PRIOR ISSUES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTION FIRM HAD
The castle was a joint venture between China Railway No. 1 and Italian-Thai Development, a seasoned Thai construction firm. 10 is a division of China Railway, a company of the Chinese government, which is the leader of numerous large-scale infrastructure projects both domestically and internationally.
China Railway No. Three Thai citizens dominated the company’s stock, while a Chinese executive dominated the remaining 49 % of the stock. This is how the company’s organizational structure was structured.
To avoid being labeled as a foreign organization, Thai citizens are required to hold the majority of a company’s shares.
The three Thai citizens and the Chinese person, who they identified as Zhang Chuangling, have been taken into custody by law enforcement. He was arrested on suspicion of using Thai citizens solely as shareholders.  ,
According to local media, Zhang is now on parole, but not the other three.
A Thai anti-corruption guardian that had formerly been monitoring the fell building project reported seeing a number of issues.
The group described several problems, including a persistent lack of supervision engineers and numerous delays, as well as running behind schedule with its development.
According to Mana Nimitmongkol, president of the Anti-Corruption Organization of Thailand,” In January 2025, we once again confirmed that if conditions remained the same, it would be difficult to scramble for implementation by August.”
” And if they had succeeded in doing it, it would have required significantly cutting corners in the building process. It might not adhere to executive requirements.
Prior to the start of the developing works, the anti-corruption guardian had earlier reported irregularities in the building of the tower to the authorities.
Mana added that the SAO control considered canceling the development contract and preventing contractors from upcoming government projects, but instead chose to continue.
A week after the tragedy, the government established a fact-finding committee to look into what caused the tower to decline.
In about two weeks after the council convenes, they are expected to release their results.
NEED FOR COMMUNITY Responsibilities
Surachet Pravinvongvuth, a member of the Thai government’s council on how position money are used, called it ironic that the SAO, which examines authorities funds and accounts, is being evasive about being audited.
Surachet advocated for more precision for the president’s fact-finding team, saying the public may be given specific information about what they will give in these 90 days.
Beyond this, there is the issue of public accountability. We don’t really see little interaction with the public or willingness to explain things to society because this is an independent organization, which is different from regular condition firms,” he said.
On April 18, Thailand’s Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra criticized the investigation’s gradual progress.
She also criticized the SAO for not offering adequate information to help with the investigation.
The SAO’s papers, which include the agency’s findings from January 2025 regarding potential legal transgressions but not the project cancellation, are requested,” We ask for assistance ( from the appropriate parties ),” she said.
” We must consider all proof and cause to carry those accountable for the loss of life.”