In a social media post on June 24, Clear stated that it was pleased with the conversation surrounding the story and that URA was taking the feedback of the general public into account.
On the painting, the company said the description of the samsui person diverged” significantly , from the historical fact of these adaptable labourers”.
She is depicted in the mural smoking a cigarette in a glamorous manner that does n’t reflect the samsui women’s grimy and harsh realities. Unintentionally, this creative choice could lead to a male-dominated aesthetic that alienates female subjects, which would undermine a genuine appreciation of their contributions.
We support creative freedom, but we also think it is crucial for creative interpretations to consider their topics and contexts. We advocate that the samsui women’s story be told with the regard and authenticity it deserves, so that it more accurately reflects their powerful and durable spirit.
AWARE even raised the question of whether “URA justified its decision by citing open criticism that the person posed as a prostitute.”
” This declaration supports damaging, masculine stereotypes about how women may act and look, and is rude to intercourse workers.”
Prior to speaking with CNA, Dunston stated that he was relieved that URA was considering its decision and that he hopes the specialist will permit the fresco to be in its current state.
” It’s important that the public feedback ( URA uses ) to regulate images seen in public be more even- handed ( or at least less offensive than the art it’s criticising ) and that enforcement of policy regarding art, in particular, be more nuanced and geared towards supporting art and discussion, “he said.