Results wo n’t have an impact on party objectives.
PUBLISHED: 22 Jul 2024 at 04: 48
According to leader Chaithawat Tulathon, the outcome of the charter court’s decision regarding whether to dissolve the Move Forward Party ( MPF ) will not deter the party from its goals and objectives in any way.
According to him, the MFP has grown stronger as its people are better prepared and more prepared to work in order for the party to win the next general election. He hoped the decision would benefit the group, citing the party’s strong legal claims. He added that a group conference was not necessary to discuss the issue.
” There’s still time to talk. We’ve told the MPs that if the goal is bad, there will be a process to follow. But, it’s not necessary to discuss the issue at this moment”, he said.
According to Mr. Chaithawat, party MPs will meet at the House meeting on August 7 to observe the ruling reading in parliament and accumulate at the party’s headquarters in the coming days.
He also urged group supporters to assemble at party headquarters, which is a more convenient option to the court element, if they wanted to show spiritual help. The Constitutional Court ended its reading into the event last week after concluding that it now had sufficient evidence to render a decision. After a four-month assessment, it is scheduled to act on the group’s death on Aug 7.
The Election Commission (EC ) requested the court to dissolve the MFP because it violated Section 92 of the organic law governing political parties in a petition it submitted in March. The judge granted the hearing request on April 3.
The polling place’s demand is based on the court’s decision on January 31 that the MFP’s efforts to alter Area 112 of the Criminal Code were intended to defy the constitutional king. The EC also requested that the jury forbid the group’s executives from contesting any upcoming elections or forbid them from forming or holding positions as the group’s executives for ten years.
MFP key assistant Pita Limjaroenrat echoed Mr. Chaithawat’s claim that the results will not have a long-term impact on the group. He asked if the EC may keep responsibility if the party is certainly disbanded, and he responded that the group had not discussed the issue.