ENGAGED IN THE Much BATTLE
The American government argued against same-sex marriage recognition in a March Supreme Court filing, pleading with the court to accept LGBTQ community challenges to the current legal system.
But, the neighborhood claimed that they merit more.
” If they want our vote, the government must do good things for us. We cast our ballots? We are therefore also animal, we have rights, and we also have requirements. Right, so we should have this essential right, this legal right. Siddhant Roy, a gay militant, was questioned.
The fight for the right to tie to be made a fundamental right has been fierce for many people, including same-sex join applicant Utkarsh Saxena and his companion Ananya Kotya.
One of their main requests was for the court to change the Special Marriages Act of India so that it reads” family” as a gender-neutral name. Receiving the equal rights as heterosexual couples is another issue at stake in the constitutional battle.
Mr. Kotya noted that unlike married couples, he would not be covered by Mr Saxena’s employment insurance. & nbsp,
He continued, referring to the tax imposed on recipients for gifts exceeding the value of 50, 000 rupees( US$ 601 ) in a fiscal year,” If we transfer money to each other, we worry about gift tax and things like that.”
However, regardless of the gift’s value, those who receive them from their kids, spouse, sisters, or other close relatives are not required to pay the taxes.
AIMING FOR A GOOD RESULTS
In order to protect the institution of marriage, some people oppose the idea of same-sex organizations, which continue to split views.
According to Mr. Vishnu Gupta, the regional president of the right-wing Hindu Sena organization, homosexuals are only present to challenge social norms and natural laws created by God.
Many members of the LGBTQ community are still hoping for a successful outcome, despite the fact that government and other organizations have generally opposed the idea of same-sex relationship, saying it goes against the basic concept of home.
The Supreme Court’s decision, according to some members of the gay community, is positive because it acknowledges some of their privileges. & nbsp,
There has been development, according to Mr. Saxena.
He continued,” I would have never imagined a time when there would be such an open and safe conversation about gay rights when I was growing up in India. & nbsp,
” This has turned into a kitchen table conversation, and we’re not concerned about our protection. And I consider that to be a significant win.