A private school in Singapore installed a tiny camera in the roof of a bathroom for the handicapped, with the intention of spying on others in their personal act.
Because his wife was expecting, the 26-year-old man wanted to use the illegal footage to satisfy his sexual desires, but he only managed to capture the female colleague’s victim.
The accused, a Malaysian, was sentenced to seven weeks ‘ jail on Wednesday ( Feb 19 ) after he pleaded guilty to one count of voyeurism.  ,
To safeguard the victim’s personality, he may get named.  ,
The accused had been employed by the school since Feb. 3, 2023, where his responsibilities included maintaining college amenities.  ,
In order to track down other people who use a crippled toilet, he made the decision to install a tiny camera to monitor them while they were working.  ,
He had the gadget delivered to his Malaysian residence after purchasing it from an e-commerce system in December 2024.  ,
On Jan 16, 2025, the accused went to work, bringing the lens with him.  ,
The guy went to the impaired bathroom with a ladder to mount the cameras at around 3.27pm under the pretense of carrying out his estate management-related duties.
He inserted a strength bank and a tiny camera into the ceiling with a screwdriver to make the hole bigger.  , He finally concealed the opening with masking tape.  ,
A female colleague who was using the same bathroom at around 4.05 p.m. noticed the gap and tape on the ceiling.  ,
The partner found the lens after inspecting the hole and was alarmed. He made a problem, and a group of university employees cut off the area for investigation.  ,
A police report was filed on Jan 20, 2025 leading to the accused’s imprisonment three days later. He had not been discovered, according to court records.  ,
The prosecution said that a “robust sentence” was needed to deter other like-minded offenders and that , there had been” significant intrusion” on the victim’s privacy as his private parts were captured in the video.  ,
The accused abused his position as property management commander, as he was able to bring a rope with him without arousing suspicion according to his place, added the prosecutors, who also pointed out the accused’s premeditation in the offence.  ,
Even though the target had been recorded, the accused had been unable to watch the footage because the cameras had been found within an hour, according to the accused’s attorney, Don Tan.  ,
Additionally, everything came to light that the accused had targeted the target.  ,
While the prosecutors said the victim had been alarmed, there was no proof that he had suffered lasting personal injury, such as sadness, Mr Tan added.  ,
The defense attorney likewise argued for his client’s punishment discount because of his first appeal of grief, which saved the judge time and resources.  ,
For pornography, the accused could have been jailed for up to two years, or fined, or caned, or any blend of the sanctions.  ,