Cordlife likewise said on Thursday, that in February, it had received notice of a state lodged against it in the Small Claims Tribunal (SCT) by another customer.  ,
The state alleged that the damage to the lawyer’s boy’s cord blood product was a result of Cordlife’s backup of the device. The state number was not stated. A state control of S$ 20,000 is set for issues brought up by the Small Claims Tribunal, and attorneys are prohibited from representing parties.
In the SGX filing, the organization said it was unable to determine , the actual financial effects of the state in the text of the need.  ,
The Company’s financial position for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024 will probably suffer as a result of the decision to live the declare in the Letter of Need, the SCT Claim, and/or claims made by many clients, according to Cordlife.
So far,  , seven directors or previous directors have been arrested in connection Cordlife’s reported handling of the rope body, including , past Group CEO Tan Poh Lan. On Apr 17, Cordlife’s board of directors lodged a police record over the “potential transgressions” of former people.  ,
The rope blood bank has promised to cancel any additional fees until their baby turns 21 and has since offered customers a refund of monthly fees” since the start of temperature excursion.”  ,
However, some consumers told CNA in April that they were never satisfied with Cordlife’s present, citing that it lacked justice.  ,
Some parents finally informed CNA that they were considering their options, including legal action, or that they would not recognize Cordlife’s payment offer.  ,
Customers who accept the payment offer must consent to four conditions, including one that calls for the offer to be considered a “final settlement.”  ,