The bespectacled Chia posed in front of the court wearing a clean shirt T-shirt. Anil Singh Sandhu, a prosecutor from Kertar &, Sandhu, represented him.  ,
No petition was taken from Chia.
Additionally, Mr. Singh requested that his customer arrange to visit his family in Perth between December 21, 2024, and January 12, 2025.  ,
Mr. Singh stated that his client would be making travel arrangements with his younger brother and mother, who both attend a college it.  ,
He added that the family vacation had been planned months in advance of the crime, and that reservations had already been purchased in July 2024.
Chia may be with his mother while in Australia, Mr Singh said.
The prosecution responded that if the court were to give the application, there was no urgent need for travel, but that they had requested further bail.  ,
District Judge Wong Li Tein granted the application and imposed an additional S$ 10, 000 ( US$ 7, 400 ) bail for Chia.
She also mandated, among other things, that Chia provide the case’s investigating officer with his full travel stay before leaving and that he be contactable.  ,
The event was adjourned until Jan 14 pending Mr. Singh’s requests.  ,
CNA recently reported that a car owner discovered that her car’s four tires had been deflated at around 12.50pm on November 19 and that police were called in to this incident.
Prior to this, an NUS spokeswoman recently stated that the university would take the necessary disciplinary action in response to court proceedings.
Chia’s most recent cost of causing mayhem has a sharper maximum penalty than his first one.  ,
A sentence in prison of up to three months, a fine of up to S$ 2, 000, or both are imposed on the cost of annoyance to the consumer.
The cost of committing evil carries a prison term of up to two years, a great, or both.