It has become clear that a trend has been present throughout history as a result of years of observing international events and choices.  ,
America embodies the spirit of motion, which is sharp and courageous and frequently preceding idea. For , better or worse, it is a state of behavior, even if the action is erroneous. The US moves initially and decides it out afterward, from the Iraq invasion of 2003  to the current price wars.
On the other hand, India is full of ideas, but it frequently gets bogged down in conversation and analysis, which causes delays or no action. Grand initiatives like Smart Cities, Industrial Corridor, Startup India, and Make in India are greeted with awe before quietly hidden beneath administrative dust.
China, on the other hand, thinks in years. It develops gradually and effectively. Then, when it moves, it shocks the world, whether it’s creating a DeepSeek AI app that shakes Wall Street and causes a$ 1 trillion drop in US tech valuations overnight.  ,
A style, a deeper fact about how societies choose to interact with the world: through urge, introspection, or integration, can be found in their differences. America is known for taking daring actions, but it never evaluates At What Cost? India has a lot of potential and intellect, but widespread gravity stifles progress. China has a powerful advantage because of its ability to think and act harmoniously.
Terribing indications of submissive behavior
Durability is frequently gauged in the global balance of power by the determination to withstand pressure as well as by military might or economic performance.
India demonstrated for leadership in 2008 with Manmohan Singh’s stance on the US-Indian Civil Nuclear Agreement. Despite leading a tense alliance, Singh held his ground. He negotiated a traditional Union cancellation without compromising India’s nuclear independence under the auspices of international strain to signal the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Despite fierce home opposition, including a no-confidence movement, Singh successfully persuaded the Indian Parliament to pass the deal without compromising India’s nuclear autonomy. He also secured a landmark waiver from the NSG in 2008, without signing the NPT or putting in jeopardizing its nuclear autonomy. The agreement brought India’s post-colonial isolation to an end and demonstrated corporate clarity, political will, and firm diplomacy.
Russia and China both have shown bravery in the present, which is unprecedented. Moscow reacted swiftly when the US imposed sanctions on Russia by adapting, adjusting, and revising its foreign policy to withstand stress from the West. China reacted quickly to Trump’s aggressive tariffs, retaliating both financially and politely and signaling that it wouldn’t be bullied into submission.
In contrast, India charted a more subdued lessons. It appeared to pacify Washington rather than argue its royal interests. The Modi administration’s handling of tariffs from the Trump administration lacked both conviction and confidence. Yet the fundamental proper independence that was present in 2008 now seems to be a mystery. India has shown the earth that despite its size and ability, it still hesitates when courage is most needed, despite its size and possible.  ,
Under Trump, India’s reaction to US force was marked by submitting rather than strength, in contrast to Russia and China.
From aspiring for global energy to serving as a client state?
Despite Modi’s repeated calling him a” near friend,” despite Trump’s victory in the US presidential election, he invited Xi Jinping to his inauguration. Modi was later invited in February, but the visit was a low-key, business-first event, which is typical of a working attend.
Trump continued to use his harsh language, frequently calling India a” business abuser” and “tariff king.” Prior to the visit, the Modi government made a number of economic concessions, including lowering average tariffs from 13 % to 11 % and lowering customs duties from 50 % to 30 % on high-end motorcycles like Harley-Davidson. After Trump threatened sanctions, India reversed its 2024 BRICS press for de-dollarization.
Trump continued to work on reducing the US trade deficit, calling it$ 100 billion, twice what it was at$ 45.7 billion, despite these objections. During their mutual press conference, Modi somewhat did not object to this exaggeration. Trump also announced increased military revenue, including F-35 planes, and increased oil and gas imports to India.  ,
However, the images deteriorated fast. Two American navy plane carrying 228 jailed Indians, including women, children, and babies, made an overnight landing in Amritsar only two weeks after Modi’s U.S. visit. India’s economy is failing to produce enough jobs for its youth ( 10 million annually, new labor market entrants ), and Washington offers no special treatment to its so-called allies. This is reflected in widely circulated images of Indians in chains.
Trump has imposed tariffs and imposed restrictions on trade and immigration while offering much in return. His strategy has been interpersonal and condescending. India is less of a strategic partner and more of a superior expected to agree.
India was once perceived as a developing world power with ability to outmatch China in terms of politics, resources, and possible. However, its standing on a global scale has declined under Modi’s decade-long authority. India’s current path is beginning to resemble those of countries like Ukraine and Pakistan, which struggled to realize true global effect.
Is India at risk of degenerating into a failed state?
The erosion of India’s political bases is a crucial component of its fall from grace. The Modi state has shifted toward dictatorship over the past ten years. India’s uniqueness, which was a lively democracy where mistakes may be made and corrected, has been completely destroyed.
Although China and India’s democratic model allowed for steady, sustainable growth, India rarely was destined to grow as quickly. India’s politics excelled because of its capacity to adapt, grow, and learn from errors. However, this basic durability has been undermined over the past ten years. Essential organizations have been hampered by the government’s inability to hold accountable and its growing centralization of power.
The government continues to ignore pressing issues like poverty, fraud, and poverty, leaving the public feeling disconnected today. While China was preparing for the fourth industrial revolution and the age of synthetic knowledge, India was occupied finding ancient temples, according to popular belief.  ,
India’s international policy, which was once thought to be healthy and sensible, presently appears misguided. The nation has failed to exercise its influence in significant international agreements. India’s decision to continue importing oil from Russia, despite American sanctions, has sparked condemnation in the wake of the Russia-Ukraine conflict.  ,
While making this choice has short-term, financially wise outcomes. India’s democratic values and non-aligned position have been undermined, which are the very things that made it special.  ,
India’s reputation suffers as a result of its increasingly being seen as buying rules for short-term gains, lowering the viability of its international strategy. Its growing reliance on Russian strength and its lack of alternative resources make it vulnerable. Given that Russia is a major simplistic supplier to India, President Trump’s subsequent warning about possible secondary tariffs on Russian oil only makes things worse. This emphasis on energy exposes India to external stress, with world powers using its requirements as a leverage.
The problem is significant. Modi’s fusion of powerful speech and subpar outcomes has given India a competitive advantage. If India is unable to assert itself as a powerful, independent country as the world shifts, it may quickly find itself a pawn in a sport it cannot control, much like Ukraine. The moment has come for significant change to occur before the path has been established and catastrophic.  ,