For decades, unanswered disputes like the one between Israel and Palestine have made the Middle East a scene of ongoing hostilities, clashes, and direct or indirect engagement of superpowers.
This has more complicated the idea of Middle Eastern steadiness and prevented the conflict from coming to a peaceful resolution.
This harsh competition was particularly pronounced during the Cold War, and as it came to an end, it entered another step, this time between the United States as the winning axis and the opposing party to US – enforced the democratic purchase.
It has become clear that due to the aforementioned ongoing power competitions, it is now impossible to reach an equitable resolution for the Palestinian-Israeli discord under for rising global tensions. & nbsp,
Also, the situation is made worse by the United States’ ongoing failure to mediate disputes, where Israel’s demands have been given priority and Palestine has been ignored as a state.
Desire is offered by multilateralism.
It’s interesting to note that the current international international system offers middle powers the chance to play a more significant role in coordinating peaceful outcomes in international diplomacy.
Surprisingly, the middle powers’ options have been reduced to either countries that demand independent foreign policy while remaining passive in international diplomacy( self-centered ) or actors who support the superpowers’ mega-projects by profiting from cooperation under the guise of” economic development.”
The new Hamas offensive presents an opportunity for middle powers like Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, India, and Iran to play a crucial role in materializing the reputation of the Arab state in more creative ways than merely declaring their positions formally. This opportunity also exists for superpowers to mediate peace talks between Palestine and Israel as mediators. & nbsp,
Additionally, the center powers mentioned above have the ability to form a partnership that invites all parties to take part in resolving this protracted conflict in order to achieve an equitable resolution in which all participants’ rights are likewise recognized.
The effective trading strategy that the majority of the middle capabilities have been employing to strike a balance between the two opposing poles( Western and anti-West ) should also be seen as an opportunity tactically to reach just solutions, taking into account the fact that all the countries mentioned above have formally announced the necessity of recognizing Palestine as the necessary code to ending the conflict.
Additionally, a coalition led by the end powers may develop into broader movement with the goal of resolving the Israel-Palestine conflict fairly.
Additionally, for comprehensive global diplomacy put together by the mid powers would create a gap between the rival superpowers by redefining the non-alignment bloc more broadly.
In other words, for the superpowers to maintain the status quo and avoid escalating their conflicts into full-scale war or starting another hybrid wars, the middle powers’ ability to effectively diplomacy from all sides through the hedging strategy increases its significance in international relations.
The conflict in Ukraine has shown that the rival powers aren’t afraid to open new fronts that could turn local conflicts into international conflicts. & nbsp,
Simply put, the present state of the world suggests that while the superpowers are benefiting from the mega-projects they have suggested, they also need the thick powers’ advanced role in pursuing a just decision that would serve as sanitizing space between the competing bipolar superpowereds.
Additionally, the coalition of thick powers’ inclusive diplomacy on a global scale would compel the US and Israel to change their unyielding stances on Palestine’s recognition, acknowledging that in order for there to be lasting peace, Palestinian rights must also be recognized.
Such an American foreign policy may increase the likelihood that the Palestinians would come to a fair resolution and put an end to the potential for another local hybrid war between the United States and its allies on the one part and the anti-Western bloc, respectively.