Russia and the West are already at battle. Since Russia’s occupation of Crimea in 2014, when it sought to establish its presence there as a foundation for its Black Sea Fleet and as a possible lever of control over Kyiv’s political way, has been so.
Vladimir Putin mentioned an increase into issue with the West at the annual Valdai safety conference yet in 2014. He later claimed that the West had” crossed a range” in his early remarks.
Putin signaled at the time that he was prepared to rise more and harm wider military fight, but generally,  , the West ignored those emails. NATO and several European countries have long since come to terms with their importance and the ongoing escalation they are experiencing.
Putin sees Russia as at odds with the West, and he has five main factors for doing so now.
These are: the progressive enhancement of NATO and the EU towards Russian borders, American financial and military aid for Ukraine to avoid the 2022 full-scale war, anti-Russian speech and international sanctions on Russian goods, measures to limit Russian use of the international banking program, and, most recently, Ukraine’s allies allowing the firing into Russia of long-range missiles
Over the years, there have been a lot of evidence of the Kremlin’s attitude. For instance, Putin stated in November 2022 that “our armed forces are fighting on the line of contact that is more than 1, 000 km much, fighting never only against neo-Nazi models but also against the whole military apparatus of the social West.”
In October 2023, Russian Security Council assistant chair , Dmitry Medvedev , described the backers of Ukraine as “actively pushing us towards World War II I”. In January 2024, Russian Foreign Minister , Sergei Lavrov , described Russia as the liberation from a revived second world war shaft and suggested that it was tackling another increase in Nazism.
Russia categorizes various forms of conflict based on their geographic range and depth. At the lowest finish of its size is “armed issue”. This happens within a single geographical location, such as Chechnya.
A regional battle is just one notch above. The first “green people” ( Russian soldiers ) who were unbadged entering Crimea in 2014 intended to maintain deniability, but it was unmistakably an act of war. But, in many ways, at this stage, Ukraine was a regional conflict.
A native war typically occurs over a short period of time, such as in the Russo-Georgian war of 2008, but it can also have implications for supporters of the says at war. It also has limited military and political goals. Regional war and large-scale war are the next two stages of the Russian conflict.
In regional wars, several states work together to achieve strategically significant military and political objectives ( such as the Soviet Union’s non-Russian military engagement in Afghanistan in the years 1979-1991 ) and the Gulf War in particular ). Since 2022, it is likely that Russia has seen the conflict in Ukraine as a regional war with some parts of a major issue.
Second level battle
Yet, the next level of combat – the “large-scale battle” – may not be far off. These are war between partnerships of state: for example, Ukraine and NATO against Russia, Iran, North Korea and China, or a large number of countries in different parts of the world ( such as the Second World War ). Large-scale war create “radical military social change”, with intensified fighting and multiply. These typically involve a significant resource participation.
Although these alliances are not yet directly in fight, there has been extensive mobilization of weapons and causes in Russia and Ukraine. North Korea has just sent 10, 000 forces to Russia.
For the West, large-scale battle would substantially increase the risk of nuclear conflict, cause stock market volatility, charge significantly more money, and content European citizens to volatility via a large number of natural and cyberattacks.
More information about crucial Russian goals, such as creating a buffer area with the Union or securing its estates, is required by Western politicians and citizens. In doing so, the government will be aware of which politicians are actually supporting and opposing Putin’s strategic goals.
Russia has clearly signalled that new changes in US and European plan, in allowing their long-range weapons to be fired into Russia, as escalatory. The Russian Security Council minister, Sergei Shoigu, for example, has stated that the West has two options when the situation is favorable: to continue funding it and destroying the Russian population, or to accept the present realities and begin negotiations.
Russia updated its atomic policy in November, and it immediately began firing a hypersonic missile into Ukraine, bringing it closer to lead conflict with NATO allies. The Russian reaction to these modifications is accelerating. However, Russian-linked damage and espionage activities continue across the globe.
Reluctantly, Europe and the US are starting to understand that Russia now sees itself at war with the West, yet if limited now.
Countries closest to Russia, such as Sweden, Norway, Finland and Lithuania have understood this most intensely. Socially, they have sought to correlate more closely with NATO and Western military friends, to constantly fight Soviet intervention. Additionally, it is important to note that Russia’s military solutions have been stretched by assisting Syria in resolving its continued insurgency.
However, decades of underinvestment in security, its ability to integrate defense and security policy, and its overreliance on the US as its protection guarantee have ultimately weakened Europe overall.
There is a limited public desire to spend more money on defense in Europe. The rise of far-right populist groups and the political interference that Russia has caused to European politics have also made it difficult to mobilize a coherent European response.
What happens next?
However, it’s important to keep in mind that the EU has more resources than Russia, and that its technology and innovation sector is stronger. Additionally, the Ukrainians have demonstrated how much more effective drone warfare is at halting Russian artillery fire and countermeasures.
Europe needs to manufacture high-end innovations at scale, something it is capable of doing.
Disrupting Russia’s base of support will also be important. It is crucial to stop military transfers from Iran, North Korea, and China, as well as to impede the functioning of the Russian military-industrial complex.
Overall, an increased understanding of Russian intentions, motivations and capabilities is vital in the West. This could help avoid further escalation into a large-scale war, or, at least, improve its ability to negotiate with Putin.
Robert Dover is dean of faculty at the University of Hull and professor of intelligence and national security.
The Conversation has republished this article under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.