data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4771e/4771e2ba22f50835f49558637f0cf423856579f0" alt="Wan Muhamad Noor Matha"
Parliament presidentPale Muhamad Noor Mathawill meet whips from the government, opposition, and Senate to determine whether a motion seeking a judicial review of some controversial charter amendment bills is urgent.
The decision Pheu Thai Party asked parliament to ask for a Constitutional Court decision regarding whether congress has the authority to completely amend the contract without conducting a first-ever referendum.
According to Mr. Wan, the whip ‘ scheduled meeting is to discuss the joint sessions ‘ schedule and explain the chamber’s priorities in order to avoid any potential conflict or disturbance.
This is to stop the political sessions from collapsing after the joint sessions to examine two constitutional amendment bills, which were aborted because there was no quorum present.
Wisut Chainaroon, a member of the Pheu Thai list and MP, said on Wednesday that the outcome of the whip ‘ meeting with Mr. Wan did determine when the action would be put up for a vote.
He stated that he anticipates the cabinet’s essential matters to be put on the plan after the combined conference has finished.
Before March 9, these issues need political acceptance.
” I understand that the contract issues may not be ready for the upcoming shared sitting, and they must wait until after that,” he said.
Following the collapse of the combined meetings on February 13 and 14, according to divergent viewpoints among parliamentarians, Mr. Wisut proposed and signed the contract amendment-related motion.
Some argued that changing the charter to allow a complete update of the Constitutional Court’s 2021 decision, which requires a vote to determine whether voters wanted a new law first, was in violation.
Others contend that Part 15/1, which would make a Constitution Drafting Assembly, will be used to add Part 15/1 to establish the requirements for drafting a new constitution, making it the parliament’s responsibility to consider and voting on both legal amendment documents.
A vote should be held to find out whether the government agrees with the constitutional amendment once it has been approved by parliament.