In a big rude, rebel groups in Syria retake the second city of Syria, Aleppo, demonstrating Hayat Tahrir al-Sham’s growing influence over the country’s civil war, which has lasted for 13 years.
Members of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, who were fighting alongside Turkish-backed organizations opposed to the concept of President Bashar al-Assad, led the shock progress.
Hayat Tahrir al-Sham has grown in both popularity and capabilities over the past few years, despite the offensive being the most important fighting in recent years.
As an expert on the actions of Islamic militant groups in the area, I’ve witnessed Hayat Tahrir al-Sham transform from a rebel organization in Syria into a formidable force in the continuing issue.
It came as a major change in the organization’s strategy that has led to its shifting focus from global terrorism to gaining power in Syria.
Origins and worldview
The Syrian civil war, which started in 2011 as a common revolt against the Assad regime, is where Hayat Tahrir al-Sham is from.
The organization was founded as an outgrowth of Syria’s standard al-Qaida affiliate, the Nusra Front. The initial merits of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham include its combat effectiveness, its support for international jihadist ideology, and its support for strict Muslim rule in the Arab world.
The Nusra Front officially ended relations with al-Qaida in a significant change in 2016 under Abu Mohammed al-Jawlani’s authority and changed its name to Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, which means” Front for the Conquest of the Levant.”
The firm became Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, or” Organization for the Independence of the Levant,” as it merged with a number of other Syrian-based groups the year after the Arab battle.
This marketing aimed to walk away from al-Qaida’s international jihadist plan, which had limited the group’s charm within Syria. It allowed Hayat Tahrir al-Sham to focus on problems specific to Syria, such as local governance, financial troubles and humanitarian assistance.
Despite these changes, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham’s fundamental philosophy is still rooted in jihadism with the main goal of overthrowing Syria’s state and establishing Islamist rule.
This proper shift was partially born of rationality. The leaders of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham came to the conclusion that the organization needed to reduce international criticism and effectively assimilate into the wider Arab revolutionary movement in order to maintain control over the lands it controlled.
In other words, it needed to strike a balance between local government and social relationship needs.
Strategic transitions and new activities
Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, the last major rebel enclave in Syria, has ruled Idlib since 2017 as the dominant power.
Despite reports of human rights violations, the group has grown to the point where it can continue to exert its influence in the area by acting as a quasi-governmental body, providing legal service, and overseeing local politics.
In recent years, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham’s advertising has focused on shielding Syria’s country and its citizens from the Assad state.
This has improved the organization’s standing among local people and different rebel groups.
In an effort to further shine its picture, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham has ramped up its public relations initiatives, both at home and abroad. For instance, it has negotiated and negotiated the delivery of assistance to the regions it governs with global media and charitable organizations.
These efforts demonstrate a commitment to the security of the common person and shield the organization from the crime that is frequently associated with ideology movements.
On the rude suddenly
Another important proper turning occurred with the latest military unpleasant, during which Hayat Tahrir al-Sham-led rebels quickly seized significant portions of Aleppo and moved toward the town of Hama. It demonstrates the rebirth of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham’s martial goals and its capacity to adapt to changing circumstances.
Hayat Tahrir al-Sham’s decision to launch an progress has probably been influenced by a combination of local and regional relationships. The Assad administration’s increasing risk has become apparent of soon, marked by economic decay and corruption.
Many regions in Syria are merely passably under state control, and the central government largely relies on the assistance of allies like Russia and Iran. These friends, however, have been preoccupied by their particular wars against Ukraine and Israel, possibly diluting their support for Syria.
Lebanon and Egyptian forces’ diminishing capabilities only add to Assad’s weakness. Both have played a significant role in supporting Assad throughout the civil warfare. However, Jewish airs in Lebanon, Syria, and Iran have the potential to stifle Hezbollah and Iran’s ability to support Syria. And this slashed in aid may have caused the military to shift more toward the rebels during the civil war.
Also, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham and other insurgent groups are facing a Palestinian military strike by low morale, higher abandonment rates and insufficient military equipment. Due to the discord between the state forces, it has been challenging for Assad to properly respond to the recent assault by opposition forces.
In comparison, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham has bolstered its military functions. The organization has consolidated strength and trained its troops after surviving numerous military activities.
As evidenced by the latest advance in Aleppo, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham has established a military college, reorganized its devices into a more regular military architecture, and created specific forces capable of carrying out coordinated and proper attacks.
In addition, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham has been able to gain some native support by positioning itself as a proponent of Sunni Muslim objectives. The inability to find a political solution to the Syrian conflict has only served to exacerbate native animosities toward the Assad state, giving rise to a friendly foundation for any army that constantly opposes the program.
Hayat Tahrir al-Sham has grown from a jihadist offshoot to a major player in Syria, a development that has had significant implications for the internal dynamics of the war-torn nation. It has also grown a more professional military and a political wing focused on governance.
Sara Harmouch is PhD candidate in Public Affairs, American University
The Conversation has republished this article under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.