Petition over ex-premier’s control causing’ cultural turmoil’
The Election Commission’s (EC ) investigation into former premier Thaksin Shinawatra‘s alleged unlawful influence over the government has been downplayed by key coalition parties, who also have criticized the petitioners for causing social unrest.
The EC’s research petitions received criticism from government officials.
The requests assert that Thaksin, acting as an observer, manipulated and unlawfully influenced the Pheu Thai Party and five other events in the previous partnership.
The other parties are the Bhumjaithai Party, United Thai Nation Party, Palang Pracharath Party ( PPRP ), Chartthaipattana Party, and Prachachart Party.
The six group leaders met at Thaksin’s Bangkok house the day after Srettha Thavisin was removed as prime minister, leading to the allegations of undue influence.
The Constitutional Court dismissed him on Aug 14 for appointing Pichit Chuenban, an ex-convict, as PM’s Office Minister in violation of the law. The EC has a 30-day green date for the sensor, according to a cause.
The petitioners– an unnamed individual, Thai Pakdee Party chairman Warong Dechgitvigrom, Ruangkrai Leekitwattana, a member of the PPRP, and Noppharut Worachitwutthikun, a former essential leader of the social group Phirap Khao 2006– asked the EC to consider asking the court to dissolve all six parties for reportedly allowing Thaksin’s influence, which they argue violates Section 28 of the natural law on political parties. Contravention of this area is punishable by a party’s breakdown.
Phumtham Wechayachai, a key figure in the decision Pheu Thai Party and also a deputy prime minister and defense minister, claimed on Saturday that Pheu Thai and the rulers of the five coalition events had merely gathered for a dinner that evening.
He added the Chan Song La property is also the home of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, Thaksin’s youngest child.
Before deciding Chaikasem Nitisiri may take the position, coalition parties and Thaksin discussed potential alternatives for Mr. Srettha at the Aug. 14 meet.
Mr Chaikasem, who is believed to have health problems, is one of two remaining prime ministerial prospects on Pheu Thai’s record. The other is Ms Paetongtarn.
Nevertheless, the following morning, Pheu Thai executives convened an urgent conference and voted for Ms. Paetongtarn to get their prime minister. This resulted in her winning the legislative seat.
Mr Phumtham expressed no worry about the EC’s research. ” We will let the research process to proceed.” But people may be allowed to join occasionally”, he added.
The deputy prime minister added that there should be a cap on the number of requests that can be filed. ” Extreme requests are causing havoc for the state”, Mr Phumtham said.
Bhumjaithai head Anutin Charnvirakul, who is also deputy prime minister and internal minister, also said he was indifferent by the problem.
Chousak Sirinil, the PM’s representative, stated that the government was prepared to respond to the requests. He claimed that Pheu Thai’s vote the day after the meeting on August 14 had overturned the decision, demonstrating there was n’t as much party dominance as Thaksin claimed. Mr Chousak, who is also a Pheu Thai legitimate professional, emphasised this place.
Thepthai Senpong, a former Democrat Party MP, suggested that photos of coalition frontrunners arriving at the Chan Song La home for the Aug. 14 meeting may have influenced the EC’s decision to accept the situation for inspection.
He added that the case may take months and need evidence to be presented in court to support or refute the alleged unlawful impact.