Oct 7, 2021
The authorities ask Ms. Khan to speak with her for an appointment to provide more information about the rape victim anecdote.
Ms. Loh suggests that Ms. Khan contact her to say that she has not spoken to the target of the assault, and that she should gather information from other victims of sexual assault.
According to Mr. Nathan, Ms. Khan should not speak out to the WP’s Central Executive Committee ( CEC ) because it is” too risky” and they might not be helpful.
Oct 11, 2021
Low Thia Khiang, the original WP chief, and Mr. Faisal Manap are greeted at his home by Singh, Ms. Lim, and Mr. Faisal Manap.
At this appointment, Mr Low says Ms Lim told him about the rest and a strategy to get Ms Khan to repent.
Since the rest was made in parliament, Mr. Low replies that the appropriate place to apologize and understand is in parliament.
He inquires as to whether the government was aware of the rest, and Ms. Lim replies that given the number of police stations, it was difficult to determine.
Mr Low replies that this is not the place, and that if Ms Khan told a lie, she really sorry.
According to Mr. Low, Ms. Lim and Singh mentioned their intention to have Ms. Khan leave the party.
He claims that Singh and Ms. Lim did not state that they had already instructed Ms. Khan to correct her lying in congress. They did not claim to have spoken with Ms. Khan’s relatives about the physical abuse. They did not state when they first learned that Ms. Khan had lied, and they did not say when they did. They did not say Singh had told her at her home on October 3 to explain the rest in parliament on October 4.
Oct 12, 2021
Ms. Khan visits Singh at his residence.
Mr. Nathan finally discovers that Ms. Singh and Ms. Lim want her to speak out.
At 5.13pm, he sends Ms Khan and Ms Loh this message:  ,” In the first place I think we should really not offer to some details. At most apologise for not having the facts ( about ) ( the rape victim’s ) age accurate”.
This information is later removed from Mr. Nathan and Ms. Loh’s separate versions of the communications they give to the COP. Miss Loh admits in jury that Mr. Nathan suggested that they continue to lie in a cross-examination.
Mr. Nathan likewise acknowledges during his cross-examination that at this point, he was in favor of “actively maintaining the rest” because he believed Ms. Khan should come clean about the party’s lack of a” appropriate plan.”
Ms. Loh and Mr. Nathan meet Singh at his home that evening.
Ms. Loh claims that they discussed whether to come clean or keep the rest and whether it was “impossible” for them because Mr. Shanmugam may pursue the matter.
Ms. Loh claims that Mr. Nathan suggested that Ms. Khan continue to tell the rest at this meeting. She later acknowledges Singh’s response by saying,” Do n’t even suggest covering this up with another lie.”
Mr. Nathan claims he is unable to recognize whether he suggested that Ms. Khan continue to lie.
Mr. Nathan claims that Singh claimed he told Ms. Khan on October 3 that he would not justice her if she continued the story or told the truth.
Ms. Loh claims that Singh told her on October 3, that he would not let her speak out against her in congress.
Ms Loh says Singh said Mr Low thought the best actions was to understand in congress, and the WP may endure the consequences, assuaging her and Mr Nathan’s thoughts.
Ms. Loh and Mr. Nathan claimed that they had agreed that Ms. Khan really tell the truth about her rest after leaving the appointment.
Oct 18, 2021
Mr. Low claims that Ms. Lim requested a meeting with him at his home, where she claimed Ms. Khan had agreed to apologize. Mr. Low responds that they should examine the apology’s draft first so that it does n’t turn into yet another lie.
Oct 20, 2021
According to the authorities, Ms. Khan has never responded to numerous inquiries for an interview.
Ms. Khan informs the press that she will address legislature on November 1, 2021.
Nov 1, 2021
Ms. Khan makes a statement in parliament admitting that the story about her assault victim was fake.
Mr. Low suggests a administrative board be set up for Ms. Khan, suggesting that Ms. Lim, Faisal, and Singh be on the screen, either this day or the following day.
At this point, he did not know that the WP officials had known since Aug 8, 2021 that the tale was false.
Nov 2, 2021
A administrative board has been established, according to the WP, and it has issued a statement claiming this.
Nov 8, 2021
Ms. Khan has her first interaction with the Singh, Ms. Lim, and Mr. Faisal WP administrative board.
She claims that they focused on her individuality and do as MP for Sengkang Group Representation Constituency and that they did not ask her a lot about her rest.
Nov 10, 2021
WP people are asked to submit submissions to the administrative panel, according to Ms. Loh and Ms. Nathan.
Ms. Loh claims that she was “extremly angry” and that she thought the individuals “had no business” making comments on the matter when they were unaware of the” correct timeline of events” and that WP leaders had been aware of the rest a week after it was released.
This is a small forward pedaling, according to Ms Loh, who messages Singh. She thinks the administrative panel was set up to suppress public and political angst.
Nov 22, 2021
Ms. Khan messages Singh to request a second meeting with the WP administrative board.
She claims that Singh said that her behavior and figure were being scrutinized because she chose to continue to tell a rest. She is shocked by this email.
When Ms Khan shares Singh’s message with Mr Nathan and Ms Loh, Mr Nathan replies” What happened to ‘ I wo n’t judge you'”?
Nov 25, 2021
Mr. Nathan claims that he and Ms. Loh met with the administrative board and that, among other things, they should have informed them that WP leaders had been aware of the rest since August.
Ms Loh says that she described Ms Khan as “lao new” to the board, meaning that she was prone to condemnation.
The Hokkien term” Chinese chi” literally means “leak air,” but it can also mean something sour or gone soft.
Nov 29, 2021
The WP administrative panel has met with Ms. Khan for her next time. She claims that she became aware at this conference that the officials wanted her to step down and that she felt defeated and betrayed.
At this appointment, the following change is noted down by Ms Lim:
Singh: Before Oct program, I met you I told you it was your phone. Did you ever feel the need to tell the facts in Parl?
Ms Khan: Well but consumed with grief unique experience. Thought it would n’t come up.
Singh: Can’t lay correctly?
Ms Khan: Well.
However, the COP meets for the first time over Ms Khan’s exist.
Nov 30, 2021
Ms Khan quits as MP and WP part.
Dec 1, 2021
Mr. Nathan claims to have dinner with Ms. Loh, Ms. Loh, and Mike Lim, Ms. Khan’s congressional associate.
Mr. Nathan claims that Mr. Lim assisted Ms. Loh in making a phone call to Singh:” Please notify Pritam that I’ve been called to the COP and I’m not going to lie the party.” Singh replies, telling Ms Loh to “tell the fact” to the COP.
Dec 2, 2021
The WP holds a media conference , where , Singh says formally that the party authority knew about Ms Khan’s rest a week after she told it on Aug 3.
Dec 10 and Dec 15, 2021
The COP hears Singh’s dental witness. Under the Parliament ( Privileges, Immunities, and Powers ) Act, Singh will eventually bring two charges against him for what he tells them about what he wanted Ms Khan to do with her lying.