WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT ,
After Mr. Jumabhoy finished the defense’s case, the parties discussed judge closing times and the availability of reply proposals for uploading.  ,
Closing proposals are paperwork where the defense and the trial present new evidence. The paperwork that each part responds to the other’s shut submissions are known as “reply submissions.”
The court may then meet to discover these submissions’ oral arguments or decide whether to hear them again.  ,
Both sides claimed before Judge Tan that they could n’t agree on the timeline. Mr. Jumabhoy requested that the final proposals been uploaded by Jan. 13, 2025, and the answers be uploaded by Feb. 17, citing the team members who will be on depart at different times, including Singh, who will be on leave from Dec. 3 to Dec. 15.  ,
Judge Tan then noted that the defense team could work on entries at different times without being together all the time, and that Mr. Ang claimed that the break was too much.  ,
The judge then addressed Mr. Ang to the judge, who was chuckled as he was told that there was nothing to prevent the prosecutors from filing its files earlier.  ,
In the end, the judge requested that entries been uploaded by January 13 and that responses been submitted by January 31.
He fixed the date for the ruling for February 17, but left it up to the parties to make arrangements with the judge regarding any prior hearings or oral claims.  ,
If convicted, Singh, who is an MP for Aljunied GRC,  , faces up to three years ‘ jail, a fine of up to S$ 7, 000 ( US$ 5, 290 ), or both for each charge.
The trial has stated that it will only be requesting a good for each cost, but it has not specified the amount.  ,
Under the Constitution, people fined at least S$ 10, 000 or jailed for at least a year is disqualified from standing for election to become a member of parliament.
A sitting MP who is subject to these fines may lose their seats. The suspension is for five decades.