Police officer on trial for abetting starvation of maid who was killed by his wife, removing evidence
SINGAPORE: A police officer whose wife and mother-in-law fatally assaulted a young Myanmar maid went on trial on Thursday (Jul 20) for his alleged role in the abuse and cover-up of the offences.
Staff Sergeant Kevin Chelvam, who has been suspended from the Singapore Police Force, faces four charges related to the case involving 24-year-old victim Piang Ngaih Don.
The 44-year-old is accused of abetting his wife in starving the maid, who was usually only given slices of bread soaked in water at irregular intervals.
He is also contesting charges of hurting the maid by lifting her off the ground by her hair, removing evidence and lying to the police.
According to the prosecution’s case, Chelvam was the victim’s employer and was “fully aware of the atrocities that occurred under his roof”.
Deputy Public Prosecutors Stephanie Koh and Sean Teh said Chelvam was “complicit” in the offences by “his conscious indifference to the deceased’s plight, which he allowed to continue unabated until her death”.
THE PROSECUTION’S CASE
Chelvam lived with his wife and their two children – then aged four and one – in a three-bedroom flat in Bishan. Two tenants lived in one of the bedrooms, said the prosecution.
Chelvam’s mother-in-law and co-accused, Prema S Naraynasamy, had her own home but would often stay over to help cook and take care of the children.
The prosecution said the victim began working for the household in late May 2015. It was her first time working outside of Myanmar.
Chelvam signed the employment contract, agreeing to provide the maid with at least three adequate meals a day, among other terms.
The victim was tasked with completing household chores and looking after the children, and was mainly under the supervision of Chelvan’s wife Gaiyathiri Murugayan. However, Chelvam saw and interacted with the maid whenever he was home, said the prosecutors.
He kept in contact with his wife via WhatsApp throughout the day, discussing household matters, He could also monitor what was going on at home in real-time via a phone app linked to the six closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras in the flat.
The prosecution said Chelvam noticed the “drastic drop” in the victim’s weight. She was 39kg when she first started working for the family and weighed only 24kg when she died 14 months later.
Prosecutors will use WhatsApp messages between Chelvam and his wife to show that he “endorsed the use of deprivation of food as a form of punishment”.
They will call a forensic pathologist to the stand, who will testify that the victim was in a poor nutritional state when she died, with an emaciated body and her muscles “wasted and somewhat pale and translucent”.
If the starvation persisted, it would have affected her consciousness, prevent her from being up and about and lead to progressive multi-organ failure and eventually death.
In one message to his wife, Chelvam allegedly said he had threatened to starve the victim: “(The victim) never put the children photo at the hall properly again … I told her that if one more time she do the same no food for her the whole day…”
After the victim died, Chelvam allegedly attempted to thwart investigations by preventing the police from obtaining crucial footage by disconnecting the CCTV recorder and lying about its whereabouts.
He knew that the victim was regularly abused by his wife and mother-in-law, and that her physical condition had deteriorated, charged the prosecution in their opening statement.
Chelvam is also accused of lying to the police that the CCTV recorder had been removed six months earlier at a tenant’s request. While he was at the house with the police on the day the victim’s death was discovered, Chelvam allegedly pretended to search the house for the recorder, before claiming he was not able to find it.
Chelvam is accused of assaulting the victim on one occasion in early August 2016. CCTV footage showed him grabbing the victim by the hair and lifting her off the ground from a sitting position. He later said he was irritated at her for falling asleep while eating.
World hunger and the war in Ukraine
On Monday, June 17, Dmitry Peskov, the spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin, announced, “The Black Sea agreements are no longer in effect.” This was a blunt statement to suspend the Black Sea grain initiative that emerged out of intense negotiations in the hours after Russian forces entered Ukraine in February 2022.
The initiative went into effect on July 22, 2022, after Russian and Ukrainian officials signed it in Istanbul in the presence of the United Nations Secretary General António Guterres and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Guterres called the initiative a “beacon of hope,” for two reasons. First, it is remarkable to have an agreement of this kind between belligerents in an ongoing war. Second, Russia and Ukraine are major producers of wheat, barley, corn (maize), rapeseed and rapeseed oil, sunflower seeds and sunflower oil, as well as nitrogen, potassic, and phosphorus fertilizer, accounting for 12% of calories traded.
Disruption of supply from Russia and Ukraine, it was felt by a range of international organizations, would have a catastrophic impact on world food markets and on hunger. As Western – largely US, UK and European – sanctions increased against Russia, the feasibility of the deal began to diminish.
It was suspended several times during the past year. In March, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, responding to the sanctions against Russian agriculture, said the main parameters provided for in the grain deal “do not work.”
Financialization leads to hunger
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said his country regrets Russia’s “continued weaponization of food,” since this “harms millions of vulnerable people around the world.” Indeed, the timing of the suspension could not be worse.
A United Nations report, “The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023” (July 12, 2023), shows that one in 10 people in the world struggles with hunger and that 3.1 billion people cannot afford a healthy diet.
But the report itself makes an interesting point: that the war in Ukraine has driven 23 million people into hunger, a number that pales in comparison to the other drivers of hunger – such as the impact of commercialized food markets and the Covid-19 pandemic.
A 2011 report from World Development Movement called “Broken Markets: How Financial Market Regulation Can Help Prevent Another Global Food Crisis” showed that “financial speculators now dominate the [food] market, holding over 60% of some markets, compared [with] 12% 15 years ago.”
The situation has since worsened. Dr Sophie van Huellen, who studies financial speculation in food markets, pointed out in late 2022 that while there are indeed food shortages, “the current food crisis is a price crisis, rather than a supply crisis.”
The end of the Black Sea grain initiative is indeed regrettable, but it is not the leading cause of hunger in the world. The leading cause – as even the European Economic and Social Committee agrees – is financial speculation in food markets.
Why did Russia suspend the initiative?
To monitor the Black Sea grain initiative, the United Nations set up a Joint Coordination Center (JCC) in Istanbul. It is staffed by representatives of Russia, Turkey, Ukraine and the United Nations.
On several occasions, the JCC had to deal with tensions between Russia and Ukraine over the shipments, such as when Ukraine attacked Russia’s Black Sea Fleet – some of whose vessels carried the grain – in Sevastopol, Crimea, in October 2022.
Tensions remained over the initiative as Western sanctions tightened, making it difficult for Russia to export its own agricultural products into the world market.
Russia put three requirements on the table to the United Nations regarding its own agricultural system.
First, Moscow asked that the Russian Agricultural Bank – the premier credit and trade bank for Russian agriculture – be reconnected to the SWIFT system, from which it had been cut off by the European Union’s sixth package of sanctions in June 2022.
A Turkish banker told TASS that there was the possibility that the EU could “issue a general license to the Russian Agricultural Bank” and that the bank “has the opportunity to use JPMorgan to conduct transactions in US dollars” as long as the exporters being paid for were part of the Black Sea grain initiative.
Second, from the first discussions about the grain initiative, Moscow put on the table its export of ammonia fertilizer from Russia both through the port of Odessa and of supplies held in Latvia and the Netherlands.
A central part of the debate has been the reopening of the Togliatti-Odessa pipeline, the world’s longest ammonia pipeline. In July 2022, the UN and Russia signed an agreement that would facilitate the sale of Russian ammonia on the world market.
Guterres went to the UN Security Council to announce, “We are doing everything possible to … ease the serious fertilizer market crunch that is already affecting farming in West Africa and elsewhere. If the fertilizer market is not stabilized, next year could bring a food supply crisis. Simply put, the world may run out of food.”
On June 8, 2023, Ukrainian forces blew up a section of the Togliatti-Odessa pipeline in Kharkiv, increasing the tension over this dispute. Other than the Black Sea ports, Russia has no other safe way to export its ammonia-based fertilizers.
Third, Russia’s agricultural sector faces challenges from a lack of ability to import machinery and parts, and Russian ships are not able to buy insurance or enter many foreign ports. Despite the “carve-outs” in Western sanctions for agriculture, sanctions on firms and individuals have debilitated Russia’s agricultural sector.
To counter Western sanctions, Russia placed restrictions on the export of fertilizer and agricultural products. These restrictions included the ban on the export of certain goods (such as temporary bans of wheat exports to the Eurasian Economic Union), the increase of licensing requirements (including for compound fertilizers, requirements set in place before the war), and the increase of export taxes.
These Russian moves come alongside strategic direct sales to countries such as India that will re-export to other countries.
In late July, St Petersburg will host the Second Russia-Africa Economic and Humanitarian Forum, where these topics will surely be front and center. Ahead of the summit, President Putin called South Africa’s Cyril Ramaphosa to inform him about the problems faced by Russia in exporting its food and fertilizers to the African continent.
“The deal’s main goal,” he said of the Black Sea grain initiative, was “to supply grain to countries in need, including those on the African continent, has not been implemented.”
It is likely that the Black Sea grain initiative will restart within the month. Earlier suspensions have not lasted longer than a few weeks. But this time, it is not clear if the West will give Russia any relief on its ability to export its own agricultural products.
Certainly, the suspension will impact millions of people around the world who struggle with endemic hunger. Billions of others who are hungry because of financial speculation in food markets are not impacted directly by these developments.
This article was produced by Globetrotter, which provided it to Asia Times.
Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter. He is an editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He has written more than 20 books, including The Darker Nations and The Poorer Nations. His latest books are Struggle Makes Us Human: Learning from Movements for Socialism and (with Noam Chomsky) The Withdrawal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and the Fragility of US Power.
Malaysia state polls: Can Perikatan Nasional sustain its winning momentum in Kedah?
On Tuesday (Jul 18), he was charged with two counts of sedition, days after authorities questioned him for allegedly insulting Selangor ruler Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah.
But under his leadership, Kedah has attracted billions of ringgit in investments and created thousands of new jobs.
PN is banking on this track record to secure 33 of the 36 seats up for grabs.
“From 2020 to 2023, our achievements show our effectiveness, integrity, leadership, transparency, and dedication,” said PN’s Kedah election director Hilmi Wahab.
“These are the main points that attract the people and the voters to ensure our victory in Kedah.”
Known as the nation’s rice bowl state, Kedah has recently been the focus of government projects and high-profile visits, underscoring the importance placed on winning over residents’ support.Continue Reading
Malaysia state polls: Can Perikatan Nasional sustain their winning momentum in Kedah?
On Tuesday (Jul 18), he was charged with two counts of sedition, days after authorities questioned him for allegedly insulting Selangor ruler Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah.
But under his leadership, Kedah has attracted billions of ringgit in investments and created thousands of new jobs.
PN is banking on this track record to secure 33 of the 36 seats up for grabs.
“From 2020 to 2023, our achievements show our effectiveness, integrity, leadership, transparency, and dedication,” said PN’s Kedah election director Hilmi Wahab.
“These are the main points that attract the people and the voters to ensure our victory in Kedah.”
Known as the nation’s rice bowl state, Kedah has recently been the focus of government projects and high-profile visits, underscoring the importance placed on winning over residents’ support.Continue Reading
NATO cracks emerge â but not how Putin expected
The cracks, long expected, are beginning to show. At the NATO summit in Vilnius, frictions between members and Ukraine boiled over. Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky, angered that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization refused to set a timeline for Kiev to join the alliance, called the situation “absurd.”
That rare public criticism drew an immediate response from the two countries that have offered the most support. First Britain’s defense secretary, Ben Wallace, pointed out that “people want to see a bit of gratitude,” and noted that Ukrainian politicians had a habit of asking for one type of weapon, being given it, and immediately starting to ask for another type.
Speaking later, US national security adviser Jake Sullivan echoed Wallace’s message, saying he felt “the American people do deserve a degree of gratitude.”
Zelensky, clearly chastened and surprised at the response, told reporters later that day that Ukraine was grateful.
A rare spat, then, after more than a year of a bloody and bruising war. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has taken an enormous toll on Ukraine, first and foremost, but also on hundreds of millions of people around the world. For those NATO countries that have provided the most money and weapons, the war has resulted in a considerable cost in inflation and the daily cost of living.
That fracturing of the alliance was long predicted and exactly what Russia was counting on in a prolonged war. But these cracks are not what Moscow predicted. Far from being a sign of a fracturing among NATO allies, the cracks are actually a result of the alliance expanding – and taking on a new, more confrontational shape.
The idea that a prolonged war in Ukraine favors Moscow has been around since the start of the invasion; it must have provided some of the baseline calculation for going in. Western countries, no matter how supportive they were initially, would eventually tire, so the theory went, and find it harder to justify the toll the war was taking to their populations.
Broadly, that has happened. The Ukraine war has exacerbated inflation and a concurrent economic crisis across many parts of the West. (In the Global South, the effect has been much more pronounced.) Polls show that European publics are tiring of the war and its effect on the economy – but not by as much as expected.
The unexpected factor has been the political response and the unifying effect the war had, particularly in NATO, an alliance that had been adrift for years. This summit was the moment the change became real.
For the first time in years, members agreed a new comprehensive plan for its future security. The plans, which run to thousands of pages of classified text, are naturally secret, but reports indicate that they cover deployments, new equipment and investment.
In other words, NATO is finally telling its members how much to spend and what to spend it on – something that countries with bigger militaries, such as France and Turkey, have long chafed at.
This realignment of NATO is real, and irreversible in the medium term. Even as late as last autumn it was probably reversible. Had the war ended then, even in an imperfect truce, it’s possible the inertia that has gripped NATO members for two decades could have reasserted itself.
NATO in for the long haul
But now the alliance is committed, with a new military doctrine that emphasizes preparation for a prolonged, grinding, land and air war, conducted across the entirety of the European continent, as opposed to the bounded wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
All of that means a new posture on the continent.
The positive side of that posture – from the perspective of the NATO members that will have to carry it out – is that the task is clear.
But the flip side is that NATO members are now starting to think seriously about their future and whether they can defend their countries.
Ukraine is using up vast quantities of weaponry, which, as Wallace pointed out in Vilnius, in essence means Kiev is “persuading countries to give up their own stocks” of weapons.
The most commonly cited example of this is the 155mm howitzer artillery shells that the US gives Ukraine.
Kiev is burning through these at an unsustainable rate – how unsustainable is a military secret, but Ukraine appears to be using more shells in two days, or perhaps 10 days, it hardly matters, as the US can produce in a month. In the long term, that presents a problem, for both Kiev and Washington.
The amount of weaponry given is getting to the point of either/or – either NATO countries have enough for their own defense, or they give Ukraine what it wants. Hence the jitters and irritation that seeped out at the summit.
None of this is good news for Russia, however social media tried to spin the spat. An invasion of Ukraine would have only worked for Russia if it could have been swift – which it turned out not to be – or swiftly forgotten, like the 2014 occupation of Crimea.
It may, however, be good news for Vladimir Putin. An invasion that provoked a complete realignment on the continent would cast Russia into the permanent role of outsider – a role in which Putin is comfortable and which he can sell rather too easily to the Russian public when elections next roll around.
The most consequential NATO summit in decades has seen the alliance take on a new role, one rather too similar to the role it played years ago.
This article was provided by Syndication Bureau, which holds copyright.
Faisal Al Yafai is currently writing a book on the Middle East and is a frequent commentator on international TV news networks. He has worked for news outlets such as The Guardian and the BBC, and reported on the Middle East, Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa. Follow him on Twitter @FaisalAlYafai.
Foreigners need approval to buy mixed commercial and residential properties, land in Singapore
SINGAPORE: Foreigners looking to buy property or land currently zoned for mixed commercial and residential use will be required to seek government approval from Thursday (Jul 20). The Ministry of Law (MinLaw) and the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) on Wednesday night announced that they have refined the Residential Property Act (RPA) to classify theseContinue Reading
NCSS to launch new framework early next year for companies to measure social impact
The robot allows clients to access leisure and educational applications, she added.
“On top of that, we also want to solve the issue of limited resources in our centre. We want to increase the efficiency of the use of our staff’s time, where they can actually provide more targeted intervention for clients.”
Temi’s creators RoboSolutions modified its software to suit AWWA’s needs, but staff at the activity centre can also re-programme the robot themselves.
“The idea here is that we want to teach them, to train them up so that they can make changes themselves or they can come up with new ideas,” said RoboSolutions managing director Lim Wen Chyi.
“They can programme the robot in their own way. Whoever is managing the robots will attend some training sessions with us, usually about three to four hours. And the rest of the time, all they need to do is get used to Temi, play with it, try different stuff, and then they can come up with their own creative content.”
China to boost consumption, private investments
The Chinese government has launched new campaigns to boost domestic consumption and private fixed-asset-investments after foreign direct investments (FDIs) and exports showed a weakening trend.
The Ministry of Commerce and 12 other government departments on Tuesday unveiled an 11-point plan that aims to encourage people to buy household consumer goods, electric appliances and furniture and to refurbish their homes.
The State Council and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s Central Committee also on Wednesday jointly issued new guidelines that call for supporting private companies in share listings, bond sales and overseas expansion. They instruct government departments to treat private companies in the same way as state-owned enterprises (SOEs).
Chinese officials warned that the West’s “de-risking” plan’s threats to the China economy are growing.
Last year, the US accelerated its “friend-shoring” and “near-shoring” plans. It treats India and Vietnam as its “friend-shoring” destinations and Mexico as its top “near-shoring” place. It also called on its allies to follow suit.
Falling orders
In the first half, China recorded a 3.97% year-on-year drop in total exports, the General Administration of Customs said on July 13. The fall was mainly caused by a slowing demand from western countries.
China’s FDIs fell 5.6% year-on-year in the first five months of this year, according to the Ministry of Commerce.
As many factories are either downsizing or leaving China, the youth unemployment rate recorded a high at 21.3% in June from 20.8% in May. Many workers also suffered from pay cuts and unstable income, said media reports.
The year-on-year growth of retail sales of consumer goods fell to 3.1% in June from 12.7% in May, partly because of a weak demand in the real estate markets.
“Due to the influence of multiple factors, the retail sales of home appliances, furniture, home decoration and other household products remained weak,” Shen Qiuping, vice minister of commerce, said in a media briefing about domestic consumption on Tuesday. He said retail sales of electric appliances and household products grew only 1% and 3.8%, respectively, in the first half from a year ago while sales of construction materials fell 6.7%.
He said the government’s 11-point plan is aimed at encouraging people to renovate their homes – for example, by allowing people to withdraw pensions in advance to upgrade their or their parents’ living facilities. He said that, from the supply side, the government will encourage manufacturers to launch innovative household products for the markets.
Xu Xingfeng, director general of the Department of Consumption Promotion of the Ministry of Commerce, said provincial and municipal governments will hold exhibitions and sales promotion activities.
He said the nation will groom five international consumption cities – Shanghai, Beijing, Guangzhou, Tianjin and Chongqing – and build 2,057 shopping centrer that can be reached by people within a five to 10 minute walk from home across 80 cities.
He said the government will also set up recycling centres to handle old home appliances.
Last month, many cities announced their plan to deliver consumption vouchers to the public. Each person can get vouchers worth from 100 to 500 yuan to buy home appliances.
‘Three-horse carriage’
Consumption, fixed-asset investments and exports combined are dubbed the “three-horse carriage,” the main driver of the Chinese economy. When consumption and exports are weak, the Chinese government can order state-owned-enterprises (SOEs) to boost investments but cannot do much to motivate the private ones.
Fixed-asset investments grew 3.8% in the first half from a year earlier, thanks to an 8.1% growth in the investments by SOEs, the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) said Monday. For the same period, private fixed-asset investments fell 0.2% as investment from Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan companies dropped 3.4%.
According to the guidelines released by the CCP Central Committee and the State Council, China will help remove barriers in market access and fully implement policies and mechanisms for fair competition.
The country said it will protect intellectual property rights, the property rights of private firms, and the legitimate rights and interests of entrepreneurs as part of the legal guarantee for the growth of the private economy. More policy support will be provided to facilitate financing for companies and meet labor demand.
“Some countries have forcibly promoted ‘decoupling’ and so-called ‘de-risking,’ artificially setting up obstacles to hinder normal economic and trade exchanges,” Li Xingqian, director general of the Department of Foreign Trade of the Ministry of Commerce, said in a media briefing on Wednesday.
“Companies told us that certain countries politicized trade issues, resulting in the forced outflow of orders and production capacity, which harmed the economic interests of both suppliers and buyers,” Li said.
However, he added that China is still full of confidence that it can overcome these difficulties and challenges.
“The supply chain of China’s foreign trade industry chain has strong resilience,” he said. “China’s foreign trade enterprises have been honed and grown up in the international market competition and have inherent innovation capabilities.”
Li said on June 8 that after the pandemic, the resumption of production in neighboring countries had resulted in an outflow of China’s foreign trade orders but the trend is controllable while its impact has been limited.
He said it’s normal for some companies to choose to move their manufacturing facilities outside China as the country continues to upgrade its industrial sectors. He said the shift can be attributed to the international industrial division of labor.
Other officials also offer optimism mixed with caution.
“Given that the first-half GDP growth reached 5.5% and the base in the fourth quarter of last year was low, it should not be a problem for China to meet its 5% GDP growth this year,” Xu Gao, chief economist of Bank of China International (China) Co Ltd, writes in an article published by Guancha.cn on Wednesday. “But it does not mean that the economic situation is satisfactory.”
“To stabilise demand, we can only rely on boosting domestic consumption as we have no control of the external demand, especially when the future prospects remain not optimistic,” Xu says.
He says China’s fixed-asset investment was slowed by the poor property markets while the government should do more to stimulate homebuyers’ demands.
Read: China’s June exports hit by weak Western demand
Follow Jeff Pao on Twitter at @jeffpao3
Dollar angst boils up at worst moment for marketsÂ
The investment world has seen no bigger widow-maker trade this last decade than shorting the US dollar. Yet recent volatility in the reserve currency has punters once again asking whether the great dollar reckoning is finally afoot?
No one knows, of course. The dollar’s sudden and sharp drop in recent days, though, has the whiff of exactly the sort of foreign-exchange shock for which markets have been bracing. As investors wait to see if things unravel, finally, it’s worth exploring how bad things might get.
For now, the dollar’s stumble can easily be explained by shifting considerations of interest rate differential expectations. As strategist Steven Barrow at Standard Bank puts it: “Our call for the dollar to enter a multi-year downtrend is partly based on the fact that the Fed’s tightening cycle will morph into an easing cycle, and this will pull the dollar down even as other central banks cut as well.”
News that inflation rose just 3% in June year on year, a third of the rate of increase a year before, suggests that the most aggressive Federal Reserve tightening cycle in three decades is winding down. The Bank of Japan, by comparison, is locked in place policy-wise, while the People’s Bank of China is in rate-cut mode.
Yet currency crises tend to come very suddenly. It doesn’t take much for a stumble to morph into the real thing. Once a critical mass of global investors starts taking a serious look at the dollar’s fundamentals, things could go south at warp speed.
Chief among the negative data points: a fast-widening current-account deficit; a national debt topping US$32 trillion; highly indebted households, buckling under the weight of hundreds of basis points worth of higher borrowing costs; President Joe Biden’s move to weaponize the dollar to punish Russia over Ukraine; trade friction with China; and a level of political bickering in Washington that has Fitch Ratings mulling a downgrade.
“There’s little evidence, however, of a sustainable uptrend in dollars at this point,” says J C Parets, founder and president of advisory AllStarCharts.com. “In fact, the majority of the data continues to point towards a lower US dollar.”
Strategist Masafumi Yamamoto at Mizuho Securities thinks the dollar will remain “under pressure” unless new evidence emerges that the US economy is “outperforming other countries.”
Economist Edward Bell at Emirates NBD says indications are that “the dollar’s prime position appears largely unchallenged, thus far. But there are developments that may yet drive a longer-term shift away from the US dollar, including the use of sanctions as a US foreign policy tool. There has also been a rise in bilateral agreements to settle trade in local currencies rather than the US dollar.”
A key problem, of course, is a lack of ready alternatives. Analysts at Fitch Analytics argue that “while the US dollar’s role will continue to decline over the coming years, it will be a slow erosion, rather than a paradigm shift. Most importantly, there is no real alternative to the US dollar, and the Chinese yuan is unlikely to become one in the near future.”
Bell adds that “despite a potential longer-term desire amongst some economies to diversify away from the dollar, there are also some fundamental stumbling blocks that may slow or limit this process.” As the International Monetary Fund has suggested, Bell notes, “there is significant inertia in reserve currency status, with a strong bias to using whichever reserve currency has been dominant in the most recent past.”
One possible reason for this inertia, Bell says, “may be the US dollar’s safe-haven status, evident in the perennial demand for US government bonds, even during times when there is heightened risk within the US economy itself. There is also a lack of feasible alternatives, with both the euro and the yuan facing their own issues as real challengers to the dollar.”
Yet little of this will matter if fundamentals get away from Washington. In 1971, Nixon-era Treasury Secretary John Connally famously said that the “dollar is our currency, but it’s your problem.” Fifty-two years later, Asia is on the frontlines of this very phenomenon.
The dollar has peaked both in cyclical and secular terms,” says strategist Luca Paolini at Pictet Asset Management. “The overvaluation is significant and our models show the dollar is 20% above its fair value versus a basket of currencies. US productivity growth is weak, fiscal policy is too loose and interest rate differentials are no longer supportive of the US currency. The dollar’s depreciation is likely to be particularly pronounced against low-yielding currencies, such as the Swiss franc.”
The risk is that investors turn on the dollar en masse, setting off a disastrous domino effect. It’s then that the poor financial fundamentals unnerving markets collide with geopolitical tensions. A big one is governments from China to Russia to Saudi Arabia searching for alternatives.
The ways in which the Biden White House moved in 2022 to freeze some of Russia’s currency reserves only encouraged the anti-dollar movement.
In April, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen acknowledged that “There is risk when we use financial sanctions that are linked to the role of the dollar that over time it could undermine the hegemony of the dollar.” Yet, she added, the dollar “is used as a global currency for reasons” that include the fact it is “not easy for other countries to find an alternative with the same properties.”
Julius Sen, a political economy expert at the London School of Economics, notes that the term weaponization is “apt as it explains how a relatively neutral but essential facility – the dollar and its accompanying payment system – have been turned into a powerful weapon by one UN member state against another without appropriate sanctions in place.” In addition to amounting to weaponization, the freeze on Russian currency reserves “also represents an aggressive form of extraterritoriality which has perhaps not been seen on this scale in the past.”
Washington’s use of the dollar to gain political leverage could drive other countries to “find their own coping mechanisms,” Sen says. Possible mechanisms that he lists include diversifying into other currencies, shunning dollar-denominated assets and turning to capital controls.
For China’s yuan, the lack of full convertibility remains a turnoff for many global investors. And, in the short run, so is concern that Asia’s biggest economy is veering toward deflation.
Analyst Kelvin Wong at OANDA warns that “further yuan weakness is likely to put more financial burden on the current offshore bonds payment obligations of Chinese property developers where the property industry still faces a credit crunch issue due to a weak internal demand environment.”
What’s more, Wong adds, “brewing financial stress of major Chinese property developers is on the rise again: Prices of their onshore dollar bonds tumbled significantly in the last two days.”
Adding to the PBOC’s list of worries, Wong says, are a trading halt announcement made by Sino-Ocean Group in a local note that is due to mature in two weeks and Dalian Wanda Group’s issuance of a warning to its creditors of a funding shortfall for a bond that is due for redemption on July 23.
The bottom line, Wong says, is that “failure to negate the current negative sentiment in the China stock market may further reinforce a negative feedback loop into the real economy which in turn increases the risk of a deflationary spiral.”
Yet the dollar’s downward trajectory could have the yuan moving higher in the second half of 2023. Strategist Kit Juckes at Société Générale thinks the dollar could soon return to its December 2020 lows.
“As was the case in January/February before the SVB mini crisis, the market is anticipating the peak in US rates and a further narrowing relative rates,” Juckes notes. “If nothing happens to scupper those expectations — another upside surprise in US growth, or further European growth disappointment — I would expect the Dollar Index to move closer but not all the way to the lows at the end of 2020.”
After that, no one really knows. The typical financial dynamics and yardsticks are far less applicable in today’s market environment.
“We’ve got a one-in-a-100-years pandemic and a once-in-75-years war and a-once-in-25-years energy crisis all thrown into the mix together,” Juckes explains. “You’ve got to be 120 years old to have any understanding of this.”
One such imponderable today is how central banks and governments tame inflation emanating from non-monetary sources — including from supply chain tensions beyond policymakers’ control.
“The great lingering fear among central banks is that the longer it takes to bring down inflation, the greater the risk of it becoming entrenched,” says economist David Bassanese at BetaShares Exchange Traded Funds.
That’s why, notes George Saravelos, global head of FX research at Deutsche Bank, “a confirmation that the US disinflation process is underway in soft landing conditions is for us the most important macro variable for the rest of the year.”
Yet no risk trumps that of the dollar, the linchpin of international finance, finally having its comeuppance. It’s too early to say that this long-awaited reckoning is afoot. If it is, economies everywhere will quickly find themselves in harm’s way.
The pink tax and other invisible taxes Singapore women âpayâ: What you didnât know about gender inequality
Closer to home, an Australian advocacy group found that Australian women pay over 50 per cent for birth control like oral contraceptives (AUD$304 or S$274) while men pay AUD$197 for condoms.
This gender-based pricing phenomenon affects many aspects of women’s lives.
WHY IS THERE EVEN A PINK TAX?
Why pink and not any other colour? It’s likely because pink has long been associated with girls and women – it’s ingrained in societal and cultural perceptions of what is gender appropriate. Even in adulthood, the preference for pink is more prevalent in women.
Some companies use this association to create products or services that capitalise on it, for example, a pink razor. Aesthetics aside, there is no real reason for this additional cost.
“Most economists will say prices are a function of supply and demand. The interesting issue with ‘pink tax’ is that the perception is it’s largely about raising prices to take advantage of demand,” said Walter Theseira, Associate Professor of Economics at the Singapore University of Social Sciences.
“(It’s) not because the costs of making the product are different or higher when catering for women. In short, women are willing to pay more, and companies take advantage of that.”