PUBLISHED: 27 Sep 2024 at 04: 00
Many people are looking to report a high-profile online retailer to the police for selling shoddy silver jewelry to customers.
Twenty people who claimed they had been cheated on by Kornkanok Suwannabut and her father, Kanpol Rueng-aram, met yesterday with Pol Col Kraiwit Saenthaweesuk, main investigator of the Consumer Protection Police Division, to pursue legal action against the pair.
Anusorn Asurapong, a attorney representing the 20 plaintiffs, said that at least 135 additional clients were unable to be present to record the police cost yesterday.
Some were living in far apart regions while others were abroad, he said.
According to the attorney, the 155 complainants ‘ damages were estimated to be at least$ 2 million.
One of the 20 accusers claimed that they unsuccessfully tried to contact Bor Win authorities in Chon Buri.
The plaintiff was at fault for not checking the quality of the goods before paying for it, he claimed, and officers refused to file the complaint.
The plaintiff claimed that they had previously decided not to file a complaint or to report it to the media because they feared the pair may reimburse them for defamation.
Further research may be required, according to Pol Col Kraiwit, to determine whether the pair had placed a false advertising.
Ms. Kornkanok and Mr. Kanpol, who are frequently referred to as” Mae Tuck” and” Pa Beer,” are accused of selling gold jewelry with lower silver content than their clients had alleged.
Ms. Kornkanok allegedly sold the jewelry during life events on her cultural media network. According to reports, she claimed that her father owned the jewelry company.
The users, who are believed to amount in their thousands, have flocked to the child’s gold factory in Bangkok to need a refund.
The retailer steadfastly stated that it would only be able to provide a full refund if customers returned the item along with the complimentary items that had been included in the product package.
Some customers reportedly were upset that they had been denied a full compensation, and they were seen tossing the presents back into the store as they left.
Different users opted in to the refunds that were given to them.
Acceptees had to agree to refrain from legal actions against the pair for the jewelry sale in a document.
Additionally, it was reported that some of the silver jewelry’s origins were unidentified, making them unresellable to other stores.