N3 lottery may get the chop

After receiving a negative response from the people since its release in November, the Finance Ministry is considering the future of the N3 jackpot.

The three-digit lottery ( N3 ), which was introduced in a bid to defeat illegal lotteries and expensive six-digit lottery tickets ( L6), did not perform as expected during its trial phase, according to deputy finance minister Julapun Amornvivat on Tuesday.

Launched on Nov 1 as part of a six-month” platform” program, the N3 jackpot offers cards priced at 20 ringgit each through 800 authorised retailers globally. The initiative sought to entice buyers by offering a legal alternative and to reduce annual underground lottery purchases by 10 % to 20 %.

But, sales have fallen short of projections, with just 1.17 million tickets sold last quarter compared to the five million cards available per pick.

Critics claim that N3 has neglected to solve important issues like the systemic problems in the raffle distribution system and the supremacy of middlemen in the L6 market.

After the platform period is over, Mr. Julapun stated that the impact of the N3 lottery would be carefully examined. If the results remain below anticipation, the state may withdraw the effort, he said.

Continue Reading

Govt threatens university over cop course for Chinese

Supamas Isarabhakdi
Supamas Isarabhakdi

Siam University will face legal action from the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research, and Innovation ( MHESI) if it does not cooperate with a Chinese executive who is accused of carrying out a contentious volunteer police training program for Chinese citizens without the university’s permission.

MinisterSupamas Isarabhakdisaid on Tuesday that the university has already affirmed that it had no involvement in, or knowledge of, the programme and did not collect any fees, but the course was promoted using the university’s logo, which is a violation of the Private Higher Education Institutions Act BE 2546 (2003).

Last year, a Chinese executive made the revelation that he had planned the training program and had charged Chinese individuals 38, 000 baht each. The training was attended by more than 20 individuals. The school denied presence and asserted that it was a person’s deed.

The secretary emphasized that if the school didn’t report a problem, the government would move in and bring expenses against it.

Because there is no need to wait, the school may move the process as quickly as possible or within one to two weeks. We are all waiting for an answer”, she said.

She explained to the government that the school had informed the government that it was a one-time program, and that a disciplinary council should be established to investigate the Taiwanese executive. Its results might lead to a warning, pay calculation, or even a contract termination.

However, Siam University President Pornchai Mongkhonvanit claimed that the institution was the victim and did not participate in the program.

He claimed that the organization formed a fact-finding commission on January 3 after receiving the report on the contentious program held from December 25 through December 27. According to its findings, the voluntary police training program was run by an outsider with knowledge of various parties, including Metropolitan Police Bureau 3 police officers.

Li Zhang, Assistant to the President for International Activities of Siam University, was the planner. The job was never approved by the school, he said.

He said Mr Li even signed the letter presumably from the school, which, if true, should have been signed by the president or an assigned people. The training program did not provide any financial support to the school.

Continue Reading

Commentary: Squid Game Season 2 plays on the almost comical way we believe in our ability to ‘win’ capitalism

Squid Game explores the almost comical capacity people have to accept that they can thrive and emerge as the victor.

Players ‘ almost transcendental beliefs that they are the only ones who will win the game are fuelled by the game’s cruelty and violence. These wants, however, fight with the main civilization of the players.

Camaraderie develops as the people work collectively, and family relationships, earlier friends, shared experience, sympathy and religion all have a clear presence in the present. In the end, however, the overall game’s firm logic glosses over them.

The most outrageous current example of this behavior is American financier Bernie Madoff, who brutally defrauded home and kin in the Jewish community for his own gain.

” TEMPORARILY EMBARRASSED MILLIONAIRES”

Some critics lamented that Season 2 is also focused on the life of the gamers, with only season four of which actually begins the games.

However, this change undoubtedly makes the connection between the real world and the games little more obvious. In turn, it makes the movie’s critique of capitalism yet more prominent.

Although the series ‘ main draw is undoubtedly the high-stakes games, the series ‘ popularity still has a lot to do with its core message, which becomes much more clear in the second season. People can identify with the figures who bravely face hardship to reclaim their life in the face of hardship.

As American author John Steinbeck once put it, some mid- and working-class American see themselves as “temporarily uncomfortable capitalists”. This outlook perfectly captures the constant involvement in a bourgeois structure with only a passing chance of success.

This fluid is exemplified in Squid Game Season 2, which explores how people rationalize their involvement in a game that often contradicts their most fundamental human instincts.

The lyrics to Bertold Brecht’s satirical song March of the Calves comes to mind:” Following the drum / The calves trot / The skin for the drum / They deliver themselves” .&nbsp,

It serves as a somber analogy for how our willingness to sacrifice to achieve success frequently conjures it up.

Dirk Matten is professor of ecology and Hewlett-Packard head in corporate social responsibility at the Schulich School of Business, York University, in Canada. This commentary&nbsp, primary appeared&nbsp, in The Conversation.

Continue Reading

River gets B95bn irrigation project

Water is released through the Chulalongkorn sluice gate in Thanyaburi district, Pathum Thani, as the Royal Irrigation Department drains excess water from Klong Rangsit Prayurasak to the Chao Phraya River in October 2022. (Photo: Pattarapong Chatpattarasill)
As the Royal Irrigation Department drains extra water from Klong Rangsit Prayurasak to the Chao Phraya River in October 2022, water is released through the Chulalongkorn gate wall in Pathum Thani’s Thanyaburi area. ( Photo: Pattarapong Chatpattarasill )

A 95-billion-baht project to improve the lower northeast Chao Phraya River water system, including Ayutthaya and Phathum Thani, to avoid floods has been approved by the National Water Resources Committee.

The council on Monday agreed with the Department of Royal Irrigation’s big project to improve water flowing along the lower Chao Phraya River in order to avoid storms in the area and the money, especially during the rainy season, according to Prasert Jantararuangtong, the deputy prime minister who presided over the regional water resources commission.

The job will increase the water river network of 22 rivers, with a full length of 462.80 km, quite as Khlong Raphiphat, Khlong Prawet Buri Rom and Khlong Dan.

He claimed that the project would involve improving the canals ‘ drainage and installing irrigation systems and pumping stations to better control the river’s flow before entering the Gulf of Thailand. The project will increase the river flow rate from the present 210 cubic meters per second ( m3/s ) to 400 m3/s, which will help to prevent and lessen flooding issues on 298, 250 acres of land in the lower Chao Phraya, crucial economic and community areas.

In addition, the 22 canals will have more capacity to store water during the dry season, increasing by 17 million cubic metres per year, he said.

He claimed that the Royal Irrigation Department and the Community Organization Development Institute ( Codi ) have collaborated on a plan to get rid of 4, 940 homes along the targeted canals.

The project will need 95 billion baht in investment, of which 76.5 billion baht will be a loan, and the rest will be allocated through the government budget.

The project is anticipated to begin the following year and be finished in 2031. It is a component of a strategy to lessen the social and economic repercussions of severe floods, which are anticipated to worsen.

Continue Reading

Johor-Singapore SEZ: ‘Build-as-they-invest’ model prudent but businesses raise concerns over infrastructure delays, red tape

Teh Kee Sin, the consultant to the Small and Medium Enterprise Association of South Johor, shares these views. &nbsp,

The company president noted that the market-response approach is “more reasonable” as it manages risks cautiously, especially given the Indonesian government’s fixed resources. &nbsp,

” But on the other hand, would foreign investors come if they see that there is no assurance on basic infrastructures like Wi-Fi (or ) electricity.” Every entrepreneur would only go in if these are all fundamental (amenities ), Teh said, “because nobody is going to spend if there is no set infrastructure.” &nbsp,

He added that there have been cases in Johor where businesses have relocated to industrial facilities only to discover that the power they have is not sufficient for their businesses. &nbsp,

Organizations must use resources to throw their own wires. International businesses may not be able to accomplish this, and they will evaluate the situation differently ( in terms of whether to spend ), he said. &nbsp,

However, scholar Anthony Dass, who is the senior director of the Malaysian Institute of Economic Research, was more optimistic about the fresh design, pointing out how it adapts system to the specific needs of investors. &nbsp,

The project “avoids the hazards of oversupply seen in earlier projects like Iskandar Malaysia,” Dass said,” thereby reducing useless spending on underused assets, improving efficiency and reducing economic chance.” &nbsp,

But he, too, acknowledged that the unit could lead to delays especially if traders adopt a wait-and-see method. &nbsp,

” The SEZ’s progress may advance haphazardly, which could hinder its general impact”, added Dass. &nbsp,

SPLIT FUNDING ‘ FAIR’, LEVERAGES ON Analytical Rewards: ANALYSTS&nbsp,

Rafizi even made a point about how the money for the SEZ will be split, with Singapore granting funding for business expansion and investment facilitation while Malaysia will provide for the financial zone’s infrastructure. &nbsp,

Continue Reading

Ministry has fishing crew reservations

Russ: Visit may be harmful
Russ: Visit perhaps be dangerous

A proposed visit by opposition People’s Party ( PP ) representatives to see four Thai trawler crew members being held in Myanmar will cause more harm than good, according to the Foreign Ministry.

On Tuesday, Vice Minister Russ Jalichandra stated that the government would not be able to stop PP party-listing MP Wiroj Lakkhanaadisorn, the president of the House’s Military Affairs Committee, from visiting the four. He further stated that he would have to ask for permission through political programmes.

He warns that the decision may cause misunderstandings because the Myanmar authorities might interpret it as putting stress and interfering, making it harder for the crew to be released. So, he asked Mr Wiroj to consider carefully and consider the consequences.

” Do not make women’s lives a democratic issue”, he said.

Prior to the incident in which a Thai fishing vessel was struck by a Myanmar ship off the Ranong beach on November 30, Mr. Wiroj stated he would inquire House Speaker Wan Muhamad Noor Matha to review his travel to the investigation of the facts of the case. The four Thai fishermen were taken into custody during the event. On January 4, Myanmar’s Independent Day, the authorities had anticipated that the four team members would be pardoned and released, but they were not.

According to Mr. Russ, the state acknowledged that their launch was still being pursued and that it anticipated their release on January 13.

Rangsiman Rome, a second PP record MP, said his committee will discuss the matter with the Royal Thai Navy and the Foreign Ministry on Thursday in his capacity as chairman of the House Committee on National Security, Border Affairs, National Strategy, and National Reform.

He argued that the government should employ every means to compel the Myanmar government to grant permission for the four Thai team members to return to their country.

The Thai government has made a number of mistakes in this case, including no protesting when the ship and its crew were taken, and citing the lack of clarity of the moderate.

This demonstrates that the government does not view the incident involving the Thai vehicle and its team as a serious problem.

He claimed that the government did not assist them with their legitimate situation.

Continue Reading

PM orders cabinet to tackle air pollution

Wants PM2.5 degrees lower than last year

A bird’s-eye view of the dust-covered Bangkok from the Samut Prakan City Observatory on Jan 4. (Photo: Somchai Poomlard)
The Samut Prakan City Observatory’s bird ‘s-eye view of Bangkok, which was captured on January 4, shows the dust-covered area. ( Photo: Somchai Poomlard )

Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has instructed the government to address PM2.5 fine particulates and reduce the pollution levels this year from those of last year.

Following the weekly cabinet meeting on Tuesday, Ms. Paetongtarn held a press conference at Government House to discuss the PM2.5 sand problem, as satellite images now show an increase in temperature areas and rising sand amounts in some regions.

The elite then urged sugar farmers and relevant ministries to put in place precise steps and to follow the instructions.

Last year, 70 % of dust pollution came from burning, but this year, the figure has dropped to 30–35 %, thanks to farmer cooperation efforts led by the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives to reduce burning, she said.

The Transport Ministry has been instructed to track big cars that emit increased exhaust fumes and put strict controls on them, while the government has been instructed to concentrate on limiting fuel pollution.

The Ministry of Interior was given the task of instructing the provincial rulers, local administrative bodies, and the Department of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation ( DDPM) to make the best efforts possible in dealing with issues.

The primary minister assured that the government is working effectively across all industries as a result of the latest high public exposure.

Ms. Paetongtarn continued, citing the success of numerous organizations ‘ efforts and their belief in a significant reduction in pollution levels this year compared to last year.

The worst air pollution levels were detected in Bangkok on Tuesday night, with fine sand formation at “red” hazardous-to-health amounts in the money and opposite provinces.

At 10 a.m., the Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency ( Gistda ) discovered particulates measuring 2.5 micrometers or less in diameter ( PM2.5 ) at an average of 88.6 microgrammes per cubic meters of air over the previous 24 hours in Bangkok. The government-set secure level is 37.5µg/m³. PM2.5 was at dark degrees in all 50 regions of the money. The worst, 96.7µg/m³, was in Bang Kho Laem city. Local regions of Nonthaburi, Samut Prakan, Samut Sakhon and Pathum Thani even faced dark ranges of PM2.5- at 83.6, 80.9, 79.5 and 79.1µg/m ³ both. According to the Pollution Control Department, PM2.5 levels in Greater Bangkok will increase from Wednesday through Friday.

Continue Reading

Paetongtarn defends dad

Former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, left, arrives at the Pheu Thai Party headquarters in Bangkok on Aug 18, 2024, to congratulate his daughter Paetongtarn ahead of her royal endorsement as Thailand's 31st prime minister. (Photo: Varuth Hirunyatheb)
Former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, left, arrives at the Pheu Thai Party headquarters in Bangkok on Aug 18, 2024, to thank his daughter Paetongtarn back of her royal confirmation as Thailand’s 31st prime minister. ( Photo: Varuth Hirunyatheb)

Former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra has come under fire for his allegedly racist comment, saying that her parents had no intention to make for contentious notes.

” I’m convinced that he had no intention to make prejudiced remarks,” said Ms. Paetongtarn.

He really intended to say that he didn’t like Thai women to have surgery, but that they should be encouraged to do so in order to maintain their natural beauty and enter beauty contests, she said.

There is no way for him to be prejudiced; however, people in other nations have their own lovely customs.

Pheu Thai, which is led by his daughter Ms Paetongtarn, is commonly believed to be the de facto leader of the country. He received criticism for making a statement at a campaign rally in Chiang Rai on Sunday that encouraged more Thais to get employment in the entertainment sector.

Nevertheless, he made disparaging remarks about designs from Africa in his statement.

Africans are paid millions of ringgit to get designs because they have dark skin and smooth faces that make it difficult to breathe. Thai citizens look much better. There’s no need for]our persons to acquire ] head, neck or chest augmentation”, Thaksin said.

” It’s time to promote more Thais, including those from racial organizations like the Karen, who possess natural beauty, to be global types”, he said.

Continue Reading

Cheap electricity touted

PM sounds Thaksin on 3.70 ringgit per product specific

After her father, former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, said during a campaign protest last week that the cost of home energy may be lowered to 3.70 baht per product this year, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has suggested that the cost might be lower.

This was one of the president’s interests, according to Ms. Paetongtarn, to lower the rising cost of living.

” The country will benefit from cooperation from all factors. The government hopes to reduce household energy costs to 3.70 rmb per unit. It is one of the president’s interests”, the prime minister said.

” Lowering the price to 3.70 baht is possible”.

She questioned how the federal do accomplish this, citing the need for discussions with other interested parties.

Thaksin stated at a campaign rally in Chiang Rai on Sunday that he anticipated a 3.70 ringgit increase in electricity prices this year.

The state will also make sure that the charges of animal feed, fertilizer, and treatments will decrease, according to Thaksin, who is regarded as the de facto leader of the decision Pheu Thai Party.

Salakjit Tiyapairat, a former head of the Chiang Rai Provincial Administrative Organization ( PAO ), was campaigning in Chiang Rai with Thaksin.

” All kinds of dominance may be dismantled so that people may have a lower cost of living, higher wages, and better options. All of this may happen in 2025″, he said.

Thaksin claimed that they discussed ways to reduce household energy costs from currently being around 4 ringgit per unit during subsequent discussions with Energy Minister Pirapan Salirathavibhaga.

The goal may seem tough, but it is probable, said Thaksin, adding that he ultimately wants to see 3.5 ringgit per device.

In the past, Mr. Pirapan spearheaded a campaign to lower energy prices and faced strong opposition from the United Thain ( UTN) Party.

According to reports, gathering financers and power business leaders were unhappy.

His new charge is earning his party acceptance with the public, however.

Before Thaksin’s notes, Mr Pirapan denied any split with Ms Paetongtarn or Pheu Thai over power issues, saying his work was completely supported by the government.

Thaksin even refuted rumors that Mr. Pirapan would become expelled during a cabinet reshuffle.

Khunying Sudarat Keyuraphan, the president of the Thai Sang Thai Party, stated on Tuesday that she supported the decision to target 3.70 baht.

However, as has been done, taxpayers ‘ money cannot be used to temporarily subvention the prices. She argued that the government may reform the energy system and be courageous enough to abolish cartels to lower the cost of energy and fuel.

Former Democrat Party MP Thepthai Senpong wrote on Instagram on Tuesday that the decision to lower the cost of energy is only a political strategy to gain voting support.

” Formerly, Pheu Thai had not been significant about tackling higher energy costs. When Mr. Pirapan made a plan to rebuild energy costs, the general public praised and praised him.

According to a new Nida poll, Mr. Pirapan and the UTN’s popularity ranking had increased. According to Mr. Thepthai, that was probably the reason Thaksin had to discuss lowering the cost of energy.

Continue Reading

Could Trump seize the Panama Canal? – Asia Times

As past and upcoming US President Donald Trump threatened to “take up” the Panama Canal, citing the great canal tolls as his justification, the world turned to Central America immediately before Christmas. In the days that followed, there was a lot of flurry of rumors as to what exactly happened with his comment and whether or not they reflected a wider political agenda.

He refrained from using military force to reclaim the river on Tuesday during a press event at Mar a Lago.

Is Panama at risk of losing control of the canal?

Trump does not have the methods to “take up” the river without starting an illegitimate war of aggression, according to the short answer.

The river territory was not US house, it was only leased. The river is not in danger of disappearing.

Trump’s remarks, in contrast, appear to be an early stage in his wider effort to reclaim control in Latin America.

Some important story

One of society’s most extraordinary engineering deeds, The Panama Canal, has connected the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans since 1914. The idea of constructing a waterway through Panama’s canal dates back to the 16th century, when Hispanic settlers saw potential in its transformation of international trade routes. However, it wasn’t until the 19th century that real programs for the river started to emerge, fueled by technological advancements, which made such a challenging job doable.

Ferdinand de Lesseps, the architect and inventor of the Suez Canal, was the first to lead the first major effort to construct the river in 1880. First, the program was for a sea-level river, but the technical and environmental issues proved overwhelming. The project’s collapse was caused by tough climates, tropical illnesses like yellow fever and malaria, as well as the challenging task of digging through swampy and rough terrain. By 1889, more than 20, 000 workers had died, and the venture’s fiscal sponsors faced bankruptcy, almost triggering a European state economic crisis.

The US expressed interest in building the river to reduce trade and military roads in the first 1900s. First discussions with Colombia, which included Panama at the time, failed when Colombia rejected the US’s request to rent the area.

The US therefore supported Panama’s democracy activity, and on November 3, 1903, Panama declared its independence from Colombia. Two weeks later, the recently established Filipino government signed the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty, granting the US rights to contract a 16-kilometer-wide zone for constructing, operating, and defending the canal in return for an annual payment, although initially at a rate so small that it fueled after social tensions.

In addition to implementing important efforts to combat illness by eradicating mosquitoes and improving hygiene, the US started building in 1904. It also employed cutting-edge architectural techniques, including a switch system to manage elevation changes. The river was formally opened on August 15, 1914, a new time in international trade, as ships had then avoid the dangerous journey around Cape Horn.

The US viewed the river corridor as its country, despite the fact it was leased from Panama. Despite its economic and geopolitical value, US control over the canal and its revenues sparked hatred in Panama.

In the 1960s, strain reached its highest point. This led to conversations that culminated in the 1977 Torrijos-Carter Treaty, which outlined a phased exchange of river leadership to Panama, completed on December 31, 1999. Since then, the river has become a representation of Panama’s financial and national power.

The change of this year marked the 25th anniversary of Panama’s assumption of power over the canal’s management. Simply one day before the celebration, former US President Jimmy Carter, who had signed the 1977 agreement enabling the canal’s transfer, passed ahead.

The legal foundation is also essential.

The Torrijos-Carter Treaty

The two main contracts that govern the exchange of the Panama Canal are contained in the agreement, which was signed on September 7, 1977 by Filipino head Omar Torrijos and US President Jimmy Carter:

  • Panama Canal Treaty: This convention stipulated that the US would keep control of the canal’s operations, administration, and defence until December 31, 1999, at which point Panama would believe complete control. During the transition, US and Panamanian authorities collaborated to ensure a smooth handover.
  • The US is also given the right to intervene militarily if the canal’s neutrality or functionality is threatened. This treaty guarantees that the canal remains open to vessels of all nations, regardless of wartime or peacetime conditions. This clause has been contentious, as it partially limits Panama’s sovereignty, but was deemed necessary to guarantee the free flow of trade.

Panama still has full control over how the canal is managed and how much money is made, with only the US now theoretically able to intervene if a significant threat arises, a situation that hasn’t occurred in the last 25 years.

However, there are also other factors at play.

An emotional issue in the US

The handover of the Panama Canal to Panama was a highly emotive and controversial topic in the United States, touching deeply rooted geopolitical, economic, and patriotic sentiments. The UA had finished it and ran it for a long period of time. Many Americans viewed the canal as a representation of their country’s technological and political strength.

The transfer formalized through the Torrijos-Carter Treaty, was viewed by conservative circles, particularly Republicans, as a weakening of the United States ‘ global power position, a sentiment that continues to influence political rhetoric– especially within Donald Trump’s populist narrative.

Further background provides a further justification for why not everyone is willing to accept that the canal’s fate has been decided for the long.

Symbol of American strength

One of the greatest engineering achievements of the US was the construction of the canal, which is a testament to its rise as a global power in the early 20th century. Control over the canal was seen as a strategic advantage, securing US influence in the Western Hemisphere.

Geopolitical significance

The canal was a strategically important asset as well as a significant trade route. It made it easier for the US Navy to move quickly between the Pacific and the Atlantic. The transfer of control to Panama, according to critics of the handover, could compromise the security of the canal and, in turn, global trade routes.

the 1970s political landscape

During the 1970s, the US was grappling with a sense of self-doubt, shaped by the Vietnam War, the Watergate scandal and the oil crisis. Many Americans saw the canal handover as another sign of a “retreat” from global leadership. The canal had been constructed with great sacrifice and had been successfully managed for decades, according to republicans, making the handover amounted to a “betrayal.”

Jimmy Carter’s policies

Many Republicans thought Carter was a weak president who failed to adequately defend American interests.

The Torrijos-Carter Treaty, which was perceived as a concession to Panama, a smaller, weaker nation, was viewed as being incongruent with the idea of American national pride.

Donald Trump’s approach to the issue

Donald Trump paints a sentimental image of American dominance through the Panama Canal, which is very well-liked by conservative voters.

Rhetoric on “lost greatness.”

Trump has previously referred to the canal’s handover as an example of the “poor negotiation skills” of prior US administrations. He expands on the idea that such decisions have diminished the United States ‘ standing and strength internationally.

Populist narrative

Trump uses the canal’s history to support his” America First” agenda, presenting the handover as a representation of a time when the US was ruled by “weak” leaders. This rhetoric appeals to voters who long for a return to the days of unquestionable American dominance.

connection between current issues and strategic considerations

Trump makes connections between the handover of the canal and the ongoing trade negotiations or military withdrawals. He emphasizes that, as president, he would never make” such mistakes”, a stance that resonates with both nostalgic and security-conscious voters.

The Panama Canal’s transfer is still seen as a declaration of a perceived loss of American privilege. It represents a fableable surrender of geopolitical power and national honor for many Republicans. Trump uses the 1977 treaty as a prime example of weak political decision-making to further his message of restoring American strength. He mobilizes his political base by framing this emotional legacy.

It is no coincidence that this issue came up less than two weeks before Jimmy Carter’s passing and the 25th anniversary of Panama’s accession to the canal.

Economically significant for both China and the US

Both the United States and China both have significant economic ties to the Panama Canal. About 20 % of the goods transported through China come from or are intended for the US. The Panama Canal accounts for roughly 5 % of global maritime trade. On average, cargo ships pay more than$ 200, 000 in tolls for passage, with significantly higher amounts possible. These figures highlight the importance of the canal in global trade.

Expansion of the canal &amp, Chinese investments

The expansion of the Panama Canal, completed in 2016 with the introduction of the so-called” New Panama Canal”, marked a pivotal moment in global shipping.

The expansion enabled the transit of neo-Panamax ships, thereby significantly increasing the canal’s efficiency and capacity. The growing scope of global trade, and particularly the expanding flow of goods between Asian and Western markets, required this improvement.

China, as one of Panama’s largest trading partners and a leading global economic power, plays a central role in this context.

In addition, China has made substantial investments in infrastructure around the canal, including ports and logistics centres, further enhancing Panama’s importance as a hub for global trade. These developments highlight China’s growing influence in Latin America, making the Panama Canal a strategic focal point within Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative.

The canal’s expansion was economically vital for Panama, as were the investments from China. However, Panama retains control over the canal.

Does China control the canal?

Trump and others in the US and Europe have been trying to make the impression that China has taken control of the canal, putting its neutrality at risk in recent weeks. This claim, however, is far from reality.

Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino has made it clear that neither the EU, the US, nor China controls the canal—only Panama does. He reaffirmed the canal’s neutrality during the 25th-anniversary celebrations of Panama’s full control. Over the previous 25 years, he emphasized, there has not been a single reason to doubt the canal’s neutrality.

Panama’s national motto,” Pro Mundi Beneficio” (” For the Benefit of the World” ), reflects the canal’s mission of serving global interests, irrespective of the nationality of the ships using it. Panama’s operations are heavily funded by the expansion of the canal, with the tolls being calculated based on the canal’s intrinsic value rather than being included in the original treaties.

Trump has been irritated by Panama’s growing political independence from the US over the years. A nation like Panama prioritizes its own national interests.

During his first presidency, Trump was already dissatisfied with China’s investments in Panama, as well as in Latin America at large, and his current rhetoric echoes a neo-colonial tone.

Trump has no contractual means to influence the canal’s toll structure, which is determined by market principles or by its management. A military intervention, under current conditions ( with neither the canal’s security nor its neutrality threatened ), would constitute an illegal act of aggression under international law.

Trump frequently declares himself to be a peacemaker, so it is likely that his strong words are intended to stifle other economic developments rather than lead to concrete action.

This is especially important in light of potential future infrastructure projects in Panama, such as the Panama City to Costa Rica train project. China might be the main target for upcoming projects.

Trump’s desire to rename the Gulf of Mexico after declaring at Tuesday’s press conference that he wanted to do so has raised a lot of rumors right now. New name: Gulf of America.

Continue Reading