Zawahiri killing shows US needs a Pakistan long game

Zawahiri killing shows US needs a Pakistan long game

When news broke this week from the death of al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul in an US drone hit,   speculation soon began   in nearby Pakistan over if the drone that slain him took off through bases there or passed through the country’s airspace.

US-Pakistan counterterrorism cooperation has been controversial since the early days of the “war on terror, ” triggering a backlash from Islamist politicians, Pashtun tribesmen, and previously pro-state  jihadist militants . This even fomented chaotic dissent from  within the armed forces .  

The united states remains unpopular in Pakistan. Sentiment toward the US is a long way away from the days when  prominent American visitors   would be greeted enthusiastically by Pakistani crowds.

And though the US-Pakistan zwei staaten betreffend relationship – including counterterrorism cooperation – is significantly decreased in scope, they have become entangled along with Pakistan’s domestic politics in ways unlike before, potentially becoming  a major electoral aspect   in Pakistan’s main urban centers.

Whenever prime minister Imran Khan was deposed through a vote associated with no confidence within April, he claimed that he had been introduced down through a  US “regime change” conspiracy , which he stated was motivated by his  firm opposition   to allowing the particular Americans to operate army bases in the country.

Many in Pakistan see recent occasions – including  the army chief’s unusual call   with a best US diplomat a week ago purportedly to secure quicker approval of the discharge of an International Financial Fund (IMF) mortgage tranche – as evidence of collusion with all the US in ousting Khan as part of a quid pro quo. An anti-Khan talk-show host  even speculated   that Pakistan allowed a “one-time” strike in exchange pertaining to help form the IMF.

Pakistan’s fighting economy could certainly use all the help it can get. Official figures put the inflation rate at around  25% . The rupee has been in a free fall, losing about 24% in worth to the US dollar since Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif took power this Apr. And net foreign-exchange reserves held simply by Pakistan’s central bank have  fallen   to US$8. 39 billion dollars, covering less than two months of imports.

The going down hill economy has considerably eroded public support for Sharif’s shaky coalition government.

For those thinking about linking Pakistan’s financial and political turmoil to exogenous makes, there are plenty of dots for connecting. Khan’s political difficulties intensified in the  early months of the year,   just as the US said it had  uncovered Zawahiri   was in Afghanistan. Which summer, as the IMF adopted a tough position in  talks with Islamabad , the US intelligence neighborhood claimed it got conclusively identified Zawahiri’s location   within Kabul.

What may simply become coincidental is evidence for some of the ALL OF US orchestrating Imran Khan’s removal and using various levers of impact to ensure it has the unimpeded ability to hit high-value targets within landlocked Afghanistan making use of Pakistan’s airspace.

The broadly held belief that Khan was the victim of an US conspiracy   feeds into his  popular assistance , increases the probability that he could return to power, and complicates America’s counterterrorism strategy in the region.

It’s very likely that the Zawahiri strike  –  and surveillance before and after the particular attack  –  involved the use of Pakistani airspace. Indeed, a  US congressman has said   that Pakistan has provided “tacit approval” of overflight rights.

Now, if US drones did in fact travel through Pakistan, possibly from a bottom in the Persian Gulf region, and not a Central Asian neighbor of Afghanistan, then the killing of Zawahiri not only proves the potency of the US  “over-the-horizon”     counterterrorism technique, but also its reliance on Pakistani airspace.

If the US is indeed influenced by Pakistan to surveil and strike focuses on in Afghanistan, its counterterrorism strategy in Afghanistan is possibly jeopardized by the return of Imran Khan to power through elections within the next 12 months. It’s vital how the US and Pakistan develop a counterterrorism assistance framework that can endure political pressures within Pakistan in the short term.

Toward this, the US should maintain a restrained, focused counterterrorism strategy, quietly joining up with Pakistan without needing bases in the country (if it hasn’t already). Drone strikes, like former US  president Bill Clinton utilized to say of illigal baby killing, should be “safe, legal, and rare. ”

The 2 countries should also increase intelligence-sharing on shared threats, including al-Qaeda and the local branch of Islamic Condition (ISIS).

But Washington must also get ready for the potential return of Imran Khan to power. It should resist the urge to demonize him as a kind of Hugo Chavez–style populist strongman and pariah. And it must avoid supporting  –  wittingly or otherwise – anti-democratic moves to keep your pet out of power. Doing so would put the US at loggerheads with the Pakistaner street.

Pakistan may be poor, and its economy in turmoil. But it is no tiny country. The US simply cannot get locked into a battle with a populist leader in   the particular world’s fifth-most-populous country.

Both sides should look for a credible off-ramp should Khan go back to office. But in the finish, he may not enable even very limited ALL OF US drone overflight rights. And that is a reality the US must be prepared to acknowledge.

It could be Khan’s prerogative as the leader of a sovereign country.