The two witnesses were close associates with his girlfriend, according to Ms. Fang’s brother, who earlier disclosed this to CNA.
He claimed he was surprised that Ms. Fang and Ong had such a close connection. He added:” My girlfriend was a downward- to- world, sit home kind of woman. The believe is obviously the strong opposite”.
The victim’s family is calling for” as little justice as possible”, said Mr Martinez on Wednesday.
He stated that if Ong is found guilty of killing Ms. Fang, he may ask for a word of 20 to 25 years.
Ong is still imprisoned in the Sangonera jail in Murcia despite not being charged. A person can be held in pre-trial confinement for up to two years under Spanish law. For severe crimes, this can be extended by two more years.
According to options close to the event, he has not yet given a declaration to the government. Under Spanish laws, a believe has the right to refuse to do so.
ECONOMIC MOTIVE
Mr Martinez said the Civil Guard, a national police force in Spain, is also investigating a probable “economic” cause behind the killing.
Mr. Fang previously disclosed to CNA that his sister had chosen Ong as the beneficiary of her mandatory social security savings plan, the Central Provident Fund ( CPF).
She submitted the election in person in October of last year, about six weeks before she was discovered dead.
Around the time Ms Fang nominated Ong as her beneficiary, almost S$ 200, 000 ( US$ 148, 000 )  , was deposited into her CPF account. Mr Martinez said Ms Fang’s CPF account has more than €430, 000 , ( US$ 462, 000 ).
In response to CNA’s inquiries, the legislative committee said on June 3 that an investigation would be conducted by examining the evidence and supporting documents in order to determine the validity of the CPF candidacy.  ,
” For CPF votes that are contested prematurely,  , CPF Board will withdraw the circulation of the deceased person’s CPF discounts till studies are completed.
CPF savings will typically be distributed based on, if any, previous nominations or in accordance with intestacy laws, if the election is determined to be irrelevant. ”  ,