Part one is a fairly regular look at Wexner’s company acumen in acquiring the lingerie outfit plus transforming it into a multi-billion-dollar enterprise, inspiring cultish devotion amongst employees while dealing with ever-escalating pressure to make the marketing more attention grabbing. Soaring for a time, the latter impulse gradually drifted toward what a single observer describes since the thin line between high-end fashion plus soft-core pornography.
Yet Wexner’s success, which made him the wealthiest man in Kansas, also brought Epstein into his umlaufbahn, eventually leading to allegations that the latter leveraged his affiliation with the company as part of their predatory behavior.
As for what Wexner might have recognized, the executive (who declined to be interviewed for the docuseries but is shown extensively from earlier video) and his representatives staunchly denied any awareness, saying that he severed ties with Epstein in 2007. They echo his statement in 2019 in which he mentioned, “I would not possess continued to work with anybody capable of such egregious, sickening behavior because has been reported regarding him. ”
The hardest-to-explain aspect of the story include Wexner granting Epstein power of lawyer over his resources. Michael Gross, author of the book “Model, ” suggests that given the closeness of the men, it was hard for many to be stunned Wexner’s name stomach up “as the particular Jeffrey Epstein red onion was unpeeled. ”
With so many tasks devoted to the Epstein scandal, including docuseries from Investigation Discovery plus Netflix , the emphasis on his part, while understandable, seems like well-trodden territory. Certainly, it tends to obscure insights having to do with Wexner’s retail strategy as well as its broader implications — turning something because mundane as under garments into a premium product, manufacturing in China to slash expenses and from a social perspective, feeding impractical expectations about ladies bodies with greatly photoshopped catalogue spreads.
In the final chapter, nevertheless , director Matt Tyrnauer deftly weaves the pieces together, conveying how the key men behind Victoria’s Secret were blind towards the changes sweeping over society while allegedly engaging in their own sketchy behavior.
The company began to look like a “dinosaur, ” states casting director James Scully, as proved by the demise of its fashion show . From the hyper-sexualization that as soon as made Victoria’s Secret a sensation, he notes, “The planet at large moved on from this, and they didn’t. ”
Wexner’s bravado also embodied a certain swaggering mindset of the billionaire class that grew up throughout those years that will draws inevitable parallels to Epstein’s additional famous and wealthy friends, as well as the present generation of high-profile moguls that has followed.
The task in repeatedly time for the Epstein from it all is that it potentially adds a salacious “ick” factor to the narrative without bringing much new to the particular party. “Victoria’s Key: Angels and Demons” mostly overcomes that criticism in a way gowns well worth watching, even though, by the standards of the greatest docuseries, it doesn’t rise to the level necessary to completely earn the wings.
“Victoria’s Secret: Angels and Demons” premieres July 14 on Hulu.