’s Treasury Secretary, James Baker, managed to cajole the most powerful industrialized nations to push the yen sharply higher and the dollar lower.

Trump’s former hotel, the Plaza Hotel, in New York, was the signing of the pact. Trump’s desire for a “new Plaza Accord” that would send the Chinese yuan into a soaring range was made apparent by then-Treasurer Steven Mnuchin and advisors like Peter Navarro early in his presidency.

That never materialized. A Trump 2.0 White House might attempt the strategy once more. Beijing would surely refuse. Official Chinese officials are aware of the effects of the currency deal’s influence on Japan’s asset bubble in the late 1980s, which led to decades of stagnation in the economy.

Also, Xi is determined to increase the yuan’s use in global trade and finance. Knowing this, Trump’s economic advisers and mulling steps to punish nations turning away from the&nbsp, dollar. Team Trump wants to stop aggressive action among key emerging markets to lessen their exposure to the US dollar, according to a report from Bloomberg in late April.

Any nation that enters a bilateral trade agreement in currencies other than the dollar may face penalties as well. These might entail currency manipulation charges, tariffs or export controls.

All this, though, might merely slow the inevitable. Investors might be doing Xi’s work with China as the US national debt climbs to US$ 35 trillion and Congress becomes polarized. Moody’s Investors Service issues a warning that a downgrade might be forthcoming because the US only has one AAA credit rating left.

Not that Biden has taken any action to halt the de-dollarization movement. Efforts by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, the BRICS, and others including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, gained new momentum in 2022.

When efforts to punish Russia for its invasion of Ukraine were led by Biden’s Treasury Department. Some of Vladimir Putin’s foreign exchange reserves were frozen, too.

Last month, Congress granted Biden’s White House authority to seize Russian dollar assets to aid Ukraine. The Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s team can transfer Russian government assets to a reconstruction fund in Ukraine thanks to this so-called REPO provision. It fueled fresh debate about the long- term costs of “weaponizing” the dollar.

” China may accelerate the process of de- dollarization”, says JPMorgan analyst Katherine Lei, noting that roughly 70 % of Chinese international trade is still held in dollars.

Quadrupling tariffs on&nbsp, Chinese EVs, batteries, solar panels or other technologies might make for nice election- year headlines. But returning to 1985 wo n’t help the globe’s biggest economy find a higher gear vis- a- vis China.

Biden must think and invest more money in domestic economic and innovative muscle if he wants to capture Xi’s attention. Trump prioritized trying to trip China on the racecourse, not limbering up to beat it organically. Binding must turn the other way and prepare for a challenging upcoming decade. &nbsp,

Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading

US special forces to the frontline against China, Russia – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

The focus of the US Special Operations Forces ( SOF ) is shifting from fighting insurgencies to a potential great power conflict with China and Russia.

According to a report released this month, the US Special Operations Command ( SOCOM) is seeing an increase in demand for SOF support from all branches of the armed forces, with demand for strategic competition rising by over 30 % and for crisis response events rising by over 15 %.

Special military activities are currently experiencing a “renaissance” as the nature of war changes and there is a” convergence of adversaries,” especially the growing cohesion between China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, according to SOCOM Chief General Bryan Fenton’s recent headline address.

Representative Jack Bergman made the switch from competing with major power like China and Russia during a US Congress hearing in February 2023. In light of the current political climate, he questioned the value of SOFs in combating asymmetrical warfare and assisting allies.

Rep. Ruben Gallego has questioned the readiness of SOFs to transition from terrorism to asymmetrical warfare capabilities like foreign domestic defense and information operations while stressing the importance of a complete government strategy to combat great power rivalry.

In response to Gallego, Seth Jones, senior vice president at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, has argued that SOFs are essential in a world of interfering with state stars like China and Russia.

In addition to conventional weapons and nuclear weapons, key global players like China, Russia, and Iran are actively engaged in unusual warfare through army, intelligence, and non-state operations, according to Jones.

He encourages US SOFs to use their wide, non-kinetic capabilities to shift their focus away from direct action to roles like unusual internal defense and unorthodox warfare. He has urged the US Congress to increase revenue and review joint responsibilities to improve US success in irrational war.

National Defense University College of International Security Affairs professor and chair of the section has emphasized that SOFs must strengthen their capacity for countering international proxies and bolster resistance in states that are threatened by international attacks.

The US has deployed SOFs on Taiwan’s frontline islands and is re-equipped for a potential major great power conflict in the Pacific, according to words to deeds.

US SOFs were reportedly stationed on Taiwan’s frontline islands, just ten kilometers from mainland China, permanently in March 2024, according to Asia Times. According to reports, US military advisers will spend the long term at Kinmen and Penghu’s amphibious command posts.

Similar to the US Navy SEALs, the US Green Berets will frequently take part in training exercises with Taiwan’s 101st Amphibious Reconnaissance Battalion and Airborne Special Service Company.

For Taiwan’s defense, Kinmen and Penghu are essential, and SOFs are essential for putting together a long-range defense plan for these islands. In a cross-strait Chinese invasion of Taiwan, Kinmen and Penghu’s capture would be crucial.

Taiwanese SOFs can use delaying maneuvers to gain access to American and allies ‘ military training while also providing crucial intelligence and targeting for strike platforms. If China occupies Taiwan, Taiwan’s SOFs may form irregular resistance units that operate behind enemy lines, inflict casualties, cause delays and sow confusion.

Additionally, The Warzone reported that the US Navy is upgrading its special operations boat fleet, ordering a fourth Combatant Craft Heavy (CCH), and testing a new loitering launcher on the Medium (CCM).

The CCH fleet is currently being upgraded to improve its capabilities and survivability. These vessels are semi- submersible, climate- controlled and specifically designed for covert and sensitive maritime missions.

They can achieve a speed of 40 knots, carry up to 7 crew members along with 12 passengers or a payload of 1, 500 kilos, and have a range of 400 nautical miles.

The hulls have different window configurations, and the CCHs have a low profile and a stealth upper structure to reduce radar and visual signatures.

The Maritime Precision Engagement ( MPE ) program aims to integrate man-in-the- loop guidance systems on CCMs with stand-off, loitering munitions. By the end of 2024 or 2025, testing should be finished, with decisions on further integration expected.

These advancements reflect a shift in the US SOF’s focus away from preventing major conflicts, particularly in the Pacific.

The US SOF community may have to deal with budget and staff cuts as well as budget issues as a result of the re-focusing on SOFs in the context of rising great power tensions.

The Washington Post reported this month that US SOCOM is adapting to budgetary constraints by adding high-tech experts to their teams while reducing its forces by about 5,000 over the next five years.

The restructuring efforts are being influenced by the lessons from the ongoing Ukraine war, particularly the experiences of UK SOFs.

It notes that the US Army is facing the most significant reduction, with plans to cut about 4, 000 positions. Due to the need to shift from focusing on small-scale combat operations to achieving recruitment goals, this reduction is impacted.

Despite those reductions, The Washington Post claims that there is talk of expanding Green Beret teams ‘ size to accommodate experts like drone software engineers and expanding the scope of technical roles across all armed forces.

Erik Prince, a critic of US military downsizing, claims for Asia Times that US credibility and power projections are declining, drawing a contrast to the US military juggernaut of World War II.

Prince cites US embassy evacuations in Sudan, Afghanistan, Belarus, Ukraine and Niger, US citizens taken hostage in Gaza and the Houthi blockade of commercial shipping in the Red Sea, where US ground and naval forces are shot at with impunity, as symptomatic of US military decline.

He attributes this apparent decline to the post-Cold War peace dividend, debt, and excessive spending on the Global War on Terror, a lack of strategic discipline, and a focus on large defense contractors ‘ revenue rather than winning wars and forming strategic partnerships.

According to Price, the US wage “forever wars of convenience” because it believes that the military-industrial complex and precise drone strikes can shield the country’s elites from the dreadful realities of war.

He urges US policymakers to draw lessons from previous failures to stop apocalyptic conflict with China. He advocates utilizing the US private sector to accomplish military goals, contrasting the efficiency of the private sector with bureaucratic government practices and large defense contractors. &nbsp,

Continue Reading

Buffaloes vanish, leaving grandma unable to pay debts

By:
On:
In: South-East Asia

Discussed: 12 May 2024 at 13: 38

Buffaloes vanish, leaving grandma unable to pay debts
On Saturday, Charn Puangmalai asks for the return of her missing cows by the side of a house in the Chalerm Phrakiat city of Buri Ram. ( Photo: Surachai Piragsa )

BURI RAM: A grandmother’s disappearance of her flock of ten cattle has left her in financial damage. In order to pay her banks debt, Charn Puangmalai planned to sell them.

The 72- yr- ancient has been letting her cattle roam in the&nbsp, neighbourhood&nbsp, around her home town of Khok Ta Tung in Chalerm Phrakiat district every morning to serve themselves. She therefore returns them to the house in the evening.

Ms. Charn went to the area on Thursday evening and discovered no trace of her animal. She turned to rescue participants on Saturday after two days of unsuccessful hunting.

She said her 10 buffaloes were to be sold one day for 100, 000 baht and she would use the money to repay 300, 000 baht of debt owed to the&nbsp, Bank&nbsp, of Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives ( BAAC ).

” If I ca n’t find my buffaloes, I have no idea how to find money to pay BAAC”, she said.

The 72-year-old hopes that her buffaloes did return to the house. ( Photo: Surachai Piragsa )

The individuals have been helping her try to locate her pets on feet and have also driven to&nbsp, neighbouring&nbsp, tambon and regions. They are unsure whether the cow were stolen or just lost their way, and they have not located them.

” If they were stolen, anybody who did that please&nbsp, have &nbsp, sympathy and bring my buffaloes back”, she begged.

All Mr Charn can do today is&nbsp, pray&nbsp, for their profit.

Continue Reading

‘Made too easy’: ‘Buy now, pay later’ schemes ensnare consumers in Malaysia in web of purchases, debt

By:
On:
In: Asia

View OF A BNPL PROVIDER&nbsp,

The three main suppliers of BNPL solutions in Malaysia last year were Shopee, Grab, and Atome. According to the CCOB, these three companies made up 97 per share of all BNPL purchases. &nbsp,

Customers used deferred payment or payment options to rhythm and stretched out their obligations in accordance with their individual budgets or financial preparing goals, according to Mr. Alain Yee, Head of SeaMoney and ShopeePay Malaysia, according to CNA. &nbsp,

He did point out that not everyone has access to regular payment options, as the company discovered that about 10 % of SPayLater users lack access to these choices. &nbsp,

In response to inquiries from CNA, he said,” The presence of BNPL solutions allows this demographic to buy and purchase necessities in times of want, including act payments, purchasing coverage policies, and other essentials.”

Mr. Yee added that using their service, fast-moving consumer products, which are items sold quickly for relatively low prices, consistently ranked at the top of the list of items purchased at the time of purchase. &nbsp,

” While consumers ‘ financial habits affect how they manage their budgets, BNPL providers must also take proactive measures to protect users from overspending,” said BNPL. &nbsp,

People are often encouraged to schedule out their payments along with earlier reminders of future payments, he said,” with SPayLater, for instance, users are given individualised credit limits suited to their payment capabilities.” &nbsp,

A lower payment control, which usually ranges from RM100 to RM300, is provided to new customers when they first install SPayLater, according to Mr. Yee. &nbsp,

And as consumers continue to implement the company, several aspects will be considered, including their spending and payment abilities. &nbsp,

Users will be notified of an adjustment to their credit limits after inner reviews, with the latter likely seeing an increase or decrease, he said, adding that the company’s customer base has grown consistently and sustainably.

In response, Mr. Yee claimed that there has been a decrease in both late and repayment delinquencies.

The proposed Credit Consumer Act, he added, would promote a good and secure environment for both customers and funds service providers, he added. &nbsp,

The Credit Consumer Act mandates that companies conduct value assessments on clients, which are the important activities that stand out in this respect. Operators can use this to better understand and tailor their services to individual customers while guarding users from unexpected overbudgeting, he said. &nbsp,

Calls for remarks were never responded to by Atome and Grab. &nbsp, &nbsp,

EASY TO APPLY, EASY TO GET TRAPPED&nbsp,

The Credit Counseling and Debt Management Agency ( CBDM), a company that is under the BNM’s control, reported to CNA that the BNPL providers make it simple for customers to apply for and be approved to use their services. &nbsp,

” It is so easy. You can even use your apps to make payments in installments for meals. It’s made very simple I think,” said AKPK mind for household monetary education Nirmala Supramaniam. &nbsp,

According to Mdm Nirnala, she noticed that a lot of what the children spent on with these BNPL companies were for” experience” for as little holidays, facials, or even for hair color. &nbsp,

Continue Reading

US, China taking over EU’s green energy transition – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

The EU’s environment plan is in trouble.

The Green Deal, which aims to reduce the world’s carbon emissions by 55 % by 2030, had a promising beginning thanks to the passage of several significant pieces of legislation, including a new carbon border tax and a ban on the sale of new combustion-powered vehicles starting in 2035.

Increasingly, but, Europeans are rebelling against natural limitations of which they have trouble seeing the benefits. The alarming number of Chinese and US companies entering the EU energy market poses yet another less-discussed but crucial threat to the republic’s shift to green power and energy.

In our book,” Energy: How to Recover Our European Ambition” ( published in French ), we shed light on this overlooked issue ahead of European elections that will be critical for the EU’s energy strategy, and call on the bloc to carefully weigh up cooperation and competition with sovereignty.

China’s clean share

China now has access to 80 % of the world’s clean-tech manufacturing capacity in 11 different industries, including solar wafers and a large number of lithium-ion battery components, despite the lack of any statistical data.

Foreign investors first stepped in in the early 2010s to take advantage of the country’s sovereign debt crisis to buy large stakes in what have long been seen as” republic” industries, such as power transmission and distribution systems.

Major among those was the nation’s largest utility organization, the State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC), generally known as the State Grid – the world’s third- biggest company nevertheless by revenue, behind Walmart, Saudi Aramco and Amazon as of March. The largest hydroelectric energy advanced in the world, Three Gorges Corp., is also becoming more prevalent.

For example, in Portugal, Three Gorges Corp. won the selling for the Portuguese administration’s 21 % interest in EDP- Energias de Portugal SA in 2010. Meanwhile, in Italy, SGCC expanded its presence by collaborating with the Italian government in 2014, acquiring a 35 % share in the CDP Reti fund, thereby attaining a blocking minority at the local gas network operator, SNAM, and electricity transmission network operator, Terna.

In Greece, the State Grid significantly increased its position by acquiring a 24 % interest in the Greek government’s federal power distribution network operator in 2016.

While Portugal, Italy, and Greece were major goals, Chinese investors have even acquired systems in Luxembourg. Last but not least, let’s not forget that China’s green-tech sector has supplied Europe with affordable solar panels and electric vehicles ( EVs ).

US making advances

The United States is even hoping to benefit from the EU’s ill thought-out energy plan, which raises the stakes even further.

Russia’s conflict with Ukraine has never diminished the United States ‘ standing in terms of power, particularly in the EU. In fact, the EU was fast to impose sanctions against its long-term trading partner to lessen its dependence, even though Russian gas was anticipated to serve as a bridge fuel in the move to electricity, especially for Germany.

The United States has grown to be the largest LNG exporter and supplier in Europe, partially filling the gap left by Moscow. This development encourages US trade while keeping home energy costs low, thereby widening the price gap as energy inflation in Europe undermines its standing as a resource-intensive industry’s comparative competitiveness and appeal.

Beyond these issues with power supply, EU member states are struggling to articulate a common vision, which raises concerns with strategic autonomy and independence.

With an attempt to form a European nuclear alliance established in November 2023, French companies, particularly those in France, have made an effort to develop fourth-generation small modular nuclear reactors ( SMR ).

However, countries like Italy, Belgium, and Romania are currently working with Westinghouse Electric Company to create lead-cooled fast reactors.

The coordination gap is another way that John Kerry’s confirmation of American influence in Europe can be benefited by. The Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Poland were chosen to participate in the” Clean Fuel from SMR” international consortium, which includes American companies and will provide funding for coal-to-SMR feasibility studies.

These EU nations are turning to Americans to construct new nuclear power plants despite the EU’s continued opposition to any support for nuclear projects developed on its soil, primarily because of their funding and technical expertise.

Cracks in net- zero

At a time when the bloc is considering decarbonizing, the size of these foreign investments in renewable energy, new nuclear facilities, and grid development may have a significant impact on its strategic independence.

These investments raise concerns over continental energy security, given the still fragmented nature of Europe’s energy landscape:

  • Short-term, supply issues caused by the energy crisis only lead to a shift in our energy dependence issue and a turning point for the EU.
  • In the face of Chinese dumping and US protectionionism, Europe will need to defend its domestic energy producers or grid operators after being neglected for a while.

One dependency must be eliminated before it becomes a new one, which is Europe’s biggest challenge. To replace imports of fossil fuels ( coal, gas, and oil ) that are harmful to the climate, the EU member states must accelerate and coordinate the development of their “green” technologies.

Toward green sovereignty

Due to these risks, the bloc must not only pay more attention to non-EU companies, but also assume greater responsibility for its own energy system. How can it do this, all while pursuing the vision of the “green, secure and affordable energy supply” set out in its Green Deal?

We advise that EU member states put forth more effort to create truly European energy grids. Our electricity system will increasingly rely on a variety of renewable energy sources as we move toward decarbonization. These arrangements will require extensive, interconnected networks that must be developed and strengthened by EU member states themselves.

A second emergency is green energy financing. The European Climate Neutrality Observatory warned in November that the bloc’s failure to reach its net-zero goals could be brought on by a lack of public investment in green energy and other advances.

Member states cut the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (STEP ) fund, which is intended for renewable energy and clean technology, to 1.5 billion euros in February, as opposed to takingheed of the warning.

Our book calls for a radical change of course by establishing a” European transition savings account” to attract private savings, on the one hand, and a” European sovereign fund” that receives proceeds from carbon-priced revenues, on the other.

The upcoming European elections will determine whether these will actually be implemented. Results that point to a higher European ambition might be useful for us to identify safe, affordable, and affordable solutions.

At the other end of the spectrum, further veering to the nationalistic right could carry harmful effects for the bloc’s economic clout and, paradoxically, sovereignty.

Michel Derdevet, president of the organization Confrontations Europe, coauthored this article. Patrick Criqui is the director and energy economist at Université Grenoble Alpes ( UGA ), and Caroline Sebi is the chair of the Grenoble École de Management ( GEM).

The Conversation has republished this article under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

AI won’t save us but cybernetics could – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia, Technology

Lu Qiyuan, a well-known scholar in China, recently claimed that the US has four years to avoid a significant political, social, and economic crisis. It must implement one of three reforms: structural political reform, ensuring that the money no longer serves as the world’s supply money, or launching a new wave of artificial intelligence ( AI)-driven economic growth.

If Lu Qiyuan is best, the US is facing a Herculean task. The primary participants and supporters of the current political system, the US’s corporate and financial companies, would be met with fierce opposition from structural reform. They are strongly rooted in the federal government and hold the reins over the national press.

After the West banned Russia from the world financial system, it will also be a battle to keep the money as the world’s supply money. The money system’s illegal weaponization spooked the rest of the world, which was exactly what it was trying to accomplish. De- devaluation has become a world buzzword.

Another big challenge faces the third option, which is to increase productivity exponentially thanks to AI. From the Third to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, there are generations of transitions in the world. China is expected to guide the Fourth Industrial Revolution, while the US initiated the Third Industrial Revolution, which was preceded by the Internet and ICT trend.

China is the country that actually uses AI.

Industry 4.0 is the fusion of digital, biological, and physical technologies and the large- scale deployment of AI, robotics, nanotechnology, biotechnology, and the Internet of Things ( IoT ). China, the largest stock in the world, produces almost all of the equipment needed for Industry 4.0, and it has the infrastructure to support it.

Mystical aura, conflicted emotions

AI also has a spiritual underbelly. The general public, especially in the West, has indifferent thoughts about AI. Many people are concerned that private may be compromised by AI. While some claim that some tech companies may be monopolizing AI, experts contend that AI could outshine human intelligence and pose a threat to humanity’s future.

The more extreme concerns about AI can be traced to science ( cyber ) fiction. Some cyberfiction depicts AI as a global mind that has a head of its and terrible purposes: taking over the world, enslaving society, or worse – eliminating people. Which business, nation, or another organization would create an AI system that could rule the world or be able to do so is not made clear.

Additionally, AI alarmists frequently overlook the fact that autonomous systems are based in defined areas. They were created to fulfill a particular set of requirements. Playing games and analyzing health X-rays are not possible in an AI system developed for a self-driving car. No automaker may create a self-driving vehicle with its own ideas.

AI is not only website- certain, it is also culture- specific. We will receive two very different responses when enquiring about the best economic system for the 21st century from large language models ( LLM) like ChatGPT and its Chinese counterpart ERNIE. Any LLM will be able to match its creators ‘ view.

When viewed as a set of bionics, the first comprehensive idea of linear computing developed in the 1940s, AI appears less difficult. AI is built on the same ( binary- Boolean ) platform as Robotics. Technically speaking, it uses a self-learning algorithms and is a branch of cybernetics. It could be called Robotics 2.0.

Analog servers were the first model of servers. Instead of distinct binary values, they based their calculations on variations in ongoing electrical current. In the 1940s, circuit technology advancements made it possible to use linear computers, and the majority of computer professionals concurred that binary techniques were more robust and program-friendly.

In the 1940s, the British scientist Norbert Wiener developed a theoretical foundation for binary technology, which he called Robotics. With the aid of binary choices (yes or no ) and Boolean logic ( IF, THEN, AND, OR, etc. ), Wiener demonstrated that binary computers are ideal for controlling complex systems. ).

In robotic systems, comments is a crucial component.

The pilot system on airplanes is a textbook illustration of a cyber system. Boolean operators allow the pilot to steer the plane from point A to point B within the navigator’s parameters. The driver makes a program correction when the aircraft is in powerful side winds. If it encounters solid winds, it does rev up the machines to keep on schedule.

After World War II, cyber theory was crucial to the development of technology and other manufacturing technologies. It made it possible for engineers to create control techniques for performance and reliability while modeling complex systems and predicting how they would behave. The conceptual foundation for contemporary technology was also provided by robotics.

In the 1950s, the arts embraced robotics. Among people, it was used to analyze social systems, organizations, and managing processes. Cybernetics provides tools for selection- making processes, corporate habits, control technology and systems thinking.

The cyber method is based on three actions: plan, estimate and navigate. The schedule defines the goal or destination, the measurement determines the required tools, and the wheel, using a feedback system, guidelines the system to its place. The process can be applied to any method, whether an pilot, a manufacturer or an entire country.

Bionics is a branch of a multidisciplinary discipline. AI will help to stop the age of expertise.

Norbert Wiener called this new scientific robotics to show its standard work: wheel. The term robotics derives from the Greek kybernētēs, meaning” I steer, travel, information, work as a pilot”.

The commander of a fleet was referred to in Plato as the “world.” The first instance of a direct comments system was a ship’s rudder. The Latin problem, gubernātor, is the root of the current phrase state or to regulate.

Robotics even spread to the cultural, political and economic regions. Following World War II, the Five and Ten Year Plans were influenced by cyber principles. Although they had a combined victory, China continued to use long-term planning even after the 1970s market liberalization. &nbsp,

Deng Xiaoping’s second Five- Time Schedule called for laying the foundation for modernization, infrastructure development, and agrarian modernization. China’s transition from an agricultural nation to an industrialized one was the goal. &nbsp,

Additionally, Xi Jinping’s current Five-Year Plan had ambitious objectives. Among others, it calls for” a society in which no one is poor and everyone receives an education, has paid employment, more than enough food and clothing, access to medical services, old- age support, a home and a comfortable life”.

For China, planning is an imperative. The population is significantly declining. A growing number of elderly people will need to receive physical and financial care from a population that is shrinking. Industry 4.0 technology will need to be at the rescue.

In Industry 4.0, humans have to meet technology halfway

Cybernetics is a branch of a multidisciplinary discipline. It offers a framework for all aspects of human development – social, ecological, political, and technological, even psychological and philosophical. Moreover, cybernetics is neutral, a- political, universal and based on binary logic.

A plan is all that cybernetics requires. Without a plan, as Plato pointed out, society is like a ship at sea without a destination, a captain or a rudder. Cybernetics requires that we state our intentions, allocate the needed resources and select reliable navigators.

The fundamental distinction between artificial intelligence and cybernetics is due to a plan’s predominance. In the cybernetics framework, AI is “merely” a tool in a larger context. It can make a plan, but it ca n’t help us get there more quickly. Only people can come up with a plan and reach agreement on the goal.

Human feedback system, from “Cybernetics in Health Care”, Milsum and Laszlo

Chinese economist Lu, in his advice to the US government, &nbsp, argues that the US urgently needs a plan. In the last 40 years, China and the nation have exchanged locations. China industrialized, the US de- industrialized. Millions of Chinese people migrated to the middle class, and millions of Americans emigrated. China had a plan, the US did not.

The fate of the US is a global concern. The US is in a financial death spiral without taking care of its debt. The national budget’s interest payments on the national debt are now the largest budgetary item. The cost of paying off the debt could outweigh any other government expenditures unless the nation makes a drastic and agonizing course correction. &nbsp,

According to economists, a nation that can print its own currency is never bankrupt. Technically speaking, that may be true, but it does not explain why a nation that can print its own currency also needs to borrow US$ 34 trillion to pay its government. This contradictory system will be put to the test by the BRICS and the growing de-dollarization coalition.

Global debt is approaching now over$ 300 trillion, or 235 % of global GDP, the highest since the Napoleonic Wars. A dollar implosion would have a negative impact on all of the world’s nations, as well as the global fiat system. Skilled navigators are necessary to navigate the world to the other side of the debt crisis.

New Thinking

The word cybernetics was first used in the modern political context by André- Marie Ampère, the French scientist and philosopher who discovered electromagnetism. Ampère, who also studied social and political systems, argued that” the future science of governance should be called cybernetics”.

Physicist Bruce Lindsay, author of the 1970&nbsp, paper” The Larger Cybernetics”, speculated on Ampère’s reasoning for using the term cybernetics. He wrote:

Ampère first used the term” cybernetique” to refer to the science of government in this memoir. Since the word “helmsman” or “governor” is used in Greek to indicate the person in charge of the ship’s direction, he clearly felt appropriate.

It is possible to say that this is the beginning of the formal recognition of control science, even though it does not appear that Ampère’s definition attracted much attention in the nineteenth century, nor does it do so in the present, until Norbert Wiener revived the term in his 1948 book, Cybernetics, making an effort to establish the subject in a more formal way.

Ampère may have influenced German philosopher Martin Heidegger, who studied the human relation to technology ( he spoke of” technicity.” ) Heidegger claimed that Friedrich Nietzsche’s nihilism had reached its zenith in a 1966 interview with Der Spiegel, which made it clear that European philosophy was insufficiently prepared to deal with technological developments. Asked what comes after philosophy, Heidegger replied:” Cybernetics.”

Heidegger added another way of thinking, “adding,” meaning the way that Nietzsche’s method of thinking contributed to the development of technology’s fundamental thrust.

Continue Reading

Can”t come soon enough

By:
On:
In: South-East Asia
Can't come soon enough
Nikorn: ‘ New contract within four times ‘

The journey to creating a brand-new mandate is expected to be exhausting and tedious.

In fact, one party appears to be finding the job to be increasingly difficult as the government releases a preliminary schedule for the rewriting.

Pheu Thai’s reputation as a ruling party was assumed by some as the party, who had promised to create a high law that was both democrat in letter and spirit during the election of last year.

The Move Forward Party ( MPF), which fought alongside Pheu Thai and Pheu Thai to replace the current mandate, which they criticized as the result of a tyranny when both parties were in criticism during the preceding Prayut Chan- o gan management, is the most depressed.

The MFP has made a number of statements about the slower speed at which the proposed contract shifts are moving.

According to a cause, the main opposition party has every reason to believe that a quick passage to a fresh constitution might prove to be its saving grace.

The Election Commission voted unanimously on March 12 to ask the Supreme Court to dissolve the MFP, which was accepted as a reading.

The committee contends that the MFP even violated Section 92 of the natural law on political parties in a decision made by the court on January 31 in which it found that MFP efforts to alter Part 112 of the Criminal Code, the der guess law, amounted to an attempt to undermine the democratic monarchy. The jury is empowered to dissolve any group that threatens the democratic monarchy under this section.

The MFP may get free of the knife, according to the source, if the charter redraft may replace the current prohibition on the Constitutional Court from disbanding political parties.

However, the government’s most current information regarding the contract update timeline was unsatisfying for the MFP.

The contract update may take years, according to Chartthaipattana Party list MP Nikorn Chamnong, who is the subcommittee’s leader, who is gathering views on the proposed reform of the whole 2017 charter. The Constitutional Court’s decision regarding the EC’s complaint against the MFP may be rendered before the middle of the yr.

The government-appointed council, led by Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai, oversees the Nikorn subpanel’s investigation into the referendums that will be held as a crucial component of the contract update effort.

Much to the MFP’s astonishment, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin confirmed the Phumtham council’s decision to hold three elections before a new contract can be approved.

The first will ask the electorate if they approve of a fresh contract. The next election will inquire if Section 256 may be amended to allow for the creation of a new contract if the majority of voters agree.

When a new contract is produced, the government may hold a second vote, asking voters to choose whether it should be adopted.

The MFP insists two may suffice. Two may save money and time while also adhering to the law, according to MFP record MP Rangsiman Rome.

The second vote is scheduled to take place either at the end of July or in early August, according to Mr. Nikorn, and it will cost about 3.2 billion ringgit. The government may work up a bill of nearly 10 billion baht, according to estimates for the two different referendums, which are roughly equal in price.

He added that the whole process for enacting a new mandate would be finished before the government finds business in less than four years.

According to the cause, Pheu Thai could not possibly benefit from replacing the current mandate, and it might not be as motivated as the MFP, who is also in no hurry to pass the constitutional amendment bill.

In fact, the election law itself is a hindrance to the enactment of a new charter. More than 50 % of eligible voters must take part in a referendum, and the majority of those voting may review the new contract, according to the “double lot” condition.

According to Mr. Srettha, the cabinet recently made a decision to change Referendum Act 2021 in order to end the “double majority” rule and make it simpler for a new charter to pass a referendum.

Caught in the crosshairs

After Pheu Thai Party-led government leader Paetongtarn Shinawatra criticized the BoT’s monetary policy and questioned its independence, apparent tensions between the Pheu Thai Party-led government and the Bank of Thailand ( BoT ) are now public.

Ms. Paetongtarn addressed the controversy between the BoT and Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin at a party event on May 3.

According to Ms. Paetongtarn, the government’s fiscal policy has been burdened by the BoT’s monetary policy, and the law keeping the central bank a government-independent means that efforts to resolve economic issues are hampered by it.

” If the BoT does n’t understand and cooperate with the government]in its efforts to tackle economic problems], we ca n’t ]win ]”, she told the event’s attendees.

Paetongtarn: Rate speech stirs alarm

The central bank’s criticism of Ms. Paetongtarn has sparked controversy, with some expressing concern about potential political interference in monetary policy. This is widely accepted as essential to maintaining economic stability and credibility.

The ruling coalition may use its majority in parliament to push for an amendment to the Bank of Thailand Act to impede the BoT’s independence, according to Sirikanya Tansakul, the opposition’s Move Forward Party ( MFP).

” It’s wrong to force the BoT to adhere to government objectives.” The MFP list- MP also stated that it is incorrect to believe that the BoT’s independence prevents the country from resolving its economic problems.

Despite Mr. Srettha’s assurances that no plans were being considered to remove the BoT governor or change the law, Ms. Paetongtarn’s comments are alarming to other critics. However, the critics doubt whether the prime minister is really in the driver’s seat.

Paroled former minister Thaksin Shinawatra, known as the de facto leader of Phue Thai, is not a believer in BoT independence. The Pheu Thai administration has previously been under political pressure on the central bank.

” We must keep an eye on this and see if the Pheu Thai-led government will act in the manner that Ms. Paetongtarn’s claims suggest. Some people say Ms Paetongtarn was just reading from the script, but I think she has inherited it]Thaksin’s belief the BoT should not be independent ].

” And everyone knows who is pulling the strings,” ex-Democratic MP Sathit Wongnongtoey said.

Pheu Thai stalwarts argued in Ms. Paetongtarn’s defense that their party leader’s remarks were merely a call for greater coordination between monetary and fiscal policies in order to solve economic problems.

Phumtham Wechayachai, the Deputy Prime Minister, and Phumtham Wechayachai, the minister of commerce, both made the point that the BoT is not immune from criticism.

” It is not an agency that cannot be criticised. Ms Paetongtarn’s criticism shows she is sincere and concerned that the BoT’s refusal to cut interest rates will affect people,” said Mr Phumtham.

Thanaporn Sriyakul, director of the Political and Public Policy Analysis Institute, thought Mr Phumtham’s response was off the mark because the BoT has always faced public scrutiny.

” But critics, including the press, have never indicated an intention to intervene in its work, “he said.

According to Mr Thanaporn, the Pheu Thai leader’s speech on May 3 was a total disaster. Her remarks were misguided, making the public question her grasp of basic economic principles.

Reading from a script without really understanding the issues she discusses, Ms Paetongtarn stands in stark contrast to Ms Sirikanya, who displays a thorough understanding of economic policymaking, said the analyst.

He argued that Ms. Paetongtarn should be better informed and stay away from economic issues until she has learned more about the economic system or is able to distinguish between public and private debt.

According to Mr. Thanaporn, Ms. Paetongtarn, who is being groomed to become the party’s next prime minister, needs training and mentorship and should concentrate on self-education regarding economic principles and policies in order to get ready for the position.

The ruling party can use its resources to support Ms Paetongtarn’s political maturity now that the Pheu Thai Party Academy has been established to develop the potential of Pheu Thai members, he said.

That day, Ms. Paetongtarn failed. She might be overconfident. Unless she is better equipped, she does n’t stand a chance in a debate with anyone from the MFP, “he said.

As things stand now, the Pheu Thai Party, perceived as neo- conservative to fend off the MFP, seems to be no match for the main opposition party, according to Mr Thanaporn.

Despite the party being in charge of the coalition, he noted, Pheu Thai’s younger MPs appear to lack vision in achieving party objectives.

Continue Reading

PM confirms Krisada departure, plans talks with UTN

By:
On:
In: South-East Asia

PUBLISHED: 10 May 2024 at 15: 01

PM confirms Krisada departure, plans talks with UTN
Srettha Thavisin, the prime minister, tides to investigators as he leaves Government House on September 25, 2023. ( Photo: Chanat Katanyu )

Krisada Chinavicharana’s appointment as assistant minister of finance has been confirmed by Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin. Due to this decision, the United Thai Nation ( UTN) Party of alliance has been discussing a possible alternative.

A meeting with the UTN is scheduled on the outside of the portable cabinet meeting the following year, according to the prime minister, who announced on Friday that Mr. Krisada’s departure was effective soon.

Mr. Krisada was the only UTN lawmaker in charge of the Finance Ministry following the most recent government change. After being given the task of leading only the Public Debt Management Office ( PDMO), the former permanent secretary for finance reportedly felt dissatisfied with his new duties.

Mr Pichai and his two different representatives, Paopoom Rojanasakul and Julaphan Amornvivat, are from the ruling Pheu Thai Party.

Parnpree Bahiddha-Nakara resigned as foreign affairs minister in protest of being removed from the position of deputy prime minister, and Mr. Krisada is the next cabinet minister in recent months.

Tuesday’s gathering of the wireless government will take place at Phetchaburi Rajabhat University in the state of Phetchaburi. The major function of the primary minister’s two- time vacation includes visits to Prachuap Khiri Khan, Samut Sakhon and Samut Songkhram.

Mr. Srettha stated that his primary objective is to address the concerns of citizens rather than to win support for Pheu Thai from various political events.

Continue Reading