As information is sought, the Thai Constitutional Court on Wednesday cast July 24 as the case’s following receiving date for Srettha Thavisin’s request for more evidence.
The jury earlier this month stated that the case may be resolved before September.
In a speech, the judge requests additional information, including data, from those who were formerly summoned.
Following a complaint filed by 40 military-appointed lawmakers in May, which the constitutional court accepted, the circumstance against Mr. Srettha was brought.
The event seeks to remove the top over the appointment of a lawyer named Pichit Chuenban, who was jailed for contempt of court. According to the problem, Pichit allegedly lacked the moral and ethical standards set forth in the constitution for ministers.
Since then, Pichit has since resigned, and Mr. Srettha has denied any wrongdoing.
Link with Thaksin
After attempting to reward Supreme Court officers by handing them a paper bag containing$ 2 million baht, Pichit and two other associates were given a six-month prison sentence in 2008. Criticisms of his performance as a government secretary disapprove him.
Before Pichit was appointed to the cupboard position, he advised Mr. Srettha. Before that, Pichit served the jail sentence for trying to bribe the Supreme Court by acting as former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra’s attorney in the “lunchbox money” scandal.
After they attempted to pay Supreme Court officials by handing them a snack with a paper case containing 2 million ringgit in dollars a month earlier, the Supreme Court on June 25, 2008, handed the two of his colleagues a jail sentence.
In the Ratchadaphisek property purchase case, for which Thaksin received a two-year prison sentence in 2008, all three were representing Thaksin and his ex-wife Khunying Potjaman na Pombejra.
At the time, Thaksin was accused of abusing his authority while serving as prime minister to facilitate Khunying Potjaman’s purchase of 33 ray of property from the Bank of Thailand’s Financial Institutions Development Fund ( FIDF) at a reduced rate of 772 million ringgit in 2003.
According to the Supreme Court, he was supposed to set a high case by upholding the ethics code for such a assigned place.
A new government may be established if Mr. Srettha, a political newcomer, is ousted, and congress will need to vote on a new leader member. His decision Pheu Thai party would also need to propose a new leader.
The prime minister’s event is being looked into, as is another issue that calls for the opposition Move Forward Party’s dissolution, which was the surprise party that won the elections last year and which is the largest party in parliament.
The military-appointed Senate prevented Walk Forward from form a government.
According to experts, the two instances have heightened social doubt in the country.  ,