Co-founder of food chain Beef Bro gets jail, caning for sexually assaulting sister’s intoxicated friend

SINGAPORE: A man was upon Friday (Aug 5) sentenced to 9 years and 10 months’ jail and eight strokes from the cane, after getting convicted of sexually attacking his sister’s intoxicated buddy in his family even.

A High Court judge discovered Norvan Tan Sobre Jie, 26, guilty in July. He previously claimed trial to two counts of sexual assault by penetration plus two counts of outrage of modesty.

Tan could be the co-founder of Singapore food business Meat Bro.

The identity of the sufferer, who was 19 during the time, is protected simply by gag order. The girl was a friend associated with Tan’s sister.

The two women acquired returned to the ripped after a night of consuming in the early morning associated with Dec 26, 2016. Around the same time, Tan returned house with two buddies.

Justice Ang Cheng Hock found that Tan physically assaulted the sufferer on the living room sofa, on his sister’s bed and in the toilet over several minutes, whilst his sister was talking to one of his friends in his room.

The sufferer formed the look at that Tan had been her assailant throughout each assault, based on the man’s voice plus build, the judge previously said.

Tan’s DNA was also found in semen over the back of the victim’s shirt, which was grabbed from the laundry basket in the toilet.

Tan’s sister testified as a prosecution witness at trial but later tried to retract statements that the girl had made in text messages to the victim and her police statements, which implicated the girl brother.

Deputy Public Prosecutors Ng Yiwen and Niranjan Ranjakunalan sought a longer jail term associated with 10 years and five months, arguing the fact that victim was vulnerable given her condition of intoxication.

The victim has been so drunk that she vomited frequently, did not have the strength to talk or change out of her clothes by herself, and fell twice when Tan was supporting her out of the lavatory, they said.

Additionally they said that she failed to have the strength in order to resist or state anything when Color sexually assaulted the girl, and had closed her eyes as they sensed heavy, only to be prompted to open them when Tan handled her chest.

They said it was obvious that Tan, “fully cognisant of how drunk (the victim) was, deliberately exploited that vulnerability to satiate his perverse sexual desires”.

“By the end of the attack, not one sensitive element of (the victim’s) entire body was left unviolated, ” said the particular prosecutors.

Additionally they highlighted that Tan did not wear the condom during the attack, which exposed the victim to the danger of sexually carried diseases.

Protection counsel Amarjit Singh argued that these are not aggravating factors plus called for a lighter in weight sentence.

The particular lawyer described Tan, who was 21 at the time of the offences, as an “aspiring” and “kind-hearted” individual. He also provided letters through Tan’s parents plus aunt for the assess to consider.

Proper rights Ang agreed with the prosecution that the annoying factors warranted the heavier sentence.

At the end of the listening to, Tan indicated which he would appeal against his conviction and sentence.

His sentence has been remained pending the charm and he remains from higher bail of S$95, 000.

The prosecution effectively sought the increase in bail, citing Tan’s own mitigation which stated that he was a successful entrepreneur.

Tan has previously been in the news to get running several companies, which includes footwear business Power outage SG, in addition to the  Beef Bro string of eateries.  

The criminal prosecution also asked for e-tagging as a bail condition. They said Tan was a flight risk when he had indicated an intention to leave Singapore after 1st finding out about the allegations against him.

The judge failed to order e-tagging.

For sexual attack by penetration, Suntan could have been jailed for up to 20 years and fined or caned.

For outrage associated with modesty, he could are actually jailed for up to two years, fined, caned or some kind of combination of these fees and penalties.