Before the missiles: How disinformation could spark Asia’s next war – Asia Times

” The issue with false information is not that citizens believe it. The issue is that they no longer assume anything.
— Yuval Noah Harari, 21 Training for the 21st Century

The largest Western issue since World War II was sparked by Russia’s massive invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. However, this conflict is more than just being won with tanks and missiles; it is also a constant struggle between reality and understanding.

Propaganda, propaganda, and media exploitation have become essential tools of contemporary war from Kyiv to Moscow, and from Washington to Beijing.

The battle for tale dominance is fundamentally influencing the war’s course even though the focus is still largely on natural battlegrounds. The fight against details is occurring all over the world, and Asia is carefully watching.

The Russia-Ukraine conflict teaches somber lessons about how disinformation can be used to destroy, separate, and rule as geopolitical tensions increase throughout the Indo-Pacific, especially in Taiwan, the South China Sea, and as always the Korean Peninsula.

Propaganda as a means of corporate warfare

Propaganda has long been used to stifle opposition, support anger, and elicit acceptance. However, thanks to digital platforms, analytic synthesis, and a squabbling media environment, its scope and scale have grown rapidly in the 21st century.

Russian position advertising sources like RT and Sputnik have become a key component of the Kremlin’s tale planning. These platforms condition reality rather than just broadcasting information.

Moscow has swung local support and soiled international waters by portraying Russia’s actions as “defensive” and portraying Ukraine as a European marionette state.

However, each country’s narrative is unique. The issue is described by US and Western media as an unprovoked war of a royal state, a view that NATO, EU institutions, and international human rights organizations have reinforced.

The outcome? Competing experiences where viewers watch vastly various adaptations of the same function.

” Misinformation and disinformation” are among the biggest threats to global security, according to the World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Report 2024. This danger is even greater in conflict areas.

False stories, elaborated theories, and coordinated promotions blur the line between fact and fiction, lowering public confidence in journalism, governance, and yet democracy itself.

This distrust is way beyond Ukraine. Governments in Asia have faced and used disinformation campaigns, both domestically and internationally, that polarize cultures and misrepresent votes.

China’s online advertising in Taiwan aims to denigrate and divide the country. These aren’t just isolated incidents; they represent a vision of the unseen war that will shape the world.

Russia and the West internet conflict

How people interpret fight in the media is a crucial part of the equation. How how information is presented, in Erving Goffman’s Framing Theory, affects how people perceive truth.

Consider the missile attack launched by 2022 against a shopping mall in Kremenchuk, an Ukrainian capital. According to the Western press, it was a deliberate Russian invasion on citizens, citing satellite imagery and Russian sources. Russian media accused American media of fabricating information and claimed the destination was a military installation.

The incident demonstrates how the same event can lead to two contradictory conclusions, one for the West and the country’s private audience.

Propaganda produces compromise rather than just manipulating information. State media claimed 95 % of people supported the proceed during Russia’s 2014 annexation, despite reports of persuasion and a lack of international spectators.

The purpose of the conquest was to silence opposition by presenting unification as fact rather than just to justify it.

Similar strategies have been employed in Asia to window contentious activities. How institutions use internet control to create the illusion of national compromise while marginalizing opposition voices are shown by China’s management of the protests in Hong Kong, India’s narrative surrounding Kashmir, or Myanmar’s protection of the Rohingya crisis.

International fragmentation and horizontal realities

The design of horizontal realities is one of the most disturbing outcomes of information warfare.

The invasion of Ukraine is widely regarded as a” special military operation” by Russia to defend ethnic Russians from NATO anger. It is viewed as a flagrant violation of international law in the West.

This fragmentation makes political exchange almost unattainable. When people are fed jointly exclusive philosophies, settlement turns out to be a sign of weakness rather than development.

This style is present in Asia as well, from China and Taiwan’s cross-Strait ties to domestic disagreements over international legislation in Japan and South Korea.

Ukrainian public opinion has remained mostly pro-Western despite Russian media’s and its allies ‘ constant pushback. 89 % of Ukrainians support joining NATO, according to a survey conducted by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology in 2023. Support for Russian independence is rising even in previously pro-Russian regions.

However, the stress of battle is beginning to percolate. Gallup reported that the percentage of people who supported fighting until they won the battle dropped from 73 % in 2022 to 38 % in 2023. These shifting sentiments identify the psychological impact of persistent issue, which authoritarian governments frequently exploit through info adjustment.

Asia’s conundrum of propaganda

Unregulated disinformation can do harm, not just to countries at war, but also to the international system as a whole, with the Russia-Ukraine war providing a terrible forecast for what unregulated disinformation can do.

The implications for Asia are clear: if disinformation persists, it may continue to undermine public trust, undermine political institutions, and aggravate local tensions.

The Indo-Pacific is now a location for narrative conflicts. A potential where electric influence operations become the norm, as evidenced by China’s growing media coverage, North Korea’s growing private disinformation, and Southeast Asians ‘ growing private disinformation.

To combat this unknown war, Asia may engage in media education, cybersecurity, and cross-border collaboration. Then, Asia might be the front line, and the next major conflict might be won with words rather than weapons.

The Russia-Ukraine issue redefines how wars are fought and understood, not just by reinventing Eastern Europe. The greatest danger, as Harari suggests, may not be that people stop believing everything, but rather that they do so in spite of what Harari suggests.

The stakes don’t get higher for Asia. The region has take decisive action to safeguard truth, transparency, and trust as information becomes more and more a weapon.

Zaheer Ahmed Baloch is a professor of international relations with a focus on media dynamics in world affairs and security.

Continue Reading

China foreign minister says US tariffs show “extreme egoism”

Beijing supports international regulations on US-imposed tariffs and opposes protectionism, according to China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Saturday ( Apr 26 ). Wang said Beijing may get cooperation with other nations regarding the tariff situation and expose “extreme altruism” and the harassment of some nations, as the government saidContinue Reading

A Chinese prison helped fuel the deadly fentanyl crisis in the US – Asia Times

This article was originally published by ProPublica, a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom.

Reporting Highlights

  • Pipeline: A Chinese prison is part of the pipeline that delivers fentanyl to the US, ProPublica found in a review of US and Chinese documents and interviews with investigators.
  • Fallout: Opioid overdoses have killed more Americans than the number of US deaths in several wars combined.
  • Permissive: Veteran federal agents told ProPublica that China has failed to cooperate and even interfered with drug investigations; China insists it has cracked down.

China’s vast security apparatus shrouds itself in shadows, but the outside world has caught periodic glimpses of it behind the faded gray walls of Shijiazhuang prison in the northern province of Hebei.

Chinese media reports have shown inmates hunched over sewing machines in a garment workshop in the sprawling facility. Business leaders and Chinese Communist Party dignitaries have praised the penitentiary for exemplifying President Xi Jinping’s views on the rule of law.

But the prison has an alarming secret, US congressional investigators disclosed last year. They revealed evidence showing that it is a Chinese government outpost in the trafficking pipeline that inundates the United States with fentanyl.

For at least eight years, the prison owned a chemical company called Yafeng, the hub of a group of Chinese firms and websites that sold fentanyl products to Americans, according to the US congressional investigation, as well as Chinese government and corporate records obtained by ProPublica.

The company’s English-language websites brazenly offered US customers dangerous drugs that are illegal in both nations. Promising to smuggle illicit chemicals past US and Mexican border defenses, Yafeng boasted to American clients that “100% of our shipments will clear customs.”

Although China tightly restricts the domestic manufacturing, sale and use of fentanyl products, the nation has been the world’s leading producer of fentanyl that enters the United States and remains the leading producer of chemical precursors with which Mexican cartels make the drug.

Overdoses on synthetic opioid drugs, most of them fentanyl related, have killed over 450,000 Americans during the past decade — more than the US deaths in the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined.

The involvement of a state-run prison is just one sign of the Chinese government’s role in fomenting the US fentanyl crisis, US investigators say. Chinese leaders have insistently denied such allegations. But US national security officials said the Yafeng case shows how China allows its chemical industry to engage openly in sales to overseas customers while blocking online domestic access and enforcing stern laws against drug dealing inside the country.

Beijing also encourages the manufacture and export of fentanyl products, including drugs outlawed in China, with generous financial incentives, according to a bipartisan inquiry last year by the House Select Committee on Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party.

“So the Chinese government pays you to send drugs to America but executes you for selling them in China,” Matt Cronin, a former federal prosecutor who led the House inquiry, said in an interview. “It’s impossible that the Chinese Communist Party doesn’t know what’s going on and can’t do anything about it.”

China’s antidrug cooperation has been persistently poor, US officials said. In 2019, Xi imposed controls that cut the export of fentanyl, but Chinese sellers shifted to shipping precursors to Mexico, where the cartels expanded their production.

“We couldn’t get the Chinese on the phone to talk about fighting child pornography, let alone fentanyl,” said Jacob Braun, who served as a senior official at the Department of Homeland Security during the Biden administration. “There was zero cooperation.”

China also remains the base of global organized crime groups that launder billions for fentanyl traffickers in the US, Mexico and Canada. ProPublica has previously reported that this underground banking system depends on Chinese elite who move fortunes abroad by acquiring drug cash from Chinese criminal brokers for Mexican cartels. Chinese banks and businesses also help hide the origin of illicit proceeds.

The regime in Beijing therefore has considerable control over key nodes in the fentanyl chain: raw materials, production, sales and money laundering.

US leaders, Democrats and Republicans alike, have accused China of using fentanyl to weaken the United States. Some veteran agents agree.

Ray Donovan, who retired in 2023 as the Drug Enforcement Administration’s chief of operations, said he believes that a “deliberate strategy” by the Chinese state has caused the trafficking onslaught “to grow in size and scope.”

“They have said for years that they are cracking down,” Donovan said in an interview. “But we haven’t seen meaningful action.”

Still, current and former US officials told ProPublica that the national security community has not found conclusive evidence of a planned, high-level campaign against Americans by the Chinese government. That is partly because for years the US treated fentanyl as a law enforcement matter rather than a national security threat, making it hard to gather intelligence about the extent and nature of the regime’s role.

“If this was Chinese intelligence doing something, we have a focus on that as counterintelligence,” said Alan Kohler, who retired from the FBI in 2023 after serving as director of the counterintelligence division. “If it was drug cartels, we have a criminal focus on that. But this area of crime and state converging falls between the seams in and among agencies.”

Nonetheless, the current and former officials said rampant fentanyl trafficking could not continue without at least the passive complicity of the world’s most powerful police state.

“I haven’t seen smoking-gun evidence that it’s a policy or strategy of the government at a high level,” Kohler said. “You could argue that their decision not to do anything about it, even after the results are clear, is tacit support.”

In a written statement, the spokesperson for China’s embassy in Washington described as “totally groundless” any allegation that the regime has fomented the crisis.

“The fentanyl issue is the US’s own problem,” said the spokesperson, Liu Pengyu. “China has given support to the US’s response to the fentanyl issue in the spirit of humanity.” At the United States’ request, he said, China in 2019 restricted “fentanyl-related substances as a class,” becoming the first country to do so, and has cooperated with the US on counternarcotics.

“The remarkable progress is there for all to see.”

The Trump administration has made the fight against fentanyl a priority and in February imposed a 25% tariff on Chinese imports to pressure Beijing for results. The approach could put a dent in the drug trade, but it’s too early to tell, officials said.

“The Chinese system responds to a negative incentive,” said former FBI agent Holden Triplett, who served as legal attache in Beijing and director of counterintelligence on the National Security Council. “China may be willing to endure more pain than we can give. But it is our only chance.”

To respond effectively, the US needs a clearer picture of the Chinese fentanyl underworld, Triplett and others say. The activities of the Shijiazhuang prison are a compelling case study, but not the only one.

To examine the role of the Chinese state in the drug trade, ProPublica interviewed more than three dozen current and former national security officials for the US and other countries, some of whom provided exclusive inside accounts. The reporting also drew on last year’s House investigation, digging into significant findings that have received little public attention, plus court files, government documents, academic studies, private inquiries and public records in the US, China and Mexico.

Prison business

In 2010, the Hebei Prison Administration Bureau combined three detention facilities to create a high-security prison in Shijiazhuang, the capital of Hebei province. The region is a base of China’s chemical industry, which is the largest in the world. It is also weakly regulated and freewheeling, according to US national security officials, private studies and other sources. Companies peddle everything from innocuous fertilizers to deadly opioids.

Liu Jianhua, a veteran Chinese Communist Party official with a master’s degree in business administration from the University of Illinois Chicago, became director of the prison in 2014. By then, fentanyl was cutting a swath across America. Overdose deaths soared due to the ease with which US users and dealers could acquire fentanyl products by mail from China.

China’s high-tech surveillance apparatus aggressively polices the online activities of its citizens. Yet sales of fentanyl to foreigners have thrived on popular, easily accessible websites, said Frank Montoya Jr., a former FBI agent with years of China-related experience who served as a top U.S. counterintelligence official.

“You don’t have to go on the dark web,” Montoya said. “It is out in the open.”

Yafeng Biological Technology Co. Ltd., also known as Hebei Shijiazhuang Yafeng Chemical Plant, became a typical player on this frontier, the congressional inquiry found. (As part of its reporting, ProPublica mapped links between the prison, the company and the US drug market with the help of two entities that specialize in China open-source research: Sayari, a company that provides risk management and supply-chain analysis and that supported the House inquiry, and C4ADS, a nonprofit that investigates illicit global networks.)

Yafeng’s websites and Chinese corporate records describe the firm as a chemical manufacturer. It has ties through other websites, phone numbers and email addresses to at least nine companies that advertised illicit drugs, causing investigators to conclude that Yafeng was a network hub, according to the report and interviews. It’s common for interconnected Chinese fentanyl producers and brokers to obscure details about their enterprises and change names and platforms to elude detection, US officials said.

In some ways, Yafeng presented itself to foreign buyers as a respectable company. The English-language websites featured peppy phrases like “team spirit” and “promoting the well-being of community.” The China-based sales representatives gave themselves Western names: Diana, Monica, Jessica. A map of markets showed shipping routes from China to the United States, Mexico, Canada and other countries.

Yet the sales pitches left little doubt that the firm knew its activities were illegal. Yafeng websites utilized familiar terms assuring US and Mexican drug users and traffickers of the company’s skill at smuggling illegal narcotics overseas, according to the House report and US investigators.

The company touted its use of “hidden food bags,” a method in which drugs are concealed in shipments labeled as food products. Ads promised “strong safety delivery to Mexico, USA” with “packaging made to measure” to “guarantee” that illicit chemicals would elude border inspections, documents show.

Chinese traffickers often discuss lawbreaking in such brazen terms with foreign customers, seemingly unconcerned about China’s omnipresent surveillance system, court files and interviews show.

Another firm, Hubei Amarvel Biotech, explicitly explained to US and Mexican clients online — complete with photos — its methods for “100% stealth shipping” of drugs disguised as nuts, dog food and motor oil, court documents say. After undercover DEA agents lured two Amarvel executives to Fiji and arrested them, a New York jury convicted them in February on charges of importation of fentanyl precursors and money laundering. (One defendant, Yiyi Chen, has filed a motion requesting an acquittal or retrial.)

At the time of the arrests, the Chinese government issued a statement condemning the US prosecution as “a typical example of arbitrary detention and unilateral sanctions.”

Similarly, Yafeng websites displayed photos of narcotics in plastic baggies to peddle a long list of chemicals, including fentanyl precursors and U-47700, a powerful fentanyl analogue outlawed in both the US and China that has no medical use, the House report says.

One victim of U-47700 was Garrett Holman of Lynchburg, Virginia. Holman had fallen in with youths who discovered how easy it was to buy synthetic drugs online. In late 2016, Holman overdosed on U-47700, street name “pinky,” that arrived by mail from southern China. His father, Don, performed CPR before paramedics rushed Holman to the hospital. Although he survived, another overdose killed him just days before his 21st birthday in February 2017.

“My son’s opioid exposure was less than two months,” Don Holman told a hearing of the House Foreign Affairs Committee the next year. “At 20 years old, I do not believe my son deserved to die for his initial bad choices.”

The father handed over evidence, including the envelope in which the drugs arrived, to federal agents, who traced about 20 shipments back to the same sender in China, he said in an interview. Don Holman blames the fentanyl crisis on the American appetite for opioids as well as the Chinese government. He has spent eight years telling anyone he can, from drug czars to fellow parents, about the experience that shattered his family.

“I’ve had to hit parents right between the eyes, like: ‘Hey, your child is not going to be here if you don’t do something,” he said. “You need to wake up.’”

No link to Yafeng surfaced in that case. The firm’s sales of U-47700 and other illicit drugs occurred during a period when its sole owner and controlling shareholder was the Shijiazhuang prison, according to the House inquiry, Sayari and C4ADS.

One of Yafeng’s street addresses was that of the prison, ProPublica determined through satellite photos and public records. Another Yafeng address next door also houses the offices of a clothing firm owned by the provincial prison administration. A third Yafeng address a few blocks away is a former municipal police station, records and photos show.

The director of the prison, Liu Jianhua, left his post after becoming the target of a corruption inquiry in 2021, according to Chinese media reports. It’s unknown how that investigation was resolved or if his fall had anything to do with the drug activity. Liu could not be reached for comment. The prison administration did not respond to requests for comment.

Yafeng stopped doing business under that name at some point between 2018 and 2022, records show. Yet the Yafeng group continued to function through at least one of its affiliated websites, protonitazene.com, the congressional report said. As of last year, the site was still advertising “hot sale to Mexico” of drugs including nitazenes, which are 25 times more powerful than fentanyl.

Government incentives

Yafeng is not the only company with connections to the Chinese state and fentanyl.

Gaosheng Biotechnology in Shanghai is “wholly state-owned,” congressional investigators found. The company sold fentanyl precursors and other narcotics — some illegal in China — on 98 websites to US, Mexican and European customers, the report says. Senior provincial development officials visited Gaosheng and praised its benefits for the regional economy. Gaosheng did not respond to requests for comment.

The Chinese government owned a stake in Zhejiang Netsun, a private firm that had a Chinese Communist Party member serving on its board of directors as a deputy general manager, the congressional report says. Netsun carried out over 400 sales of illegal narcotics, the report says, and served as a billing or technical contact for over 100 similar companies — including Yafeng. Netsun did not respond to requests for comment.

And the Shanghai government gave monetary awards and export credits to Shanghai Ruizheng Chemical Technology Co., a “notorious seller of fentanyl products, which it advertises widely and openly on Chinese websites like Alibaba,” the report says. Chinese officials invited company reps to roundtable discussions about technology and business. Shanghai Ruizheng did not respond to requests for comment.

Chinese government officials who interact with the trafficking underworld are often prominent in provincial governments, where corruption is widespread, said a former senior DEA official, Donald Im, who led investigations focused on China. Not only can they make money through kickbacks or investments, but they benefit politically, rising in the Communist Party hierarchy if their local chemical industries prosper.

“Key government officials know about the fentanyl trade and they let it happen,” Im said.

China’s central government also plays a vital role by providing systemic financial incentives that fuel fentanyl trafficking to the Americas, US officials say. The House inquiry discovered a national Value-Added Tax rebate program that has spurred exports of at least 17 illegal narcotics with no legitimate purpose. They include a fentanyl product that is “up to 6,000 times stronger than morphine,” the House report says.

This state subsidy program has pumped billions of dollars into the export of fentanyl products, including ones outlawed in China, according to the report and US officials. The tax rebate is 13%, the highest available rate. To qualify, companies have to document the names and quantities of chemicals and other details of transactions, the report says.

The existence of this paper trail refutes a frequent claim by Chinese leaders: that weak regulation of the chemical sector makes it impossible to identify and punish suspects.

Chinese officials did not respond to specific questions about the government financial incentives or the state-connected companies involved in drug trafficking. But the embassy spokesperson said China has targeted online sellers with a “national internet cleanup campaign.”

During that crackdown, Liu Pengyu said, Chinese authorities have cleaned “14 online platforms, canceled over 330 company accounts, shut down over 1,000 online shops, removed over 152,000 online advertisements, and closed 10 botnet websites.” He said Chinese law enforcement has determined that many illegal ads appear on foreign online platforms.

Wall of resistance

In May 2018, Cronin — then a federal prosecutor based in Cleveland — went to Beijing in pursuit of one of the biggest targets in the grim history of the fentanyl crisis: the Zheng drug trafficking organization, an international empire accused of trafficking in 37 US states.

Cronin and his team of agents hoped to persuade Chinese authorities to prosecute Guanghua and Fujing Zheng, a father and son who were the top suspects. They ran into a wall of resistance.

In an interview, Cronin recalled walking into a cavernous room in China’s Ministry of Public Security where a row of senior officials and uniformed police waited at a long table. A curtain-sized Chinese flag covered a wall.

Cronin took a breath, opened a stack of binders he had lugged from Cleveland and presented his case. The prosecutor laid out evidence connecting the Zhengs, who were chemical company executives based in Shanghai, to two overdoses in Ohio. The US distribution hub was a warehouse near Boston run by a Chinese chemist, Bin Wang. Later, Wang said he simultaneously worked for the Chinese government “tracking chemicals produced in China” and traveled home monthly from Boston “to consult with Chinese officials,” a memo by his lawyer said.

The response of the Chinese counterdrug chiefs was a brush-off, Cronin recalled in the interview. Essentially, he said, they told him: “You are right that the Zhengs are exporting these drugs that are killing Americans. But unfortunately, technically what they are doing is not a violation of Chinese law.”

Cronin pulled out another binder. He went over evidence and an expert analysis showing that the Zhengs had committed Chinese felonies, including money laundering, manufacturing of counterfeit drugs and mislabeling of packages.

Tensions rose when the Chinese officials responded that, unfortunately, the police unit that handled such offenses was not available; they rebuffed Cronin’s offer to delay his return flight in order to meet with that unit, he said.

After the US Justice Department charged the Zhengs that August with a drug trafficking conspiracy resulting in death, a Chinese newspaper reported that a Chinese senior counterdrug official criticized the case. The US “failed to provide China any evidence to prove Zheng violated Chinese law,” the official said.

Later, the US Treasury Department sanctioned the Zhengs and designated the son as a drug kingpin. US investigators told ProPublica they concluded that the Zhengs operated with the blessing of the Chinese government, citing the defendants’ sheer volume of business, high-profile online activity and open communications on WeChat, the Chinese messaging platform that authorities heavily monitor.

Ohio courts granted millions of dollars in civil damages to the family of Thomas Rauh, a 37-year-old who died of an overdose in Akron in 2015. The family never received any money, however.

Rauh’s father, James, who traveled and did business in China in his youth, has become an antidrug activist. He said the US government must do more to crack down on China’s role and counter public stigma that still blames addicts.

“I don’t think the US government wants to take the responsibility for confronting this,” he said.

A decade of frustration has compelled James Rauh to call for a drastic solution. He wants the US to designate fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction in response to what he sees as an intentional Chinese campaign.

“It’s asymmetric warfare,” he said.

Wang pleaded guilty and served prison time. The Zhengs, however, remain free in China and have never responded to the allegations in court. During a brief encounter with a “60 Minutes” journalist in Shanghai in 2019, Guanghua Zheng denied he was still selling fentanyl in the United States and said the Chinese government “has nothing to do with it.”

The Zheng case is typical, said Im, the former senior DEA official. Thousands of DEA leads relayed to Chinese counterparts over the years have been “met with silence,” he said. In other cases, Chinese officials have asked for more details about the targets of US investigations — and then warned suspects linked to the Communist Party, Im said.

Most US national security officials interviewed for this story described similar experiences, citing a few exceptions, such as a joint US-Chinese operation in Hebei province in 2019.

A former DEA agent, William Kinghorn, recalled the dispiriting aftermath of an investigation he oversaw centered on Chuen Fat Yip, whose firms allegedly distributed more than $280 million worth of drugs. Yip has denied wrongdoing and denounced US criminal charges and sanctions. He is on the DEA’s 10 most wanted fugitives list and remains free in China, US officials said.

“We obtained information that the Chinese authorities did ban or shut down the companies” the DEA targeted in the case, Kinghorn said in an interview. “We learned that afterward these same people [linked to Yip] were now owning or managing similar companies. Even though they had been banned, they basically just changed the name of the company.”

A sense of impunity persists in the chemical industry, according to a 2023 inquiry by Elliptic, a UK analytics firm. It reported that many of the 90 Chinese companies contacted by its undercover researchers were “willing to supply fentanyl itself, despite this being banned in China since 2019.”

The final year of the Biden administration brought signs of modest progress in China, including new regulations, shutdowns of firms, and arrests of a suspected money launderer and four senior chemical company employees charged by US prosecutors.

Citing those cases from 2024, spokesperson Liu Pengyu said China has “collaborated closely” with the US, adding, “Multiple major cases are making great progress.”

Meanwhile, US overdose deaths fell by 33% compared with the previous year, according to the annual threat assessment by the US intelligence community released March 25. The drop may be tied to the increased availability of naloxone, a drug for treating overdoses, the report said.

The threat assessment report warned that “China likely will struggle to sufficiently constrain” companies and criminal groups involved in the US fentanyl trade, “absent greater law enforcement actions.”

Cronin, the former federal prosecutor, went on to become chief investigative counsel for the House Select Committee. He led last year’s inquiry into China’s role in the fentanyl crisis. The committee’s review of seven Chinese company websites found over 31,000 instances of firms offering illegal chemicals during a period of about three months in early 2024.

Undercover communications with the firms “revealed an eagerness to engage in clearly illicit drug sales,” the report says, “with no fear of reprisal.”

Kirsten Berg contributed research. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Continue Reading

With Trump talking with Tehran, could a new nuclear deal be next? – Asia Times

On April 26, Iranian and American diplomats are scheduled to meet again in Oman, which should raise hopes that, albeit cautiously, the two nations will be moving closer to a fresh nuclear agreement.

The planned talks follow the two preceding rounds of indirect conversations that have taken place under the new Trump presidency. Those conversations were deemed to have produced sufficient progress for sending nuclear specialists from both sides to initiate elaborating the specifics of a possible model for a deal.

Given that Trump unilaterally withdrawn the US from a bilateral agreement with Iran in 2018, the growth is particularly noteworthy. That package, negotiated during the Obama administration, place restrictions on Tehran’s atomic programme in return for sanctions relief. Trump rather pursued a plan that involved putting more pressure on Iran’s finances through increased punishment and making inherent military threats.

However, that strategy failed to halt Iran’s nuclear program.

Then, rather than resurrect the maximum pressure policy of his first term, Trump – always good to be seen as a dealmaker – has given his team the natural light for the renewed diplomacy and yet apparently rebuffed, for then, Israel’s desire to launch defense strikes against Tehran.

Jaw-jaw over a war-war

Iran-US ties are back to where they were under the Obama administration thanks to efforts to spur Iran on to curtail or ban uranium enrichment.

Only this time, with the US having left the previous offer in 2018, Iran has had seven years to improve on its enrichment capacity and hoard considerably more plutonium than had been allowed under the abandoned authority.

As a long-time analyst on US international policy and nuclear disarmament, I believe Trump has a unique chance to build a more comprehensive agreement and improve relationships with the Islamic Republic in the process.

It is true that Trump enjoys the optics of dealmaking, but there are also actual indications that a potential deal might be in the works.

But an agreement is by no means certain. Any progress toward a deal will be hampered by a number of factors, not the least of which are internal divisions and opposition within the Trump administration, skepticism among some in the Islamic Republic, and uncertainty over a succession plan for the ailing Ayatollah Khamenei.

Conservative hawks are still present in both nations, which could yet dampen any efforts to lower diplomatic tensions.

A checkered diplomatic past

There are also decades of untrust to be overcome.

Since the Iranian revolution of 1979 and the subsequent retakeover of the U.S. embassy in Tehran, it is understated to say that the US and Iran have had a tense relationship.

Many Iranians would say relations have been strained since 1953, when the US and the United Kingdom orchestrated the overthrow of Mohammad Mossadegh, the democratically elected prime minister of Iran.

Since 1979, Washington and Tehran haven’t established diplomatic relations, and their rival countries have waged decades-long conflicts over Middle Eastern influence. Concerning Iranian support for a so-called axis of resistance against the West and, specifically, US interests in the Middle East, tensions continue to rise today. That axis includes Hamas in Palestine, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen.

Tehran, for its part, has long balked at American dominance in the area, noting its unwavering support for Israel and its history of military action. In recent years, US action has included direct assaults on Iranian property and personnel. In particular, Tehran is still angry about the 2020 assassination of Qassem Soleimani, the head of the Quds Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Iran’s nuclear ambitions have remained a constant source of conflict for the United States and Israel, who are the only nuclear power in the area, despite these various disputes.

During the Obama administration, there was a chance for warmer relations between the two countries, despite the Bush administration’s rejection of Iran in 2003.

US diplomats began making contact with Iranian counterparts in 2009 when Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns met with an Iranian negotiator in Geneva. In 2013, the so-called P5 1 started direct negotiations with Iran. This made possible the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA ), or atomic deal, between Iran and the United States.

In that agreement – concluded by the US, Iran, China, Russia and a slew of European nations – Iran agreed to restrictions on its nuclear program, including limits on the level to which it could enrich uranium, which was capped well short of what would be necessary for a nuclear weapon. In exchange, US sanctions would be lifted from both bilateral and multilateral.

With the restraints on a growing nuclear power and hopes for greater economic cohesion with the international community that might lessen some of Iran’s more provocative foreign policy behavior, many observers saw it as a win-win situation.

Yet Israel and Saudi Arabia worried the deal did not entirely eliminate Iran’s ability to enrich uranium, and right-wing critics in the US complained it did not address Iran’s ballistic missile programs or support for militant groups in the region.

Trump and his team of experts in foreign policy pledged to reverse Obama’s course and close any diplomatic doors when he first took office in 2016. Trump unilaterally withdrew US support for the JCPOA despite Iran’s continued adhering to the terms of the deal and lifting sanctions.

Donald the dealmaker?

So what has changed? There are many things, I suppose.

While Trump’s withdrawal from the JCPOA was welcomed by Republicans, it did nothing to stop Iran from enhancing its ability to enrich uranium.

Saudi Arabia, in turn, is now supporting a deal it opposed during the Obama administration because it wants to change its image and diversify its economy.

Trump still harbors anti-Iran feelings in this second term. But despite his rhetoric of a military option should a deal not be struck, Trump has on numerous occasions stated his opposition to US involvement in another war in the Middle East.

Iran has also experienced a number of blows in recent years that have made it more isolated in the region. Hamas and Hezbollah, which are affiliated with Israel, have been severely weakened as a result of Israel’s military action. Meanwhile, strikes within Iran by Israel have shown the potential reach of Israeli missiles– and the apparent willingness of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to use them. Additionally, Iran has lost a regional ally as a result of President Bashar al-Assad’s removal from Syria.

Tehran also has to deal with a domestic economy that was more fragile during the JCPOA negotiations.

With Iran weakened regionally and Trump’s main global focus being China, a diplomatic avenue with Iran seems entirely in line with Trump’s view of himself as a dealmaker.

A deal is not a predetermined fact.

There appears to be a real window of opportunity for diplomacy now that two rounds of meetings have been completed and the move has been made to more technical aspects of a potential agreement has been negotiated by experts.

This could mean a new agreement that retains the core aspects of the deal Trump previously abandoned. In terms of the enrichment aspect, I’m not convinced that a new agreement will look any different from the one that was.

However, there are still a number of potential roadblocks standing in the way of any potential agreement.

The president appears to be less interested in details than spectacle, as was the case with Trump’s meetings with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un during his first term. Even though meeting with an American leader’s counterpart in North Korea was amazing, it ultimately did not make a significant difference in the direction of policy.

On Iran and other issues, the president displays little patience for complicated policy details. The US administration is complicated by intense factionalism, with many Iran hawks who appear to be opposed to a deal, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and national security adviser Mike Waltz. They could clash with newly appointed Vice President JD Vance and Undersecretary of Defense for policy Elbridge Colby, both of whom have previously pushed for a more diplomatic line toward Iran.

As has become a common theme in Trump administration foreign policy– even with its own allies on issues like trade – it’s unclear what a Trump administration policy on Iran actually is, and whether a political commitment exists to carry through any ultimate deal.

Steve Witkoff, the top Trump foreign policy negotiator without any prior experience, demonstrates this tension. Witkoff has already been forced to refute his claim that the US was only attempting to cap the level of uranium enrichment rather than to end the program entirely. He has already been given the task of leading negotiations with Iran.

For its part, Iran has proved that it is serious about diplomacy, previously having accepted Barack Obama’s “extended hand“.

Tehran, however, is unlikely to give in to its own interests or allow itself to suffer the consequences of any agreement.

In the end, the key question is whether pragmatists will reach an agreement with Iran and whether it will be narrow or expansive or stifled by hawks in the administration.

Jeffrey Fields is an associate professor of the practice of international relations at USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences.

This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the article’s introduction.

Continue Reading

India hunts militants in Kashmir as tensions with Pakistan soar

The nuclear-armed countries have unleashed a slew of measures andnbsp against one another, including Pakistan, India, which has abeyed the crucial Indus Waters Treaty, and Pakistan, which has closed its airspace to Indian carriers. The Indus River and its tributaries were divided between the two nations and their water revealingContinue Reading

Thailand, Australia target global crime

Pol Lt Gen Jirabhop Bhuridej, CIB Commissioner, exchanges mementoes with AFP Commissioner Reece Kershaw. (Photo: Wassayos Ngamkham)
Pol Lt. Gen. Jirabhop Bhuridej, CIB Commissioner, and AFP Commissioner Reece Kershaw exchange memories. Wassayos Ngamkham is the photographer.

Thai and Asian authorities have launched a joint operation to demolish transnational criminal systems in a significant step toward preventing international murder. The collaboration aims to address complex crimes that transcend borders, from cocaine to child abuse and cryptocurrency-based money fraud.

Pol Lt Gen Jirabhop Bhuridej, Commissioner of the Royal Thai Police’s Central Investigation Bureau ( CIB ), led a delegation to Australia earlier this month for discussions with its law enforcement counterpart, the Australian Federal Police ( AFP).

According to Pol Lt Gen Jirabhop,” the nature of international crime nowadays demands real-time cleverness, cross-border cooperation, and scientific integration.” ” We are no longer focusing on isolated businesses. Our goal is to create a co-operative system that is flawless.

Both sides came to terms with the necessity of creating shared task forces and information-sharing procedures during the visit. Thailand’s officers displayed their skills in industry operations and local knowledge, especially in the Greater Mekong Subregion, while the AFP introduced tools and systems developed for international crime surveillance.

He claimed that the Australians liked how quickly we operated. Our officers are trained to manage challenging terrain and access challenging locations, which are frequently the hub of these legal networks.

Digital Trails, Drug Routes

One of the main points of discussion was drug smuggling. Thailand, a long-standing transport nation, is a key player in the transition from Myanmar’s Shan State’s manufacturing hubs to Australia’s high-value markets.

” Crystal meth, or “ya glacier,” continues to be the main drug coming into Australia from Southeast Asia,” remarked Pol Lt. Gen. Jirabhop. It’s inexpensive to produce, high-quality, and low, which makes it very beneficial for organized crime organizations.

Another medications, such as cocaine and MDMA, are still popular among those who are younger and in the heart of entertainment. Despite the knowledge shared by the AFP, medications are frequently kept hidden inside reasonable shipping pots filled with gadgets, household items, or car parts, a tactic used to obstruct border inspections.

Thailand and Australia are looking into preventing actions in response, including sharing information on known traffickers and trafficking routes and improved goods screening. The possible development of a joint databases that both countries can use to track supplies and suspects in real-time is a key growth.

The conflict goes way beyond traditional contraband, though. Today’s criminal organizations are becoming more tech-savvy, frequently laundering profits using electronic money and online wallets. He claimed that” criptocurrency is the new frontier for criminals.” They” industry anonymously, move money immediately, and escape conventional financial oversight,” they claim.

Thailand also faces legitimate and structural restrictions, despite the AFP’s advanced crypto-tracking technology. Digital property lack a clear position as admissible evidence in Thai law, putting a strain on efforts to freeze or acquire funds.

” Despite the difficulties, we are moving forward,” he said. To tighten controls on illicit money flows, we are working with partners like Interpol ( International Criminal Police Organization ), Aseanapol ( Association of Southeast Asian Nations Chiefs of Police ), and financial intelligence organizations like Amlo ( Anti-Money Laundering Office ) and Austrac ( Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre ).

Both nations are investing in the future of law enforcement through engineering, management training, and inter-agency cooperation, in addition to their functional work. Data management is a promising area of cooperation. The AFP, which has developed related methods for predicted surveillance and case integration, is of particular attention to the CIB’s Big Data Centre.

We had in-depth debate about Thailand’s Big Data Center and how it could work with the AFP’s Investigation Management System, according to Pol Lt Gen Jirabhop. There are many things that we can understand from one another, particularly in terms of system infrastructure and software in real-world situations.

The American Criminal Intelligence Commission, which manages the nation’s potent database that connects crime data from across Australia, received similar industrial synergies during discussions with them.

” We think this is a concept that is for replicating,” said Pol Lt. Gen. Jirabhop. ” Centralizing crime data prevents effort duplication because it allows companies to answer more quickly, identify patterns sooner, and prevent duplication.”

Leadership growth was also high on the plan. To discuss leadership training programs, Thai officials met with the Australian Institute of Police Management ( AIPM). Programs are being made to take Thai officers to AIPM for superior training, and to invite American trainers to Thailand to share their experience. He claimed that “effective policing depends on good leadership.” It’s about creating institutions that can adapt, innovate, and lead in a fast-changing world, not just about catching criminals.

The Joint Policing Cybercrime Coordination Centre ( JPC3 ), an Australian multi-agency hub that brings together police, cybercrime experts, banks, and tech companies in one location with shared databases and real-time coordination, is a standout example of innovation.

He claimed that it provides the kind of integrated approach we require. We want to use this model in Thailand to combat cybercrime and financial crime more effectively.

Security Partnership

Thailand and Australia’s shared commitment to public safety is emerging as a cornerstone of regional stability as transnational criminal threats become more sophisticated.

Both of our countries are clearly facing common threats, according to Pol Lt. Gen. Jirabhop. By uniting through joint operations, intelligence sharing, and institutional development, we convey to criminal networks that we are prepared, connected, and resolute.

Both parties are optimistic about the plans to formalize this cooperation through more structured frameworks and regular exchanges. As crime continues to become more global, so must the response. ” This is only the beginning,” Pol Lt. Gen. Jirabhop declared. A partnership for peace, safety, and justice across our nations is something we’re building that will endure.

Continue Reading

What Trump’s North Korea diplomacy says about his Russia strategy – Asia Times

Donald Trump claims that he wants to put an end to the conflict in Ukraine. It’s worthwhile to inquire as to what kind of “peace” he envisions and to whom it may really be a benefit. There is already a law for Trump’s high-stakes relationship with North Korea during his first name, for someone looking for insight into how his most recent political bargain over Ukraine might turn out.

If history can be used, Trump-Putin deals may be edgy, ambiguous, and finally pointless, only like his diplomatic relations with North Korea.

Trump’s interactions with Kim Jong Un were a workshop in artistry. His talks with North Korea did not lead to any significant political breakthroughs, but they did lead to some amazing images and wonderful firsts, including a US president gathering a North Vietnamese leader for the first time, a handshake and a first-ever DMZ crossing into North Korea, and a&nbsp, a serious departure at the Hanoi Summit.

Although each of these events was portrayed as ancient, the end resulted in no longer-existent peace on the Korean Peninsula, no lessening the threat to Northeast Asia or the rest of the world.

The crucial question is now: Will Trump’s approach to Moscow follow the same pattern as his one with Pyongyang as he pledges to send peace to Ukraine and looks forward to direct conversations with Putin? Will public discussions about Ukraine turn out to be spectacles more than serious political efforts? And most significantly, who will profit if peace is achieved?

Trump oversaw personalized agreements with Kim Jong Un from 2017 to 2019. The process transitioned from escalating language and panic to an abrupt pivot, which culminated in a number of summits with spectacular photo-ops, a tempting but lifeless agreement, and finally the collapse of negotiations.

Trump heightened conflicts in 2017 by threatening to “fire and indignation” against” Little Rocket Man” from North Korea and appointing a “bigger nuclear box” for his office. Trump made his intentions known as the world prepared for war, but as inter-Korean relationships improved and he announced his intention to communicate, he abruptly reversed course.

North Korea and North Korea agreed to “work toward denuclearization” at the Singapore Summit in 2018, but the deal lacked details, identification procedures, and any responsibility from the United States to raise restrictions. Trump declared success during joint military exercises with South Korea after halting them, claiming that the danger had vanished.

It didn’t, either.

The Hanoi Summit ended in disaster a year later. Trump agreed to a waiver of punishment for Kim’s request to destroy his nuclear arsenal in the area of Yongbyon. Trump left the table with the intention of imposing himself and reaffirming both the destruction of nuclear weapons and the closing of another weapons services.

Donald Trump entered North Korea at the demilitarized area in what was commonly viewed as an effort to rekindle interest in a procedure that had already failed in June 2019. The next move was real drama. His staged, extremely publicized prank made headlines, but soon after, North Korea resumed its missile tests, demonstrating how much Trump’s summitry had changed on the ground.

The teaching may be obvious: Trump thrives on movements and a string of lavish performances but lacks the tolerance for sustained, administrative discussions. Trump is then prepared to use the same solution in Ukraine.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

His politics with Moscow may have been influenced by his ineffectiveness as it was with North Korea because it was substance-light and optics-heavy. Trump might carry a mountain with Vladimir Putin in Riyadh or Geneva, where they might announce a ceasefire and shake hands. Without any true protection mechanisms, the ceasefire itself may only include flimsy protection guarantees for Ukraine.

Trump could in exchange for a lifting of Russian sanctions or halting military support for Kyiv, properly cementing Moscow’s territorial gains. Russia could bolster its hold on eastern Ukraine while pretending to participate in one-on-one politics, merely as North Korea did after Singapore.

Trump’s real problem is not whether a peace deal will be forged, but whether it will continue, or will it just be another example of Singapore where the opposing side rewards while the other party benefits in vain.

The main distinction is that Kim Jong Un is no Putin. Putin does not need Trump for validity, but Kim did. North Korea was a secluded government with minimal influence. In contrast, Russia has a worldwide network of allies, a war-time business, and a proper desire to keep its aggression.

In contrast to Kim, Putin is seeking agreements rather than reputation. Putin does not need Trump to defend his battle; he needs regional power, sanctions pleasure, and fractures within the American alliance, as Kim and Kim did with Trump to reach an agreement to improve his political and economic standing. Putin will gain a lot more from Trump than Kim ever did.

The Korean Peninsula is presented in a different context than the European dynamics. Moon Jae-in, the president of South Korea, tried to influence US policy by presiding over inter-Korean relations and urging Washington to adopt a more disciplined strategy during the negotiations.

However, South Korea quickly realized that Trump could not be relied upon to bring about a breakthrough with Pyongyang. Seoul was powerless as a result of Trump shifting his focus away from sustainability to reality television, where security conditions and a strong North were at odds with.

Europe should take note of South Korea’s experience and not let it repeat Seoul’s error. If Europe doesn’t assert itself right away, it runs the risk of becoming isolated and unable to influence future negotiations that will define its own security.

Trump’s and Vance’s statements thus far suggest that Seoul and Washington would support European allies. A Trump-Putin deal may be impacted by Korea’s passing, which may indicate how ignored Europe will be.

French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer have made similar visits to Washington, demonstrating how important it is for Europe to grasp the urgency of the situation. They must act right away if they want to influence Ukraine’s future. Europe must accelerate Ukraine’s accession to the EU, increase its defense spending, and increase military production and aid beyond seizing Russian assets. The era of passive diplomacy is over.

The free world needs a new leader, Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s chief diplomat Kaja Kallas said in response to the rift between President Zelensky and Trump in the White House in late February. It’s up to us, Europäers, to take on this challenge. Europe has the option to lead or to be led. The message is clear: It’s time to “man up” ( not” Moon up” as South Korea did ) or be erased from history.

Tereza Novotna PhD is a political scientist and analyst with a focus on EU-Asia affairs, global security, and European External Relations. She is a senior affiliate researcher and lecturer at the Free University of Berlin, a senior associate research fellow at EUROPEUM, a member of 9DashLine for Korea, and a Pacific Forum non-resident Kelly fellow. Her commentary has appeared in publications like the  Bulletin of the East-West Center Washington , 38 North, The Diplomat, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,  , NK Pro and , Bulletin of the East-West Center Washington , and others.

Continue Reading

Pakistan and India border closure separates families

Haider Ali waved his family goodnight as she crossed the border into India to visit her family in Pakistan two months ago. The pair isn’t confident when they will see each other again right now. After New Delhi claimed Islamabad was linked to a violent attack on travellers in Indian-administeredContinue Reading

After tackling gap in cloud expertise, PayNet aims to boost AI talent pipeline for Malaysia’s financial sector

  • By the end of the year, Microsoft AI agreement will have 100 school students at the end of the year.
  • Akar&nbsp, a PayNet plan, creates a digital skill pipeline for the future of the financial sector.

(Second row): Farhan Ahmad (9th from left) GCEO, PayNet; with Laurence Si, Managing Director, Microsoft Malaysia celebrating their partnership with students of the cohort and PayNet and Microsoft execs. Joining them were PayNet directors, Ganesh Kumar Bangah (first from left) and Dr Fadhlullah Suhaimi (2nd left).

Payments Network Malaysia Sdn Bhd ( PayNet ), a talent provider for the financial sector, has started the second phase of its national talent development initiative Program Akar ( the Malay language word for “root” ) with a new emphasis on artificial intelligence and data science for Malaysia’s financial services industry, expanding its role in its almost eight year existence. 100 students may be chosen for the six-week programme, which PayNet will pay entirely.

The curriculum, which is supported by Microsoft’s AI for Malaysia’s Future ( AIForMYFuture ) initiative, aims to prepare university students for roles in the rapidly changing financial sector.

According to Farhan Ahmad, Group CEO of PayNet,” We view skills development as federal enhancement,” meaning that the country’s development may be hampered if it is unable to produce the talent required by industry to fuel its growth and advancement. Farhan goes on to say that” Program Akar is about preparing students for jobs, but it’s also about preparing them to direct Malaysia’s digital economy with goal.”

According to Amir Hibban, a student at Multimedia University ( MMU), the students appear ready for the challenge. He said,” Being selected for Program Akar feels like a big step forward. Sharing and being chosen is how exciting I think I feel.” Not every time you get the chance to learn from actual business leaders about AI and online payments. I’m looking forward to seeing how this will affect my future and how it will help me find a place in Malaysia’s modern economy.”

The success of the software will be determined by students ‘ ability to secure jobs or employment options in the financial services sector, according to PayNet. Plan Akar aims to strengthen Malaysia’s economic ecosystem and foster long-term economic resilience in an exceedingly AI-driven environment by connecting learners to hands-on learning, mentoring, and work placements within Malaysia’s top financial institutions.

The captain group, which includes 25 MMU students, will be Akar’s second cohort for 2025. By the end of the year, PayNet intends to expand the program to incorporate 75 more students from other regional universities.

Microsoft-related agreement focuses on AI

” AI is changing every part in every field, including economic service,” he said. By working with PayNet through Program Akar, we are assisting in the development of a century of expertise who are equipped with AI and modern skills to succeed in accordance with Microsoft’s AIForMYFuture initiative,” said Laurence Si, Managing Director of Microsoft Malaysia.

As part of Malaysia’s wider efforts to develop modern skills, Microsoft’s AI teaching methodologies are integrated into this second Akar. Application lovers PEOPLElogy Bhd and Futuresparx Sdn Bhd provide the system.

Microsoft, which announced its ambitious” AI for Malaysia’s Potential” action in December 2024, was a natural partner for PayNet.

comprehensive education that addresses economy requirements

Software Akar provides individuals with a three-pillar curriculum that includes:

  • Values-Driven Enrichment – Fostering management, integrity, and a future-ready mentality
  • Knowledge of electronic payments – covering the development of cash, banking systems, online payments, and transaction security
  • AI & Data Science Mastery: combining fundamental information with critical wondering and practical applications

Following the initial cohort, which generally focused on online payments and fog technologies through a collaboration with AWS, the curriculum was developed in response to feedback from monetary industry partners.

While the pillars of the Digital Payment Knowledge and AI & Data Science Mastery are visible areas of focus, Jun Maria Tan Abdullah, Senior Director of Program Akar, noted that the value of the values-driven element:” Critical thinking is vital. The students must be more imaginative and strategic because they will learn it quickly after they receive it. We must not only concentrate on the systems, but also on developing their strength skills to be more holistic.

For the July 2024 group of 50 technology and IT students from the Kuala Lumpur-based Asia Pacific University of Technology &amp, &nbsp, Innovation ( APU), who were chosen through an analysis and discussion process, were chosen. The plan included 45 days of online learning, two days of physical education, and 47 days of training with &nbsp. Finally, they completed a three-month internship with monetary institutions throughout the nation. According to APU, the fully funded training cost US$ 2, 743 ( RM12, 000 ) for each student. &nbsp,

Selection procedure for individuals

Malaysian Bachelor’s Degree learners in their final or last year are eligible to enroll in the system and seek internship or job placement opportunities. Candidates may fulfill a certain set of requirements:

  • Minimum CGPA of 3.00
  • Now pursuing a bachelor’s degree in computer science, computer technology, or other technology-related fields.

Candidates who qualify pass both professional and cognitive tests to assess both their technical and soft skills.

Transactions processed by PayNet, Malaysia’s national payment system, totaling US$ 1.4 trillion ( RM 6.1 trillion ), or 3.3 times GDP, are processed annually. Services like DuitNow, JomPAY, and MyDebit, which are a key component of regular financial deals in the nation, are included in the ecosystem’s retail payment habitat. Additionally, the business is in charge of Malaysia’s real-time financial QR payment system, which is compatible with techniques in Singapore, Thailand, and Indonesia.


Dashveenjit Kaur contributed to the post.

Continue Reading