Jail for wanted delivery driver who drove lorry into officer at Gurkha camp

Jail for wanted delivery driver who drove lorry into officer at Gurkha camp

When officers there realized he was a wanted person after scanning his NRIC, a delivery driver was attempting to transport items to the Gurkha Contingent.

Muhammad Hizamudin Sheik Allahuddin, 49, rammed his vehicle into a police officer and slammed his leg as he attempted to flee.

On Thursday ( May 16 ), he was sentenced to 20 months in jail.

He admitted to having drug utensils, damaging a police vehicle, and deliberately causing harm to a public servant on work. Five additional charges were considered in imprisonment.

On Aug 23, 2021, Hizamudin was released from the Drug Rehabilitation Centre, which is a prison establishment, and placed on the facility’s time transfer scheme until Jun 25, 2023.

The time release program is a community-based initiative that assists individuals in moving back to normal life and teaches them to work or study outside of prison walls.

However, Hizamudin was unable to contact his reporting official until the program was over, and he was unable to return to a recognized establishment on Jun 5, 2023. A policeman herald was issued for him.

While he had absconded, Hizamudin took up a portion- day job as a shipping vehicle. He was assigned to the Gurkha Contingent on Vernon Road on June 22, 2023, to provide products.

He drove his company’s vehicle to the mixture at about 4pm, handed his NRIC to an agent for testing, and parked beside the shield home.

A pair of police constables were dispatched when they realized he was a required man. Around 4.30 p.m., Sergeants Desmond Chi Wei Siang and Sanah Abdul Ghani, Sergeant Al Faini Sanah, arrived in a policeman vehicle.

The constables approached Hizamudin, who was in the pilot’s desk, and asked him to switch off his website and enter the vehicle. But he was obstinate, refusing to do so and giving evasive answers to their questions.

SGT Chi repositioned the police vehicle immediately behind his vehicle to stop him from leaving as SGT Faini spoke to Hizamudin.

Soon after, Hizamudin abruptly drove the vehicle forward, repositioning it so that he could have left the compound without the police car blocking him.

SGT Chi ran and tapped into the empty driver-side window with his hands before pressing stop in the vehicle.

But shut- circuit television (CCTV ) film, which was played in judge, showed Hizamudin reversing his vehicle instead. SGT Chi’s feet were wedged between the police vehicles, which was parked a short distance away, and the vehicle.

According to Deputy Public Prosecutor Darren Ang, Hizamudin reversed the lorry once more after receiving continual guidance to stop, causing it to” love” SGT Chi’s proper hip between the vehicle and the police vehicle.

SGT Chi lay on the ground, screaming in pain, as two nearby police officers immediately pulled her away.

The lorry’s rapid motion likewise caused the customer side reflection to reach SGT Faini’s shoulder, and she fell to the ground.

Another police officer attempted to pull his hands away from the wheel wheel as Hizamudin continued moving the vehicle.

The conflict came to an end when the vehicle collided with a metal railing and several Gurkha regiment officers jumped onto the car to capture Hizamudin.

About 20 days after the first two constables arrived on the scene, he was detained. The vehicle was searched, and medicine items were found.

SGT Chi received three times of health left after suffering a leg hematoma. The police vehicle was even scratched, which cost the Singapore Police Force S$ 400 to fix.

Mr. Ang claimed that Hizamudin had placed SGT Chi in a “highly dangerous” situation and that it was unfortunate that the agent did not suffer further injuries from having his knee crushed between a car and a large automobile.

The attorney, who sought 21 to 24 months ‘ prison, said Hizamudin’s activities showed rebellion against expert and had great potential for harm.

He even noted that the criminal indicated his intention to plead guilty at the earliest period, was cooperative in examinations, and had shown some grief.

Defence attorney Ryan Nonis, who is from the Public Defender’s Office, argued that the real damage caused by Hizamudin’s behavior was not that great.

Hizamudin could have been imprisoned for up to seven times, fined, or even be caned for inflicting harm on a common servant while carrying out his duties.

For committing evil by damaging the officers automobile, he could have been jailed for up to two years, fined, or both.

The greatest punishment for having drug items is a prison term of three times, a great of S$ 10, 000 or both. &nbsp,