People’s Party won’t join Sondhi rally

wants to work “inside the technique.”

Parit: Won't hit the streets
Parit: Won’t hit the streets

The main opposition party, the People’s Party ( PP ), announced it would work within the parliamentary system to fulfill its role in Sondhi Limthongkul’s planned anti-government protests.

Parit Wacharasindhu, a PP official, stated on Wednesday that the group would concentrate on the government’s work and use political mechanisms to handle public concerns.

He said that these problems, such as the justice management method, the Khao Kradong property dispute, and the written Memorandum of Understanding on Joint Development in the Gulf of Thailand in 2001, would continue to be examined.

He added that the group would do its best to support laws and reforms by submitting expenses or making constitutional amendment suggestions, many of which were approved by parliament.

Mr. Parit responded to remarks made by the prime minister’s director Nattawut Saikuar, who claimed PP supporters might protest against the schedule.

The PP official dismissed Mr Nattawut’s remarks as debate, saying he had no thought on what it was based.

He insisted that regardless of whether the group supports the issue or no, political expression will not be infringe on political principles.

The party does n’t intend to start up political movements outside of parliament.

He declared,” We’re determined to work within the program to promote shift and control the government.”

This week, Mr. Sondhi, the former leader of the now-defunct People’s Alliance for Democracy ( PAD), revealed his intention to hold regular activities the following year.

Some observers cautioned that these actions could lead to widespread demonstrations against the Pheu Thai-led authorities and even the savage state.

The uprisings of 2006 and 2014 culminated according to Mr. Nattawut, who cited prior demonstrations against the Thai Rak Thai-led authorities and the Pheu Thai management.

On Wednesday, PM’s Office Minister Chousak Sirinil demanded that the people take into account the effects of previous uprisings and yellow-shirt protests, citing them as lessons for the nation.

He claimed that these events caused social unrest, which had a significant impact on the development of the nation.

No discussions under the 2001 MoU were in development, according to Mr. Chousak, adding that there were no restrictions that could cause widespread protests.

He claimed congress would need to review and approve the outcome of the discussions.

” Such a crisis is way behind us, and I do n’t want the country to go back to that point, “he said.

The Pheu Thai Party part dissuaded rumors that the Paetongtarn Shinawatra management would be in trouble.

The government should not mess up, especially when it comes to the controversial charter amendments and the referendum bill, according to Paiboon Nititawan, secretary-general of the Palang Pracharath Party ( PPRP ).

After the Senate won the combined House-Senate board vote last week to keep the dual majority rule necessary to pass a charter amendment referendum, Mr. Chousak said the waiting period for the referendum bill would be much shorter if it was designated as a finance-related law.

Since it has previously supported for a change, the House is likely to support the basic bulk when the invoice is returned for a ballot. In this case a 180-day required” cooling-off time “would use before the bill is passed.

But, if the bill is classified as a finance law, it will be suspended only 10 weeks, instead of 180 days.

According to Mr. Paiboon, the government should adhere to the House Speaker’s ruling that the election expenses is not a financing bill.

He added that he concurred with some experts ‘ predictions that the Paetongtarn authorities might not last for a time.