Old national stadium eyed as concert venue
Chulalongkorn University will be contacted by the tourism and sports ministry to introduce a new leasing agreement.
Discussed: 20 Nov 2024 at 19: 06
The Supachalasai National Stadium will be converted into a new musical place in accordance with the Ministry of Tourism and Sports.
The Department of Physical Education’s commitment to use the 86-year-old federal facility is about to expire. According to secretary Sorawong Thienthong, the service will be returned to Chulalongkorn University, who owns the land.
Mr. Sorawong stated that he would deal with the university to grant the university a lease on the inside stadium where concerts can be held.
He claimed that” the discussion has already begun so that Thailand will have a place to host concerts or major activities.”
Pathumwan Palace once owned the land on which the facility is situated. The second sporting event held at the stadium in 1938 was the first one that was completed until 1941, though construction on the facility started in 1937.
The facility features an eight-lane running track and has a seating capacity of 19, 615 for sporting activities.
Supachalasai Stadium has hosted numerous regional sporting events and performances, including the 1993 Blackpink World Tour show and Michael Jackson’s 1993 Harmful World Tour music.
The 26-year-old Rajamangala National Stadium, located in the capital’s Bang Kapi neighborhood, is also on the Ministry of Tourism and Sports ‘ development plan.
The hospital, with a potential exceeding 50, 000, is overseen by the Sports Authority of Thailand, said Mr Sorawong.
He said,” We are debating whether to make it a concession or a joint investment project between the government and the private sector.”
Funding is required for construction job because the construction is in disrepair.
But, it might not be for repairing. There are many parties interested in renovating the facility, he said, if the private sector is permitted to operate it.
Attacks in northwest Pakistan leave 20 dead in 24 hours
The bombing occurred less than 24 hours after another attack, likewise in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, according to an intellect official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. Eight men and nine militants were killed in the Tirah area of the state as a result of that fight on Monday, according to theContinue Reading
Jury still out on Thaksin’s ‘dual citizenship’
Reviewers questioning the ex-premier’s significant effect in the Pheu Thai Party raise more questions.
Described: 20 Nov 2024 at 18: 24
Due to his dual citizenship, former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra‘s function as a” plan helper” for the Pheu Thai Party may not be permitted, according to foreign affairs minister Maris Sangiampongsa on Wednesday.
Political activist Sonthiya Sawasdee has petitioned the Election Commission (EC ), seeking an investigation into Thaksin’s involvement, following the ex-premier’s high-profile visit to Udon Thani recently.
According to reports, Thaksin had obtained a second membership in Montenegro or another nation, Mr. Sonthiya attracted attention. Montenegro prohibits two membership but from 2019-22 it offered” citizen by investment” to those who invested at least 250, 000 dollars in the country. Though the windows has closed, calls for the “golden documents” are still being processed, according to some studies.
Mr. Maris declined to comment on Thaksin’s claim to have a subsequent card.
Suriya Jungrungreangkit, the transport minister and a vital Pheu Thai find, said the side’s legal team had discussed the information.
He claimed that the investigation into the incident led to the conclusion that Thaksin had never violated any laws by supporting the president of the provincial operational organization in Udon Thani last week. According to Mr. Suriya,” the crew looked over the law and concluded there was no cause for concern.”
Numerous legitimate issues have focused on Thaksin and Pheu Thai’s barely-disclosure of influence over the government. The Constitutional Court will decide on Friday whether to hear one of the problems.
However, Mr. Maris claimed that Yingluck Shinawatra, the sister of former prime minister Thaksin, had not contacted the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to inquire about her plans to leave Thailand.
Thaksin, who was quoted by Nikkei Asia on Monday, said that Yingluck should be able to attend the Songkran event in April, either immediately or just before.
He claimed that he saw no barriers to her returning.
Yingluck fled the country in 2017 immediately before a court decision on her administration’s false rice-pledging scheme, according to Thaksin during a visit in his native state of Chiang Mai in April.
Musk’s government-by-tech to show the limits of disruption – Asia Times
Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, will take over the newly created Department of Government Efficiency alongside fellow software billionaire and former national member Vivek Ramaswamy on November 12th, according to president-elect Donald Trump’s announcement on November 12. The new office will be tasked with reining in state government, curbing federal spending, and reducing rules.
Musk has been vocal in his support of Trump’s campaign, which included probably illegal monetary “giveaways” to citizens. Although Musk is relatively new in electoral politics, technology companies and their leaders have made numerous attempts to restructure public policy and governance, ranging from housing and transportation to city planning.
By looking more closely at some of these efforts, we may be able to get a preview of what Musk’s Department of Government Performance may try to do, what government-by-tech may seem like, and what might go wrong.
Replacing public service
In 2013, Musk himself proposed a new form of public transportation called the “hyperloop” to join Los Angeles and San Francisco. And Musk’s SpaceX aims to outsource the rocket-building business to the government.
But another tech firms have had similar interests.
Uber has made a series of attempts to replace people transport. Companies like Sidewalk Labs, a subsidiary of Google’s parent company, have created” intelligent cities” that collect and analyze information about people’s behavior in order to make decisions about providing services, making attempts to replace urban infrastructure.
Perhaps an analyst suggested that public libraries may be replaced by Amazon bookstores. In fields as diverse as cover, personality identification, and education, tech firms have challenged people products.
The boundaries of disturbance
One thing some government-by-tech jobs have in common is a perception that government is inherently inefficient, and that (unregulated ) technology can offer better options.
Silicon Valley software companies have huge espoused “disruption“, the idea of overthrowing a dead standing status with technology. Unlike people agencies, the reasoning goes, companies is “move fast and break things” to discover new and more effective ways to deliver services and price.
Tech firms that adhere to this theory have undoubtedly provided service that many of us use frequently in our day-to-day lives and generated significant profits. But this does n’t mean the Silicon Valley model makes sense for public administration. In reality, the information suggests something more like the same.
A record of disappointment
Tech’s attempts to provide public companies have had mixed results.
Innisfil, Canada, switched to Uber in 2017 to replace all of its public transportation options. The result was a rise in city costs ( in Uber’s fees ), more cars traveling, and more expensive transportation for low-income residents.
After encountering concerns regarding protection and planning, Sidewalk Labs ‘ smart-city trial in Toronto was abandoned in 2021.
The software industry’s disruption has worsened existing issues, with Airbnb and other short-term rental firms playing a role in the housing crisis.
Small solutions for slim problems
Additionally, tech firms typically concentrate on a select few issues. Silicon Valley has helped us to find a car, choose a restaurant for dinner, manage quickly around a town, transfer money to our friends, and search for the best rental for our vacation.
It has provided fewer options for getting low-income cover, providing treatment for the younger, or reducing our power usage. There are significant benefits to this: technology companies want to tap wealthy buyers with disposable income to generate income.
These disparities even reflect Silicon Valley’s lack of diversity, though. Tech remains mostly white, mostly female, generally upper-middle course, typically highly educated. This affects the troubles and answers Silicon Valley finds.
The secret business will suffer from all of this. However, the government’s primary function is to look after all of its citizens, not merely owners or buyers ( or even just those who voted for it ).
The couple get a dozen services.
The issue is that Silicon Valley’s “efficiencies” and solutions may end up delivering the few at the price of the many. Some “inefficiencies” of public service arise from the truth they are designed to get as many people into accounts as possible.
Rules and protections for older people, for those with disability, for those who may not speak English as a second language, for instance, all create the need for more government and more rules.
Musk has compared the public transportation system to a “pain in the pussy” where possible serial killers must be positioned next to one another. Of course, in some places public transportation carries no such discrimination. Additionally, many people who prefer to travel by private jet ( or even Tesla ) may have no other choice but to rely on a public bus for their needs.
One of SpaceX’s aims is to reduce the cost of a trip to Mars to under US$ 1 million. This would be a extraordinary success, but it means that Musk’s imagined Mars settlement may be very wealthy. As a form of public policy, spacecraft and hyperloops are terribly insufficient.
Unromantic needs
The technology sector itself depends on existing facilities and institutions, even though the idea of disruption attempts to minimize its impact.
Uber depends on roads and vehicles, as well as the institutions that maintain them, and Airbnb depends on brick-and-mortar construction, as do Amazon and eBay, which rely on postal service and travel system.
All tech companies rely on solid, enforceable financial, property, and tax laws. These outdated institutions and infrastructures may not be attractive or even effective.
However, these so-called inefficiencies have often evolved in ways aligned with fairness, justice, and inclusivity. Silicon Valley tech companies ‘ past records do not support their positions on these issues.
Hallam Stevens is professor of interdisciplinary studies, James Cook University
The Conversation has republished this article under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Thailand detects first case of new vaping disease
Health officials anticipate more” Evali” situations because the ban on e-cigarettes has remained in place.
Discussed: 20 Nov 2024 at 18: 12
The first local situation of a new vaping-related condition has been reported in Thailand, and Thai authorities are concerned about additional cases involving frequent e-cigarette use.
A 32-year-old man from Buri Ram has been diagnosed with the condition known as Evali, or E-cigarette or vaping-associated lung injury, according to the Department of Disease Control ( DDC ) at the Ministry of Public Health.
The person, who was admitted to Buri Ram Hospital, was coughing up blood and his condition rapidly developed into serious and severe asthma, said Dr Chayanan Sittibusaya, chairman of the agency’s Division of Tobacco Product Control.
” Our symptoms deteriorated quickly within 24 to 36 hours, and we do n’t typically have acute pneumonia.” In this case, he had to be put on a ventilator”, he said.
” All tests for infection, such as Covid-19, RSV ( respiratory syncytial virus ), and others, were negative. He told specialists he emitted about 400 puffs of an e-cigarette every day after removing his respiration pipe.
Dr. Chayanan said that it was not known how long the gentleman had been pursuing a violent tobacco habit. But, he also had main diseases including diabetes and high blood pressure. Light patches on his lungs were discovered after a thorough physical exam.
Nevertheless, the patient’s condition is improving, and there are no known infections. Nevertheless, he was experiencing symptoms related to smoking removal.
The Buri Ram municipal public health department was given the situation to look into more and was informed of it.
Dr. Chayanan remarked,” We have urged all facilities to report Evali cases to us.” We worry that youthful people’s increased risk of getting e-cigarettes is due to their ease of use.
Despite the government ‘ promise to deal with them, e-cigarettes are prohibited in the country but are readily accessible both online and offline.
Heavy metals and nicotine are among the various harmful substances found in e-cigarettes, according to numerous academic studies. People should steer clear of using e-cigarettes because they can lead to fatalities and even sudden heart attacks, especially if they have chronic problems.
Man gets jail for assaulting ex-girlfriend who received flowers from another man at nightclub
SINGAPORE: A 26-year-old man was on Wednesday ( Nov 20 ) sentenced to one week in jail for punching and kicking his ex-girlfriend at her own home out of jealousy.
Zachary Chung Wei Yik admitted guilt on one count of inciting harm without consent, with a second count of evil still being considered for punishment.
District Judge James Elisha Lee made the decision to ignore the defendant’s identity in the opening argument.
The trial claimed the gag order was to prevent her from being humiliated and embarrassed.
According to James Ow Yong, the victim’s identity would also be protected because of her loving connection with him, according to the defense attorney.
However, Judge Lee granted the victim’s name because she was not protected by the Children and Young Peoples Act and the assault was certainly sexual.
The victim, a 40-year-old North Korean person, worked at a bar located in the Orchard place. She met Chung in March 2022, and they started a marriage.
They broke up in May 2023 but nevertheless saw each other. They argued over another person a few days prior to the assault.
When Chung noticed another benefactor had purchased flowers for the victim, he was drinking with companions at the club where the sufferer worked.
In Singapore bars, it is common to purchase flower bouquets for sexual hostesses and performers.
Chung became jealous when he saw this, and spent more than S$ 1, 300 ( US$ 970 ) buying flowers for the victim. Eventually, he witnessed her leaving the club with the other benefactor.
At about 5.30am, the target returned house but could not find the key to her place, which she kept in a shoe inside.
Chung then raised the code and exited the pull. He started punching and kicking his ex-girlfriend, including in her face and head.
Chung demanded the personality of the sponsor who had left the club with her while assaulting her. She was therefore led into her apartment by him.
Outside, he cut the woman’s clothes and a smooth toys that belonged to her, which constituted the evil cost.
After the rape, Chung stayed the night. The next day, the sufferer started feeling pain from her wounds.
Chung drove her to the doctor to find care, and she was admitted for surveillance. The doctor who treated her reported the abuse.
On various body parts, the girl experienced bruising, swelling, and scratches. A day later, she was discharged and given five times of health left.
During the abuse, the person’s face’s plastic fillers were removed as well. She simply began working after returning from South Korea on October 17, 2023, after receiving therapy for this, according to the prosecutor.
The attorney, who asked for a short prison term, described the abuse as “brutal”, arguing that Chung targeted the defendant’s head and face.
He claimed that after the victim told him she had no money to pay for them, he only made restitution of about S$ 1,600 for the victim’s medical expenses, which totaled more than S S$ 2, 400.
Mr. Ow Yong, the defense attorney, claimed that Chung and the sufferer had been accused of being unfaithful in a situation where his customer had lost command over his feelings.
He claimed that Chung did not intend to inflict wounds in those specific locations and that the defendant’s injuries were minor. ” It was more a fury than a qualified attack”, said the lawyer.
He added that Chung did not attempt to “ambush” the prey, and that the abuse was not intentional. According to Mr. Ow Yong, he had a plan to meet her at her place that day and was there for a” cultural purpose.”
Mr. Ow Yong demanded a great of S$ 5, 000, claiming that “he was for all intents and purposes a welcome guest at her spot.”
The victim’s attorney claimed there was nothing to indicate that the victim had been traumatized by the rape, but Judge Lee questioned whether the victim had simply allowed Chung to be.
In punishment, the prosecutor pointed out that Chung attacked the prey without any provocation from her, and that it was a one-sided abuse.
He also benefited from Shawn Tan Jia Jun‘s case, who was imprisoned for two weeks for hitting and kickkicking his then-girlfriend when she was nine months along.
Given the wounds his ex-girlfriend suffered and the nature of the abuse, the judge said Chung’s crimes were less severe than Tan’s, but that the sentence had still been commuted.
After receiving a postponement to negotiate work issues, Chung is scheduled to begin serving his sentence on December 13, 2024.
A three-year prison sentence, a fine of up to S$ 5, 000, or both are the penalties for deliberately inflicting pain.
What Ukraine can now do with longer-range US missiles – Asia Times
According to reports citing White House officials, the incoming Biden administration has given Ukraine the authority to launch a longer-range missile strike into Belarusian territory using materials from the US.
The West is concerned that Moscow, with the aid of the flow of hundreds of North Korean combatants, may be putting together a significant battle to regain control of the Kursk region of Russia.
But how large a package is the Biden choice? And had it alter Eastern Europe’s conflict’s course? For clarifications, The Conversation US contacted Benjamin Jensen, a teacher at American University and the School of Advanced Warfighting at the Marine Corps University.
What types of weapons did the US permit Ukraine to apply?
The Army Tactical Missile System, or ATACMS, are short-range nuclear missiles that can go a lot farther than the arms earlier at Kyiv’s waste.
We are n’t talking about new technology. Since the late 1970s and 1980s, ATACMS have been around since 1986, when it first started to be produced. By the mid-1990s they were in company, being first deployed by the US in 1991 as part of Operation Desert Storm.
ATACMS have a range of about 190 miles. That distance is longer than British-supplied Storm Shadow and French-supplied Scalp cruise missiles, which have a range of 155 miles ( 249 kilometers ).
Not only do ATACMS get a bit further, they likewise travel very fast – at Mach 3, or three days the speed of sound, making them harder to catch. ATACMS may be challenging for sensor systems to detect depending on where they are fired from.
The other advantage, in this regard, is that ATACMS are no dependant on GPS setting. Different arms that depend on GPS have been successful in preventing clogging and reducing their effectiveness. But ATACMS you move to an gravity guidance system, based on gyroscopes, to avert GPS blocking tactics.
Additionally, the newly authorized missiles can have a significant cargo, which can cause a massive crater when struck.
The current issue may have a significant impact on its range, end velocity, and warhead size. This would give Ukraine the ability to launch extensive attacks on Russian soil.
In contrast, US approval of their use by Ukraine in Russia had, in theory, even make it easier for various allies to transport ATACMS to Kyiv. Nearby Poland and Romania have them, since do South Korea and Australia. The Biden administration’s approval of those institutions ‘ plans to provide the weapons to Ukraine as well.
Why was this longer-range weapons approved then?
The decision by Washington comes as North Korean fighters are increasing their troop numbers in Russia; the 10,000 North Koreans apparently in Russia are just the second wave.
This coincides with the deployment of 50 000 Russian forces near Kursk, which was crucial Belarusian territory that Ukraine seized earlier this year. In order to prepare for what might be a many bigger assault to recover the country, there have been what I would visit “probing problems” by Russia in the area over the past few weeks.
North Korean and Russian forces will need to unite before moving to the front, and they will do so in council regions further away from Russia.
The defense thinking is, if you can strike troops in those strong areas, you can really disrupt Moscow’s functional reach. And because of their size, speed, and selection, ATACMS are ideal for attacks on military assembly areas.
I would be using ATACMS to attack both assembly lines, ammunition depots, and airfields if I were to advise the Russian government.
What appears to be the wondering in Washington?
If I had to wager, I would suggest that there are still growing concerns about an increase but that the fight is transitioning.
Donald Trump, the president-elect, has indicated that he wants to negotiate the close of Ukraine’s conflict. I believe that the Biden administration’s approval of ATACMS suggests that these agreements are about trying to help Ukraine.
Alternately, the latest White House might have considered how to handle the growing pro-Moscow help of North Korea and come to the conclusion that allowing Ukraine to attack North Korean forces before sending them to the front would be a better solution. More artillery casings have been sent to Russia by Pyongyang than Ukraine, aside from forces.
These rationales are not mutually exclusive. Additionally, it appears that the Biden administration values the imperatives more than any perceived danger of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s escalating answer or the U.S. being further into the conflict.
What does this indicate about the current status of the conflict?
My checking of the conflict – and you are getting a sense of this through recent , comments from Ukrainian President , Volodymyr Zelensky – is that Ukraine may only have until the close of the next promotion time, that is, spring to summer 2025, to maintain its position.
This is because battle is still costing Ukraine money. Kyiv is having trouble mobilizing enough forces because Ukraine had tried to avoid using recruitment more frequently.
Not to say that Ukraine has lost all heat. But it will struggle to take more Russian-controlled province. Capturing place in Kursk was a big success, but it was a one-off, high-risk bargain. And fighting in pieces of Ukraine’s eastern occupied by Russia is proving tricky.
Is the goal here to aid Ukraine in retaining Kursk’s holdover?
According to reports about Biden’s approval of ATACMS, Washington has been telling Ukraine that Kursk is the only place the weapons can be launched.
If Trump does have the ability to push people to talk, as he says he does, that will not stop the fighting. Fighting may continue until a cease-fire is reached between the parties, and it could continue even then.
For these reasons, I think you will see Russia put whatever at Kursk, physically. In the event that Kursk becomes its biggest bargaining chip, Ukraine will do everything in its power to maintain its territorial dominance that.
Did Trump’s defeat play a role in Biden’s considering?
I really believe that the decision to grant ATACMS was more about Ukrainian real than American politics. That said, the president-elect’s reported push for conversations as a way to live the Ukraine-Russia turmoil may well have escalated the decision.
Benjamin Jensen is doctor of corporate research at the Marine Corps University School of Advanced Warfighting, Scholar-in-Residence, American University School of International Service
The Conversation has republished this post under a Creative Commons license. Read the original content.
India looks to sow more climate-resilient crops as it braces for more heatwaves, water crises
Farmers in India are given these crops, but they are then required to persuade them to move from the ones the government intends to increase to those that are unfamiliar with them.
The shift has a price tag that is beyond belief, but it does promise to change everything.
Roughly three-quarters of India’s$ 32 billion is used for welfare initiatives and subsidies. How much of the remaining portion will be used for produce analysis is unknown.
Khandelwal noted:” If we look at what is being spent towards development and deployment of climate-resilient seeds or climate-resilient agriculture practices, the expenditure is miniscule as compared to ( subsidies ). It’s this mismatch which is more worrisome”.
Bayer, a German leader in biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, hopes to use climate-resilient planting methods and technology in addition to the government’s crop breeding efforts.
It is working with an American federal agency to use drones to monitor crops and spray pesticides.
Bayer wants to encourage farmers to use direct seeding rice machines rather than individually transplanting crops. According to the report, this is reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 44 % and reduce water usage by up to 30 %.
The wish is that public-private collaborations like these can better make India’s agriculture industry for the uncertainty that will arise as India prepares for a more uncertain future with environment.
There are also hopes that they will aid in the sustainability of producers and the billions of people who rely on agriculture for meals.
Bo Guagua: Son of disgraced Chinese politician Bo Xilai reportedly in Taiwan and getting married
According to local media reports, Bo Xilai’s son, a disgraced former high-ranking Chinese politician, is reportedly in Taiwan and getting married this Saturday ( Nov. 23 ).  ,
Apparently, the ceremony will take place in the city of Hsinchu, which is located west of Taipei.  ,
Bo Xilai, 36, the younger brother of past Chongqing party chief Bo Xilai, who was also a part of the strong Politburo before being expelled and given a life sentence for fraud, larceny, and abuse of power.
According to a report from Taiwan’s Central News Agency ( CNA ), which cited official information from the Mainland Affairs Council ( MAC ) on November 15 and is reportedly in town to visit his fiancee’s parents, the younger Bo has been granted legal travel authorization to visit Taiwan.  ,
According to the CNA report, his rumored bride is a Chinese lady from a well-known family in northeast Yilan County.  ,
The couple met while Mr. Bo was worldwide, according to Chinese news website The Taipei Times, and they were planning to get married this year.  ,
In its speech, carried by Chinese media outlets, MAC officials said they were closely monitoring the situation given Mr Bo’s “unique history” and urged people to “respect his protection and his wish to keep a small page”.  ,
Out of respect for his protection, MAC stated that his visa application would not be made public.  ,
While the information was censored in China, it drew attention and comments from Chinese netizens on Twitter, many praising Mr Bo on his relationship while others criticised the media’s “obsession” with his arrival.  ,
Some also made fun of Mr. Bo’s and his Chinese bride’s union, which meant that Xi Jinping’s government referred to two sides as “one family.”
According to reports, Mr. Bo Guagua has been employed by the Power Corporation of Canada as a business analyst.
Before his families were arrested, he was well-known for his colorful attitude, frequent events, nightclub parties, and photo opportunities at parties. He has since studied at prominent international universities, including Oxford University in the UK and Harvard and Columbia in the US.
Rice farmers to get help with harvest costs
Farmers ‘ calls for the government to end the compost subsidies were condemned as unfavorable.
Discussed: 20 Nov 2024 at 17: 20
According to Agriculture Minister Narumon Pinyosinwat, the state is considering reviving a notoriously expensive co-payment scheme for rice producers and introducing a new program to reduce the cost of the crop.
Next month, a subcommittee’s report will be presented to the cupboard for approval, according to Ms. Narumon, according to a statement released on Wednesday.
Farmers previously called for additional subsidies for the planting season 2024-2020 and had raised concerns about the restrictions of the compost plan. More than 70 % of landowners have already started planting their crops, and they said they would like assistance with the cost of planting.
Under the compost plan, the government was to subsidise compost costs for farmers at a rate of 500 ringgit per ray, up to a maximum of 20 ray per man, for the 2024-25 time. But, farmers were required to pay half the costs honest, which they said was not realistic.
The project, estimated to cost 29.9 billion ringgit, was scheduled to work from July 15, 2024 to May 31, 2025. According to Ms. Narumon, the government will be asked to withdraw its approval of the plan.
According to the secretary, the ministry is currently preparing to make a proposal to the cupboard for a plan to stabilize paddy rice prices in the years 2024 and 2025.
With a resources of 60 billion baht, she claimed, the corn plan committee on November 8 approved a plan to stabilize the price of 8.5 million tonnes of rice grain.
The plan includes loans to farmers who agree to put off the purchase of rice rice, loans to organizations that support rice farmers, and support for the scheme’s participating secret rice warehouse operators.
Natthakit Khongthip, director-general of the agency’s Rice Department, said the harvest value support plan would be widely welcomed by farmers, although some are demanding financial help of 1, 000 baht per rai.
He claimed that the grain policy commission may consider increasing the amount of monetary assistance given that it has not already reviewed the proposed plan.