Kunal Kamra: Why an Indian comedian is challenging new fake news rules

The Indian government implemented new regulations in April that gave it the authority to label information related to it as” false, misleading, or false” if its private fact check unit deemed it to be so.

Social media intermediaries like Twitter and Facebook are subject to the updated Information Technology ( IT ) Rules, which require them to remove content flagged by the government’s fact-checking unit.

These businesses risk losing their” safe harbor” status, which is a provision under the IT Act that shields them from being held responsible for third-party articles posted on their platforms, if they don’t agree.

The government has stated that it won’t notify the truth check item until 5 July, and the rules are being contested in court. This indicates that the new regulations may currently be put into effect.

However, the president’s action has sparked worries about potential negative effects on Indian press freedom.

The new regulations have been dubbed” draconian” and” against principles of natural justice and akin to censorship” by the Editors Guild of India. These new regulations were made without any significant visit with them, according to the Guild and India’s information broadcasters association.

Additionally, a stand-up actor has come forward with the court to challenge the new regulations.

Kunal Kamra of Mumbai has petitioned the Bombay High Court, claiming that the new regulations violate people’s freedom of speech and make the government the only one who can decide what is true” in respect of any company” that is related to it.

Additionally, they compel social media brokers to force customers to accept that edition of the truth.

Kamra claims that” the government possesses by far the largest microphone” around in society in his programs, which combine social and political irony. If retaliated against, it has access to” every available equipment, with the broadest possible have” to correct the record.

The comedian claimed that” as a political humorist ,” he engages in comment about public actions and relies on social media platforms and the vastness of the internet to share his work.

Kamra claimed that if his ability to write political satire were subjected to an” arbitrary, subjective” fact check unit that the government hand-picked, it would be” unreasonably and excessively curtailed.” This had” completely defeat the purpose of social satire ,” he continued.

The actor claimed that as a result of these new regulations, satirists may be forced to self-censor or limit their use of social commentary out of concern for legal repercussions.

He expressed concern that if the new regulations were applied to material produced by social satirists or comedians, their social media accounts might be suspended or deactivated.

The new regulations, on the other hand, were made in” the larger public interest ,” according to an affidavit from the Indian government to the court.

The rules, according to the government, called for an evidence-based fact-checking system to develop a mechanism to work with the kind of false, misleading, or misleading information that, in the past,” has resulted in riots, mob lynching, and some terrible crimes.”

Additionally, it stated that the content the machine would check would only be related to official policies, programs, notifications, rules, and regulations, as well as their application.

The government informed the court that” the truth check unit perhaps only find false, misleading, or misleading information and not any opinion, satire or creative impression.”

However, the court previously stated that the new regulations didn’t appear to rescue reasonable criticism of the government through satire or parody.

” These regulations seem to be in favor of the government and against the people on the surface.” They can be used against the people in a very serious way, much like the sedition law, according to renowned political cartoonist Manjul( who hardly goes by one name ).

While there can be no discussion about the dangers of fake news, an editor in the Indian Express news claims that a system where the public has judgment to determine the veracity of online articles is dangerous.

BBC News India is now on YouTube. Click here to subscribe and watch our documentaries, explainers and features.