After nine times of a federal government led by Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha, the results of the May 14 general election were widely viewed as voters expressing their desire for change.
Pheu Thai faced harsh criticism for breaking its promise when it broke away from the Move Forward Party ( MFP) to form a partnership with organizations connected to military leaders involved in the 2014 coup, particularly the Palang Pracharath Party led by Gen Prawit Wongsuwon and the United Thai Nation Party, whose prime ministerial candidate was at the time.
Observers claim that Pheu Thai has lost voter appreciation, respect, and trust.
The Pheu Thai Party defended itself by arguing that it could not succeed on its own without the support of the others after parliament voted against the MFP’s option for excellent minister. Cholnan Srikaew left his position as party chief after the coalition was formed due to its choice to form the government with the coup-related events.
Pheu Thai’s action has sparked concerns about its confidence and integrity as well as what moral standards politicians may be held to. It has been harshly criticized by so-called pro-democracy supporters as an act of betrayal.
issue of trust
Pheu Thai faces a trust matter, but its guidelines can help it regain its reputation and image, according to Stithorn Thananithichot, chairman of the King Prajadhipok’s Institute Office of Innovation for Democracy.
Pheu Thai has proposed economic revitalization measures, the most notable of which is the 10,000-baht digital wallet, which aims to boost economic activity and accelerate GDP growth to 5 %.
The party must utilize the online budget scheme and make sure it functions if it wants to maintain its reputation. For example, the scheme must produce activity for a trillion baht if it is to cost 500 billion Baht. The group is expect worse if it fails, he said.
He claimed that Pheu Thai received criticism for leaving the MFP to align himself with its social adversaries, but some people genuinely believed that after weeks of impasse, the alliance between the two parties would be successful.
” Persons in the regions have different opinions than MFP followers. They merely want Pheu Thai to lead the country, and they would be even happier if Mr. Srettha [ Thavisin ] or Ms. Paethongtarn [ Shinawatra ] served as prime minister. The remainder is irrelevant to them, he claimed.
Additionally, he claimed that citizens may be roughly split into two groups: those who support the MFP and, as a result, political ideologies, and those whose support is for the other events and anticipates an effective partnership despite some differences.
Because the confederation would not have been possible without compromise, Mr. Stithorn stated that the Srettha presidency is anticipated to last as long as the ruling party can keep its coalition partners from the so-called traditional camp content.
He continued,” Protests by the MFP’s followers will now be strong enough to remove the Pheu Thai-led state unless supporters of the traditional tent take to the streets.”
Mana:” We’re ready to fight bribery.”
Amounts and investigations
The Anti-Corruption Organization of Thailand’s secretary general, Mana Nimitmongkol, stated that criticism of the government is a social problem.
According to him, politicians are thought to be the primary contributor to the nation’s corruption, and whether corruption occurs depends on the political objectives of the government and how severe the prime minister is about preventing graft while he is in office.
” The government officials ought to control one another as well.” We have fresh tools to help people observe how the government uses its energy and spends cash, he said, and we’re ready to deal with problem no matter who takes office.
According to Mr. Mana, state agencies are moving into a new era of electronic state, but they still need to improve transparency and accountability. People must have access to the information required for investigation.
He responded that he still has hope for nearby officials and that the results of the May 14 polls show a high level of public involvement in politics when asked about the social norms of Thai officials in comparison to those in other nations.
Srisuwan Janya, a social activist and frequent applicant, told the Bangkok Post that most officials break their vote guarantees because they are aware that the majority of voters don’t care as much about them.
Even though they have never done something they promised, the majority of voters voted for hopefuls they liked.
According to Mr. Srisuwan, he urges people to criticize officials who break their word. They may inform the public using social media.
” To combat those who break their promises, we need to build a strong action. Lawmakers should now be expected to keep their word. According to him, they ought to regard the voice of the people more and build voter confidence.
He also urged the populace market to look into any irregularities in the administration’s policies.
Srisuwan urges people to” make a powerful action.”
There is a cost to be paid.
Rosana Tositrakul, a former senator from Bangkok, commented on the alliance between Pheu Thai and its social rivals, saying that the country had reached its breaking point and had done everything it could to retake energy, including handing over important economic positions to alliance partners.
She asserted that she thought the party’s popularity would decline further and that it would not be able to successfully implement its economic and social security procedures. According to Ms. Rosana, some politicians have no liberty to advance the interests of the people because they speak for the financial supporters of their parties.
She argued that since politicians must also be inspected for security, it is crucial to increase public social awareness and encourage them to participate in examining state agencies and business holders.
She claimed that Thailand has a variety of natural resources that, if everything is free of corruption, is promote growth and benefit the populace.
Social science expert Professor Siripan Nogsuan Sawasdee of Chulalongkorn University stated that public independent agencies should be absolutely independent in order to carry out their duties objectively.
As she saw the recent proposed line-up as nothing more than a pay-off to loyalists, Prof. Siripan stated that she anticipates the primary cabinet reshuffle in three to six months to place the correct people in the proper jobs.
She added that the alliance state will make every effort to remain united because they do not need early elections that could result in a resounding victory for the MFP. If the economy strengthens and people benefit, Pheu Thai has a chance to rebuild its reputation and popularity with Mr. Srettha in charge of the finance department.
Rosana: Pheu Thai’s recognition might drop.
Siripan: Demands government agency freedom