Commentary: Musk, Myanmar and the murky future of internet freedom

NETWORK DEPENDENCY IMPLICATIONS GENERAL IMPLICATIONS
To be clear, system interdependence has a global impact that goes beyond Myanmar. Similar risks exist in nations that depend on foreign-owned digital infrastructure, including undersea cables and cloud providers. Political power plays are now a reality for governments that once saw connection as a purely financial or cultural tool.
The US has already shown that it is willing to utilize key technology, as evidenced by the restrictions and taxes imposed on the semiconductor sector. Dependable groups may remain in limbo if the same approach was used for satellite internet companies.
Countries and resistance movements had diversify their online infrastructure and engage in alternative technologies to reduce these risks. For opposition groups, innovative thinking and a thorough knowledge of communication techniques are required.
Before choosing a method of communication, they should take into account the type of information they want to communicate and their target market. Not all forms of communication require internet exposure; it should not even be the preferred method of communication in troubled or prone areas.
A possible solution is provided by localized wire networks, which enable devices to communicate without central internet providers. With the help of this technology, computers and other devices can communicate instantly without having to use any key power.
In Haiti, The Serval Project was established to build a disaster-proof wifi network that would enable cellular-like communications in the presence of mobile signals. Similar to how the Open Mesh Project aims to provide free and open communications to people who are subject to government online persecution.
In the end, connectivity is power, and many people are unfortunately liable for having it concentrated in the hands of a select few. As Myanmar’s opposition groups and regular people manage their online futures, they should be aware of the risks of transferring their conversation lifelines to foreigners, especially in a time when politics can determine who stays connected and who is left in the dark.
The global community should in turn acknowledge the risks of allowing a small number of private players to have control over important electronic equipment in conflict areas. Failure to comply with this will not only have an impact on Myanmar, but it will also set a worrying precedent for global digital sovereignty and digital freedom.
Surachanee Sriyai works for the Yusof Ishak Institute’s Media, Technology, and Society Program. The Institute’s website, Fulcrum, originally contained this remark.