On Thursday ( Feb 13 ), a man who sexually abused the daughter of his then-girlfriend was sentenced to 11 years in prison and eight strokes of the cane.
The woman, who was 13 to 14 at the time, did not dare to show anyone about the misuse and became withdrawn in college, drawing issue from her teacher.
When she was 16 and began working to support her home, she gradually dropped out of post-secondary training and struggled to concentrate on her research.
The gentleman, 32, pleaded guilty to a charge of sexual abuse. Five other expenses, including two charges of murder, were taken into consideration.
To safeguard the personality of the victim, he may be named.
According to Deputy Public Prosecution Wong Woon Kwong and Jocelyn Teo, the criminal treated the perpetrator as her father.
The victim’s home and his own mother were living together in a level at the time.
In the flat where he sexually abused the prey between March 26 and June 11, 2020, he violently retaliated against her.
He then instructed her to show everyone and to state that he had met his friends if she asked. She complied out of fear and shame.
The victim was sexually assaulted in her bed at night on another event between January 1 and February 11th, 2021.
He alerted her to stay quiet so that no one else in the home would light up when he saw her.
He biologically abused her again in the same time, two more times.
The girl was afraid and didn’t think anyone she told because she did not dare to inform everyone.
She even felt conflicted as the perpetrator was her mother’s partner, prosecutors said.
The girl held a leadership position in her Extra 1 class between 2019 and 2021 and was regarded as a valuable and participative pupil with leadership qualities.
In her co-curricular activities (CCA ), she also participated in the school team.
However, the sufferer started having issues with school because of the physical abuse.
She stopped skipping her CCA training sessions until the close of 2020.
After talking with her about his family issues with her in August 2021, the prey found the courage to show a classmate about it. She even confided in her then-boyfriend.
She informed her professor of the abuse on September 1, 2021, with their support and encouragement, and the criminal was detained the same day.
The girl claimed that the misuse made her unable to concentrate and that she rather spent her afternoons contemplating what to do about the situation.
Even after the abuse was reported, the results on the target continued.
In a defined altercation with her earlier behavior, the victim retreated from the classroom in 2022.
She left her secondary school in 2023 and began her next step, but she had trouble focusing for a fortnight.  ,
Additionally, the victim had to squat several days. After reporting the maltreatment, she was taken to a hospital for treatment. After being discharged, she lived at an interval selection and evaluation centre before moving to a children’s house.
She was prohibited from having unrestricted touch with her household throughout this time.
The woman escaped from the family’s house numerous times, most recently for more than two decades in early 2023.
In April 2023, she was placed in a household person’s attention, with plans in place to assure her health.
The prosecution sought 12 to 13 times ‘ prisons and eight stroke of the wood, arguing that the woman’s life had been “irreparably damaged” by the boy’s activities.
Mr. Wong and Ms. Teo made a point about the murderer’s risk and her abuse of trust by the man.
They even argued that the crimes were premeditated because the perpetrators waited until the target was asleep before he was uncovered, and that there was even a hint of grooming.
The law company named after Mr. Hariharan’s doctors, Prakash Otharam and Ashvin Hariharan, requested six wood strokes and eight to nine years in prison.
They disagreed with the trial regarding the lawyer’s behavior, including grooming and malice.
Additionally, the attorneys argued that there was no proof of “particularly severe physical or mental results on the target” such as maternity, the transmission of a critical illness, or a medical condition.
There was no sign of serious harm to the victim” as opposed to what may normally be expected of crimes of a similar nature,” and that was now taken into account when determining the severity of the crimes, they claimed.
Justice Dedar Singh Gill said in his punishment that he had taken into account the hurt the victim had caused because it “makes clear” that the victim was impacted by what the offender had done to her.
He also noted that the person chose to enter a guilty plea about one-and-a-half days before the trial would begin, which significantly reduced the phrase.
After Hari Raya Puasa, Justice Gill granted the defense’s request that the person begin serving his sentence.
For the sexual assault charge that was brought against him, the man may have faced prison sentences of up to 20 years and a fine or ban.