The army, led by prosecutor Andre Jumabhoy, even completed its cross-examination of each see. Mr. Jumabhoy had repeatedly attempted to undermine Ms. Khan’s legitimacy by highlighting contradictions in her information. He also , characterised the original WP part as a phony who told lies “non-stop”.  ,
Mr. Jumabhoy has attempted to obfuscate holes in the two WP functionaries ‘ stories by highlighting contradictions in their information.  ,
The defense said it would submit written proposals at the conclusion of the prosecution’s case, arguing that the defense had no case for the defense to answer for the first cost but not the second demand. Eventually, it submitted written arguments contending that Singh has no event to answers for both costs.  ,
Judge Tan had also requested that both parties address him regarding the language used in the Singh claims. He pointed out that Singh’s trade with the COP before the COP contained some words that were not present in Singh’s statements.
The trial claimed in its written arguments that the current charges were unnecessary and that Singh should be represented by the court. But, it proposed amendments if the jury feel the need to update the charges.  ,
Judge Tan and the trial both agreed that the current costs met the requirements of the law and that no changes were required after reading both sides ‘ arguments.  ,
Singh was subsequently asked to testify on the witness stand.
The trial’s next phase is scheduled to continue until November 13.  ,
For each cost, Singh faces a maximum prison term of three times, a fine of up to S$ 7, 000, or both.  ,