PUBLISHED: 25 Apr 2024 at 04: 00
House Speaker Wan Muhamad Noor Matha stated that propositions for charter amendments may be put on the plan until a vote is held to ask for voters ‘ approval for a new contract to get written.
Mr. Wan Noor addressed questions regarding a particular House program that is scheduled to be called for the first reading of the finances expenses for the 2025 fiscal year while addressing questions about whether other significant pieces of legislation will be taken into account during the particular session.
The new parliament is scheduled to convene on July 3rd, despite the fact that it is currently in corner. The budget costs for the 2025 fiscal year, which begins this October, is likely to be deliberated in a particular program the following month or in June.
But, Mr. Wan Noor claimed that ideas for new charter amendments may be put up for a House controversy because the state is legally required to hold a vote to ask voters whether they would like to see a new contract. The second referendum is scheduled for around July, according to the preliminary timeframe.
There is no guarantee that any ideas for mandate amendments may get put on the House’s agenda, but they will be accepted if they are submitted. Parliament’s legitimate office will examine the material first, he insisted.
It will be a waste of time, he said, “if the House money with the consideration of the law article ideas and the procedure is discovered to go against the Constitutional Court’s decision.”
The government agreed on Tuesday in theory to hold three referendums on a new charter, with the first scheduled for the end of July or the beginning of August.
That would be the question of whether or not the electorate may approve of Sections 1 and 2 being included in a new contract. Thailand is described in Chapter 1 as a single, unbroken, political country with the King as head of state, while Chapter 2 contains chapters on aristocratic privilege.
If the majority of voters decides, a second election will be held to determine whether Part 256 should be amended to allow for the creation of a new contract. When a new contract is produced, the government may hold a second vote, asking voters to choose whether it should be adopted.
The first referendum question, which involves Chapters 1 and 2, may be controversial, according to the Move Forward Party ( MFP)’s ( MPP ) request yesterday.
Parit Wacharasindhu, an Stock list member and spokesman, wrote on Twitter that the government should choose a question with no restrictions, such as “if voters support the draft of a fresh charter.”
MFP head Chaithawat Tulathon claimed yesterday that some federal figures were attempting to imply that the MFP is opposed to the proposed vote question by demanding that Chapters 1 and 2 be changed.
” This is untrue. We’re talking about a process, which is the remainder may be up for change if the electricity belongs to the people”, he said.
Nevertheless, Chusak Sirinil, a member of the Pheu Thai list and former chief executive, stated yesterday that the government may choose when to deal with the proposed revisions to the Referendum Act 2021.
He claimed that the ruling party has already submitted its edition to the House, but that it would be decided whether or not the state may create its own version because the government had agreed to alter the rules.
He was referring to the commission’s walk on Tuesday.
The “double bulk” law, which requires more than 50 % of eligible voters to cast ballots, may be amended to make it applicable to the Referendum Act 2021.