Charn fails to churn interest

Despite backing from Pheu Thai heavyweights, narrow margin does n’t bode well

Charn fails to churn interest
Kamronwit: Failed in r- election pay

Social observers believe that the ruling group is having a difficult time expanding its aid center following a small victory by the Pheu Thai-backed candidate in the May 30 local election in Pathum Thani.

Charn Phuangphet, a Pheu Thai Party candidate, won the election for Provincial Administrative Organisation ( PAO ) chairman in Pathum Thani with 203, 032 votes, defeating his main opponent, Pol Lt Gen Kamronwit Toopkrajang, who ran under the Khon Rak Pathum ( Love Pathum ) group banner, by only 1, 820 votes.

The thin margin, according to Stithorn Thananithichot, chairman of the King Prajadhipok Institute’s Office of Innovation for Democracy, suggested either Mr. Charn nor Pol Lt Gen Kamronwit could render important tides.

Although Mr Charn won the contest, the adjacent competition means that the Pheu Thai Party, despite mobilising all resources to help with Mr Charn’s battle, is struggling to enhance its base in this northern state, he said.

Pheu Thai is believed to possess attached significance to this PAO vote, considering the level of support Pheu Thai head Paetongtarn Shinawatra and her stepson, Panthongtae, lent to Mr Charn’s election campaign.

Their dad, Thaksin, even went to the state and called on the red tops, who make up the core of Pheu Thai’s enthusiasts, to strengthen and march behind the group.

Pheu Thai is alleged to have benefited from the help of its candidate as the province’s ruling party.

The election results, in the opinion of Mr. Stithorn, show that Thaksin’s political influence is also substantial and that the Pheu Thai Party can also defeat its political rivals in upcoming elections.

” But the party ca n’t sit back and relax because Mr. Charn could n’t win a decisive victory.” Otherwise, the group may work hard to win public assistance”, he said.

Mr. Stithorn claimed that Bhumjaithai and the Move Forward Party ( MFP ) had kept their distance from the PAO contest because they had no idea how Pol Lt. Gen. Kamronwit and Thaksin would interact.

Mr. Stithorn claimed that Pol Lt Gen Kamronwit failed to win re-election, perhaps because the two political parties were reluctant to support him and the locals were unimpressed by his achievement.

Bhumjaithai, one of the members of the Pheu- Mai- led coalition government stayed apart from Pol Lt Gen Kamronwit’s plan to pacify Pheu Thai, while the MFP, on the other hand, doubted Pol Lt Gen Kamronwit’s independence, according to Mr Stithorn.

The PAO culture clearly demonstrated Thaksin’s strong interest in local and regional elections, according to Jade Donavanik, the president of the Faculty of Law College of Asian Scholars.

He claimed that the PAO competition reminded him of the previous Bangkok government election in which Chadchart Sittipunt, one of the Pheu Thai’s prime ministerial prospects for the presidency in the 2019 general vote, ran as an independent candidate.

He claimed that despite him still being on parole and being indicted on a lese majeste charge, Thaksin was using the PAO contest to resuscitate the provincial’s Pheu Thai Party.

Continue Reading

Military education for a young prince

HRH Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn’s involvement in the military forces gathered speed after he attended a five- year program at the King’s School in Sydney, Australia, in August 1970

Military education for a young prince

At the Chitralada School in Dusit Palace, HRH Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn was four years old when he began school.

His father founded the class in 1955 to educate both the palace’s babies and the prince and princesses.

The Crown Prince continued his education in the United Kingdom after receiving a degree from Mathayom 1 ( Grade 7 ) at the institution. He attended King’s Mead School in Seaford, Sussex, from January to September 1966, and he eventually attended Millfield School in Somerset, where he received his tertiary education.

The Crown Prince admired military endeavors, but His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej approved of him enrolling in a five-week military training at the King’s School in Sydney, Australia, in August 1970.

In 1972, he entered the Royal Military College, Duntroon, in Canberra, Australia. The university’s education was divided into two sections: a military training program developed by the Australian Army and a bachelor’s level under the care of the University of New South Wales.

He received a degree in liberal arts and the rank of lieutenant in 1976.

Eventually, the Crown Prince’s military education was expanded to include advanced navigation and courses in the United States, the UK, and Australia. Additionally, he has a martial pilot’s license to fly a chopper.

He attended the Command and General Staff College in 1977 and served as a career officer for the Royal Thai Army (RTA ). He even held the position of head of the King’s Bodyguard Battalion in 1978 while serving as a team official in the Directorate of Army Intelligence.

The Crown Prince also pursued a minute bachelor’s degree in law in 1982, graduating with second-class honors from Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University.

He then enrolled in a Civil Aviation Training Center course for Commercial Pilot Licence ( CPL) and was granted the title of commercial pilot. He successfully completed an Airline Transport Pilot Licence ( ATPL) course at Thai Airways International Plc ( THAI ) in 2004.

In 2005, the Crown Prince earned his arms as a Boeing 737- 400 aircraft. The Crown Prince received the captain license from the Department of Civil Aviation, according to a report from the Public Relations Department.

According to the report,” His Royal Highness is then a’borrowing’ aircraft from Royal Thai Airways International, in accordance with the agreement that was made between the Royal Thai Air Force and Thai Airways International on August 9, 2004.”

In May 2009, he achieved 3, 000 periods of business flight time on the Boeing 737- 400.

He therefore held the positions of air chief marshal in the Royal Thai Air Force, captain in the Royal Thai Navy, and standard.

Continue Reading

Senate election results delayed

Election Commission still sifting through numerous complaints about winners’ qualifications

Senate election results delayed
Votes are counted at the venue for the final round of the Senate election at Impact Muang Thong Thani in Nonthaburi on June 26. (Photo: Nutthawat Wichieanbut)

The Election Commission (EC) did not announce the official results of the Senate election as originally planned on Tuesday, as more time is needed to handle numerous complaints about dubious qualifications of some senators-elect, according to an EC source.

Since the complaints concern qualifications and alleged ineligibility, the EC needs to be extra careful and ensure that it strictly follows the law, said the source.

“We promise that we will get this task done as soon as possible while ensuring fairness for all sides,” said the same source.

When asked whether the poll body would announce results on Wednesday, the source said: “Maybe after that.”

The EC has so far reviewed more than a thousand complaints received about suspected ineligibility of a number of senators-elect and alleged violations of the election law, according to an informed source.

The law governing the Senate poll stipulates that the EC must wait for five days before it announces the certified result. There is no stipulation on the maximum number of days that can elapse between the final vote and the certification of results, explained the source.

The five-day period is for receiving complaints about the poll, in which 200 senators were elected and another 100 candidates held in reserve in case any senators-elect end up being disqualified later.

A former senatorial candidate on Monday urged the Supreme Administrative Court to suspend the announcement of the election result pending its ruling on the poll agency’s handling of the Senate race.

More than 45,000 candidates were approved to compete, and thus to cast votes, in the complex three-stage election. The final results indicated that the Bhumjaithai Party was among the few groups that managed to figure out the intricacies of the process well enough to exploit them.

A nation-leading 14 senators-elect come from Buri Ram, the party’s longtime stronghold. Eighty senators in all come from 12 provinces where Bhumjaithai has MPs.

Parit Wacharasindhu, a party-list MP and spokesman for the opposition Move Forward Party, said the EC had better announce the result as soon as possible so that the legislative and other duties of the new Upper House could resume.

Among these important responsibilities is passing bills that are required to allow the rewrite of the constitution, said Mr Parit, who is also chairman of the House committee on political development.

He also said that all sides, including those who were raising doubts over the qualifications of a number of successful senatorial candidates, should look at the bigger picture and acknowledge the importance of having new Senate in place.

“I think everyone has gone through the same rules designed under the 2017 constitution. So, if there is no proof of [those speculated] violations of the Senate election law, for me all successful candidates equally won the race under the same election process,” he said.

Prof Prinya Thaewanarumitkul, a law lecturer at Thammasat University, also agreed that the EC should announce the results first while continuing its investigations into any misdeeds.

The longer the newly elected Senate isn’t certified, the longer  the caretaker Senate — appointed by the military-led government in 2019 – will remain in office, he said.

Caretaker senator Somchai Swangkarn, on the other hand, urged the EC to strictly follow Sections 42 and 59 of the organic law on the composition of the Senate, which stipulates that the poll body is duty-bound and holds the authority to ensure the Senate election is “correct, honest and fair”.

Continue Reading

PM ‘will consider’ easing booze sale rule

Struggling restaurants ask government to lift afternoon ban

PM ‘will consider’ easing booze sale rule
Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin arrives in Nakhon Ratchasima for a cabinet meeting on Tuesday. (Photo: Thai Khu Fah Facebook)

NAKHON RATCHASIMA – The government has promised to consider lifting the afternoon ban on alcohol sales to help ease the plight of restaurant operators who say the poor economy is starting to hurt them.

Representatives of the Restaurant Business Club on Tuesday handed Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin a letter asking the government to help restaurants survive tough economic times.

They said operating costs and prices of ingredients continued to rise even as the economy was faltering, forcing many businesses to close down.

One of the measures they are calling for is an end to a 52-year-old rule that prohibits sales of alcohol between 2pm and 5pm.

“I will consider it [the lifting of the afternoon ban on alcohol sales] … The government is trying to promote tourism, hoping they will also earn more income,” Mr Srettha said on Tuesday, referring to restaurant operators.

He made the remarks as the cabinet gathered for a mobile meeting on Tuesday at Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University.

Sorathep Rojpotjanaruch, head of the Restaurant Business Club, said the group wanted the government to introduce urgent relief measures before more businesses close down.

Operating costs have increased by 50% while prices of ingredients such as milk, eggs and vegetables have risen by 20-30%, he said.

“The economy has been sluggish, and consumer purchasing power has declined. The cost and prices of ingredients, such as vegetables, have gone up, on top of expensive electricity fees,” he said.

In 2019, restaurant businesses nationwide earned an estimated 420 billion baht in combined revenue, about 7% of gross domestic product (GDP). This revenue was initially expected to grow by another 4-5% this year. But since April, growth has slowed, and restaurants continue to close, Mr Sorathep said.

“Small-scale vendors and food shops along streets are at risk of going out of business as they don’t have sufficient financial resources to stay afloat for long periods,” he said.

In addition to lifting the afternoon alcohol sales ban, Mr Sorathep said the group proposed reducing the building and land tax rates to ease the burden on businesses.

Members also want the government to devise measures to help businesses run by small and medium-sized enterprises, he said.

For example, he said, customers who ask for tax invoices from restaurants could be allowed to claim up to 20,000 baht in tax deductions, while business operators could use the bills for tax deductions of up to 100,000 baht each.

Another proposal is a cash handout to give people 2,000 baht each to spend over a three-month period — but only on food through the Pao Tang app, said Mr Sorathep.

The ban on retail sales of alcohol between 2pm and 5pm is not covered in the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. It was announced by the coup regime of Thanom Kittikachorn in 1972 to deal with officials drinking during work hours, and has never been rescinded.

Continue Reading

Bangkok to grow another one million trees

Target for first one million, mostly shrubs and creepers, reached well ahead of schedule

Bangkok to grow another one million trees
City Hall staff join members of the public in planting trees at Chalerm Phrakiat Park in Bang Bon district of Bangkok on July 10, 2022. (Photo: Apichart Jinakul)

City Hall will plant 1 million more trees after achieving its initial target of 1 million sooner than planned.

The Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) announced on social media platforms on Tuesday that its 1-million-tree campaign has already reached its goal, two years ahead of schedule.

Making Bangkok greener with 1 million more trees, big and small, was one of the flagship policies of Bangkok Governor Chadchart Sittipunt. He expected to reach the number by the time his four-year term ends in 2026.

Despite attaining the goal, BMA spokesman Aekvarunyoo Amrapala said City Hall had not stopped its activities and was continuing to grow 1 million more trees.

Most of the trees planted under the project were small ones, according to the BMA. About 350,000 big trees have been added to Bangkok soil, while the rest were shrubs or creepers.

Districts in the capital planted 80% of the trees, while only 2% of the new greenery was added by individual residents, according to tree.bangkok.go.th, the BMA website dedicated to the project.

Who planted 1 million trees?

  • All Bangkok districts: 804,791
  • BMA Environment Department: 75,436
  • Other BMA agencies: 9,759
  • Private firms, state enterprises: 110,670
  • Individuals: 2,281

Bang Khae led all districts in greening up with 63,667 trees, followed by Taling Chan, Nong Chok, Chom Thong, Bueng Kum and Kannayao.

Continue Reading

Pathum Thani election winner’s suspension upheld

Government’s legal advisers say procurement corruption case from 2012 must be resolved

Pathum Thani election winner’s suspension upheld
Charn Phuangphet, the Pheu Thai Party candidate for Provincial Administrative Organisation (PAO) chairman in Pathum Thani, campaigns for votes in the rain on June 29. (Photo: Charn Phuangphet Facebook)

The Council of State, the government’s legal advisory body, has confirmed that Charn Phuangphet, the winner of Sunday’s election for Provincial Administrative Organisation (PAO) chairman in Pathum Thani, should be suspended pending the outcome of an earlier malfeasance case.

Mr Charn, from the Pheu Thai Party, faced an investigation over irregularities in the procurement of relief supplies during the great flood in 2011, when he previously held the PAO chairmanship in Pathum Thani.

Pheu Thai, however, has argued that a new court order is required if Mr Charn is to be suspended, complaining that the council’s legal advice was at times inconsistent with the court’s final decision.

The National-Anti Corruption Commission (NACC) in 2012 found grounds to believe Mr Charn had committed malfeasance in connection with the procurement of relief supplies.

The NACC forwarded the case to the Region 1 Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct Cases, which later that year suspended Mr Charn from work. The case is still active, with another hearing scheduled later this month.

A new court order to suspend Mr Charn is not required as the authority to suspend him from work now lies with the Department of Local Administration, said Pakorn Nilprapunt, secretary-general of the Council of State.

The chief of the Pathum Thani provincial office is allowed to serve as acting PAO chairman pending a resolution, he said.

The main reason the court suspended Mr Charn from work in 2012 was to prevent him from interfering with criminal proceedings, said Mr Pakorn.

“As such, if Mr Charn returns as the Pathum Thani PAO chairman now, he could potentially interfere with the legal process in the case,” he added.

Sorawong Thienthong, the Pheu Thai secretary-general, argued that a new court order is required because at the time Mr Charn was previously suspended from work by the court in 2012, he no longer served as the PAO chairman.

If Mr Charn is suspended this time by the Department of Local Administration, a unit of the Ministry of Interior, he could petition the Administrative Court against such an order, added Mr Sorawong.

He insisted Pheu Thai’s legal team had reviewed Mr Charn’s eligibility carefully before the party fielded him in the Pathum Thani poll, which was seen as a critical test of the party’s popularity and de facto leader Thaksin Shinawatra’s clout.

Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai said that at times the legal advice of the Council of State happened to be inconsistent with court rulings, which in this regard points to the need to wait until a new court ruling is handed down.

The Pathum Thani office of the Election Commission (EC) on Tuesday insisted it had run a check on Mr Charn’s eligibility prior to Sunday’s vote, and consequently certified that he was eligible to run.

However, the final decision on whether to certify the result of Sunday’s election is to be certified now lies with the EC head office.

In another development, political activist Ruangkrai Leekitwattana said he had sent a petition to the Ministry of Interior asking it to consider suspending Mr Charn from work.

Continue Reading

Convicted foreigners deported to countries based on where their passports allow them to enter: Sun Xueling

SINGAPORE: Foreigners who have been convicted of offences in Singapore and are to be deported can indicate which country they would like to be deported to, said Minister of State for Home Affairs and for Social and Family Development Sun Xueling on Tuesday (Jul 2).

But it is not a case of the offenders saying “I choose and therefore I will be sent there”, said Ms Sun in response to a parliamentary question by Ms Sylvia Lim (WP-Aljunied).

“There needs to be an assessment by the ministry as to whether or not the individual can be admissible to the country, based on the travel document that he or she holds,” she explained.

Ms Lim had asked about the considerations taken into account when deciding which countries convicted foreigners get deported to after serving their sentences, and how the considerations applied to the offenders involved in the recent billion-dollar money laundering case.

In response, Ms Sun had said: “Such foreigners can go to any country to which their passport or travel document allows them to go. This applies similarly to the convicted foreigners in the S$3 billion (US$2.21 billion) money laundering case.”

The case, which involved 10 foreigners and assets such as hard cash, luxury properties, branded goods, cryptocurrency and alcohol, thrust the issue of money laundering into the spotlight in Singapore.

As of the end of June, eight of the 10 had been deported.

Su Baolin, Su Haijin, Su Wenqiang, Wang Baosen, Zhang Ruijin, Chen Qingyuan and Lin Baoying were all deported to Cambodia while Vang Shuiming was deported to Japan.

They are barred from re-entering Singapore.

Law Minister K Shanmugam previously said in an interview that offenders who complete their sentences can be deported to wherever the passports they hold allow them to go.

BILLION-DOLLAR CASE CONVICTS

On Tuesday, Ms Lim also asked if the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) has a default guideline under which convicted foreigners are typically deported to the countries they belong to.

“From my past experience, it is quite normal for foreigners to be sent back to their home countries,” said Ms Lim, who works in the legal sector.

In response, Ms Sun said that those examples cited by Ms Lim could be cases where the subject did not hold multiple passports, and therefore the only country they could be deported to was their home country. “In this case, the 10 subjects hold multiple passports,” she noted.

Ms Lim also asked why those who are not Cambodian nationals were also deported to the country. Based on publicly available information, three of the seven sent there do not hold Cambodian passports, she said.

Ms Sun later acknowledged this, and said that the priority was to quickly and effectively deport the convicted foreigners.

EXTRADITION TREATIES

Noting that five of the offenders are wanted in China and also hold Chinese passports, Ms Lim asked why they were not sent there and whether the extradition treaty between Cambodia and China played a part in Cambodia being chosen as their destination.

“Whether or not there was an extradition treaty between Cambodia and China was not part of the decision-making process that the ministry undertook,” said Ms Sun.

She said that for convicted foreigners with multiple passports, the ministry will have to decide which country they have the greatest likelihood of being admissible to, and then make an assessment before deporting them.

“We don’t want a situation where we try to deport an individual and actually the country to which we are deporting the individual to does not accept the individual,” she said.

Ms Lim also specifically asked Ms Sun about how much weight the offenders have in deciding their deportation destinations.

“Is she saying that the offenders have a right to indicate which jurisdiction they would like to be deported to? Because she used the word ‘chose’, so I’d like her to clarify that,” she asked.

She later repeated her question on the issue of choice, asking if offenders can “choose where to be deported to” and if the government accedes to these choices.

In response, Ms Sun said: “I think you’re using the term ‘choice’ rather loosely.”

Ms Lim also asked if other governments had indicated to the Singapore authorities that those convicted in the billion-dollar money laundering case will face investigations into related offences upon being sent back to their home countries.

Minister of State for Law and Transport Murali Pillai noted in response that Ms Lim’s question is about extradition, rather than deportation.

“Extradition will only take place when there is an extradition treaty in force, and a valid request has been made under the treaty. There are no extradition proceedings here,” said Mr Murali.

“In the absence of extradition, the position is that after conviction and serving of sentence, the offenders will be required to leave Singapore,” he said.

“What happens to them in those countries or in their countries of nationality is not within our control.”

Continue Reading

Opposition vows to step up scrutiny of government

Move Forward MP says no-confidence debate possible during new session that opens Wednesday

Opposition vows to step up scrutiny of government
MPs and senators attend a parliament meeting in July last year. (File photo)

The opposition will intensify its scrutiny of the government’s work with a plan to seek a no-confidence motion now that the government has full authority and resources to implement its policies, said opposition chief whip Pakornwut Udompipatskul.

Speaking ahead of the reopening of parliament on Wednesday, Mr Pakornwut, a list-MP of the main opposition Move Forward Party, said the Pheu Thai-led government faced a number of constraints in its first year including the delayed budget.

“However, this year the government has full authority and budgetary resources at its disposal, so the public and the opposition will have higher expectations. Our work will be more intense from now on,” he said.

Mr Pakornwut said that a no-confidence motion is likely to be sought but the opposition has yet to decide when.

Other opposition parties including the Democrats have been working closely with Move Forward and are expected to join the planned censure debate, he added.

He said Move Forward remains committed to being a proactive opposition party. Apart from keeping the government in check, it will make recommendations to the government for the sake of improving its work.

Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin on Tuesday welcomed the opposition’s move to step up its scruting and seek a no-confidence debate against the cabinet.

“It’s their job, and the government is ready for and open to scrutiny,” he said.

The House of Representatives is scheduled to deliberate four bills related to the work of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research when it returns from a break on Wednesday, according to Mr Pakornwut.

Also on the agenda are bills that have been screened and revised by the Senate, he said, adding that MPs would decide if they will approve the revisions or stick to the MP-approved versions.

Continue Reading

Investments from GIC ‘not the solution’ to shake up Singapore’s stock market: Chee Hong Tat

SINGAPORE: Directing Singapore sovereign wealth fund GIC to invest in locally-listed firms is “not the solution” to improve the attractiveness of the local equity market, said Transport Minister Chee Hong Tat on Tuesday (Jul 2).

“Doing so will compromise our objectives of setting up GIC, which is not beneficial for Singapore and Singaporeans,” he said, adding that the government would continue to seek more “sustainable” approaches.

Mr Chee, who is also Second Minister for Finance, was responding to a parliamentary question from Member of Parliament Liang Eng Hwa (PAP-Bukit Panjang) on whether the government would consider a suggestion from some industry players for GIC to allocate part of its investments to securities listed on the Singapore Exchange (SGX).

GIC – one of the three investment entities managing Singapore’s reserves – is the government’s fund manager. It does not own the assets it manages and as a rule, it does not invest in Singapore.

The suggestion that GIC should expand its portfolio to include the Singapore market gained traction after a recent report by the Financial Times.

The report on May 5 said the SGX and other government agencies are studying proposals from a venture and private capital association that include allowing pension and sovereign money to be invested in the stock market.

This is not the first time that this has been mooted. The Singapore Business Federation proposed having GIC use Central Provident Fund (CPF) monies to invest in the Singapore stock market as early as 2016. 

Earlier this year, the Society of Remisiers (Singapore) also made a similar recommendation as a way to shake up the struggling local stock market, which has seen subdued trading volumes and delistings frequently outnumbering listings.

Last year, for example, there were 25 delistings and just six initial public offerings (IPOs).

This contrasts with the SGX’s regional peers. In 2023, there were 79 IPOs in the Indonesia Stock Exchange, while bourses in Malaysia and Thailand welcomed 32 and 40 listings, respectively, according to a report by Deloitte.

Several Singapore companies have also opted to list overseas in recent years, such as property tech firm Ohmyhome, which made its debut on the Nasdaq last year. More recently, cancer diagnostics firm Mirxes refiled its draft prospectus in May for an IPO in Hong Kong.

“SHOULD NOT DIRECT OR INTERFERE” WITH GIC’S INVESTMENT DECISIONS: CHEE

In his reply, Mr Chee said GIC’s mandate is to preserve and enhance the international purchasing power of Singapore’s reserves, especially for crisis needs.

This means that GIC’s investment decisions must “aim to achieve good long-term returns for Singapore”.

“GIC must, therefore, continue to make professional investment decisions, and the government should not direct or interfere with GIC’s investment decisions,” said the minister.

He added that under current arrangements, the sovereign wealth fund can “invest in appropriate Singapore companies if these companies have a global footprint and generate good returns for GIC’s portfolio”.

A “more sustainable way” to develop the local equity market is to groom and develop a pipeline of good companies to list on the SGX, Mr Chee said.

One initiative is through establishing funds, such as the Anchor Fund @ 65 introduced in 2022, that support growth enterprises and prepare them for IPOs in Singapore. 

“These funds have invested in nine companies to date and they are working closely with the portfolio companies to prepare them for IPO on the SGX,” said Mr Chee.

The government also has various schemes in place to help more SGX-listed companies expand overseas and become more attractive to global investors.

“The government remains open to new ideas and measures to improve our equity market and support business growth. We will continue to work with industry stakeholders on this goal,” Mr Chee told the House.

Continue Reading