The 70th anniversary of the 1953 Korean War peace was commemorated on July 27. The global Korea Peace Appeal plan to remove the ceasefire agreement with a peace agreement to end the 70-year Korean War was organized by South Korean peace movements in the three years prior to the anniversary.
The celebration has passed, but rather than bringing about peace, Joe Biden, Yoon Suk Yeol, and Fumio Kishida’s governments are using the Korean Peninsula as a ruse to promote their plans to form ties with China at the NATO levels.
Yoon Suk Yeol, the leader of South Korea, has played his supporting role admirably. Yoon has made it possible for the United States’ two main allies in the area — its” cornerstone” Japan and its” linchpin” South Korea — to form an alliance by putting aside long-standing claims for historical accountability of Japanese colonialism.
His political agreements are essential to overthrowing the United States’ shoddy post San Francisco System because, following Japan’s fight in World War II, the US sacrificed judge for the sufferers of Japanese imperialism in order to start the Cold War.
At that political retirement in Maryland on August 18, Biden, Yoon, and Kishida announced the” Spirit of Camp David” to protect the multilateral empire from upcoming political pressure. This initiative institutionalized yearly trips to the triangle that could withstand administrative changes.
Francis Daehoon Lee discussed the multilateral alignment and the state of South Korea’s harmony motion in an interview on August 28. Lee founded People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy, is a professor of harmony research at Sungkonghoe University in Seoul, and serves as the chairman of the peace and learning research institute known as Peacemmo. Lee has long been involved in the reform movement in Korea.
radioactive deterrent
Lee notes that extended deterrence( including US nuclear weapons ) has adopted a” pre – emptive nature” under Yoon, in contrast to the Park Geun – hye administration that first proposed it 10 years ago.
In addition, North Korea is merely” a excuse for the US to plan, exercise, and teach its forces for an emptive technique in Northeast Asia” against China. China, on the other hand, has persistently refused to” use military power to modify the international get.”
Lee quickly clarifies that Taiwan is a local problem for China, not an international one. According to Lee, economic ties have consistently helped China increase its effect. Beijing’s commitment to upholding” indivisible protection” in its Global Security Initiative, in which the safety of one group is inextricably linked to that of the other party, supports his knowledge.
a statement? Cornerstone?
The terms” linchpin” and” cornerstone” are frequently used to describe South Korea and Japan, respectively, in US military documents about the area. But what does being the core or statement actually mean? How are they related to one another?
Lee begins by describing how Japan’s business, nuclear warfare, and long-range weaponry give it more proper value. This makes it the” basis” upon which the local security of the United States is built. In contrast, South Korea’s” mostly short-range land-based military assets” make it useful” in the same way that Ukrainian forces are important: They can fight to the death on the ground, they can take their individual people and resources.”
After all, despite all of the US attacks on China, there are” brakes” to the rising tensions and conflict: According to Lee, the Trump administration caused the United States to become a divided society, making it impossible for” bipartisan politics to win people over.”
Because of this, economical stability is crucial. Financial imbalance puts the brakes on the United States destroying the” economic ties with China ,” he claims, even though Donald Trump and Biden” decided on weakening China instead of co-existing with it.”
Lee observes that despite the US” decoupling,” trade between the two nations grew while China’s trade with other nations shrank.
He compares America’s position on South Korea to that of Ukraine. European nations want Ukraine to defend its borders and prevail in battle. However, despite providing the conflict on a global scale, they finally want the battle to be” localized.”
What if Northeast Asia today has a similar plan in place? Therefore fighting Chinese troops with American troops is not the best course of action. Chinese forces are also not suited for actual combat. They receive training to serve as security forces, international procedure networks, and supply networks. Who then constitutes the real battle power? The provincial statement of the United States is South Korea.
averting conflict in Northeast Asia
Understanding Korea’s recent peace movements is necessary to create a peace activity in South Korea to counter the spread of the new cold war. I questioned Lee about the Korea Peace Appeal plan and the cultural movements’ upcoming tasks.
Lee, who took part in the battle, offers insight and criticism. The Korea Peace Appeal sought to” take the world’s attention to the fact that we Koreans want peacefulness.” Within the harmony movements, there was” a middle ground between the right and left ,” according to the discussion. The campaign ultimately became straightforward and” too Korea-focused” as it tried to find” a middle ground and to process the larger people.”
This contrasts with Lee’s local peace strategy. In a statement titled” Early Warning on the Danger of Armed Conflict in Northeast Asia ,” Peacemomogo makes the suggestion. Understanding Northeast Asia as a battle theatre, where one party’s actions set off an ongoing chain of behavior and reactions that push us closer to war, serves as the foundation for such an early warning system.
According to Lee, the” early warning” urges local civil society organizations to keep an eye out for and inform their respective populations of war’s signs and developments.
These include South Korea and the United States’ joint air exercise carrying out” decapitation operation training” against North Korea, Japan’s plan” to double its defense budget” within five years, and” possess counterattack capability ,” as well as the North Koreans’ ominous declaration that” if the command center is in danger, an automatic and immediate nuclear strike will be carried out ,” according to Lee.
In the end, without tranquility in the area, a peace agreement in Korea is impossible. Social activities will need to demand peace and a shift of resources away from war and toward people’s well-being in order to accomplish that.
Globetrotter created this post and gave it to Asia Times.