A 23-year-old man was given a three-week jail term on Monday ( Mar 24 ) for exposing his genitalia to a member of the airline’s crew during a flight to Singapore in January.  ,
Amazing Angjaya, an Indian national, entered a guilty plea to one count of intimate exposure.  ,
The prosecutor was informed that he was on a journey from China to Singapore on January 23. He drank two glasses of vodka while on the plane and snoozed before falling asleep.  ,
According to court records, he went to the bathroom after he awoke from his sleep to reduce himself, where he” instantly” formed the intention to have the effect recorded.  ,
He got up to his seat at about 4.45 a.m., and he set his phone in recording mode, with the rear camera pointing directly at the sidewalk. After that, he removed his trousers and blanketed his trousers, leaving his genitalia exposed.
The victim approached the man with his in-flight dinner soon afterward, who could not be identified due to a joke order.
She looked in the same course and immediately left the box of food on the folding table before leaving, frightened at seeing the offender’s revealed genitals.  ,
She reported the incident to her officer after finding out that a cellular phone was pointed at her.  ,
Angjaya denied recording the affair when approached by the victim’s officer. After the officer requested to examine the device, he received videos of the incident.
According to the authorities, the aircraft police arrested him after the plane touched down at Changi Airport.  ,
Deputy Public Prosecutor Ng Jun Kai requested a word of four to six weeks in prison on Monday, noting that there were several worsening factors, including the fact that the crime had been committed while traveling on an airplane and against a public transportation worker.  ,
Mr. Ng added that the criminal had also recorded the event and that he had also been drunk.  ,
The defense argued that the harm caused by Angjaya’s offence was at most in the lower end of the average range because the offence was “fleeting” and that the sentence could be commuted to two to three weeks. Because he had been sitting in business school and had a stand-alone chair, he had little chance of hurting other passengers.  ,
Navin Shamugaraj Thevar, a defense attorney, added that Angjaya’s guilt was at most at the lower end of the platform selection because his intention was to avoid getting sexual gratification.  ,
District Judge Paul Quan stated in sentencing that despite the offence being brief and the risk to other passengers being small, the level of damage was reasonable because it had been committed while traveling on an airplane and against a common transportation worker.  ,
He noted, however, that Angjaya had apologized to the target in a letter of apology and worked with investigations.  ,
Angjaya said in his explanation letter, which Mr. Thevar read out in court on Monday, that he was deeply regretting what he did and that he was not in the “right state of mind” at the time.
He claimed that he had made a lot of great friends it and that he had been “very sad and disturbed” on the trip home from China because he had not known when he might see them again.
Angjaya may have faced jail time for physical exposure, which could have included a year in prison, a good, or both.  ,