Sure A Not

The relationships of any arrangement— if there is one — will be very different if it is reached tomorrow if the Ukraine war go much further into the future.

Ukraine will soon be forced to decide whether to continue fighting and try to prolong the war or to strike a bargain as soon as possible. & nbsp,

Ukraine would still have complete control over its five most significant locations, Kharkiv, Kiev, Dnipro, Odesa, and L’viv, even if it started political talks with Russia nowadays. Its troops would still be useful.

In a settlement, Ukraine could generate sizable amounts of agricultural and industrial output as well as exports, increasing the nation’s revenue( assuming Russian cooperation ). The self-exiled people as a whole may decide to go back. & nbsp, That would depend on the extent of post-settlement infrastructure in Ukraine. & nbsp,

More of the nation’s business foundation will be destroyed if the combat lasts longer.

The likelihood of migrants returning is less good if the battle is prolonged. & nbsp, Many of the most talented people will find employment somewhere and blend in with the local population.

Ukraine may be confident that it will maintain control of important cities, keep its armed forces up, revive its economy, or uphold an independent state if the war goes on. In addition, & nbsp,

Ukraine may continue to rely on Western assistance for very long. Additionally, it is uncertain whether the alleged billion for rebuilding may actually be available. & nbsp: If the war goes on, the cost of reconstruction will undoubtedly rise to very high levels and take decades to complete, if at all. Western nations are in a recession, and budgets are getting tighter.

These assessments of Ukraine’s little – and long-term fortunes are based on the current conflict findings, which are turning out to be very unfavorable for Ukraine.

Today, Ukraine is completely reliant on outside assistance and nbsp to maintain its war effort, pay its own workers, and compensate cultural and non-profit costs. Even with this assistance, it is evident that Ukraine’s war is dealing with serious issues that it cannot resolve.

These issues include a decrease in labor( as well as alternative issues ),

• The lack of airpower( which a few F-16s didn’t make better )
• The Soviet forces, which are becoming more and more worthy, are armed with contemporary arms and
• an equipment that is constantly being attacked by long-range Russian weapons, drones and Lovely bombs.

The military is powerless to defend its people from Russian assaults. It is unable to stop the destruction of organizations.

Ukraine’s problems are made worse by the fact that its sponsors are running low on supplies and are able to take them to Ukraine.

The offer issue brings up a number of problems. The first is that weapons transfers have significantly weakened NATO nations’ home defenses. & nbsp,

The second is that the dealer nations are unable to join the conflict on behalf of Ukraine, never just because doing so would end a public German conflict, but also because they lack the resources to wage war, particularly one that is fought far outside of their borders.

Simulations conducted by the Pentagon, & nbsp, RAND, and other think tanks before the Ukraine War have demonstrated how challenging and potentially unsuccessful it would be to defend Europe from a Russian attack. & nbsp, The situation is much worse now that NATO is literally out of bullets.

Third, despite the fact that some of the best Western technology has frequently been hailed as game-changers, the Ukraine war is harming NATO’s reputation around the world.

Last but not least, the battle’s costs and outcomes are making it harder for the US to maintain stability in both the Middle East and the eastern Pacific. In this sense, the Ukraine NATO expansion, & nbsp, which has been promised since 2008 and has not yet been fully realized, is a country that has gone too far because it has given Russia more energy than the war’s planners anticipated and put the NATO alliance at real risk of disintegrating.

The geopolitical theory of Zbigniew & nbsp, Brzezinski, is largely the foundation for the US’s promotion of a Greater NATO and, consequently, the EU idea of an Even Bigger EU. A revision of Mackinder’s” tactical book” was proposed by Brzezinski.

The fundamental idea is that the US needs to control the vast majority of Asian land. Ukraine’s & nbsp, in this context, is the turning point. Beyond Ukraine, the US also wants to replace Russia in central Asia( the” stans”) and, if an alliance with Iran is possible, push Russia out of the Caucasus, according to the Biden administration. Importantly, the US has been able to persuade Armenia, a longtime Russian client, to change course and join forces with NATO. & nbsp,

Policymakers from both major political parties in Washington have been greatly influenced by Brzezinski’s book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives( 1999 ). In essence, it is what many critics refer to as the so-called neocons’ perspective. Zbig continues to be extremely pertinent.

Russia is fully aware of the goals the US is pursuing. Moscow is aware that US military, diplomatic, NGO, and CIA endeavors in its neighborhood represent a significant & nbsp challenge, despite the fact that Washington’s primary focus is on Ukraine. Andnbsp, just as the US is attempting to bring about regime change in Russia and sabotage Russian energy, Russian counter-strategie is to split NATO.

With all, Ukraine is fighting to retake the regions of its nation where thousands of Russians reside. Ukraine has been conducting a comprehensive purge rather than attempting to entice Soviet speakers back into the Russian collapse. & nbsp,

The use of the Russian speech in educational institutions, government buildings, and nbsp, including medical professionals, has been prohibited. The educating of Russian literature has been prohibited by it. Russian Catholic priests have been detained, and it has taken over Belarusian monks and churches.

Russian social sites, statues, and other examples of Russian accomplishment are reportedly being routinely destroyed by so-called vigilantes. There is no turning up and no chance of reconciliation after the Russians are expelled from Ukraine.

There are still significant amounts of Russian listeners in some regions of Ukraine. For instance, the 1.02 million-person city of Odesa has a sizable minority of 62 % Ukrainian and 29 % Russian. Jews made up 32 % of the Odesa people in the past, but today’s Jewish population is only 1.2 % due to the Nazi extinction of Jews. Russia has been asked to conquer Odesa with its troops. In addition, & nbsp,

On October 5th, Soviet President Putin discussed Russia’s war objectives at the Valdai Discussion Club in Sochi.

In the conflict with Ukraine, he stated that Russia & nbsp is more concerned with safeguarding the citizens of Donbass and Crimea than it is with” looking for new territories.”

Putin’s claim does not imply that Russia will be satisfied with merely defending the regions that are already largely under Russian power if the battle continues. Additionally, it is true that Russia’s war objectives include other significant objectives, no the least of which is to keep NATO out of Ukraine. Any war arrangement in which Ukraine admits it has lost the war is subject to Russia’s desire to keep NATO out of Ukraine.

If Ukraine continues the war, the results will be significantly worse if the present battle trends continue. Andnbsp, A protracted war might result in civil war in Ukraine, a shift in military rulers, or the overthrow of the government. While some believe the war will continue for a few more years, it is doubtful that Ukraine’s military will be able to hold out for that much. & nbsp,

Instead of escalating the conflict in Ukraine, Washington politicians may be wise to try to end it. & nbsp, While some believe Biden, who has vowed to fight the war for as long as it takes, needs it for his re-election campaign, changes in public opinion suggest that strategy is incorrect. & nbsp,

Although Congress also supports funding Ukraine to some extent, it is unlikely that Ukraine will receive adequate assistance to alter the result, aside from escalating casualties on the field. Andnbsp, This gives the Ukrainian government yet more justification to request words from the Russians while it still has the opportunity. & nbsp,

Shortly, a peace agreement with Ukraine will be to the advantage of Ukraine, the US, and NATO.

Rephrasing the query

A pretty top retired military president who is a good friend of mine read the previous. Why do you think Putin has the motivation and nbsp to discuss, he questioned?

It is a reasonable problem, and I gave him the following response:

Putin is available to conversations right now for a number of reasons, in my opinion. Here they are( in no particular order ), & nbsp. & nbsp, I believe you asked a good question, and I hope the answers I’ve provided below are helpful.

1. Putin, in my opinion, doesn’t want a bigger conflict or take the chance that NATO will start one. When London suggested American boots on the ground in Ukraine earlier this week, the Russians informed the English that Russia would respond. The British defense minister’s action was a trial balloon on behalf of the Biden administration, according to & nbsp. & nbsp, Incidentally, there was a very unfavorable response from the British and NATO. That, in my opinion, reveals a lot about Putin’s thoughts as well as how eager the UK and US are.

2. Putin does not want to appear to be attempting to increase Russia beyond the more prescriptive says that Russia is making about a Russian people in Ukraine that must be safeguarded. This is significant because Russia doesn’t want to be perceived as an interventionist neocolonial power and has international ambitions. One of the causes of Russia’s minimal territorial passions, according to Putin, is this.

3. 3. Putin wants to maintain control over the Special Military Operation and prevent it from being seized by politicians or careless generals( think Medvedev or Prigozhin ), which would inevitably result in the use of WMD.

4. Putin is aware that the battle is expensive and difficult. Russia’s capabilities in terms of industrial, financial, and domestic political support may be outmatched by a larger war. Russia may also face the same issue even if the conflict lasted much longer and was not expanded. Commercially, Russia is currently on a war basis. It doesn’t continue doing that continuously.

5. 5. China, Putin’s principal friend, wants the war to be over and done with. The Chinese believe that a protracted conflict will make the US more ruthless and yet impose severe restrictions on China. The Chinese are undoubtedly pushing their personal peace plan and have admitted to Putin their concern over a protracted conflict in Ukraine.

6. For financial and strategic causes, Russia is eager to reestablish good relations with Germany. Andnbsp, Putin is aware that the reunification of Germany posed a significant threat to Russia because he worked for the KGB in the GDR( East Germany ) and is fluent in German. Putin believes that a settlement will allow for the political, social, and economical restoration of ties with the Germans. This will immediately jeopardize NATO, which is Russian territory( just as the US is attempting to destroy Russia and bring about regime change that ).

7. Putin primarily views the conflict in Ukraine as an Anglo-Saxon conflict that has dragged other Europeans together. Putin, who is nearing the end of his career, may experience a huge victory if he could end the war on his words. & nbsp,

8. Putin is really concerned with maintaining the Soviet army’s trust. This is essential to the battle efforts, nbsp. The Russian military is re-energized and making significant progress, but it may also be harmful. & nbsp, The end of the Ukraine War will stifle military ambitions.

9. Russia’s finances would drastically improve after the war, primarily through exports and the transfer of American manufacturing and technology. With the introduction of nanomaterials, artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and other unique capabilities, Russia needs access to northern technologies.

10. Russia can’t be very confident in China’s stability or in the US ‘ ability to avoid engaging in conflict with a struggling social and economic China while keeping an eye on it. Putin needs to fence his bets, and ending the Ukraine War may make that easier.

In conclusion, I believe Putin has significant benefits right today in terms of negotiating a deal. He has no power over the circumstance, though. Zelensky and Biden must want to strike a bargain, that much is obvious. Zelensky has set up his own capture. It will be interesting to see if he can walk out and get his voice.

Senior fellow Stephen Bryen & nbsp works for the Yorktown Institute and the Center for Security Policy. His Substack, Weapons, and Strategy was the original subject of this article. Asia Times is republishing it with their consent, nbsp.

Continue Reading

It is not the first time that alchemy has received a Nobel Prize in 2023 for research in nanotechnology. However, it is arguably the most vibrant use of technologies to get connected to the award.

Moungi Bawendi, Louis Brus, and Alexei Ekimov are recognized for their contributions to the identification and creation of classical lines with this year’s reward. These specifically crafted nanometer-sized contaminants, which are only a few hundred tenths the diameter of human hair, were the talk of the industry for many years.

I’ve also used them myself when speaking with developers, politicians, advocacy groups, and others about the claim and dangers of the technology as a scientist and advisor on nanotechnology.

Before Bawendi, Brus, and Ekimov’s operate on classical dots, engineers like Erik Drexler were speculating about the potential of chemically specific production in the 1980s. The mathematician Richard Feynman also made predictions about what might be possible through nanoscale engineering in 1959.

However, the three Nobel laureates from this year were a part of the first wave of contemporary nano, when scientists started using material science discoveries in everyday life.

Classical lines have a brilliant glow because they quickly absorb one color of light and reflect it back as another. When illuminated by broad spectrum light, a bottle of quantum dots glows with just one brilliant color. However, what makes them unique is that the size of their colour depends on how big or small they are. If you shrink them down, you get an extreme turquoise. The colour changes to red as you make them bigger but also nanoscale.

This characteristic has produced a number of startling photos of rows of vials containing classical dots of various sizes, ranging from striking blue to vivid red to greens and oranges. This presentation of the power of nanotechnology is so captivating that, in the early 2000s, classical lines came to represent the strangeness and innovation of Nanotechnology.

However, quantum dots are obviously more than just a pretty lounge strategy. They show that rather than experimenting with the substance bonds between atoms and molecules, it is possible to engineer the actual form of matter, changing things like the size, shape, and composition of materials.

The difference is significant and at the core of contemporary nano.

Concentrate on quantum physics instead of chemical ties.

The substance ties that bind a material’s constituent atoms along typically determine the wavelengths of light that it absorbs, reflects, or emits. It is possible to fine-tune these ties so that they give you the colors you want by fiddling with the science of a substance. For example, some of the earliest dyes began with a clear substance like acid, which was chemically changed to produce the desired color.

Although it’s a useful way to work with light and color, it also results in items that fade over time as those securities deteriorate. Additionally, it generally involves the use of chemicals that are dangerous to both people and the environment.

Quantum lines function in a different way. They rely on tiny cluster of semiconducting supplies rather than chemical bonds to determine the light frequencies they absorb and emit. The wavelengths of light that are emitted are then determined by the classical physics of these regions, which in turn depends on the cluster size.

When it comes to the strength and value of light that quantum dots you create, as well as their resistance to bleaching or fading, their novel uses, and- if they are cleverly engineered– their toxicity, this ability to control how a material behaves by just changing its size, is an absolute game-changer.

Some substances are, of course, entirely harmless, and quantum lines are no exception. For example, the toxic components of copper selenide were frequently the basis for beginning quantum dots. The likelihood of transfer and exposure, as well as how they compare to alternatives, must be taken into account when weighing the potential toxicity of classical lines.

Since its inception, classical point technology has improved in terms of safety and effectiveness and has found its way into an increasing number of items, ranging from sensors, medical applications, displays and lights, and more. They may have lost some of their innovation as a result. It can be challenging to recall how much of a quantum leap the technology is, for example, to showcase the newest generation of bright TVs.

However, quantum lines play a crucial role in the technological revolution that is transforming how atoms and molecules are used.

” Basic scripting” at the molecular level

I discuss the idea of” base coding” in my book” Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies.” The concept is straightforward: We can start to design and reengineer the world we live in if we can control the most fundamental code that defines it.

When it comes to technology, where developers use the” basic code” of 1, s, and 0’s through higher-level languages, this idea is simple to understand. It also makes feeling in science, where researchers are getting better at deciphering and writing the fundamentals of DNA and RNA, in this case by using the coding language of the chemical bases purine, guanine. nucleotides valine.

The material universe can also benefit from this capacity for working with basic codes. The code in this example is composed of atoms and molecules and how they are arranged to produce fascinating qualities.

The labor on quantum dots by Bawendi, Brus, and Ekimov is a prime example of this type of material-world basic coding. They were able to access tale quantum properties that would otherwise be inaccessible by perfectly forming small clusters of specific atoms into globular” dots.” They demonstrated the transformational power that results from coding with particles through their work.

They made it possible for nanometer base coding to develop to the point where it is now used in products and applications that were not previously conceivable. Additionally, they served as a source of inspiration for the nano rebellion that is still going strong today. Reengineering the physical world in these cutting-edge techniques goes far beyond what is possible with more traditional systems.

A 1999 US National Science and Technology Council statement with the name Nanomaterials: Shaping the World Atom by Atom captured this chance. It doesn’t directly notice quantum dots, which I’m sure the authors are now kicking themselves for, but it does get how revolutionary the ability to orchestrate materials at the molecular scale may be.

Through their ground-breaking job, Bawendi, Brus, and Ekimov aspired to this atomic-level formation of the world. As they harnessed the quantum physics of small particles using atomically precise engineering, they were some of the first materials” base coders ,” and the Nobel committee’s recognition of this merits praise.

Arizona State University’s Andrew Maynard is a professor of innovative technology moves.

Under a Creative Commons license, this essay has been republished from The Conversation. Read the original publication.

Continue Reading

The alleged” no-limits” agreement between China and Russia has come to a standstill over the price of electricity and natural gas, sparking concerns about the viability of the larger strategic alliance. & nbsp,

Due to China’s refusal to pay a 7 % price increase, Russian state-owned energy company InterRAO has limited power supplies to the northern region of the country since the beginning of this month.

While Beijing and Moscow haggle over fuel load prices, China has also reportedly refused to give final authorization for the 2 Power of Siberia pipeline initiative, which is intended to send Russian natural gas to China via Mongolia. & nbsp,

Outside of the Eurasian Economic Union, which includes Russia and several other former Soviet says, China is the largest export market for power in Russia.

Russia announced last month that export taxes related to the franc exchange rate would be applied to a variety of goods, including oil and gas. If the rouble is weaker than 80 US dollars, which it is currently trading at around 98 to the dollar, the duty rate will range from 4 % to 7 %, according to reports by Reuters.

For users in China, Mongolia, Azerbaijan, and the independent Greek region of South Ossetia, InterRAO announced in late September that electricity prices would increase by 7 % on October 1.

While pointing out that Russia sells crude petrol to India at a higher discount than it permits China, some Taiwanese critics have argued that the country’s increase in electricity prices is ridiculous. & nbsp,

The Russian ruble had been floating at about 75 francs per penny for about two years prior to the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in February 2022. The rubles, yet, fell to 134 per dollar in March of last year as a result of American sanctions, but it quickly recovered to 54 in June as concerns about sanctions’ effectiveness grew. & nbsp,

The franc has been trading at around 100 since August after easing back to around 80 in April of this year. & nbsp,

The InterRAO claimed that conversations with Mongolia, which consented to pay the higher costs, were powerful on October 2. While discussions are ongoing, the state company has begun to inflict some supply restrictions, according to its statement that it is still in talks with China.

Lu En, a Fujian-based author, wrote in an article that was published on October 4 that” even though China and Russia are deepening their participation in some areas, it does not imply that their interests are fully aligned on all problems.” ” We can see this intricate activity from Russia’s numerous price adjustments in the oil and gas supply, in addition to electricity prices.”

According to Lu,” China runs the risk of relying on a single power supply, particularly when it comes to power supplies that have an impact on the nation’s lifeline.”

He argued that China should not be long-term interested in Russia’s most recent increase in electricity prices and urged Beijing to maintain a diversified supply chain while constantly boosting its strategic energy reserves.

According to some other commentators, it’s common for China and Russia to agree on specific trade agreements. & nbsp,

A writer who goes by the pen name” Qianliyan” and claims to be an associate professor at the College of Literature and Journalism at China’s Sichuan University says in an article,” When dealing with external trade, the Chinese government has always been very rational and has a clever mind.” & nbsp,

Organization is one thing, connection is another. He claims that this should be the appropriate stance. Putin, the chairman of Russia, actually made no requests of China. We are aware that the energy field has remained involved in the negotiations regarding the electricity price increase, which have not yet been brought up to a political level.

A few agreements, such as light import prices or the price of natural gas in the 2 Power of Siberia initiative, which is intended to deliver Russian oil to China via Mongolia but is still under talks, won’t jeopardize China and Russia’s” great friendship ,” according to Qianliyan. He suggests that there shouldn’t be an exaggeration of Sino-Russian industry conflicts.

shortage of power

Through the Blagoveshchensk – Heihe power wires, Heilongjiang province of China has been importing energy from InterRAO since 1992. In 1996 and 2006, two more connectors started running. The three is transport up to 7 billion kWh of electricity annually when combined. & nbsp,

China chose to purchase more energy from InterRAO after experiencing a countrywide power shortage in September 2021. The National Energy Administration reports that in the first three quarters of 2021, Russia’s energy supplies to China increased 1.4 % year over year to 2.38 billion kWh. However, the number increased by 1.64 billion kWh in the final quarter of the same year, resulting in 134 % more energy exports than the anticipated 700 million.

4.1 % of Heilongjiang’s total electricity consumption( 113.9 trillion kWh ) in 2022 came from Russia, whose electricity supplies to China reached a record-breaking high of 4.7 billion KW.

Chinese media has reported that Russia’s energy costs have historically been fiercely competitive. According to them, in 2019, InterRAO sold 3 billion kWh of electricity to China for 776 million yuan($ 108 million ), or 0.26 kilowatts. Power plants in Heilongjiang sold light at 0.374 yuan per kWh during the same time period, 44 % more costly than Russian exports. & nbsp,

The declaration of a” no restrictions” connection between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Putin on February 4 of last year was followed by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine that same month.

Fu Cong, the Chinese embassy to the European Union, just asserted that” no control” was more rhetoric than reality after Russia experienced losses on the battle with no end in sight.

2 Power of Siberia

Those bilateral limitations are also seen in the stalled 2 Power of Siberia pipeline project. In July last year, Mongolian Prime Minister Oyun-Erdene Luvsannamsrai said the pipeline’s feasibility study had been completed and that construction would begin in 2024. The pipeline is scheduled for completion in 2028.

Nevertheless, as of right now, China has resisted giving the job its final go-ahead while it is still engaged in talks with Russia about gas prices. & nbsp,

” Russia has less trust the more urgently it wants to close the deal.” We should maintain our composure and waited, a poet from Henan writes in an essay that was released in August. & nbsp,

According to him,” Due to the Polish situation, European nations reduced their reliance on Russian oil and gas, while many nations are afraid to engage in product industry with Russia because of pressure from the US and NATO.” & nbsp,

” China is unique. The Henan-based author opines,” We are the country’s second-largest business and a military authority and are not afraid of the United States’ danger.” ” Until Russia agrees to lower oil prices, we have time and energy to delay.”

” Business advantages should always come first, despite the fact that China and Russia are naturally friends.” Russia performs its own equations as well. For instance, he claims that it sells fuel to China for US$ 80 per barrel while selling it to India for just US$ 35. He asserts that Russia is exploiting China.

According to a journalist in Shanghai, China has geopolitical concerns in addition to price and cost issues. & nbsp,

He claims that it is uncertain whether the gas pipelines will go through Mongolia. Will Mongolia shut down the pipeline if it wants to ship rare earths to the US but China rejects it in the future? & nbsp

Additionally, he claims that China may expand its energy sources rather than relying solely on Russia, which is currently experiencing severe economic unpredictability as a result of the Ukraine war.

Earlier in August, Mongolia and the US signed an” open skies” agreement that could make it easier for rare earth metals to be transported by air to the United States in the future. However, Chinese pundits have claimed that such a program must be approved by China and Russia for landlocked Mongolia. & nbsp,

Read: Unique Earths wall: US-Mongolian Aviation Pact

Read: 2 Power of Siberia to divert Europe-bound gas to China

At & nbsp, @ jeffpao3 is Jeff Pao’s Twitter account.

Continue Reading