PUBLISHED: 6 Jan 2025 at 19: 16
The Pheu Thai Party believes that the government, the opposition, and Senate whips can come to an agreement on a proposed charter amendment that would establish a charter drafting assembly ( CDA ) that would be in charge of creating a new constitution” soon.”
On Tuesday, Pheu Thai’s MPs are scheduled to meet to decide whether to send its edition of the plan, which primarily addresses Section 256 of the constitution.
The part explains the steps and needs for a legal article.
Pheu Thai’s edition, if approved, may involve the creation of a 200-member CDA, whose people are picked from several groups from across the nation, before an article can continue.
From January 14 to January 15, Parliament is scheduled to examine different law act bills section by section. Its president, Wan Muhamad Noor Matha, said he would include the People Party’s ( PP ) proposal to amend Section 256 to set up the CDA.
Chousak Sirinil, the deputy head of Pheu Thai, stressed the necessity of creating the CDA on Monday, claiming that the law drafting assembly will not need to take section-by-section reviews of amendment proposals.
” I believe the government, criticism and Senate whip will discuss and agree on the subject”, said Mr Chousak, who likewise serves as the Prime Minister’s Office Minister.  ,
He also said that general government punch, Wisut Chainarun, will determine when the authorities, criticism and Senate whips did meet to discuss the issue.
In response to rumors that Pheu Thai MPs won’t help the PP’s expenses, Mr. Chousak said that any group should be allowed to make a proposal to amend Section 256.  ,
In a Twitter post on Monday, PP list-MP Parit Wacharasindhu noted that despite Pheu Thai’s frequent criticism of the PP’s force to amend the constitution, several of its ideas are similar to PP’s.
He then referred to the PP’s plan to replace the law, which requires an act to have the support of at least one-third of the Senate in order to go, and a subsequent drive to have the need replaced with two-thirds assistance from the House of Representatives.
Did you forget that you also suggested removing the requirement when you introduced your personal legislation in the first place in the year, Mr. Parit wrote in the Facebook post.