According to a Supreme Administrative Court order, the National Anti-Corruption Commission ( NACC) has agreed to only release two of the three sets of documents that are relevant to its investigation into the luxury wristwatch controversy involving Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwon and activist Veera Somkwamkid.
According to an order issued on April 21 by the court, Mr. Veera, the mind of the Anti-Corruption People’s Network, was to receive the way information within 15 years.
The NACC claimed that after reviewing the courtroom order, it unanimously decided to keep only two sets of documents secret because the investigation included personal accounts of different case participants.
According to the NACC, Mr. Veera you get in touch with the organization to request a copy of the documents starting on May 8 in order to receive them. The documents that won’t be made public include the opinions of those involved in the investigation.
The council previously stated that it might require the Constitutional Court’s opinion on how far it could go in disclosing specifics.
Mr. Veera also threatened to oust them if they disobeyed the jury attempt at the same time.
Following the NACC’s expulsion of the case in December 2018, Mr. Veera submitted a petition to the Central Administrative Court requesting that the investigation be made public.
When Gen Prawit did not list 22 luxury watches and bracelets on his list of property, the commission ruled 5:3 that there was no basis for the charge that he had falsely declared his income.
When Gen Prawit was seen wearing a silver Richard Mille RM 029 valued at about 2.5 million ringgit and an engagement ring on December 4, 2017, at an event held at the Government House, the luxury watch investigation was launched.
Gen Prawit’s property declaration to the NACC omitted these items and some watches that were afterwards discovered.
Gen Prawit asserted that the pricey observes belonged to friends and were all given back.
When Gen Prawit omitted the 22 luxury watches and rings from his number of goods in December 2018, the NACC found no evidence to support claims that he had misrepresented his income.
The publication order was afterwards granted in response to Mr. Veera’s petition to the Supreme Administrative Court.