Reporters also questioned Mr. Chan about the WP’s state that the PAP manifesto was” small on specifics” and contained opposition party ideas like ending streaming in universities and free education.
” I think at the halfway point, we need to concentrate on the problems that are closest to the souls of our people,” said Mr. Chan.
The three words that I’ll use to sum up this are tasks, wages, and pricing, which I believe the majority of Singaporeans may be concerned about, especially given the current circumstances.
He claimed that voters should first inquire about how the presented programs may be paid for when evaluating any proposals by political events.
They ought to inquire whether the proposals did encourage Singapore to make more and better opportunities, Mr. Chan said, in order to promote job creation and pay.
How do we put together a group that will best represent Singapore in the current economic climate and hold the strongest negotiating position when we go to negotiations with the rest of the world to secure our assets and supplies? he said.
Alvin Tan, the minister of state for Tanjong Pagar, Joan Pereira, and Foo Cexiang, the fresh face, joined Mr. Chan on the haywire.
You can watch streams of all gatherings on GE2025, CNA’s GE2025 website, CNA’s GE2025, YouTube channel, and mewatch on GE2025.