Flexible work arrangements an important issue but MOM says no one-size-fits-all approach

Given the frequency of scheduled school closures, the amount of care leave that is available is frequently unsatisfactory, which places a heavier burden on single parents.

Flexible work arrangements, according to Mr. Chua, are a way to” bridge the gap” and give parents more time for their kids if more childcare leave will have an impact on the company’s workforce and activities.

Carers” face the Herculean work” of caring for their loved ones while working in Singapore, which also has a rapidly aging population.

By allowing caregivers to more easily program and fulfill their labor obligations while minimizing disruptions while they are caring for their family members, flexible function arrangements can reduce stress.

For people with disabilities( PWDs ) who may need more time and effort to get to their jobs, telecommuting is also beneficial.

The ability to request FWAs would” help to elevate the careers of many of our workers with disabilities, while empowering more of the 65.7 % of PWDs who are outside the labor force to launch their own careers ,” he said.

LEGISLATION VS. Bilateral Recommendations

According to Ms. Gan, MOM will implement bilateral rules on flexible job plans and nbsp calls the following year, establishing standards and expectations for both employers and employees.

While creating the guidelines, a workgroup does research foreign practices and read with employers, people resources experts, and employees.

Regulations on the right to flexible work plans has been introduced in countries like the United Kingdom and New Zealand. This establishes a process to form the proper balance of workplace flexibility, she said, but does not ensure such arrangements for all employees.

We are not yet certain that this is the best course of action, according to Ms. Gan.

She said, citing an opinion piece by Singapore National Employers Federation government members,” We must be mindful of the risk of creating a more contentious work tradition if both parties can simply take their flexible work agreement disputes to court or tribunal, rather than working out socially acceptable arrangements peacefully.”