This month, multiple media outlets reported on the US Navy’s evolving plans for the next-generation DDG( X ) destroyer, emphasizing its advanced capabilities and challenges. But while the US Navy bets on the DDG( X )’s futuristic concept to outpace China ’s naval surge with advanced tech, logistical and industrial hurdles loom large.
Notable design changes for the DDG( X ) include removing the traditional Mark 45 main gun, which implies integrating directed-energy weapons like lasers and microwaves and a new vertical launch system (VLS ) layout.
Designed to replace the aging Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, the DDG( X ) will incorporate state-of-the-art weapons, radar systems and a powerful Integrated Power System ( IPS) to meet the high-energy demands of next-generation combat. But, steep costs, technical uncertainties and technological limitations present fierce obstacles to the program’s success.
The DDG( X ) will feature hypersonic and directed-energy weapons, the AN/SPY-6 radar, enhanced stealth and increased payload capacity. This technological step is critical for countering evolving challenges like robots, hypersonic weapons and advanced naval platforms. The ship’s IPS, adapted from the Zumwalt-class ships, promises unparalleled power generation essential for supporting its high-powered techniques.
However, these advancements come with a significant price tag: the DDG( X ) is estimated to cost US$ 4. 4 billion per fleet, far exceeding its forebears. Structure will begin in 2032, with a three-year overlap alongside continued Arleigh Burke-class production to maintain business continuity.
Directed-energy weaponry promise infinite magazine level, low-cost engagements and rapid strikes against different threats ranging from drones to fast weapons. Nevertheless, they require significant storage, power and heating. Also, atmospheric disturbances and collection restrictions pose challenges to light tool success.
The US Navy’s aging Ticonderoga-class cruisers and maxed-out Arleigh Burke-class destroyers cannot meet these demands, underscoring the importance of the DDG( X ) in the US Navy’s future surface fleet. Directed-energy weapons may also alleviate the US Navy’s rely on expensive fighter missiles, freeing area for anti-ship missiles essential for high-end conflicts, particularly against China.
China ’s marine development poses a major challenge to US sea dominance. According to the US Department of Defense’s ( DOD ) 2024 China Military Power report, China now fields over 370 ships and submarines, including 140 major surface combatants, outpacing the US fleet numerically.
Moreover, China ’s People’s Liberation Army-Navy ( PLAN ) has achieved over 50 % of the US Navy’s vertical launch system (VLS ) capacity, with nearly 4,300 VLS cells on 84 principal surface combatants, compared to the US Navy’s 8,400 cells on 85 ships.
In an article for the International Institute of Strategic Studies ( IISS), Johannes Fischbach highlights that China ’s construction of high-end platforms, such as Type 052D destroyers and Type 055 cruisers, further narrows the VLS gap.
The Type 052D battleship has 64 Vocabulary, while the Model 055 ship has 112 VLS. In contrast, the Journey IIA and later Arleigh Burke-class warships have 96 Vocabulary, while the Ticonderoga-class ships have 122 VLS.
Despite that power gap, the PLAN’s quick shipbuilding—producing 3. 1 Model 052D ships every compared to the US’s 1. 6 Arleigh Burke destroyers—illustrates the size of China ’s business benefits.
The DDG( X ) is designed to address this disparity, offering greater operational range and reduced logistical needs, vital for countering the “tyranny of distance ” in Pacific operations.
US Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro has emphasized the critical need for the Transferrable Reload At-Sea Method ( TRAM ), which enables at-sea VLS reloading. Properly tested in October 2024, The War Zone information Metro addresses a major logistical challenge by minimizing the moment warships spend out of action for disarming.
This ability is essential for sustaining a ahead existence during conflicts, especially with China, where rearming at distant foundations like Guam may become impractical and dangerous. By integrating TRAM with the DDG( X )’s design, the US Navy aims to bolster combat readiness and mitigate the presence gap created by extended resupply periods.
Despite its promise, the DDG( X ) program is hampered by systemic challenges hounding US shipbuilding. Post-Cold War expenditure cuts significantly reduced the number of naval architects and engineers, creating obstacles in both design and production.
Over 60 % of US Navy ship repairs are not completed on time, reflecting inadequate infrastructure and outdated practices. Also, US factories cannot match China ’s industrial production.
China ’s civil-military fusion strategy—which combines military and civilian shipbuilding facilities —has enabled unmatched efficiency and surge capacity. In comparison, the US’s scattered approach and selection of big ships over smaller, cost-effective vessels slow development efforts.
US politicians, including Representative John Moolenaar, warn that without striking policy changes and important investments, the US cannot hinder or succeed in a possible conflict with China, as quoted by the Associated Press.
Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi underscores the disparity, noting that China can produce 359 ships for every US ship made annually. He has emphasized the need to revitalize the US defense industrial base to maintain global stability.