BRI’s recent award triumphs point to its focus on becoming a champion of financial inclusion | FinanceAsia

According to Sunarso, leader director, Bank Rakyat Indonesia ( BRI),” Tr I will continue to focus on the MSME section to realize its dreams of becoming the most important banks group in Southeast Asia and a champion of financial inclusion by 2025.” He continued,” As the nationwide economic structure is dominated by Enterprises, providing loans to MSME people is anticipated to have a significant positive impact on the Indonesian business.”

The 130-year-old company’s outstanding achievement in FinanceAsia Asia’s Best Businesses Poll 2024 and the FinanceAsia Awards demonstrate how focused this perspective is on BRI’s peers in the industry.

In FinanceAsia Asia’s Best Companies ballot, the banks won silver in the following categories: Best Director for Sunarso, leader director, BRI, Best Managed Company – Indonesia, and Best Investor Relations – Indonesia.

Additionally, BRI won bronze in the types of Best Big Cap Company in Indonesia and Best CFO in Indonesia for Viviana Dyah Ayu Retno K, Most Committed to DEI – Indonesia, Most Committed to ESG – Indonesia, and Best Big Cap Company – Indonesia.

The bank had a stellar run at the FinanceAsia Awards 2023-2024 winning Best Bank for Financial Inclusion ( Domestic ) and Best Commercial Bank- SMEs ( Domestic ), apart from securing commendations for Best Sustainable Bank ( Domestic ), Most Innovative Use of Technology – Banks ( Domestic )

View Sunarso, the president’s director ,’s acceptance speech, below.

¬ Capitol Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

MAS network to bolster ‘global south’ as fintech hub | FinanceAsia

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) announced the establishment of the Global Finance and Technology Network (GFTN) on October 30, an ambitious initiative designed to reinforce Singapore’s standing as a global fintech leader and boost the tech potential of the ‘global south’.

Headed by Ravi Menon, former managing director of MAS from 2011-2023, the GFTN aims to “enhance global connectivity for impactful innovation in financial services”.

Menon old a media briefing that networks such as the GFTN aimed to tap the potential of the “global south”.

Beyond Silicon Valley

He said it was important to broaden fintech innovations beyond traditional centres like Silicon Valley and London to emerging cities such as Nairobi, Jakarta, and São Paulo.

He said that by 2030, the Asia-Pacific region is predicted to become the world’s largest fintech market, with Africa and Latin America projected to grow by 30 per cent annually. Yet regions like Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East still faced substantial funding gaps, noted.

Through GFTN, Singapore would aim to address these inequalities by providing resources, infrastructure, and collaborative frameworks to foster sustainable growth, especially in underserved regions.

“Through our networks and partnerships, GFTN will aim to unlock sustainable and inclusive pathways that serve communities facing critical gaps,” Menon said.

He added that the world is “entering an era of growing digital connectivity across borders” starting with electronic payments and progressing toward universal trusted credentials and data exchanges.

Getting cross-border digital infrastructure right, he added, would be critical.

After years of experimentation, Menon stated, “the tokenisation of financial assets has reached a tipping point” with billions of dollars of financial assets now on-chain.

However, he noted that “the promise of a tokenised financial system has not materialised,” indicating it was still a work in progress.

Quantum leap

He observed that artificial intelligence is beginning to make significant inroads into financial services, bringing both AI-powered innovations and potential risks.

Menon pointed out that if quantum technologies develop, the coupling of AI and quantum technologies would “unlock new opportunities as well as unprecedented security challenges”.

Addressing climate change had also become a growing focus for the financial sector,  he said, with increased interest in climate tech solutions for both carbon mitigation and climate resilience.

All these advancements, according to Menon, would demand “closer and more meaningful engagements between countries (and) between the public and private sectors” couple with coherent policies and regulations to “harness the benefits of these technologies while mitigating their downsides”.

GFTN initiatives

The GFTN will be launching four key initiatives as a part of its scope:

GFTN Forums will expand Elevandi’s five flagship events, including the Singapore Fintech Festival (SFF), to foster cross-border collaboration with experts worldwide. Elevandi – to be replaced by GFTN -is a not-for-profit entity set up by MAS to connect people and businesses, ideas and insights in the fintech sector in Singapore and globally. 

GFTN Advisory will offer practitioner-led consultancy to help developing economies build digital infrastructure, form innovation-friendly policies, and support social-impact-driven private entities with market insights.

GFTN Platforms which will empower small enterprises and startups through digital services, improving market access, analytics, and sustainability reporting.

And lastly, GFTN Capital that will target early- and growth-stage startups in fintech and climate tech, providing patient capital and global partnerships to promote financial inclusion and environmental sustainability.

 

 


¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

FinanceAsia Achievement Awards 2024: entries are now open | FinanceAsia

FinanceAsia’s annual Achievement Awards recognises excellence in bringing together those issuers, banks, investors, advisors and other market participants, who are working hard to develop and expand Asia Pacific’s (Apac) financial markets.

This year, for the first time, we are also looking to recognise excellence in the fast-growing markets of the Middle East.

We are looking to recognise the standout companies and strategies that are redefining the way issuers and investors are interacting with markets and adapting to evolving regulatory requirements and diverse needs, amid an increasingly competitive environment.

There are both Deal awards and House awards across a range of categories and markets. For more details please see here for Apac and here for the Middle East. 

In addition, our Deal Maker Poll rewards individuals who have been instrumental in closing some of the region’s most ambitious deals over the last 12 months.

The timeline for the deals is October 1, 2023 to September 30, 2024.

We look forward to your participation and seeing your entries! Please click here to find out how to enter at our dedicated Awards website. For frequently asked questions click here and for list of our experienced judges see here

Key dates: 

August 19: Awards’ launch

Early-bird entry deadline: September 6, 2024

Main entry deadline: September 19, 2024 

Entries’ evaluated by judges: October 2 to November 6, 2024 

Winners’ announced: November 2024 

Awards’ ceremony: February 2025, date TBD  


¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Natixis-affiliated Ostrum AM creates new transition department; aims to expand FI offering in Asia | FinanceAsia

Paris-based Ostrum asset management (AM), an affiliate of Natixis Investment Managers, has appointed Nathalie Beauvir to head up its newly created sustainable transitions department.

A spokesperson confirmed to FinanceAsia that Beauvir had been in her new role in Paris since the start of the job transition in May.

The newly established department, according to a July 10 press release, consists of five environmental, social and governance (ESG) experts and two corporate social responsibility (CSR) experts.

They will be responsible for strengthening Ostrum AM’s strategic positioning on ESG; optimising the interdependence of investment policies including exclusion, engagement and voting; and developing offerings with new thematic ranges.

The department reports directly to the firm’s chief executive officer (CEO) office.

CEO Olivier Houix commented in the press release that the team expects Beauvir to establish Ostrum AM as a “committed partner for transitions” for stakeholders, in terms of investment strategies and development financing.

Beauvir was promoted from her previous role as head of sustainable bond analysis and research at Ostrum AM,where she was involved in the launch of the firm’s climate and social impact bond fund.

Asia expansion

The Ostrum AM team currently has five portfolio managers and analysts in the Asia Pacific (Apac) region, led by Rushil Khanna, head of equity investments, within Natixis Investment Managers’ Singapore local operations.

Currently, the team has a specific focus on equity investments, while Ostrum AM also aims to provide fixed income expertise locally in Southeast Asia, with the upcoming arrival of a fixed income portfolio manager, the spokesperson told FA.

Globally, Ostrum AM manages around €40 billion ($43 billion) in green, social and sustainability (GSS) bonds, out of its €402 billion in assets managed for institutional clients as of end-March.


¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Sustainable transformation: making transition finance stick | FinanceAsia

The Asia Pacific region is currently facing a significant gap in the race to fund decarbonisation – estimated at $US1.1 trillion by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

However, this is not the only problem for a region whose coal-fired economies represent around half of global emissions, according to the International Energy Agency.

China alone accounts for 35% of global CO2 emissions, the agency says.

Speakers at the Sustainable Finance Asia Forum 2024 said that regulators will need to rebalance sustainable investment priorities – placing more emphasis on adaptation rather than mitigation – if the region’s most heavily polluting emerging economies are to meet their carbon zero targets.

Debanik Basu, the head of responsible investment and stewardship APAC at APG Asset Management, told a panel on harnessing transition finance for sustainable transformation that investment in mitigation (reducing greenhouse emissions at source) now represented the majority of transition funding.

He said the often more complicated task of climate adaptation – the need to change systems, behaviours and whole economies – was receiving scant attention.

“Currently the region is getting around $300 billion in transition finance so there’s a massive gap that needs to be addressed,” he told the conference. “Even within the small portion of finance that we are getting, more than 80 per cent of the funds are moving towards mitigation.

“Consensus estimates suggest that ideally it should be 50/50 between mitigation and adaptation.”

He said the other critical problem was that aspects of climate finance were not well understood and appreciated by the market overall, in particular within the agriculture and forestry segment.

“When you look at the NDCs (Nationally Determined Contribution) put out by a lot of countries, there are specific targets around climate change, but there aren’t explicit targets around forestry and agriculture,” he said.

“And even when there are targets, there is no clear roadmap. What all this means is that the institutional capacity is lacking. There are gaps in infrastructure and there are gaps in knowledge.

“As an investor, conversations with companies around biodiversity are at a very nascent stage.”

A question of taxonomies

Kristina Anguelova, senior advisor and consultant on green finance strategy APAC at the World Wildlife Fund, told the conference that regulation was moving in the right direction, guided by hubs such as Singapore and Hong Kong.

She added that the unofficial rivalry between Hong Kong and Singapore in terms of developing regulatory taxonomies was having a positive effect on the transition finance landscape in the region.

“I think the competition between Singapore and Hong Kong in this case is a good thing because it’s advancing regulation in the region quite a bit,” she said. “The Singapore Asia Taxonomy lays out transition taxonomy criteria across eight sectors.”

While the regulation is tailored to Singapore, she said she believed it would lay foundations for others to follow.

“It’s so important as a regulatory piece because it can serve as an incentive for investors to start to scale transition finance comfortably and confidently without the loopholes and the risks of potentially being accused of greenwashing,” she said.

In terms of biodiversity, she highlighted the nascent stage of biodiversity finance compared to climate finance, discussing the need for capacity building, regulatory clarity, and financial instruments to support nature-based solutions.

A case in point, she said, is the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) which is developing standards aimed at developing a high-quality, comprehensive global baseline of sustainability disclosures focussed on the needs of investors and the financial markets.

“On biodiversity, I think we’re moving a bit slowly, but we’re getting there. Obviously coming from a science-based NGO, efforts can never be fast enough,” she said. “But the good news is that the ISSB will also be integrating the TNFD or the Task Force for Nature-related Financial Disclosures soon.

“Those jurisdictions that have adopted or committed to the ISSB will also be adopting those nature regulations.”

The challenge as always, she added, was that regulators had to strike a balance between mitigating financial risk and overregulating such that it slowed economic development.

Blended solutions

Building capacity, both speakers argued, would be critical to transition finance solutions to climate change and that new instruments, particularly in blended finance, were likely to be leading the charge.

“We are seeing beyond transition bonds to different types of instruments that are designed to go into blended finance structures such as transition credits which are based on the assumption that we can get carbon savings out of early retirement of coal-fired power plants,” Anguelova said.

One avenue that was currently being explored in a number of jurisdictions was concessionary capital: i.e. loans, grants, or equity investments provided on more favourable terms than those available in the market.

These terms could include lower interest rates, longer repayment periods, grace periods, or partial guarantees.

Of these instruments, Basu said, guarantees were evolving as one of the methods currently being pursued in several markets.

“What we are also seeing is that, apart from concessionary capital, a lot of public institutions are more comfortable with providing guarantees instead of direct capital because that then keeps the overall cost of capital down,” Basu said.

“It might be at a very nascent stage – and it is difficult to say if this is going to be the future – but it is developing,” he said.


¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Who’s afraid of TSMC’s management culture? – Asia Times

Excellent investigative report has been produced by Viola Zhou into the tensions and growing symptoms at the TSMC shop in Phoenix, Arizona.

Before I tumble in, but, I should note that in my opinion, the article that the newspaper gave to this article was not very representative of what’s really going on. Although the plant’s headline reads” TSMC’s debacle in the American desert,” it does n’t currently look like it.

Output at the TSMC factory was scheduled to start in 2024. Most&nbsp, sources&nbsp, — including Zhou’s post — say that time has been delayed until 2025. However, some  and recent&nbsp reports&nbsp claim that the manufacturer is now&nbsp, ahead&nbsp, and may begin manufacturing in 2024:

Today, according to a&nbsp, a report from the Taiwanese news outlet Income. udn, TSMC is expecting to start aircraft manufacturing operations by late- April, with the preparations for mass manufacturing to be completed by the end of the year. Whether both fabs or just the 4 nm service are scheduled to start producing sooner than expected is a mystery.

The more positive reports emerged quickly after the anticipated subsidy was given, suggesting that TSMC was merely sandbagging to ensure they received their CHIPS Act funding. It’s still not very apparent which times are right, and the company itself does not know.

However, it’s important to keep in mind that there was a lot of hubbub in a dispute between TSMC and the Arizona construction organizations in the middle of 2023. A few months later, however, a resolution was reached and the debate vanished.

There’s a very good chance that this title turns out to be anxious and early, even though calling the TSMC’s Arizona task a “debacle” might garner a lot of attention from those who are ideologically invested in either the US’s failure or its success.

That having been said, yet, the real monitoring in the content is excellent. The conflict between TSMC’s work culture and the American workforce is illustrated by a number of narratives. Just a few examples, please:

The American engineers complained of rigid, counterproductive hierarchies at the company, Taiwanese TSMC veterans described their American counterparts as lacking the kind of dedication and obedience they believe to be the foundation of their company’s world- leading success … “]The company ] tried to make Arizona Taiwanese” ,]said ] G. Dan Hutcheson, a semiconductor industry analyst…

According to TSMC executives, an intense, military-style work culture is the key to the business’s success, according to Rest of World. Professionals have 12-hour days off and occasionally weekend off. Chinese commentators joke that the business runs on engineers with” slave mentalities” who” offer their livers” — local slang that underscores the intensity of the work…TSMC’s work culture is extremely demanding, even by Japanese standards. Previous executives praised Taiwan’s tight work ethic, the Confucian culture, and the respect for authority as key factors in the company’s success…

In front of their classmates, managers often made the suggestion that American workers quit engineering… ” It’s hard to get them to perform things”, a Chinese expert in Phoenix]said].

Stories like these inevitably sway stereotypes: stupid Americans who want to be coddled and praised versus hard-working, polite East Asians. And this further fuels the conceit that the US ca n’t compete with East Asian nations for high-tech manufacturing, or for manufacturing chips.

But there are many factors to fear this conclusion. First of all, Americans ‘ concerns about Chinese device manufacturers are very similar to those they had about Japanese companies in general in the 1980s and first 1990s. However, even in some manufacturing sectors, Japanese management emerged as bulky and ineffective.

East Asian management culture does n’t always succeed

In some manufacturing sectors, including cars and electronics, US companies struggled to compete with Chinese companies from the late 1970s until the early 1990s. A number of academics, including Richard T. Pascale and W. Edwards Deming, attempted to examine Chinese management practices for insights that American companies could use.

But some observers, like&nbsp, Ezra Vogel, &nbsp, Robert Christopher, and even&nbsp, Akio Morita of Sony, claimed that Japan’s performance on manufacturing stemmed from heavy- embedded cultural values of difficult work, respect for authority, etc — very similar to the Chinese cultural values attributed to TSMC by Viola Zhou’s interviewees.

It did n’t work out that way. Japan’s labor productivity lag significantly behind that of many other wealthy nations at the beginning of the 1990s. In 2007, economists Dale Jorgenson and Koji Nomura did&nbsp, a detailed industry- by- industry accounting&nbsp, of productivity differences, taking differences in capital investment into account ( when you do this, it’s called Total Factor Productivity ). Around 1990, they discovered that Japan’s manufacturing productivity almost doubled that of America; this resulted in a reversal of this trend.

Source: Jorgenson & Nomura ( 2007 ),  

When they broke things down by industry, they found that although Japan did beat the US in some industries, this outperformance sometimes reversed itself over time:

Source: Jorgenson & Nomura ( 2007 ),  

In the 1990s, Japan established itself as a leader in the manufacturing of motor vehicles. However, it lost ground in terms of computers and electronic components, and its advantage vanished in terms of machinery in the 1990s.

There are many things that go into TFP — technology, resource costs, regulation, clustering effects, trade, and so on. We ca n’t simply say,” Oh, Japanese management culture was n’t that good after all.”

However, it’s worth noting that many analyses of Japan’s current, stagnant productivity now explicitly attribute this to an office culture that is not productive! Working for a Japanese company means long, unproductive hours at the office, trying to look productive for&nbsp, elderly, entrenched managers.

Useless, overwork is a practice known as “presenteeism,” which prevents employees from getting enough sleep and makes them slow and unmotivated. In addition, I’ve personally seen instances of this in Japanese universities, and my Japanese friends ‘ companies have many similar tales.

This does n’t mean the cultural essentialists of the 1980s were necessarily wrong. In fact, it’s possible that the same principles of work for work’s sake and respect for corporate hierarchy that were once attributable to Japan’s manufacturing competitiveness now prevent work to be done in a white-collar environment.

We ca n’t simply apply the lessons learned from one nation to another because Taiwanese management culture is different from Japanese management culture. But here’s another interesting example. Stan Shih, the founder of Taiwanese multinational Acer, predicted that US PC brands would vanish in 20 years.

According to the Taipei-based Commercial Times newspaper,” the trend for low-priced computers will continue over the next few years,” said Stan Shih, the founder of the island’s top personal computer brand.

” But US computer makers just do n’t know how to put such products on the market … US computer brands may disappear over the next 20 years, just like what happened to US television brands”.

Since Shih only has six years left, it seems like only 14 have passed. However, the top three US PC manufacturers still held a 45.4 % market share as of late 2023, compared to the top three brands combined, China and Taiwan, for which Acer was only 6.4 %:

Source: Wikipedia

The East Asian electronics cluster is formidable but not invincible. Viola Zhou’s account of TSMC’s history suggested that the company’s management culture is n’t quite as effective as you might think:

Several former American employees argued that only if the tasks were worthwhile to complete, and that they were against longer working hours. ” I’d ask my manager’ What’s your top priority,’ he’d always say’ Everything is a priority,'” said another ex- TSMC engineer. So many times,” so, so, so, many times, I would put in extra hours to finish something,” I thought.

Additionally, the Americans objected to Taiwanese colleagues ‘ unjustifiable tardiness at work. ” That pisses me off” ,]former TSMC engineer ] Bruce said. They were” just doing it for show,” the statement continued.

Five US employees admitted to telling a newspaper, Rest of the World, that TSMC engineers occasionally fabricated or fabricated customer or manager data. Sometimes, the engineers said, staff would manipulate data from testing tools or wafers to please managers who had seemingly impossible expectations.

One engineer once said,” Anything they could do to get work off their plate, they would do,” “because the workers were spread out so thin.”

Four American employees compared TSMC culture to” save face,” where employees strive to improve the appearance of their teams, departments, or organizations while sacrificing productivity and employee wellbeing. &nbsp, Pointless busy work just to please the boss? I’ve heard that story before, I guess.

High Capacity blogger Kyle Chan had some intriguing thoughts on the subject:

]Viola Zhou’s ] story provides a much- needed counterpoint to the narrative that” Asians simply work harder. Everyone else is “lazy” all the way. It’s easy to equate a set of cultural practices that appear to be “hard work” with actual performance, despite the fact that I have no doubt that TSMC is largely responsible for its success thanks to its extraordinarily hardworking employees.

Publicly shaming your employees, restricting contact with family and listening to music, churning out endless PowerPoints and weekly work reports, forcing American staff to somehow understand instructions in Mandarin. Although these business practices may seem like they’re incredibly difficult, are they actually effective?

We all knew that good managers did n’t stay in the office late at night when I was in my consulting days. The good managers did n’t have junior staff put in” face time” and pull all- nighters to make slides that ended up getting deleted. The competent managers understood when to sprint and how to convey to the team that their work was important…

The fact that Taiwanese employees are so eager to work for TSMC is one of the key factors in why they are so eager to do so [. ]

Which brings me to my next point.

Macroeconomics or management?

One of the most prosperous companies in the world is TSMC, a true national champion and a significant advance in industrial policy. But there are a number of reasons why its success relative to American chipmakers, as well as its struggles in the US market, might depend on economic factors outside the company and unrelated to Taiwanese culture.

First of all, much has been made about how TSMC surpassed Intel, Samsung, and other chip manufacturers who create and manufacture their own chips in-house.

This success is typically attributable to TSMC’s “foundry” model, which allows it to specialize in the manufacturing process and cross-apply techniques and lessons from one type of product to another. Instead of making its own chips, it makes everyone else’s chips.

But you know who else ca n’t make chips as well as TSMC? Any other Taiwanese business that is active today. It’s just TSMC towering over the rest of the others in a chart of revenue for chipmakers in Taiwan:

Source: Taiwan Semiconductor Industry Association

Only 30 % of TSMC’s revenue comes from competitors, who also make 30 % of its revenue. No one is discussing whether the US would launch a war to protect Nuvoton from a Chinese invasion in Arizona or about building Winbond factories there. Unlike Japanese auto companies in the 80s, or even Taiwanese PC makers in the 2010s, there is precisely&nbsp, one&nbsp, top chipmaker in Taiwan.

In terms of skill and work ethic, TSMC pretty much picks Taiwanese talent. If you’re a top Taiwanese chip engineer, TSMC is where you work, but other companies do n’t. So the engineers at TSMC are n’t representative of Taiwanese skills and work ethic as a whole, they’re a special, hyper- selected elite.

Additionally, TSMC does n’t have to pay a lot for these elite performers. The median salary at TSMC was US$ 64, 874 in US dollars in 2021, with a bonus of US$ 40, 000, or roughly$ 105, 000.

In the tech world, that’s nothing. A starting-level American software engineer working for Visa, the credit card company, earns less than that.

Why do TSMC employees have such high salaries? Well, one big reason is that Taiwanese workers just do n’t make very much in general. The typical pay for full-time employees in Taiwan is$ 22, 242. In Missouri or South Dakota, that’s less than a worker making the minimum wage. So in Taiwan, a TSMC salary is fairly big bucks.

Why are Taiwan’s wages so low? Taiwan is poorer than the United States, for one reason. Another reason is that Taiwan makes sure to&nbsp, keep its currency very cheap&nbsp, relative to the US dollar, probably in order to improve the competitive position of companies like TSMC.

In addition, TSMC’s Arizona fabs must compete with other American tech companies for talent. Chip companies pay a bit less than what TSMC employees in Taiwan, but typically between$ 200,000 and$ 30,000 for hardware engineers at Apple. But it’s not just the hardware industry TSMC has to compete with in America, it’s the&nbsp, software&nbsp, industry too.

The skill set is similar to what a smart young American would be if they wanted to learn either how to write code or how to build chips. And they typically get paid more if they choose to write code. A typical software engineer at Google will get paid around$ 300k-$ 400k, for Facebook&nbsp, it’s more like$ 300k-$ 500k. Try naming a Taiwanese software company in the meantime.

And do n’t make up for it: The best American actors frequently put in a lot of effort. High earners in America&nbsp, work hard in general, and many top people are putting in those 70- hour workweeks. Many young lawyers and doctors practice this, as do Tesla’s and other tech company founders and new hires.

Under Andy Grove’s leadership, Intel had an intense, punishing work environment, similar to TSMC. But they have to have some special motivation in order to do this — either the promise of a very high salary, or the promise of a big exit for their startup, or at least the pride of working as a doctor or for a prestigious company like Tesla. TSMC is well-known in America, but it lacks that prestige in Taiwan.

According to Zhou’s article, Taiwanese workers in the United States are drawn to better jobs elsewhere.

An engineer, who has worked at both Intel and TSMC, said Taiwanese colleagues had also asked him about vacancies at Intel, where they expected a better work- and- life balance. &nbsp,

At its Arizona factories, TSMC is actually competing against that. It’s having to pay a multiple of what it would pay in Taiwan, for workers who are less elite and less passionately committed to the company.

Taiwan’s management or culture have no business doing this, it’s just that Taiwan is a less wealthy nation than America, and it has chosen to integrate many of its best people into a single national champion organization. In addition, it will cost more to make chips in Arizona, of course.

Americans can learn East Asian manufacturing methods just fine

I’ve argued that:

  • Even if East Asian management culture appears to be very intense, hard-working, and not necessarily the best, it is not.
  • TSMC’s cost disadvantages in Arizona depend on macro factors, not just on cultural differences ( or perhaps not on cultural differences at all ).

However, East Asian businesses occasionally come up with significant management innovations that actually increase productivity significantly. However, when they do, American workers can learn from and use those innovations in America.

The prime example here is the Japanese car industry. Japanese automakers started producing significantly more cars in the US in the 1980s as a result of significantly fewer exports from Japan:

Source: JAMA

Every Japanese carmaker has a number of sizable US auto plants, and many of its most famous American models are produced by workers for Japanese companies.

This was an absolutely massive experiment in foreign direct investment by an East Asian country into the US. The Japanese companies had a lot to teach their American workers because their auto manufacturing productivity was significantly higher at the time.

And instruct them, as they did. American car plants adopted practices such as the kanban scheduling system, the kaizen system of continuous improvement (originally conceived of in the US but put into practice in Japan ), and many others.

These methods are primarily derived from the well-known Toyota Production System, but they are also the foundation of what is now known as lean manufacturing. These methods were first used by Japanese automakers in America, but they have since been widely used in many other sectors of corporate America as well.

American factories were successfully able to learn these Japanese management techniques. There are only a few discernible differences between Japanese and American vehicles, according to detailed comparisons.

And despite America’s uncompetitive exchange rate, the cars produced by Japanese brands are still highly competitive abroad. Consumers in Korea are &nbsp, buying Nissan Altimas&nbsp, made in Tennessee and&nbsp, Honda Accords&nbsp, made in Ohio. Toyota Highlanders, manufactured in Indiana, are being purchased by Australians.

It seems a safe bet that American workers can learn to build chips like Taiwan if they can learn to build cars like Japan. But Japanese carmakers started trying to teach American workers their tricks in the late 1980s, TSMC has barely started trying. According to Viola Zhou’s article, TSMC is not even capable of talking to American workers:

Nearly all communication at Fab 18 [in Arizona ] was conducted in Taiwanese and Mandarin Chinese. Technical terms and images were hard to decipher.

One American engineer attempted to translate documents by copying Chinese text into a handwriting recognition program because Google for employees was prohibited from uploading work documentation to the site. It was n’t very effective because managers turned down Americans ‘ participation in higher-level discussions held in Mandarin…

Language barriers are the very earliest thing that companies have to overcome when they build factories overseas. It’s still very early to say that TSMC ca n’t even communicate in English.

It’s absurd to claim that TSMC’s American factories are a “debacle” just because there was a small delay at the beginning is irrelevant. Foreign direct investment is a long, winding, arduous journey. It’s not the kind of situation where we should anticipate that everything will work out flawlessly the first time.

However, challenges like this one are not viewed through the mystique of East Asian culture. Cross- country cultural differences are real but they are n’t as impactful on business as people like to think. Humans have the ability to learn.

This article, Noah Smith’s Noahpinion, was originally published on Noah Smith’s Substack, and it is now republished with kind permission. Read the&nbsp, original and become a Noahopinion&nbsp, subscriber&nbsp, here.

Continue Reading

AI’s rapid evolution | FinanceAsia

Asian listed technology stocks outperformed world indices in 2023. While lingering geopolitical worries and supply chain constraints muffled the industry’s early year outlook, the sector was buoyed by the near overnight mass adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI).

The release of user-friendly chatbots found an immediate audience. Within two months of its official launch, ChatGPT reached 100 million monthly active users, making it the fastest-growing consumer application in history, according to Similarweb data. The popularity of the OpenAI-designed chatbot spurred other notable rivals, including Google’s Bard and graphic designer Midjourney. AI systems are now capable of producing digital art designs, college-level essays and software coding – all in just a matter of seconds.

Unsure which generative AI platform will ultimately reign supreme, investors have been adopting a “picks and shovels” approach, a mining analogy favouring equipment makers. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index returned almost 50% in 2023. Asian tech companies followed, with the MSCI AC Asia Pacific Information Technology Index rallying more than a fifth, compared to a 10% gain for the MSCI World Index.

Looking into 2024, there is little to believe tech’s outperformance will reverse, said Mazen Salhab, chief market strategist, MENA for BDSwiss, speaking to FinanceAsia. Salhab foresees the trend continuing beyond the next 12 months, considering the urgency for corporations to leverage innovative technologies capable of addressing headwinds such as tightening labour dynamics and higher costs.

Given its technological reach, experts see generative AI’s transformative properties creating significant economic value across a spectrum of industries. Bloomberg Intelligence predicts generative AI sales to reach $1.3 trillion over the next decade from a market size of $40 billion in 2022, representing a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 42%, with rising demand for AI products adding $280 billion in new software revenues. 

These numbers are hard to ignore, explained Hong Kong-based Robert Zhan, director of financial risk management for KPMG China, to FA. He added that companies harnessing AI would not only establish a competitive advantage for themselves, but would also unlock substantial client and shareholder values, enriching the entire business ecosystem.

Concentrated gains

Yet, despite the broad-based optimism, generative AI value creation has been narrowly focussed with select names. The market cap of US-listed Nvidia, the graphic processing unit (GPU) chipmaker behind chatbots like ChatGPT, tripled in 2023, breaching the trillion-dollar level and quickly becoming the industry’s benchmark for AI sentiment.

The excitement surrounding AI pushed Nvidia’s current price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to 120 times, compared to Nasdaq’s market multiple of just 25 times, with analysts justifying AI premiums due to the sector’s rising income profile and robust sales outlook. While historical productivity cycles have often inflated speculative prices, even at the current trading multiples, Salhab doesn’t believe an asset bubble exists, arguing that visible efficiency gains are set to materialise in the near future.

Timing when those AI-related gains appear is riddled with obstacles for asset allocators. Chip designer Arm Holdings, which listed on the Nasdaq in September 2023, has been trading with a P/E as much of 200 times, nearly double that of Nvidia’s, reflecting the widening gap investors are assigning to companies with AI linked revenues.

Despite the elevated valuations, fund managers see generative AI investments as just one catalyst for the tech sector. 

The outlook is particularly promising for semiconductors, said Matthew Cioppa, co-portfolio manager of Franklin Templeton’s technology fund, in a conversation with FA. Cioppa highlights ongoing drivers such as proliferating demand for electric vehicles, internet of things (IoT), and cloud computing, noting that these technologies are at the early growth stages of their innovation, offering catalysts for semiconductor stocks.

The politics of chips 

There are also many political considerations for AI investors. 

As semiconductors serve as the underlying hardware for AI, experts say the technology will inevitably always be related to political decisions that can quickly rattle markets. In October 2023, the US tightened export controls on advanced chip sales to China, hampering Beijing’s AI ambitions and fuelling US-Sino tensions ahead of the US 2024 presidential election.

The US-China trade dispute has diminished the Chinese semiconductor market for US suppliers, acknowledged Cioppa. Although he argues that export restrictions are already priced into the market, Cioppa believes that the political fallout linked to semiconductor chips and AI technology remains a volatile factor that can never be ignored, especially when the world’s two largest economies are directly involved.

Nvidia’s share price has bucked the trend. While the company has thus far overcome trading hurdles by offering alternative chips, that balancing act appears vulnerable following the group’s third-quarter earnings announcement which mentioned a more challenging operating environment ahead. That caution is now being echoed by Nvidia’s Chinese customers who are also concerned about their own generative AI aspirations.

In late November 2023, e-commerce giant Alibaba reversed its decision to spin off its Cloud Intelligence Group, citing the US export controls of advanced Nvidia chips, while China’s Tencent said it would look to domestic semiconductor manufacturers to meet its demand. Even as Nvidia coordinates with the US government on developing approved chip designs compliant with the existing rules, the outcome and timing of decisions remains unclear.

This matters for any technical development, said KPMG’s Zhan. “[Because] geopolitics impacts which AI vendor is selected, companies will be cautious to ensure they meet local regulatory requirements, particularly across data privacy and security.”

Rapid development of Chinese-produced semiconductors may test market sentiment if incumbents like Nvidia underestimate those capabilities. While supply may meet chip demand in the current market, Nvidia believes those alternatives may not provide sufficient computing power to train the next generation of AI systems, as stated in the earnings report.

Technological challenges are also occurring alongside policymaker efforts to incubate a regulatory landscape that supports AI platforms without derailing its potential. In October 2023, London initiated a summit aimed at establishing an AI oversight committee, but soon discovered that Washington had similar intentions, reflecting a lost coordination opportunity. 

What regulations are ultimately introduced is uncertain, but it’s anticipated that numerous discussions and obstacles will arise in the years ahead, said Zhan. When asked what type of regulation works best, he shared: “I would like to compare AI to a human. Right now, AI technology is still in its infancy, so it makes sense that it should get more supervision and more controls to help it learn and grow. But as AI matures and learns, such controls should adjust proportionately according to the risk.”

It is a sentiment underscored by Franklin Templeton’s Cioppa, who said that “over time a combination of sovereign regulatory frameworks and private market solutions would effectively provide AI guardrails as not to stifle innovation or make it too difficult for smaller companies to compete with the mega cap companies on any advancements.”

2024 outlook

The uncertainties facing AI investors for the year ahead are magnified by higher capital costs such as elevated interest expenses as central bankers grapple with inflation, and also the increasing need for expensive data centres.

It will be interesting to see how AI stocks’ performance compare to non-tech companies in an overall weaker investment environment. Any company looking to bring AI into their businesses will have an expensive journey which could weigh on their earnings’ outlook.

As the market undergoes tapering, venture capital and private equity firms are adjusting their expectations. Hong Kong-based Alex Wong, head of M&A advisory at FTI Capital Advisors, told FA:

“Our clients, particularly those considering Hong Kong initial public offerings (IPOs), have recalibrated their expectations. Impacted by the weaker local market, some are exploring various alternatives at reduced exit valuations. Others are studying different listing venues, or altogether, deferring IPO plans and choosing direct exit strategies like trade sales.”

For fund managers preparing for the year ahead, these factors may bode well again for Asia’s technology stocks over non-tech names, particularly innovative companies backed by reliable cash flows and visible dividend payouts to shareholders. For investors that may mean holding onto 2023’s winner in 2024.

Peter Choi, a senior analyst at Vontobel, favours firms such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), the largest constituent for MSCI AC Asia Pacific Information Technology Index which returned more than a third to investors last year, highlighting that TMSC powers AI businesses not only for Nvidia, but also for tech giants such as Google and Microsoft.

Yet, no matter which AI-related companies lead stock market returns, the generative AI attention will unlikely fade, explained Andrew Pearson, managing director of Intellligencia, an AI and analytics company in Hong Kong and Macau.  

“Fundamentally, generative AI is anything that can be imagined even if it doesn’t currently exist, making it good marketing material inside a PowerPoint presentation or even a book,” said Pearson, who recently published The Dead Chip Syndicate. Ominously, he added: “There will always be an audience for something that carries a 10% chance of destroying the human race. It is too big to disregard at this point.”

For investors, there may be a sense of irony by sticking to the same investment strategy in 2024, as arguably the most prudent approach to capture the market upside for a constantly evolving technology, is to repeat what has worked before. Will this trade work again? We will find out over the next 12 months.

This article first appeared in the print publication Volume One 2024 of Finance Asia.


¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

How Moody’s new affiliate VIS Rating will boost the development of Vietnam’s local corporate bond market | FinanceAsia

Southeast Asia’s thriving economies, including Vietnam, will continue to fuel growth in the region’s developing domestic corporate bond markets. In particular, Vietnam’s local corporate bond market is set to get a boost with the recent launch of a new local credit rating agency (CRA) in the country by Moody’s and several leading local financial institutions.

“Moody’s has long recognised the pivotal role that domestic bond markets play in financing investments to propel growth not only in Southeast Asian economies but also the broader Asia region,” said Wendy Cheong, managing director and regional head of APAC, Moody’s Investors Service. She added, “Over the years, we have formed domestic strategic alliances in China, India, Korea and Malaysia with local CRAs that have actively contributed to the sustainable expansion and advancement of their bond markets.”

Wendy Cheong, MD and regional head of APAC, Moody’s Investors Service

More recently, Moody’s has made another bold commitment to its domestic strategy. In September, it formally launched Vietnam Investors Service And Credit Rating Agency Joint Stock Company (VIS Rating) in partnership with several leading local financial institutions in Vietnam. Moody’s is the largest minority shareholder of the domestic CRA. VIS Rating is Moody’s first investment in a greenfield CRA in a frontier market.

“VIS Rating is ready to support the development of efficient and liquid debt capital markets in Vietnam with the aim of providing independent, best-in-class rating services to corporate bond issuers in the country,” said Tran Le Minh, managing director of VIS Rating. He added, “At the same time, we will continue to draw on Moody’s global expertise and deep insights to introduce best practices to the domestic market.”

Tran Le Minh, MD, VIS Rating

Moody’s firm commitment rides on the back of the large growth potential of Southeast Asia’s (ex-Singapore) economies and domestic corporate bond markets, including Vietnam. Over 2017-2022, the region’s local bond markets collectively recorded a cumulative annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.4% and are now almost triple the size of the cross-border market in terms of issuance volume. Domestic corporate bond issuance volumes have returned to pre-Covid levels at about $140 billion in 2022[1]. Meanwhile, on a macroeconomic level, the region’s GDP accounts for 12% of Asia’s emerging markets and grew at 4.8% CAGR over 2017-2022.

Moreover, multinationals are scouring Southeast Asia, including Vietnam, to diversify their supply chains amid elevated geopolitical tensions. Given Southeast Asia’s large consumer base and infrastructure development needs, the region’s economies are set to expand further. Vietnam is no exception. Moody’s projects the economy will grow faster than most peers[2] in Southeast Asia through 2024.

Furthermore, the country’s local bond market has large room to grow with outstanding corporate bonds consisting of just 13% of GDP as of August 2023. This level comes after brisk growth of 30% CAGR over 2017-2022. As Vietnam’s domestic corporate bond market develops, credit ratings and research will play a meaningful role by helping companies access new sources of capital, diversify their funding base, enhance market transparency, as well as maintain investor confidence during times of market stress.

“In Vietnam, VIS Rating is well placed to empower bond market participants with informed decision-making through its independent domestic credit ratings,” said Tran. He added, “Our activities such as joint events with Moody’s, foundational and market educational outreach will help deepen Vietnam’s credit culture and bring value to local market participants.”

Leveraging Moody’s global best practices and extensive capabilities, VIS Rating has built out its ratings and research function. These include developing its rating methodologies; publishing research reports; engaging in market outreach through podcasts, media interviews and industry events; as well as developing its own database and ratings platform.

VIS Rating outreach activity with market participants

“For Moody’s, VIS Rating not only broadens our network of domestic partners in Asia but also complements our cross-border coverage,” said Cheong. She added “Since we first assigned a sovereign rating to Vietnam in 1997, we have grown to become the leading global rating agency in terms of cross-border coverage in the country.”

Beyond ratings, Moody’s continues to harness its global insights and local expertise to offer timely and high-quality research on Vietnam. For example, it has been hosting its annual Inside ASEAN investor conference virtually and in-person in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City since 2016.

As Vietnam’s domestic bond market flourishes, Moody’s is undoubtedly there for the long haul. It remains committed to providing talent and technical support to VIS Rating as the company embarks on an exciting journey to become the country’s rating agency of choice. 


[1] Source: Moody’s, AsianBondsOnline, BIS, Securities and Exchange Board of India.

[2] Source: Moody’s sovereign report, titled, “Government of Vietnam – Ba2 stable: Update following change in economic strength score and GDP forecasts” published 13 July 2023.

 

¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Exclusive interview with Paul Yang, BNP Paribas CEO for Asia Pacific | FinanceAsia

Paris-headquartered BNP Paribas boasts a history of over 160 years in Asia and today, it draws upon a 20,000-strong team that is active in thirteen markets across the continent.

The regional effort is led by Paul Yang, who ascended to role of CEO for Asia Pacific in December 2020, as the world succumbed to the full throes of the beginnings of a three-year pandemic. As society grappled with widespread affliction, Asia’s key economies responded to rapidly evolving government direction with fervour: leaving borders closed and markets shaken.

However, as you will discover through this exclusive interview, Yang was defiant in his refusal to be beset by external challenges. Proving himself an astute leader at the regional helm, he navigated the uncertain scenario deftly, and would go on to secure solid returns for both full-year 2021 and 2022; as well as robust revenue for the first quarter of 2023.

With a view to steering the bank’s business in support of the group’s Growth, Technology and Sustainability (GTS) strategy for 2025, FinanceAsia sought Yang’s take on Asia as a key international powerhouse, and learned about the milestones of his international career to date.

Entering Asia

BNP Paribas’ forerunner, the Comptoir National d’Escompte de Paris (CNEP), was set up by France’s finance minister following the hardships endured during the French Revolution; to curb mass bankruptcy in the financial markets; and to stimulate the economy. 

Following signature of a free trade agreement with the British, the Comptoir sought to develop an international strategy to source the raw materials required to support the flourishment of European industry. To do so, it extended beyond its French national borders for the first time; establishing offices in Calcutta and Shanghai in 1860, independent of foreign partnership.

Later, CNEP merged with the Banque Nationale pour le commerce et l’industrie (BNCI) to form the Banque Nationale de Paris (BNP). Capitalising on these regional capabilities, the bank made Hong Kong the centre of its Asian platform.

Q: Paul, you’ve been based in Asia Pacific for the majority of your career with BNP Paribas. Can you share what has defined BNP’s corporate journey in Asia so far?

A: Well, I wasn’t there in the 1860s, but it’s true that we have had a very long presence in the region. However, I consider “modern” BNP’s presence to be quite recent. It was really the bank’s merger in 2000 that created who we are today, elevating us as France – and then Europe’s – leading financial group and the most profitable bank in the eurozone.

But regarding Asia, we’re proud to be able to say that we’ve been here for a long time, which demonstrates our commitment to the region.

In Hong Kong, for instance, we often deal with multiple family generations of entrepreneurs and tycoons. The same is the case for some of our mid-cap clients – we have dealt with their fathers. We have built a sufficient network in the region to be able to play a key role in executing succession plans and building businesses for the future.  It really means something that we’ve been here for so long and to be profitable in all of the 13 markets where we operate.

These days, being relevant to your clients counts. You need a strong balance sheet, presence and scale to guide key them from their home markets into new areas. This is how we started, building our financial institutions group (FIG), then multinational and corporate (MNC) franchises,before further progressing to build scale, solutions, products and platforms.

We have developed a strong Asian presence and over the last three years, we’ve built on connectivity to improve the flows between the various corridors we participate in. We are relevant to key local participants and accompany international clients in reverse, also.

This goes for all facets of our business: whether in the corporate and institutional world, or in consumer finance. We are bigger than the sum of our parts and many things we do have relevant purpose for our clients.

Q: How does the bank’s business in Asia compare to that of the European markets (e.g. France, Italy, Belgium and Luxembourg)?

A: Understandably, our stronghold is Europe and we are significant as well in America. But overall, Asia represents a sizable portion of group business.

The bank’s longevity and strong heritage in Asia Pacific, coupled with our integrated business model places us in good stead to extend and reinforce our presence in this growth region.

In this regard, BNP Paribas’ Asia Pacific revenue contribution to the group’s corporate and institutional business is about 20%; and it will continue to grow.

Ultimately, the bank is emerging as a leading player in the region – and this brings us to a better position to aim for larger deals and more ambitious goals.

In this respect, we have grown our market share in our regions – for example, we hold dominance in markets such as Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong in the wealth management space, and we have recently launched an onshore wealth capability in Thailand. Asset management is developing; and our insurance business – Compagnie d’Assurance et d’Investissement de France (Cardif), has also been successful.

Where we do not have underlying domestic market strength, we choose to partner. We are humble enough to realise that sometimes it is better to do so. For example, in Asia, on the insurance side of the business we have partnered with local banking distributors. We started exploring this type of partnership around 25 years ago in markets such as Taiwan, Japan and Korea, and we are building up our strength in China, India and Southeast Asia.

The same goes for the retail side – personal finance. In 2005, we became a strategic shareholder of Bank of Nanjing in China and we are now their single largest shareholder with a 15.7% stake. 

We have built core business through partnerships, but where we think that we can control the entire business because it’s part of our DNA, is on the wealth management and corporate institutional banking (CIB) sides.

Q: What are the bank’s strategic priorities across Asia over the short and long term?

A: We are a bank that tries to deliver short-term results alongside long-term goals. Long-term relationships are part of our nature from a strategy perspective, and we are not in the business of pursuing rash opportunities when things look great and then making drastic cuts in a down cycle. We have a long-term vision and try to cultivate trust and relationships with this timeframe in mind.

From a short-term perspective, we have targets around our top line to maintain cost discipline and ensure that we invest for the future. We are intrinsically risk-aware and we insist on having a good mix of new blood and older experience, to move forward prudently.

Diversification is key. When you pursue disciplined growth, you avoid temptation, fashion and fad and consequentially, mistakes. Across all markets and products, we want to be positioned as the number one European bank for CIB, the preferred partner for wealth management, insurance and asset management – and we are not far from achieving this goal. 

Asia comprises a mix of developed and developing markets. Whether you look at the position we have in Japan, Australia, or Korea – or across more emerging business hubs such as Southeast Asia or China, we are well positioned there for our clients and we generate good returns.

Some of our peers will concentrate their presence at a particular local base, say in hubs. But we do not believe in guaranteeing strong, underlying growth simply by sitting in Hong Kong and Singapore and flying bankers all over the place.

The creation of local platforms is important. We have been building these in a considered manner across Southeast Asia, Taiwan, mainland China and elsewhere for the past decade and we are able to see the results. For example, we recently complemented our business mix with a securities licence in China. Once we have completed the takeover of several prime brokerage businesses from our competitors, we will see an increase in the equity cash portion of our business mix. Then there’s the joint venture (JV) we secured with the Agricultural Bank of China, which is the largest bank in the market by network and with whom we’ll be structuring investment products for retail clients.

Q: Diversification is a theme that has emerged from the pandemic to build business resilience. But are there any particular geographies or sectors that stand out as offering growth opportunity?

A: We’ve seen some volatility in the banking sector, but as a group, our corporate culture has focussed on development in a very diversified way. In terms of resilience, this sets us apart.

If you look at our group results, you will see that around 50% of our business is in the domestic retail and consumer finance market;

a third is in CIB; and over 15% is concentrated on activities such as asset gathering – from private banking to asset management and insurance. Within CIB, there’s also security services, which might not have a great cost income, but involves limited capital consumption and brings recurrent fees.

This percentage mix has been kept stable as we’ve grown across all areas and however you slice and dice our business, you will always see diversification. It’s the same for our client base – we not only serve financial institution clients but also corporates and high net worth individuals (HNWI). These three pillars are quite well balanced and offer us the means to build a sufficient product platform.

Capital market activities, including equity capital markets (ECM), debt capital markets (DCM), fundraising and advisory services can be volatile and event-driven; while another big portion of our business and effort is in transaction banking: following the flow of finance, supply chains, trade finance and cash management activities.

The interest rate surge of the last 12 -18 months has been very much beneficial to the cash management business, while monoliners who rely only on investment banking, have suffered. We have benefitted. Whatever way the world or region goes, we are naturally hedged.

Across the Asian region, our presence differentiates us from the rest. We are more than 2,500 in Hong Kong, have 2,200 in Singapore, plus a solid foothold in Japan where we’ve ranked consistently within the top five thanks to our leadership in the global macro environment, both in fixed income currencies and commodities (FICC) and across equity and credit.

In Australia, we have a dominant position in the custodian business that we started 20 years ago; we do well in China, and then we have strong ambition in India and Southeast Asia. I cannot see any market where there isn’t potential.

Q: How do you aim to grow the Asian business?

A: In the past, we have grown organically – even when we looked to secure Deutsche Bank’s prime brokerage business in 2019, it was not a typical acquisition. They were trying to expand in terms of platforms and wanted to lighten up their equity business. Meanwhile, in July 2021, we acquired another 51% of Exane, the top-rated equity research business, following a successful 17-year partnership where we had held 49%.

Both deals demonstrated ambition and keenness to complement the building blocks of our equity business.

So yes, our focus is organic over external growth. We feel it’s better to rely on organic opportunity.

Q: Which developments excite you across sustainability?

A: We’ve been involved in sustainability for over a decade, having started our sustainable finance forum (SFF) in Singapore seven years ago. I’m happy to see that what was a niche market is now very much mainstream.

I would say we have been dominating the ESG thematic, especially when it comes to corporate social responsibility (CSR). We’ve exited from carbon-heavy energy, have moved towards renewables, and we are working to lighten up our upstream exposure. It’s pleasing that every year we do more, whether green bonds, sustainable loans or other structures. We are among the top three banks in the space and even if we cannot manage to stay number one, our efforts make a positive impact across society.

Last year, we created a group of more than 150 bankers, the Low Carbon Transition Group (LCTG), to support our clients’ energy transitions. We’re experienced, so are not having to start from scratch and can support those corporates who might not know where to begin.

We recently held an electric vehicle (EV) conference where we gathered more than 300 clients, corporates and investors in Hong Kong. The topic sits well with what we want to do in the sector around mobility as an engine for growth and we think we can bring value-add to our clients.

EV adoption figures are impressive. In 2019, they accounted for 2.2% of the global total in cars sold, and rose to 13% last year. In China, the penetration figures are double. We’ve seen how this market can surprise everybody regarding adoption of new technologies. China did it with internet access, the smartphone, payments, and now EV. It’s exciting.

Q: You started in the IT department, held positions in Paris, Taipei and Hong Kong, before taking on Asia Pacific leadership at the height of the pandemic. What has shaped your career?

A: You’re right, I took the helm of the region in the middle of the pandemic. I was very fortunate to have been based in Asia for more than 20 years, so I knew the people, the teams, key clients and our platforms, which helped tremendously. During the pandemic, we adopted new technologies and forms of digital communication to stay close to our clients. We succeeded and the vast majority of our clients did also.

I think I’ve been lucky. I started in IT – I’m not sure I was good enough to stay in it, but my first business trip was to Hong Kong. I loved the place and dreamed of how amazing it would be to be based there. Thirty years later, here I am.

Like everybody, I’ve worked hard, but I was very fortunate, and at times, daring. When I wanted to switch from IT to credit, people said “No, Paul. We like you very much, but please don’t do something stupid. You already have a promising future.”

My response was to ask for a chance. I was curious to learn and probably would have gone elsewhere if I hadn’t been given opportunity. Fear around not succeeding makes you try harder and you don’t want to disappoint the people who see something in you.

A few years in, I moved from credit to corporate banking, where I was offered a great job in China – everybody wanted to be in China, but interestingly, it was a bit early – nobody was ready to do much there. So, I transferred to Taiwan to lead the corporate banking team and learned management on the ground. Doing quite well, I was later promoted to head of the territory and then after, moved to Hong Kong. That was 18 years ago!

For me, it’s been a combination of hard work, opportunity, luck and meeting the right senior people to support my development.

One memory that stands out was when the bank appointed a Hong Kong local to lead Greater China. It was a big move, as previously, the standard was someone French and male, but a Hong Kong woman took on the role and I worked for her for many years, learning from her insights. She believed in me and offered me the support to grow.

Q: What’s been the biggest highlight of your career to date?

A: This is difficult! But a key milestone was being given the opportunity to move from IT to banking. I’ve always liked a challenge – from coding, to implementing new tech systems and platforms, to what I do today.

I’ve seen many different things in my career and I have always been very curious. I’ve really cherished every opportunity I’ve had.

I’ve been very happy in the organisation and even today, it’s meaningful to partner with faces old and new. Back in 2004-2005, I had the opportunity to build a partnership in China. After much research, we invested in the Bank of Nanjing, which, two years later, was the first City Commercial Bank to list. There are many board members who I know well. It’s great for both them and me – it’s nice that our professional focus involves making core connections. It’s meaningful.

Q : If you weren’t in banking, what do you think you’d be doing?  

A : Very early on, I think we all wanted to be football players! For France or Argentina – the recent World Cup rivals!

Sometimes I reflect and think I would have been pretty good at teaching. But whatever alternate path I would have taken, it would have involved international opportunity.

I grew up first in Taiwan before moving to France and it was at that point that I knew that I wanted to see the world and find opportunity to do so.

Of course, these days, when I look at my daughter evolving, I can see that there is a lot of opportunity ahead for her, more so than when I was young.  

¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Sustainable Leaders series: Ayala’s path to an ESG driven business | FinanceAsia

With several ESG-backed initiatives in recent years, the Philippines-based conglomerate Ayala has solidified its commitment to sustainability. Operating across verticals including energy, finance, infrastructure, and real estate, Ayala has committed to net zero greenhouse emissions by 2050. The conglomerate’s energy wing ACEN recently created the world’s first energy transition mechanism (ETM) in November 2022, backed by BPI and RCBC.

On the social front, Ayala’s GCash app and BPI’s BanKo have  played pivotal roles in financial inclusion for unbanked Filipinos and small to medium size enterprises. BPI and Globe are currently reviewing their framework to consciously focus on these areas.

When it comes to governance, Ayala’s boards are working towards an appropriate level of diversity and independence. This involves maintaining high standards when it comes to transparency and disclosure.

The 190-year-old company’s social and sustainability initiatives have a long history. Albert de Larrazabal, CFO at Ayala Corporation said, “We have always aligned ourselves to national interest and had very high standards of governance and stewardship. As we must be mindful of the ecosystems we operate under, ESG in various forms has always been part of our value proposition.”

Ayala’s approach to ESG

Today, ESG-based financing is a priority for Ayala. Apart from ACEN’s implementation of the world’s first ETM, Ayala has issued a social bond with the IFC in support of its cancer hospital. Larrazabal said, “We are looking to do KPI-linked social and ESG financing, which incorporates targets into the commercial terms and conditions of the loan.”

Even during the M&A process, the conglomerate is mindful of integrating new acquisitions into its ESG framework. Ayala has also taken steps to ensure that ESG is a priority that is ingrained at the highest levels of the organisation, leveraging its membership with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). The conglomerate’s board has received training which ensures they can play an active role in tracking and monitoring developments in the ESG space.

Corporates making public commitments to sustainability draw a lot of attention, not all of it positive. Asked how Ayala approaches concerns about greenwashing, Larrazabal said, “Sometimes it happens inadvertently because of incorrect measurements. That’s why we brought in South Pole. We have taken steps to ensure we are on the right track by committing to independent verification, to give people a degree of reassurance.”

Building a model for the APAC region

While the need for sustainable leaders is strongly felt across APAC, many countries in the region have a minimal contribution to emissions — the Philippines emits half the global average on a per capita basis. Larrazabal said, “Between 80% to 88% of our emissions — depending on individual businesses — are scope 3.” These emissions are defined as the result of activities from assets not owned or controlled by a reporting organisation, but which are a part of its value chain. Larrazabal said, “Our scope 3 is somebody else’s scope 1 and scope 2. We need an environment that enables, incentivises, and if that fails, penalises those who disregard scope 1 and 2.”

Many emerging markets grapple with issues similar to those facing the Philippines — adopting renewable energy, while meeting the demands of a growing population and economy. As a result, ETM-like arrangements may be embraced to a greater extent. Asked for his advice on managing such a transaction, Eric Francia, president and CEO at ACEN said, “It is important for investors to reconsider their position on coal, so long as the principles are well understood. One may be investing in a coal plant, but for a good purpose, which is enabling its early retirement.”

Offering a financial perspective on the ETM, TG Limcaoco, president and CEO Bank of Philippine Islands added, “We provided lending and brought in other institutions. We took reduced rates of returns for equity and debt exposure, which allowed us to shorten the life of the plant by 10 to 15 years. It is a big win for everyone involved.”

For more on Ayala’s adoption of ESG and a deeper insight into the world’s first ever ETM, please watch the accompanying video.

 

 

¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading