He added that India is concerned that these organizations are returning from their” safe have n” in Canada and other Western nations, where they might be able to unhinderedly be arranging an uprising.
” India is claiming that this could, in due course, pose another big violent menace to India”, Kugelman told CNA’s Asia First.  ,
” Canada looks at this very different. It does n’t believe that it’s sheltering anti-India extremists. It thinks that these are protesters who are Sikh separatists, and that what they say and do is protected by Canadian freedom of speech rules.
How does it contain an issue of proof?
One of the other issues at the heart of the worsening conflicts is the availability of evidence to back up Canada’s open accusations.  ,
While Canada has made many claims officially, it has not provided the necessary evidence to back them up, pointing to how doing so could destroy the morality examinations, said Kugelman.  ,
” But the more claims it makes in front of the general public, the more pressure is placed on Canada to release some pretty precise evidence,” he said.  ,
Ruparelia speculated that there might be a connect in what constitutes facts.
” It could simply be that … ( the ) evidence, for the Indian authorities, has n’t met a threshold that they’re happy with or comfortable with”, he said.  ,
He added that India’s option for Canada would be to cooperate with and look into its investigation. For India, the need is for Canada to provide information in a way that it deems appropriate to take action.  ,” That’s the deadlock best now”, he said.